tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post6630560906544397680..comments2024-03-19T05:37:45.510-04:00Comments on SafeLibraries®: Violating Constitutional Separation of Powers is American Library Association's Latest Move for Net NeutralitySafeLibraries®http://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-81203703609675781172013-09-10T22:09:25.695-04:002013-09-10T22:09:25.695-04:00@john Lamica, was that question intended for me? ...@john Lamica, was that question intended for me? If so, I'm unclear how to answer because I don't see where I discussed that in any way. <br /><br />Generally, I disagree with efforts to violate the US Constitution. And when the ALA is recommending that, that goes directly to the credibility of the ALA when it argues that the US Constitution protects porn in public libraries despite the law being the exact opposite.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-32018725826145619782013-09-10T20:50:29.741-04:002013-09-10T20:50:29.741-04:00Do you think Verizon should have the right to bloc...Do you think Verizon should have the right to block this site because it disagrees with conservative views?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03064291012255989679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-21104918243368355472013-09-10T03:48:48.491-04:002013-09-10T03:48:48.491-04:00Thanks for commenting. Reread what ALA/EDUCAUSE s...Thanks for commenting. Reread what ALA/EDUCAUSE said. Let me distill it down for you: <br /><br />"We respect the Congressional prerogative to legislate on these matters ..., however, ... action in the near-term by the FCC [is recommended]."<br /><br />In other words, we respect the US Constitution, but not in this case.<br /><br />And do you think violating one part of the US Constitution somehow protects another part of the US Constitution?SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-22732111353331967442013-09-10T03:03:32.229-04:002013-09-10T03:03:32.229-04:00Wow, you read a lot into that quote that wasn'...Wow, you read a lot into that quote that wasn't actually there.<br /><br />What do you have against protecting First Amendment rights anyways?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-58862007975562728242013-09-08T20:23:37.441-04:002013-09-08T20:23:37.441-04:00"We respect the Congressional prerogative to ..."We respect the Congressional prerogative to legislate on these matters. It is not clear, however, that there is a consensus on legislation, and the legislative process often takes time". .....(WELL NO, WE REALLY DON'T, WE ARE JUST LYING)....THIS is what WE REALLY LIKE...<br />"FCC action in the near-term will act as a "spare tire" to ensure(WE GET WHAT WE WANT) that consumers are protected and to implement the Goals of the National Broadband Plan while Congress decides upon its course of action ( or in other words behind Congress' back!). "<br />In other words...or these words "we really want to By Pass the People's Voice of Congress and Just RAM Through what we want as executive action because...well the obvious...i.e. WE Know WE are Right and We Know the People Do Not Know what is good for Them"...Because Ya SEE...we are the intellectual elite-or we think we are!<br />I am sick to death of this Progressive Liberal nonsense !<br />Beverly Marinellinoreply@blogger.com