Pages

▼

Monday, February 12, 2024

Librarians Suddenly Care About Parental Rights: Freedom to Read Act NJ S2421 A3446

Librarians suddenly care about parental rights, but only to mislead people to pressure legislators to pass the Freedom to Read Act, NJ S2421 / A3446.  Look at tinyurl.com/testify2421 to see the disinformation campaign at work.  Examples:
  • In addition, banning books interferes with parental rights to determine what their family can read.
  • Parents: The bill protects my rights as a parent to offer my child a wide range of reading material.
  • The bill also protects the right of all parents to challenge materials by providing a process to follow in the event they believe materials need to be removed from a library.
  • Parents have always had the right to request that limitations be placed on their own child’s access to library materials; this bill retains that right.
All that is fake, phony, fraud.  Parental rights are removed by the Freedom to Read Act as I will be detailing here: 


Let's dig further.  Like child trafficking victims are trained to go out and get more child trafficking victims, that same document contains another link that gives students specific directions on how to astroturf for the Freedom to Read Act that will indoctrinate and s@xualize more children.  Click here.  That has instructions like, "Hybrid Template 1: Copy paste this template into your email if you want to use a pre-written message that contains some of your own thoughts about the value of diverse books. Be sure to personalize it with your name, town, grade, school, and your ideas for each of the highlighted prompts."  See graphic top right.  

Remember, what librarians mean by "diverse" or "diverse books" is "s@xually explicit material":


Here comes the worse part.  The information in that document comes directly from the American Library Association.  It's a giant astroturf technique to fool people into thinking like ALA, then they in turn get the legislators to think like ALA, and suddenly there's a law that embeds ALA's Chicago Way into states nationwide and parents lose their rights.  Let's look at the final paragraph in the document I first linked:
General: The bill addresses a broadly popular, non-partisan topic: the right to read. Americans on both sides of the political aisle oppose censorship. An October 2023 IPSOS poll found that 78% of Americans are less likely to support a candidate who favors book bans. Recognizing the danger of censorship, legislators in Illinois and California have already passed “right to read” bills. Similar bills are being advanced in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Kansas, Wisconsin, Colorado, New Mexico, and Washington. As a national leader in educational excellence, New Jersey should join these states in establishing protections for intellectual freedom. Please pass the bill.
That language is substantially similar to the "long-term inoculation" American Library Association has done as detailed here, right down to the use of fake polls:
So after long-term inoculation in New Jersey, and now short term astroturfing of students and others to support the Chicago Way, here we are in New Jersey on the verge of passing a law written by ALA from Chicago, Illinois, that embeds Marxism: 
Oh yes, let me add this.  S2421 / A3446 seeks to exempt librarians from obscenity laws.  What?  Hello?  Of course we should not exempt people from obscenity laws, especially those giving obscenity to children.  But beyond that, isn't that a tacit admission school librarians are currently making obscenity available to children?

Should we not be arresting these people?  Should Martha Hickson, Roxana Caivano continue to get away with giving obscenity to children?  Why do they need an exemption if they are not already guilty of the crime?  Hello?  Anyone listening?  Anyone thinking?

Oh look, more astroturfing for the Chicago Way, this time from the New Jersey Association of School Librarians, the very organization S2421 / A3446 charges with creating model policies for school boards to adopt, “the commissioner shall consult with the State Librarian and the New Jersey Association of School Librarians….”  Don't expect any model policy to defend any parental rights or protect any children from harm in the slightest—just another reason why the Freedom to Read Act is flawed:

at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments of a personal nature, trolling, and linkspam may be removed.