tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post2757609421736452141..comments2024-03-28T14:15:25.583-04:00Comments on SafeLibraries®: Teri Lesesne as Professor Nana, the Censor of Sam Houston State UniversitySafeLibraries®http://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-58670350084768462122014-11-08T11:17:29.356-05:002014-11-08T11:17:29.356-05:00You're better off hiding behind no comment rat...You're better off hiding behind no comment rather than ignorance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-20304486410055796592014-11-08T09:04:34.311-05:002014-11-08T09:04:34.311-05:00I don't know what you're trolling about.I don't know what you're trolling about.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-38490638286424182872014-11-08T07:45:31.126-05:002014-11-08T07:45:31.126-05:00No one cares. Must be disheartening that your enti...No one cares. Must be disheartening that your entire life's work only receives attention and interaction from thosebyou label as trolls and now you ironically face disbarrment because of your trolling of a fake Facebook page.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-2478027296640997422014-11-08T00:41:20.615-05:002014-11-08T00:41:20.615-05:00Troll, no, I've deleted none of your comments ...Troll, no, I've deleted none of your comments here. I did see just now Google on its own had automatically marked your comment as spam. I just clicked the button to have it published. I assume it is now published. I had not realized this earlier when I said you deleted/edited the comment, so I withdraw my comment in that regard.<br /><br />And, by the way, to bring this back to the actual issue of this blog post, "Teri Lesesne as Professor Nana, the Censor of Sam Houston State University," Professor Censor could have done what I just did and unmark a comment as spam. She didn't. She's a censor.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-29713968878946485332014-11-08T00:20:37.128-05:002014-11-08T00:20:37.128-05:00Nah, just forgot what comment you deleted. Thanks ...Nah, just forgot what comment you deleted. Thanks for reposting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-69458192616320748172014-11-08T00:05:05.754-05:002014-11-08T00:05:05.754-05:00The troll's previous comment he/she appears to...The troll's previous comment he/she appears to have deleted/edited was "Disbarrment awaits." I suppose realizing that itself might be defamatory, he/she changed it to "You're worried about disbarrment?"<br /><br />Troll: I am about to or now have counsel (depending on certain things). Therefore, I'll not comment further for the time being.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-103130220607352932014-11-07T22:57:43.495-05:002014-11-07T22:57:43.495-05:00You're worried about disbarrment?You're worried about disbarrment?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-5659258576413519772014-11-07T20:40:47.492-05:002014-11-07T20:40:47.492-05:00Disbarrment awaits.Disbarrment awaits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-59453183270865948012014-11-07T19:59:03.124-05:002014-11-07T19:59:03.124-05:00I am about to or now have counsel (depending on ce...I am about to or now have counsel (depending on certain things). Therefore, I'll not comment further for the time being.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-72390976549611071512014-11-07T18:13:59.453-05:002014-11-07T18:13:59.453-05:00Truth is not, however, an absolute defense to fals...Truth is not, however, an absolute defense to false light, which you are being sued for two counts of in addition to two counts of defamation per se.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-69189350179628775452014-11-07T14:11:57.412-05:002014-11-07T14:11:57.412-05:00What about your Facebook posts on the page defamin...What about your Facebook posts on the page defaming her? How do you defend your participation in that?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-50493160173421038132014-11-06T22:46:50.401-05:002014-11-06T22:46:50.401-05:00She likely has zero interest in me, but ALA has be...She likely has zero interest in me, but ALA has been after me for quite some time. Most likely ALA has funded this matter. <br /><br />It is a suit for alleged defamation. The alleged defamation includes that I linked/embedded the Megan Fox YouTube video of Bridget Bittman and Diane Jennings making homophobic remarks to Kevin DuJan. <br /><br />For those reading this comment who are not familiar, Megan and Kevin both disclosed unfettered and unreported child pornography at the Orland Park Public Library, which the library has been hiding/enabling ever since, and Bridget Bittman is the PR person employed by the library. <br /><br />Here is the link for which I am being sued: "<a href="http://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2014/07/gay-hate-at-your-library.html" rel="nofollow">Gay Hate @ Your Library</a>." Please go there and watch the homophobia in action in Megan Fox's video. <br /><br />I feel great standing up to oppose those who spew hate. Of all the years I've been exposing ALA for promoting child porn in public schools and public libraries, nothing has ever angered me. This gay hate displayed in that video and known to me from other sources makes me angry. Certainly ALA and Jennings/Bittman could make arguments in favor of allowing child porn in public libraries without also attacking Kevin DuJan for the great sin of being gay like many other people. How Kevin DuJan is being attacked for being gay as a means to continue to enable child porn in a public library truly shocks the conscious, and I am happy to report on the homophobia by library trustees/employees others have made evident.<br /><br />Truth is an absolute defense to defamation, and Bridget Bittman made repeated homophobic statements against Kevin DuJan, and there are many witnesses to this blatant homophobia.<br /><br />So, in summary, this is just a SLAPP suit (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation), and I have a First Amendment right to report on homophobes being homophobic to enable/maintain child porn in public libraries.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-19844060090527917542014-11-06T16:59:16.939-05:002014-11-06T16:59:16.939-05:00What's she suing you for?What's she suing you for?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-76852726330137200322014-10-28T03:39:12.241-04:002014-10-28T03:39:12.241-04:00You said, "Bridget Bittman is suing you for a...You said, "Bridget Bittman is suing you for assault." That is false. She is not suing me for assault. Claiming that she is is uncivil and it's trolling as you are not here to discuss "Teri Lesesne as Professor Nana, the Censor of Sam Houston State University," rather you are here to make false claims about my assaulting people. That's not true. It's uncivil and it's trolling. And in the past you have made homophobic remarks and I have had to remove them. And a critic differs from a troll. You are a troll.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-56012242437836189462014-10-28T03:33:51.484-04:002014-10-28T03:33:51.484-04:00Where was I ever uncivil? I was showing you what&#...Where was I ever uncivil? I was showing you what's published on the internet. How are you saying that you're not being sued? It says it right there. <br /><br />I have no connection to the OPPL, I just don't like people like you making up stupid things. Also, I am the farthest from a homophobe. This has nothing to do with your sexuality. Why do you always assume it does? I'm not sure who you are referring to when you say 'as you have in the past' but I have made no homophobic comments. You must have more than one person that is a critic.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-52619283625884776632014-10-28T03:28:37.528-04:002014-10-28T03:28:37.528-04:00Oh, I see. You are saying assault because it is h...Oh, I see. You are saying assault because it is how it is characterized by that web site. Okay. Just know I've assaulted no one, but I may have peppered them with questions. Also, no one now or ever has sued me for assault. You're just trolling.<br /><br />Oh yes, how did you learn of such an obscure web site? It leads me to think you as a troll/harasser are in some way connected to the plaintiff, perhaps the plaintiff herself, or to OPPL. Really, no one else would know/care. <br /><br />You should reveal your name and connection to OPPL if you wish legitimate debate instead of ad hominem trolling. <br /><br />At some point your comments will fill this blog post with homophobic hate as you have in the past so at some point I'll likely have to delete your comments again. Stay civil if you wish to continue to have a say.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-46026227636656785412014-10-28T01:15:53.281-04:002014-10-28T01:15:53.281-04:00Bittman v. Fox et al
Filed: October 20, 2014 as 1:...Bittman v. Fox et al<br />Filed: October 20, 2014 as 1:2014cv08191<br />Plaintiff: Bridget Bittman<br />Defendant: Megan Fox, Kevin DuJan, Dan Kleinman and others<br />Cause Of Action: Federal Question<br />Court: Seventh Circuit > Illinois > Illinois Northern District Court<br />Type: Torts - Injury > P.I.: Assault Libel & SlanderAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-11673281803665568112014-10-28T01:14:36.916-04:002014-10-28T01:14:36.916-04:00http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/assault-libel-a...http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/assault-libel-and-slander/illinois-northern-district-court/920589/bridget-bittman-v-megan-fox-kevin-dujan-dan-kleinman-adam-andrzejewski-and-for-the-good-of-illinois/summary/<br /><br />Probably verbal assaultAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-86048167325492046772014-10-27T03:44:23.411-04:002014-10-27T03:44:23.411-04:00She is? I'm in NJ, she's in IL. I've...She is? I'm in NJ, she's in IL. I've never been to IL. How did I assault her in IL from NJ?SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-13298569508173365182014-10-27T00:03:54.329-04:002014-10-27T00:03:54.329-04:00This is boring news. Why aren't you talked abo...This is boring news. Why aren't you talked about Bridget Bittman is suing you for assault, libel, and slander?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-33844720463889065732014-10-14T19:03:38.574-04:002014-10-14T19:03:38.574-04:00Reminds me of your buddy Megan Fox.Reminds me of your buddy Megan Fox.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-20167293283576025782014-10-14T10:53:28.686-04:002014-10-14T10:53:28.686-04:00Sorry, but I'm not a professor teaching about ...Sorry, but I'm not a professor teaching about censorship in a department of library science at a public university. Sorry, but removing your ad hominem comments that NEVER deal with the subject matter has nothing to do with removing the comments of someone responding substantively to how he was falsely maligned. Sorry, but my removing "anonymous" comments from my blog has nothing to do with platforms like LiveJournal learning named commenters like "SafeLibraries" have been marked as spam by various users, so let's just save us all the trouble and not publish that person's comments any further.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-25197499126785612652014-10-14T10:45:44.051-04:002014-10-14T10:45:44.051-04:00Do my comments appear on her blog posts about me o...Do my comments appear on her blog posts about me or do they not? They do not, even as of today. That solves the "liar" problem.<br /><br />Further, I have noticed for a long time that the free speech advocates who wish to silence me and others with whom they disagree use this tactic of clicking the spam button or leaving comments marked as spam. Professor Nana just made it very obvious so I finally wrote about it.<br /><br />Here's Google advice: "By marking the message as not spam or phishing, Gmail's system will learn from that example and be more accurate in marking messages in the future." And vice versa. And the censors know it. <br /><br />Professor Nana is just the latest in a long line of censors who use this particular technological lever to silence free speech.<br /><br />What makes Professor Nana noteworthy is that she TEACHES the evils of censorship while she PRACTICES censorship herself from her perch as a PUBLIC university professor on a blog link on her PUBLIC university profile. She did so in a completely UNPROFESSIONAL manner.<br /><br />Recently I wrote a piece that completely misidentified the speaker. It was an honest mistake due to the similarity of voices. An American Library Association official politely pointed out my error, I corrected it, and he appreciated the correction. This is how professionals operate.<br /><br />Contrast Professor Nana. She did a hit job on me from the start with flat out false information, even making things up then attacking me for the words she put in my mouth. When I responded I found I was blocked. I asked her to unblock me. She simply failed to do so AND piled on more absolutely false things she simply made up then attacked me for. VERY unprofessional.<br /><br />Here is what a professional response might have been, particularly from someone who teaches the evils of censorship. Mr. Kleinman, I do see your comment is not published on my blog post. Please allow me to review the reasons why then get back to you. Thank you.<br /><br />As it stands now, my comments on her blog are still marked as spam, so her LiveJournal blog has learned that comments from me are spam. Thus they are not published. Thus I am censored. In this case, by a public university professor who teaches school librarians that keeping children from sexually inappropriate material is censorship.SafeLibraries®https://www.blogger.com/profile/06756725065032196698noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-21805046653364836922014-10-13T14:36:42.922-04:002014-10-13T14:36:42.922-04:00LOL @ Dan accusing people of the EXACT SAME THING ...LOL @ Dan accusing people of the EXACT SAME THING he does right here on his blog. You're a HUGE hypocrite. Now, delete this comment and prove me right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5060593324936581367.post-85468472676760633632014-10-12T18:12:36.893-04:002014-10-12T18:12:36.893-04:00Liar. Take it up with the software developer if yo...Liar. Take it up with the software developer if you're getting that message.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com