Pages

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

General Mike Flynn Calls American Library Association 'Marxist Thugs' Who 'Hurt, Abuse or Negatively Influence Our Children'; Brave Books Blocked

General Mike Flynn denounced American Library Association as "Marxism thugs" and said ALA needs to "stop trying to hurt, abuse or negatively influence our children or any children for that matter."  This in the context of ALA's training librarians to commit censorship of Brave Books by Kirk Cameron and block his use of public library meeting rooms.  Right during ALA's annual conference #ALAAC23, this has to be the biggest shock for the organization since losing the US Supreme Court case in 2003 that allows Internet filtering in libraries.  

Librarians responded by attacking General Flynn as a "moron," and I predict library media will be sure not to report on this truthfully, if at all.

Many others criticized ALA as well. Kirk Cameron, Andy Ngô, Haley Kennington (who did the initial research and tweeted evidence of the censorship attempt), Christin Bentley, David J. Harris, Jr., HotAir, Twitchy, and myself.

It's about time major attention is being brought to bear against what I have been reporting for almost twenty-five years.  Thank you General Flynn for saying what you did and promising to follow up!  Thank you Kirk Cameron for your book reading drive!  Thank you Haley Kennington for your excellent research!

Here's what different people has to say about ALA's training for censorship of conservative voices:

General Mike Flynn:

I, for one, am sick and tired of the Marxist thugs on the left who currently control far too many of our institutions of government and other activities that are taxpayer funded…the American Library Association (ALA), a taxpayer funded entity, is at the very heart of this latest controversy. 

ALA, this won’t be the last time you hear from me regarding this issue.

This, among many reasons, is why we must get positive and strong leaders with God-given common sense back in charge of our country. Those in charge currently are driving us straight through the gates of hell. 
 
Lastly, stop trying to hurt, abuse or negatively influence our children or any children for that matter. Why does the left insist on culturally abusing children? WTH!!!???

Brave Books, and do read the entire thread:


Haley Kennington, the initial researcher who got the ball rolling, and everyone should watch this to see how egregious is ALA's training, like it's advising librarians to bully those who come to the library for Kirk Cameron events:


Andy Ngô, a super excellent reporter (full disclosure, I read his book "Unmasked: Inside Antifa's Radical Plan to Destroy Democracy"):

Kirk Cameron, the actor/author against whom ALA members express their ire for his daring to let kids read wholesome books:


Twitchy:


HotAir:


Christin Bentley, SREC SD-1, who fights "filthy books" in Texas schools and helped get HB900 passed after sending the Texas legislature over of month of daily reports of, well, the "filthy books" in Texas schools:


David J. Harris, Jr., who doesn't like David:


Despite the library leader Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Esq., getting caught red-handed training librarians how to keep Kirk Cameron and friends from reading Brave Books in public library meeting rooms, librarians are defending ALA by smearing General Flynn.  

These people are despicable.  They get caught training for censorship (making a complete mockery of all their "United Against Book Bans" and "Banned Books Week" efforts to defend schools kids from parents trying to stop school librarians from giving their kids s3xually inappropriate material because Caldwell-Stone trained them to "reframe" it as diversity and inclusion, but I digress) and their reaction is to smear the General.  

Here, parents and Kirk Cameron are called "hatemongers" by Harvard Medical School librarian Matthew Noe (who smeared me causing me to get death threats):


Here the General is "this moron" and "incredibly disingenuous":


Now he's "completely bananas" and "sh*t":


Here it's "nonsense":


Here it's "Lol. Lmao.":



It really is time to defund the American Library Association, stop sending money to ALA, stop buying memberships, stop attending its trainings and conferences.  I am building another library association, but that's neither here nor there in this particular matter, other than to say my library association will not train librarians how to commit official public censorship.

Saturday, June 24, 2023

Newly Created Library Association Announced on Freedom 96.9 The Jake Merrick Show

A newly created library association was announced on Oklahoma's Talk Radio Freedom 96.9 The Jake Merrick Show.  Just look what's going on at this weekend's annual conference by American Library Association they call #ALAAC23.  All sorts of child groomers are being promoted and awarded.  A racist is the keynote speaker—again, is it the third time?  Fourth?  And ALA announced a $1,000,000 fund to widen and speed up efforts to s3xualize more children, including special funding for its new self-declared Marxist President.  Its EveryLibrary is even fund raising off of Hitler!  Not kidding.

People are clamoring for an alternate source for information on libraries.  Whistleblowers are reporting to me all sorts of crazy.  Many people in different roles are writing to me with horror stories, some of which I publish right here.

It's time for a new library association to eventually replace the American Library Association that has lost its way over fifty years ago beginning with Judith Fingeret Krug from the Illinois ACLU.  And I'm the one who's going to get that ball rolling, with many clamoring to help me.




Below is a transcript and recording of my conversation with Jake Merrick in Oklahoma announcing the new library association, so breaking news for both Jake and myself, and now my readers and whistleblowers.  

Here is a link to the transcript and a recording that tracks the transcript, and here is a link to download just the MP3 recording.



Radio Announcer:
Straight out of the heartland, a voice of the people, by the people, and for the people. This is The Jake Merrick Show.

On the new Freedom 96.9.

Jake Merrick:
Well, good morning, good morning. Are you awakened, Oklahoma patriot? Good to be with you here on this Friday morning. Uh, it looks like we all survived the tornadoes last night. Uh, crazy night. Well, it looks like there was about 15 that were reported to have touched down, so it was a, a wild night for Oklahoma, but, you know, it's typical here in the state.

So, uh, basically, you grab your popcorn, you get on the front porch, and watch it happen. Um, we actually watched one forming over us, and then, it, uh... It was the one that touched down in Tuttle, about two miles from us. And, uh... So some of our family... We're running to the cellars. Uh, it was a, um, eventful night. But it... We, we like it. It actually, uh (laughs)... As long as there's no injuries, deaths, or damage, then all is well, it's a, usually, exciting night.

But, um, got a great show for you this morning. Mr. Dan Kleinman's gonna come on here in just a second. He is, uh, pushing for an alternative to the American Library Association, which uh we've been talking about. Um, you know, there needs to be alternatives in many different areas. If you heard the recent interview I had with Riley Gaines... Again, she's talking about her ongoing fight for women's rights and to get, uh, men out of women's sports and out of women's locker rooms. And so she's pushing for that.


And, and, you know, it's, uh, it's discouraging and frustrating to see organizations like the NCAA just cowering to the leftist agenda and promoting these things, allowing these things. And as long as they're doing that, it's hard for these, uh, athletes to know what direction to take.

So you need to go back and listen to that interview I had with Riley Gaines. Uh, of course, you can always access that on freedom969.com or download the Freedom 96.9 app and see all of the archived shows.

Um, but we are going to, in a little bit, talk to Dan Kleinman. Just like we need alternatives to sports organizations, we need alternatives to library associations that are led by a Marxist leader, that are allowing, uh, graphic, sexually-explicit material on lower shelves for kids to readily access.

Uh, this could... should not be happening. Uh, of course, we're not banning books and saying that you cannot allow books in libraries, uh, but we're just saying there are... there should be guidelines and age restrictions, just like we have in movies. Uh, we have Rated R, Rated NC-17, Rated PG-13. You know, there are some movies that my eight-year-old does not watch. If it's a PG-13 and mostly mild, but there are some things in there, I don't want her to be exposed to just yet.

And so, there are young minds and souls that we wanna protect, and that's all this is about. But there are those that are leading the library association that think otherwise. So I'm looking forward to this conversation with Dan in just a minute to talk about the SafeLibraries push.

Um, just a few more headlines from around home. Uh, we got some people fleeing, uh, donors actually fleeing the University of Oklahoma, OU. Um, i- i- i it had some great donors that are saying, "Hmm, I'm rethinking my donation."

Uh, one of them is Dr. Christopher Boxell. Uh, he, he actually was a... he is a neurosurgeon who graduated from University of Oklahoma. And, you know, his last donation was about $250,000 to his alma mater. But he's saying, "I wa-..." h- he said, "I was really disturbed..." um, when he found out about the perverted agenda.

And there is a former donor named Mo Anderson. He delivered a letter to the president in 2021 and accusi-... accused the institution of promoting Marxism. He said, "OU has embedded a Marxist-derived worldview in its colleges via so-called diversity, equity, and inclusion programs that foster racial and social division. OU's DEI efforts produce the opposite of diversity and inclusion. Mainstream Oklahomans know they will now be labeled 'privileged,'" quote, unquote, "'privileged' individuals regardless of life circumstances, meaning OU is not a welcoming place for all students."

And a former donor named Susan Bergen, she said, "As a proud Oklahoman, I cannot support the deliberate destruction of our state's future. I will not donate to OU's academic efforts any longer." That she was a 35-year donor, averaging $50,000 a year.

There's a lot of pushback, as there needs to be. Um, we especially have, like I mentioned before, the $18,000 dollars going to paying a drag queen dancer performer to come and perform at their Crimson & Queens, uh, drag queen, the largest drag queen performance in the state. And, you know, uh, uh, people have had enough. This is coming around... uh, coming to bite the woke agenda.

And, hey, we're just seeing right here. Donors are saying, "Nope. No more. We're not donating to this cause, to the DEI, all-inclusive cause that includes everyone except for those that have a moral foundation, except for those who say, "No, we actually stand for something." "Well, you can no longer be included because you're a bigot. And we're going to include everybody else."

So, um, that's encouraging to see. Now, I think the next step and needed step is what some legislators like J. J. Humphreys, uh, was pushing for, saying, "Hey, we need to go ahead and pull federa-... uh, or state funding from the universities that are promoting these kinds of, um, uh, Marxist, leftist, immoral agendas. Why are we funding that? It's state... uh, it's taxpayer money that's going to fund these things."

So, uh, I am on board with, uh, our representatives like Humphreys, who are saying, "Hey, it's time to pull out until things can get lined out." Hey, if this is a private university, do whatever you wanna do. You're private, and people have a choice to, uh... Whether or not they wanna go there. But whenever we have taxpayer money that's being collected by the state and then distributed to these universities that are directly opposed to the moral values of the majority of the state, this must stop. And I'm glad to see these donors are backing out.

Um, along the same line here, another story, the ESG law... "Oklahoma ESG Law Gets BlackRock's Attention." Uh, I love this. I love that... Uh, you know this is a great example of how, um, a state can have an impact when they take a stand. A state simply has to stand up and say, "No more," and suddenly, the bullies that were over there demanding, they come hat in hand into the office, saying, "Oh, oh, please, no, please don't back out."

So, "Under Oklahoma law, investment companies that politically boycott oil-and-gas investments are now prohibited from receiving state contracts to manage hundreds of millions of dollars in state pension funds." Makes sense, especially here in Oklahoma. I mean, if you have a company that boycotts oil and gas, and we're an oil and gas state, what relationship do we have with you? What interest do we have in a relationship with you at all?

So, um, "This week, officials from Bra-... BlackRock, they met with Governor Stitt to plead their case." And Governor Stitt said, "We had a good conversation. BlackRock doesn't want to turn into the next Bud Light, that's for sure, so they're traveling the country and are very concerned when they show up on lists."

And so we had House Bill 2034, and it created the Energy Discrimination Elimination Act of 2022. That's House Bill 2034. And it "required the office of the state treasurer to conduct a review of investment firms to identify those that boycott investments in oil-and-gas companies regardless of the impact on investment returns."

And then we talked about this in a recent show, uh, talking about the treasurer, Todd Russ. And he generated a list of all of those companies that would no longer be doing business with Oklahoma because of their stance on, uh, boycotting oil and gas. Very bold, very appropriate move, especially for a state like Oklahoma, but, um, I am going to be watching this pretty closely because I have concern when, when Stitt says, "I had a good conversation with them."

Because on some levels, I don't think a conversation's what needs to happen, especially whenever the, uh, BlackRock chairman and CEO, Larry Fink, says stuff like this.

Larry Fink:
... like, actually, totalitarian govern-... It's, like, actually, totalitarian governments, where you have a understanding of what's, uh, out there. And obviously, we're... uh, the whole dimension is changing now, with the, uh, as you said, a democratization of gov-... uh, uh, of countries. And, and democracies are very messy, as we know in the United States, so, uh, you have opinions changing back and forth. Markets, like, ac-

Jake Merrick:
So, uh, you have Larry Fink there, and he's actually... he's, he's a little bit pro-totalitarianism. And he's a little bit against democracy. And, of course, we know we're not a democracy. We are a representative republic, a constitutional republic. We're not a democracy. And it just annoys me that the Left continuously makes this cry that, that Donald Trump is upsetting our democracy.

Um, well, we don't have a democracy. We have a representative of-... A representative republic, a constitutional republic. Very, very different. Our Founding Fathers did not want a democracy, but Larry Fink thinks we have a democracy, and he doesn't like the structure of America, and he would actually rather have a totalitarianism because democracy, and, you know, the will of the people c-... Thing. That kind of gets in the way. It's all messy.

And so it's easier when you have someone just telling people what to do. And that's why BlackRock owns about everything. They have investments in all of the major companies. And so, I don't think that you negotiate with a company like this. I don't think you entertain an audience at all. I don't think you give them a, a chance to plead their case.

They've made it clear what they're about. They want a global takeover. They wanna dominate and tell states and people what to do. So don't give them an entrance. And I would encourage Governor Stitt to not even eng-, uh, engage in conversation with them because it's... uh, they've made it clear where they stand, and, uh, w- we don't stand with that, not here in Oklahoma.

Um, I'm gonna go to a quick break. And there's a couple of stories I'd like to get to at the bottom of the hou-...Uh, or the, uh, the... towards the end of the show. Uh, one I wanna look at, Kansas City and how they have become a sanctuary state for peop-... Or Kansas City (laughs) will become a sanctuary city, not a state, become a sanctuary city for people seeking gender-affirming health care.

Uh, now, uh, the reason this story interests me is because of the, the lo-, uh, the local emphasis in a city taking a stand against the state. And actually, I like that. I don't agree on the principle and why they're, uh, why they're taking the stand, but I like that a city is taking a stand, regardless of the cost.

I think it's something that we, as Conservatives, should learn from this. And, uh, so I'm gonna get to that towards the bottom of the hour and also, uh, looking at Oklahoma preparing, uh, to spend millions on interstate EV-charging networks.

And, you know, this is something we gotta ask ourselves. I mean, how much do we really believe in this EV push? Uh, I know it's very big. I have questions about the longevity of it. And, um, we're about to spend a lot of money to establish EV-charging networks across the state, so I think it's something that we need to be, uh, taking a hard look at.

But I'm gonna go a quick break so we can get back to Dan Kleinman with SafeLibraries 'cause I'm, uh, excited about this conversation about his, uh, ideas for new libraries that actually promote the morals and values that we all believe in. So stay tuned for this conversation.

Radio Announcer:
Freedom.

Traffic, traffic.

We now take you to our eye in the sky.

Traffic:
....

Radio Announcer:
Remember, you listen to the new Freedom 96.9, Oklahoma's most powerful talk radio voice. Freedom 96.9 and freedom969.com, Oklahoma's new home for talk radio.

Advertiser:
....

Radio Announcer:
From Stillwater to Washita, from Chickasha to Medford, we have Oklahoma covered, with 100,000 watts of Freedom. We're the new Freedom 96.9. It's Brian Kilmeade.

Brian Kilmeade:
You're doing nothing all day that I could tell in front of the camera. What does this add up to? Everyone thinks she's too old. Everyone thinks she's ineffective. Nobody likes any of his policies. You see what's happened with foreign policies. You see what's happening on our southern border. You see what's happening with the economy. He wants to point to jobs. You see inflation there.

Now, when you have 36% approval rating, I'm telling you, if this does not improve, if things don't get better, I think they're gonna make a move on him.

Radio Announcer:
The Brian Kilmeade Show, weekdays 8:00 to 11:00 AM, on the new Freedom 96.9.
Welcome back to The Jake Merrick Show, where truth is the only news of the new Freedom 96.9.

Jake Merrick:
That's right, truth is the only news. That's what we pursue, right here on The Jake Merrick Show. Welcome back. It's 7:18. Thanks for joining me on this Friday morning.

Uh, you're gonna wanna stay tuned for this conversation with Dan Kleinman, uh, with SafeLibraries. I got him on the line. Mr. Dan, good morning.

Dan Kleinman:
Good morning.

Jake Merrick:
How are you, sir?

Dan Kleinman:
I'm all right.

Jake Merrick:
(laughs). Good. Now, you're calling from, uh, up north, right?

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah. Uh, well, uh, normally, I'm located in, uh, New Jersey and New York area. Right now, I happen to be visiting in Florida.

Jake Merrick:
Oh, now... Okay. Nice. It's a good place to visit (laughs).

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
Not only for the sunshine, but, um, you know, got some, got some different values down there in the South.

Dan Kleinman:
Oh, yes.

Jake Merrick:
(laughs).

Dan Kleinman:
(laughs).

Jake Merrick:
Well-

Dan Kleinman:
Like a free air.  [Note: this was prescient as the Canadian wildfires were about to make the Northeast air very oppressive.]

Jake Merrick:
E- exactly. Some free air. Well, if you're ever inclined, come out and visit, um, visit the free air of Oklahoma. Uh, you can come during tornado season, and it'll be nice and exciting. So... (laughs).

Dan Kleinman:
(laughs).

Jake Merrick:
Uh, well, um, I'm glad you're able to hop on. Um, I interviewed Janice Danforth with Moms for Liberty, uh, here a while back, and, and she mentioned you and said I should check you out. So I reached out, and we made the connection, and we were able to get this interview lined up.

So, uh, I've been looking forward to it because I appreciate your effort, and, uh, we stand for the same thing.

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
I love, I love how across the country... I mean, you're up in New Jersey, in New York area, but you're fighting for the same things that we are down here in Oklahoma.

Dan Kleinman:
Well, I have to live somewhere (laughs).

Jake Merrick:
Right? Right?

Dan Kleinman:
With... The values cross America. Uh, in my case, they cross America because the American Library Association's values are destroying America.

So in order for me to take on the American Library Association, I have to do it from somewhere, so I just happen to be in the Northeast-

Jake Merrick:
Hey-

Dan Kleinman:
... area.

Jake Merrick:
That... I... Um, we're all for it. Wherever you're at, take a stand. We just... You know, we interviewed some people... Actually, just as last Monday, a lady out from California who is a strong Conservative taking a stand out there. So, hey, we're all over the place.

Now, I believe we're still the majority here in America, those that, uh, value the same thing, the same principles. And how can you get any more common sense than protecting children? And that's really what this conversation's really all about, is let's just-

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, there's nobody else... Th- there's nobody who protects children, right? When, when kids go to school, and they're being sexualized by either the librarian or by the trans movement... or they're anywhere else, and they're being sexualized, there's very few people that, that stand up for children. There's no advocates for them. There's no, uh, corporate sponsors that are, uh, supporting them in, in general.

We're it. It's just the parents that are doing it. So it's time to get out of our seats and get up and protect our children. That's basically what I'm doing and many other people, such as yourself.

Jake Merrick:
Yes, absolutely. So you're a parent. Uh, how many children do you have?

Dan Kleinman:
Um, I have, uh, at least one (laughs).

Jake Merrick:
(laughs). Right.

Dan Kleinman:
The one, the one who started me on this journey, uh, about 24, 5 years ago, uh, is the one that I'm... uh, that I usually talk about because I went to... What happened was she was in public school, and on the fourth day of school, they gave her a book to read. And I said to myself, "Well, this is it. I've, I've reached the top. I have a beautiful wife, a house in the country, and my kid has to read a, a book from the public school. So I'm gonna read her the book."

It was totally inappropriate, and, um, I soon found out... uh, I mean, I had to change the words. Like, uh, words like, uh, "'Ooh la la,' she said in a lusty voice, skinny-dipping on a date with three guys at the same time."

Jake Merrick:
Hmm.

Dan Kleinman:
And, uh, (laughs), I reported it to the principal. And she said it's twice as bad as what I reported it as and, "I'm removing from the library." And, uh, uh, so yes, about my kids, this is how I started, with, with, with my kid.

And I said, "Well, why did you give it to my kid?" "Well, one, it was multicultural, and two, it was recommended by our American Library Association member librarian from an American Library Association list of books for kindergarteners."

Jake Merrick:
Wow.

Dan Kleinman:
[inaudible 00:19:14].

Jake Merrick:
It was in kindergarten-

Dan Kleinman:
I, I was... Uh? Right, in kindergarten. I was like, "Wow..." So I went to my, uh, my s-... m- my library in town, and they had a, um, a website there called Fun Sites for Kids and Teens. And it had on it a website from, uh, Columbia University's Go Ask Alice!, uh, where you can learn all sorts of things about, uh, sexuality, including, for example, how to, um, hang yourself so that you have a better orgasm-

Jake Merrick:
Wow.

Dan Kleinman:
... which is the way that actor David Carradine died.

Jake Merrick:
Right.

Dan Kleinman:
And, and, and, uh, that's when I put two and two together, and I said, "Something's going on here with the American Library Association." And indeed, I had a library director come to me and admit that a child, uh, who's 15 years old died from that very same reason the day after viewing that website in their library.

Jake Merrick:
Wow.

Dan Kleinman:
I pr-... I post-... Yeah, I... uh, a lot of this is, is going to be a, a wow.

Jake Merrick:
Yes. And this has been going on a while. I mean, your, your kid was in kindergarten whenever you were first made aware of this. And so, th- this has been something that you've been addressing for a while. You know, I think that, uh, many, uh, especially here in Oklahoma, are just now becoming aware recently of the books that are available to our kids in both the school libraries and the public libraries.

And, you know, thankfully, we have a, a fire brand and superintendent, Ryan Walters, who's out making this... he will not let it go away. And people are saying, "Hey, we need to focus on other things." And he's like, "Well, first things first, let's get the porn out of schools. Then we can talk about other things." And so, we so-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... appreciate him as a Conservative doing that, fighting on our behalf. Um, but what is it that, um... You have this SafeLibraries. So I wanna get to that. And, uh, what, what is that led you to form this organization, and what does it look like now?

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, well, SafeLibraries has been around for a long time. If you're talking about me forming a new library association, um, that I just started about two weeks ago. And if you wanna know h-... what led to that, it's my years and years and years of, of, uh, of seeing this kind of thing going on from the inside, uh, with these librarians, uh, um, uh, inappropriately treating children.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
And, uh, and hearing the complaints of library directors, librarians, patrons, children, uh, pr-... uh, library school professors, library school students. People come to me and tell me what's going on. And nobody can stand this stuff anymore. When the American Library Association is basically dictating how all these librarians think. Right?

The American Library Association doesn't even have literacy as its top goal anymore. Its top goal is now equity, which we all know means Marxism. Uh, the, um... Uh, th- that's what it is. The-

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, a hundred percent.

Dan Kleinman:
... American Library Association. It... They, they, they just, uh, appointed a new president who's openly Marxist and bragged about all the, uh, solidarity and the power she's gonna wield within the organization, um, to further spread, uh, her views.

Uh, this is not an, an American Library Association that we want in our libraries, right? Um, in Oklahoma, for example, you guys, uh, can't stand these ESG funds for obvious reasons that you discussed before.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
Well, the America- the American Library Association invests basically primarily in ESG funds. Do you want an organization to be controlling your libraries that's primarily investigate... In- invested in, in things that you guys in Oklahoma hate? I mean, there's really (laughs)... That's basically-

Jake Merrick:
Mm-hmm.

Dan Kleinman:
... what it is.

Jake Merrick:
For sure.

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, uh, so, so I heard all these complaints from all these people, and I finally said... and, I, uh, and I finally said to myself, somebody's gotta start a new library association, where, uh, people... Where librarians can learn how to be effective librarians for their communities and for themselves but without all of the political Marxist baggage of the American Library Associat- Association.

Uh, for example, wouldn't it be nice if librarians learned how to, um, uh, uh, help children to learn to read instead of, uh, help children to learn that there are 62 genders, and a drag queen is going to flash-

Jake Merrick:
Hmm.

Dan Kleinman:
... his behind-

Jake Merrick:
Ugh.

Dan Kleinman:
... or underneath to children? Right? It's the American Library Association... Uh, it, it, uh... Well, it didn't create it, but it's spread it, uh, nationwide "sneakily" into small rural red communities... I'm quoting now, sneakily is their word, across America. And when confronted, they deleted the article, uh-

Jake Merrick:
Wait, you said you were-

Dan Kleinman:
... that they had-

Jake Merrick:
... quoting it. Uh, this was a, an article they put out, bragging about how they sneakily snuck it around?

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
Wow.

Dan Kleinman:
In American Libraries Magazine, I believe, which is their trade journal, their-

Jake Merrick:
Okay.

Dan Kleinman:
... monthly, uh, magazine for membership. Um, this is what's going on. People can't stand... A lot of people, not just, not just Conservatives, right? This is not just a Conservative issue. This is an everybody issue.

The ALA even knows it, but they don't wanna say it publicly, uh, that everybody opposes the sexualization of children. Uh, they don't wanna say it, so they, they like to talk about how it's the Conservatives that are bad, the prude people, the Christian people. "They're, they're after us." No, it's not. That's projection. It's the librarians who are after our children.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
That's what's going on. And, and they cover it up by saying, "Well, it's just the Conservatives."

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, exactly.

Dan Kleinman:
So I start-

Jake Merrick:
I mean, the, the... It seems like they, uh... This DEI is not truly DEI. I mean, their inclusion stops at the Church. Their inclusion stops at, at the values that have undergirded this c-, this country since its inception. Um, they, they truly-

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
... only want to include those that have, uh, have for centuries been rejected as-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... cruel and immoral. That's the ones they want to include. And so the line is-

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
... clearly being drawn.

Dan Kleinman:
Right. And how did all... How... Why are you and I talking? We're talking because of the American Library Association, because of what they've done for decades. For... In specific, if you look at the Library Bill of Rights, which is in, uh, lots of libraries, they say, "We adhere to the American Library Association, Library Bill of Right."

Well, that thing makes it age discrimination to keep material from children. Okay? Age discrimination. So that's why kids nationwide are now getting Gender Queer and books like that in their schools because there's no more discrimination (laughs) against children-

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
... supposedly. Because the American Library Association inserted that 50 years ago, when they got the idea from a 1960s radical guy, uh, who, um... You know, they're all into this no-age limit. It's like, kinda like NAMBA... NAMBLA, right?

Jake Merrick:
Right.

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, no age limits so you can have sex with children and everything like that. This is where this came from. 50 years ago, uh, ALA injected into th- their Library Bill of Rights, and now it's in your community in Oklahoma and elsewhere. And now, because of Illinois, uh, Governor Pritzker, who, uh, funds a lot of the transgender movement, uh, is about to sign a bill that will make it illegal for parents to challenge these books in schools anymore be-... uh, on the theory that they're about diversity and inclusion.

Jake Merrick:
Wow. So we're gonna go to a quick break here at the bottom of the hour, but I wanna get back and talk a little bit more about that when we come back, Dan. What happened in Illinois that has essentially drawn a... pushed a wedge between a child and, and their parents. Um, so let's get back and talk about that some more. I'm here with Dan Kleinman, uh, talking about the libraries in America and how to take a stand for truth. Stay tuned.

Newscaster Rich Thomason:
With SRN News, I'm Rich Thomason. The already-overburdened US immigration system being strained to the breaking point by the expiration of pandemic-related asylum restrictions. The Title 42 restrictions expired at midnight.
Federal judge temporarily blocking the Biden administration's plan to start releasing migrants into the country without a court date for an immigration hearing once holding facilities have reached full capacity.
Congressional leaders will not meet with President Biden until next week to talk about the debt ceiling after today's scheduled sit-down was postponed.
Noble, Oklahoma, is among towns in the Oklahoma City area swept by powerful thunderstorms and tornadoes last night. Considerable damage reported but no reports of any injuries.
On Wall Street, Dow futures is up 99 points, and Nasdaq futures is ahead 14. More details at srnnews.com.

Advertiser:
....

Radio Announcer:
And now, the weather.

The weather.

Weather:
....

Radio Announcer:
Our country was founded on freedom. With the stories of today, are we defining our freedom for tomorrow. So stay informed on the issues that matter by making the new Freedom 96.9 your first choice for talk radio in Oklahoma.

We're letting freedom ring, with 100,000 watts of static free truth, with the new Freedom 96.9 and freedom969.com, Oklahoma's new home for talk radio.

Advertiser:
....

Radio Announcer:
A voice of the people, by the people, and for the people. The Jake Merrick Show on the new Freedom 96.9.

Jake Merrick:
Hi, guys. Welcome back here to The Jake Merrick Show. It's 7:35 AM. It's a beautiful Friday morning. Here talking with Dan Kleinman, uh, about our library situation. Uh, good morning, Dan.

Dan Kleinman:
Good morning.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, so, so good. We were talking before we went to the break about the action taken in Illinois. Um, tell us about that again.

Dan Kleinman:
This is a... an effort by the American Library Association to pass legislation that would codify its Library Bill of Rights, the thing that we discussed they added the word age to 50 years ago or so. Um-

Jake Merrick:
Now, what-

Dan Kleinman:
And-

Jake Merrick:
Explain that, "They added the word age." What are the implications of that?

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, the implication is, uh, the... b- because the, the Library Bill of Rights used to say something like, "You can't discriminate against books based on the ideas they contain or the, uh, the people involved," or the, you know, whatever. But then they also added the word "age," so that you can't discriminate against books based on age.

So suddenly, uh, a school teacher can't keep an inappropriate book, uh, from a child in a school because the Library Bill of Rights makes that age discrimination.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, it's... So this is so important because, um, the, the guidance that our schools are getting concerning what books they're allowed to have in their libraries is coming from the ALA, from the American Library Association. And-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
And when they are making these kinds of... uh, adjusting these standards to open it up, um, that's why we're seeing downstream, these books infl-... uh, coming into our school system and then, ultimately, in the hands of our-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... children. And so, we've gotta, I think, uh, uh, find the root of this. And I... Tha- that's why I love what you're doing 'cause I think you're addressing the root of the issue because we can go-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... talk to the local librarian. She can't change anything. You can go talk to your librarian at school to the, to the, uh, school board, whatever, and we're just dealing with the leaves of the trees. We're not dealing with the roots. And the root-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... is where this is coming from, from the American Library Association, who's offering-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... the guidance to our schools.

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah, and that guidance includes that librarians know that this material is sexually inappropriate for children. They know it, but they are trained by the head of the Office for Intellectual Freedom to reframe it as diversity and inclusion.

Jake Merrick:
The head of the Office of Intellectual Freedom?

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah. So-

Jake Merrick:
(laughs).

Dan Kleinman:
... she's teaching librarians that they know this stuff is sexually inappropriate, books like Gender Queer in specific, but needs to be reframed as diversity and inclusion. Now, the key to this is that that's what's in that law that they wanna pass in Illinois, that they want to specifically include a fo-... uh, include the Library Bill of Rights to actually mean this thing, and they also wanna make it so parents cannot challenge books for being, uh, diverse or inclusive.

Jake Merrick:
Right. So the-

Dan Kleinman:
But I'm telling you-

Jake Merrick:
... parent, the parent stands up and says, "This is sexually explicit, and my... Inappropriate for my child," then the response will be, "Well, you're not diverse or inclusive, and so-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
"... we must include it because we are a diverse and inclusive library."

Dan Kleinman:
Exactly.

Jake Merrick:
Wow. A- and obviously, uh, the, uh, one of the, one of the, uh, intended, uh, consequences is that parents are removed from the equation.

Dan Kleinman:
The parents have been removed from the equation for decades by, uh, YA authors and, uh, educators, and, and librarians.

Jake Merrick:
Yes.

Dan Kleinman:
And-

Jake Merrick:
Yes.

Dan Kleinman:
... there's an article on my website, uh, by a Rita, uh, I think, Kozanin, whatever, uh, she's a professor from the University of Houston, which goes into detail on exactly how this happened over the course of time, how somehow, the parents became the enemy, and the, uh, YA authors and the librarians and the educators became the saints that everybody else should now follow.

Jake Merrick:
You know, we had-

Dan Kleinman:
And, and by the way... They created essentially something called a "right to read," so now we have-

Jake Merrick:
Oh.

Dan Kleinman:
... this thing called the Right to Read Act. It's just created by these people intentionally, and I discuss this on, uh, on my, uh, SafeLibraries, uh, uh, blog and writings that I've been doing for, like, 15 years.

Jake Merrick:
And there they're saying a five-year-old has a right to read whatever they want, just like a-

Dan Kleinman:
Bingo.

Jake Merrick:
... just like a five-year-old has a right to decide whatever sex they are, a- a- a-

Dan Kleinman:
Correct.

Jake Merrick:
... and the parent has no right to accept being... and, and intervene and, and suggest something other than what this five-year-old, in all of his wise knowing, uh, about himself and about the world has concluded. Uh...

Dan Kleinman:
Well, the, the parents have the right in their own home, essentially, is what they say-

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
... which means they don't have a right.

Jake Merrick:
For now. For now.

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
You know, we saw-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... Joe Biden-

Dan Kleinman:
Uh-

Jake Merrick:
... in a... Say, "There's no such thing as someone else's kids. They're all of our kids." (laughs). And-

Dan Kleinman:
A- a- and speaking of Biden, uh, he just made this banned book stuff, which is a fake, phony fraud, he just made it a national issue.

Jake Merrick:
Okay. What did he do?

Dan Kleinman:
Um, uh, he, he just came out in support of a, basically, the American Library Association's view, uh, that, uh, nobody should be banning any boo-... Nobody bans books-

Jake Merrick:
Right. It's not about-

Dan Kleinman:
... anyway. So the-

Jake Merrick:
... banning books.

Dan Kleinman:
... the last book ban was in 1963, um, in the United States. Uh, nobody bans it. This is just a word that they use... you know, they, they change language to get us-

Jake Merrick:
Yep.

Dan Kleinman:
... to, uh, fight with each other and, and lose. Uh, there's no book banning going on. This is what is allowed to have been happen since the beginning of time when you remove the, uh, inappropriate material from schools.

Even the Supreme Court allows it in the Board of Education vs Pico case in 1982. I mean, that makes it so that it's perfectly legal to remove inappropriate materials from school--immediately--without even any of these silly reconsiderations committees. Just remove it.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
Perfectly legal. And, uh, and that, that's where we are today. We're in a... uh, we're all thinking that we can't do this because the Library Bill of Rights says it would be age discrimination. Crazy! How did we get to-

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, and it's in-

Dan Kleinman:
... this point?

Jake Merrick:
And it's intentionally labeled that. It's called the Bill of Rights so we, in our subconscious-

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
... think, "Bill of Rights, that's untouchable. We can't touch it." This is, this is not a government. This is a library association that has listed-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... their standards and called it the Bill of Rights. Now they're attempting to codify this into law and then we have something very much to be concerned about because, um, well, well, then, y- you're equating their, their standards in their association with law, the law of the land. And, you know, this is undermining (laughs) parents' rights at its core and is exposing children to harmful images and material.

Uh, you know, somebody brought up a question on the live Facebook stream about, you know, libraries offer more than just books. They also offer movies and other, you know, uh, audio versions. Uh, does this apply to them as well? I mean, if a, if a five-year-old comes and checks out a, a Rated-R movie, are they allowed to? Do you know about that?

Dan Kleinman:
Uh, well, look, it depends on every library, but, uh, in general, the American Library Association, the same lady who says to reframe sexually-inappropriate material as diversity and inclusion, she says that libraries should not be considering movie ratings because that comes from a private organization. Remember, they're a... A- ALA is a private organization-

Jake Merrick:
(laughs). Right.

Dan Kleinman:
... injecting its way into Oklahoma, but they're complaining about MPAA being a private organization--you sh-... we shouldn't follow these ratings, and kids can have whatever they want. And if they don't like it, they'll just simply put it down.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, so we should just say, "I agree with that one part of your argument. We should, uh, not consider private organizations (laughs) so we're gonna dismiss-

Dan Kleinman:
Right?

Jake Merrick:
"... yours."

Dan Kleinman:
(laughs).

Jake Merrick:
Uh, you know-

Dan Kleinman:
(laughs). Exactly.

Jake Merrick:
... Dan the, uh, the thing I love about what you're doing... Uh, and you said that you have launched into this... This, this is breaking news this morning, guys. This is the (laughs), the first interview Dan has done about his library association that he's started. Is that correct, Dan?

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah, that's it.

Jake Merrick:
Man-

Dan Kleinman:
I only started two weeks ago.

Jake Merrick:
I'm, I'm honored, and I'm fully behind it. Now, listen, uh, we, we, uh, have a state full here down in Oklahoma who get sick and tired of stuff. And we organize. And we have meetings across the state, GOP meetings, where we come together-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
... and we talk about how bad things are. And we complain, and we cry, and we say, "Somebody needs to do something about it."

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
And then there's silence. And now the-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... the question that is begged is, who will stand and do something about it? Are we going to just wait on legislation on elected officials to do something? Or are we going to do what you're doing as a father, standing up and starting something? Now, uh, uh, uh-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... this is what has to happen. This is the spirit of America, if you will, is that-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... you can start a business. Go start one tomorrow. And you can start an association. And you can get some movement behind it, and it grows. And then, suddenly, it becomes a competitor to the ALA.

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
So, uh-

Dan Kleinman:
Yes.

Jake Merrick:
... I love what you're doing. Um, talk to us a little bit more about this process of starting this, what's your vision is long term for this association.

Dan Kleinman:
My vision is to be able to assist libraries, library directors, librarians in being able to run a library efficiently, uh, that doesn't cause the harm that the current library association causes.

For example, uh, one harm is that the librarians themselves all need to work in sexually-hostile work environments because the American Library Association tells them that they need to allow pornography on the computers. Well, you don't need to allow that. You can cut, cut it out if you want.

And, uh, and, and I would advise librarians to do that. Right? I'd tell them that the filters work. I would provide, uh, uh, uh, pro- proper guidance. Now men will stop looking at the pornography in the computers and the, uh, predominantly women librarians will stop being sexually harassed by such men.

Jake Merrick:
Hmm.

Dan Kleinman:
Right?

Jake Merrick:
Yes.

Dan Kleinman:
So that's one, one way right there that the library association could help librarians. It can help, uh, you know, children by, uh, not allowing, um, uh, say, uh, uh, Drag Queen Story Hours into libraries. You know, those things are already illegal under library laws, but nobody applies the library laws, right? The, the laws say that the libraries are for the use and benefit of the public, but Drag Queen Story Hour is actually harmful to children.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
Right? Uh, it's, it's plain harmful. I... My library association would recommend useful, uh, uh, things to do other than Drag Queen Story Hour. Maybe we can start ham radio clubs in libraries, for example.

Jake Merrick:
There you go.

Dan Kleinman:
It'd be a very useful STEM skill, a ve-... You know, ham radio people are trying to get children into the field. Uh, well, this can be one way to do it. You use public libraries to do it. Uh, it would be very interesting for the kids. They can learn coding, they can learn to talk with, like, with each other. It could be a, a wonderful experience, and the, the country will benefit by having people getting back into, uh, coding and things like that.

Jake Merrick:
A hundred percent.

Dan Kleinman:
So that's another... Right? Uh, and, and, and that's the key to this, is just to build a library association, sort of like the way that would make sense instead of the way that it's driven by an organization with literally a Marxist president.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah, um. Now, if you start this, uh, that... And you have. That... But it becomes an advisory kind of board is what I'm hearing, that you come into an, uh, a library, an existing library... That's a building full of boo- books. And then you become the advisory board that replaces the ALA over that, uh, facility?

Dan Kleinman:
No-

Jake Merrick:
Is that correct?

Dan Kleinman:
No, I wouldn't come into a library. It'd be very similar to the American Library Association. The American Library Association has no power over libraries except to the extent that people allow it to happen.

So what I'm gonna do is something similar. I'm gonna make standards that libraries can follow, uh, that will help them to guide their libraries in ways they wish. The American Library Association has such standards, for example. One standard was that, uh, librarians are to ignore child pornography because librarians are not lawyers and wouldn't know what is child pornography. And only a judge can, uh, uh, determine that.

Jake Merrick:
Wow. Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
So librarians must ignore child pornography. That was in one of their policies. My policies on p-... (laughs) On Safe Libraries Association will not be recommending that librarians ignore (laughs) child pornography.

Jake Merrick:
(laughs). Yeah. Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
So that's, so that's it. It's the policies that I'm gonna set up that people can choose to decide, which do they like, ALA's or Safe-, or SLA's policies? Uh, and the SLA's will make more sense. Um, uh, a community in, in, in California, for example, is deciding to pass, uh, a resolution. And the resolution says, uh, you know, "We adhere to the American Library Association's Library Bill of Rights."

The resolution also says that, "We, we, we age separate things for kids." You know, if they're too young, remove those things to a different section. Well, actually, that makes the policy internally inconsistent because one is against age discrimination, and the other says they specifically agree with this.

But the people don't realize it. People don't realize that the Library Bill of Rights is the camel's nose under the tent-

Jake Merrick:
Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
... that brings on everything else. Um, so they had an inconsistent policy, internally inconsistent. And, uh, I will help to, uh, uh, guide librarians on how to set up policies by providing, uh, model policies and things like that. And they can choose, uh, whether they like it or not based on their own thinking and not on me browbeating people into it.

Jake Merrick:
I love it. I love it. And so, then, would states be able then to pass legislation that says that, "We are going to, uh, direct our publicly-funded libraries to adhere to Safe Libraries Association's standards rather than the ALA"?

Dan Kleinman:
Huh, I guess they could, but I think that's... uh, you know, uh, ALA is in the middle of trying to pass legislation to make people follow them.

Jake Merrick:
Yeah. Yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
So I am not inclined-

Jake Merrick:
That's why I'm thinking, yeah.

Dan Kleinman:
... to do this... Yeah, so I'm not inclined to do the same thing.

Jake Merrick:
Okay.

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
Hey, I like it. Hey, let's keep it independent (laughs), uh, get the government out as much as possible. I'm all for that. Um-

Dan Kleinman:
Right.

Jake Merrick:
Dan how can people find out more about, uh, your association and what you're doing and come alongside you?

Dan Kleinman:
Oh, uh, well, they can go and search for SafeLibraries on the internet. Uh, maybe you can put in some keywords also, like, um, I don't know, SafeLibraries children in, in school libraries or something like that. And eventually, you'll come to my, uh, my blog. It's principally where I write, uh, right now, uh, at safelibraries.blogspot.com.

And you can subscribe or you c-... Which is free. And you can follow, you can t-... You can, uh, read all my stuff. You c-... Uh, there's a search feat- feature in the upper left. You can, you can steal my stuff and use it if you want. I don't care. I'm not interested in copyright or anything like that.

I'm just interested that people learn this stuff, get the reliable sources that I, that I link to, and then use them on their own to, uh, protect, ch-, uh, children. I can't be everywhere across the United States, but if I can set up a means for parents to learn about this stuff, and they can act in their own communities, then, then I think I've done good.

Jake Merrick:
Absolutely. Thank you so much for your time, Dan. I appreciate it. And we'll be praying for you and for this effort and, uh, we'll be sending people your way, so, uh, be looking for them.

Dan Kleinman:
(laughs). Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.

Jake Merrick:
Absolutely. You have a good day.

Dan Kleinman:
Hey, can I-

Jake Merrick:
Dan-

Dan Kleinman:
Can I-

Jake Merrick:
... in South Florida.

Dan Kleinman:
C- c- can I say one more quick thing?

Jake Merrick:
Oh, do it, please.

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah, I just wanna say how, how, how awful these c-... Librarians can be. The Texas Library Association, right there below, uh, Oklahoma, they actually trained their librarians that, uh, they are, uh... Literally how to avoid the Texas's Open Public Mee-... Uh, Open, um, Records Act, uh, by... Basically, they trained them to use their personal emails, their personal Wi-Fi devices, and their personal everything to communicate about what's going on in s-... with school books. Right?

Because they're literally colluding behind the parents' back, violating li-... uh, Texas law in order to do this. A librarian literally will do anything to sexualize as many children as possible. There's no other-

Jake Merrick:
Wow.

Dan Kleinman:
... other reason for them to intentionally defy Texas law.

Jake Merrick:
No kidding, no kid-... Well, hey, Dan, we have to go to a break, but tha-... Um, so glad you-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... interjected with that last point. So, uh, uh, very much useful information. We're gonna have to have you back-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... on so we can talk about this some more 'cause I know it's, uh... There's so much out there we need to address. Uh, but again-

Dan Kleinman:
Oh, yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... thank you for your time, Dan. And we'll, we'll be talking-

Dan Kleinman:
Yeah.

Jake Merrick:
... to you again soon.

Dan Kleinman:
Thank you. Bye-bye now.

Jake Merrick:
All right, Dan. Bye-bye. All right, well, that was Dan Kleinman with the Safe Libraries Association. And we're gonna go to a quick break and come back here with Jake's final take on some issues related directly to Oklahoma and, of course, our libraries. So stay tuned.

Radio Announcer:
Freedom.
Traffic, traffic.
We now take you to our eye in the sky.

Traffic:
....

Radio Announcer:
100,000 watts of Freedom. You're listening to the new talk radio, Freedom 96.9 at freedom969.com, Oklahoma's new home for talk radio.

Advertiser:
....

Radio Announcer:
From Pauls Valley to Perry, from Clinton to Henryetta, we have Oklahoma covered. With 100,000 watts of Freedom, we're the new Freedom 96.9.

Dan Bongino.

Dan Bongino:
... war going on in our institutions in the United States right here. It's not just the war on self-defense. The Left doesn't want you to be able to defend yourself. The Left wants to make sure they corrupt absolutely everything.

And one of the goals of this show, from the start, has been to get across to you what I say I mean. We're not the one with the political fight here, folk. We are absolutely dealing with a fight between good and genuinely evil human being.

Radio Announcer:
The Dan Bongino Show, weekdays 11:00 to 2:00 PM on the new Freedom 96.9.

The truth about your state every morning, right here on The Jake Merrick Show. The new Freedom 96.9.

Jake Merrick:
Hey, guys. Welcome back. I just had a great conversation with Dan Kleinman. Uh, he's just, uh, an average guy. Okay? You're like, "Who's this guy?" Well, you know, he's a guy that is taking a stand and making a difference. I love to have people like that on my show.

Uh, they're, they're not in the national headlines yet, and they're not in Congress. They're not in the movies. They're just concerned parents who are taking a stand for their children. And he's starting this Safe Libraries Association. How does that relate to Oklahoma? Well, I think we can all connect the dots.

Uh, we're having issues with our libraries here. We're having issues with our schools. You know, um, people are sick of... well, certain people are sick of Superintendent Ryan Walters talking about it and making it a constant issue. Well, as soon as it changes, the conversation can change.

But until it changes, we're gonna say, "This must change, and we're not doing anything else until we get the sexually-explicit stuff out of our libraries." That's how important it is. And it's so important that they're making... they, they're fighting back, insisting that they keep it available to children.

Why? Once it's brought out and made public, it should be immediately removed if they had the same kind of concern for children. But they don't. This is part of their agenda. They want to keep it there. It's really part of the next step in the LGBTQ+++ movement. Um, that way it's gonna promote "MAPs," minor-attracted persons. All right?

Why do they want children in their audience? Because they wanna desensitize the general public to be accustomed to this sexual engagement between adults and children. That's why. Because it was homosexuality. People had to get used to that. And then we legalized marriage so that, uh, the homosexuals can be married. And then the next step was trans. We're in the middle of that.

And the next step is going to be minor-attracted persons, NAMBLA, all of... uh, the fact that you have, uh, official organizations that can, can group these people together and that the term pedophilia is no longer gonna be used... Okay? We're not gonna talk about that 'cause, "That's so demeaning." But we gotta call them MAPs, minor-attracted persons.

And, you know, that's where it's going. That's why we have to stop this because children are the target. And it's, it is demonic at its root. It's the history of Baal worship, of sacrificing children. It's gonna come down to God or Baal, God or the devil. That's what it is.

It's a spiritual war. Everybody's coming to that conclusion. It's very obvious. And the devil doesn't like our children, wants to cut off the next generation, wants to influence the next generation because that generation then will be in bondage from its inception.

So that is the agenda. We need to be aware of it. Um, I mentioned two things that I'm gonna just highlight. Kansas City has taken a stand to push back against the state, since the state has banned, uh, transgender, uh, therapy and the gender-affirming care, so just puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery. And so, Kansas City has said, "Okay, we as a city, then, are going to reject state funding and become a sanctuary city for LGBTQ community."

Okay. At one point, I love that, locally, a city is saying, "We believe in this so much that we are going to reject state funding, be self-sufficient, and welcome this city... welcome these people." I love that. I love that. I don't agree what they're doing it for, their cause, their purpose, but we should take a lesson from that, as a state, as individual cities, and counties, because s-... How...

Uh, we, we are, we are addicted to the dollar, dependent on the dollar instead of God. And we, as a state, should be rejecting federal funding, saying, "In our schools, we are going to do this. And if it means we lose federal funding, so be it." But we're so addicted to the dollar and dependent on the federal government that we don't.

So let's learn a lesson from Kansas City. Even though they're doing it for the wrong reason, they're doing it because they believe in something so strongly. We could do it too, both as individual cities, counties, and the state. So I'm gonna encourage us all to do that because what do I say everyday on this show? "Never forget the sovereignty of your person, your state, and your God."

As a person, you can take a stand like Dan Kleinman. As a state, you can do the same thing because we service a sovereign God who's not dependent on men, no dependent on, on the lawmakers. He's sovereign. He gives us our rights that makes us free as long as we adhere to Him first. Never forget the sovereignty of your person, your state, and your God. This is The Jake Merrick Show. I'll see you Monday.

Radio Announcer:
The Jake Merrick Show is a product of Freedom 96.9. All content is the property of Champlin Broadcasting. Any use of a broadcast without consent is prohibited.

URL of this page: 

Wednesday, June 21, 2023

Library Boards Trained to Lie by ALA; Banned Books Wedge Issue Adopted by White House

Library boards and librarians are trained to lie about so-called "banned books" by a crypto American Library Association [ALA] group called EveryLibrary (501c3) or EveryLibrary Institute (501c4), so essentially by ALA.  Read their training to see just how insidious it is.  Even details on how to target Democrats differently from Republicans are described, while they take advantage of the great good will librarians have from the past.  Those days should be over.

Then a wedge issue is discussed—one the Biden Administration has adopted, citing ALA, to make so-called "banned books" an election issue.  And the wedge issue is based on lies I'm about to discuss in detail, line by line.

First I will explain what is EveryLibrary, then I will lay out its deceptive training that a whistleblower sent me.  I will then analyze the contents of that training and of the "wedge issue" the Biden Administration has now adopted.  Lastly, I will provide a link to all the documents given to me by a whistleblower, point out how they are filled with gold parents can use to stop the s3xualization of school children by school librarians, then give a call to action.

What is EveryLibrary?  It's ALA:

I've written about EveryLibrary in the past.  It has a history of deceptive training.  It guided librarians how to silence parents who complain about p*rn in the library: "get them to quiet down or get out of the way.  We are going to use the p[*]rn in the library discussion as our example...."  Librarians were trained to use a "very common political ploy."  Another technique is "never mention or directly oppose or attack the person making the original claim.  Simply bury their claim in great stories that tell a counter account of their experience."  We will see below that's exactly what they do when they attack Moms For Liberty without naming it.  "The last technique you can use is to simply ignore them."  I could go on with the deceptiveness of this tax exempt organization but I've written details here:

Kleinman, Dan. “Librarians Guide to Defeating Parents By EveryLibrary.” SafeLibraries® (blog), December 12, 2016. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2016/12/librarians-guide-to-defeating-parents.html.

Pictured at top right is John Chrastka who wrote the training and who is EveryLibrary's main driver.  As evidence EveryLibrary is a crypto ALA group, simply look at his history with ALA.  For example, at one point ALA describes him as "John Chrastka, the Director of Membership Development, otherwise known as "the guy who sends you e-mails.'"  

As to the organization itself, EveryLibrary was created in close coordination with ALA Executive Director Keith Michael Fiels, and, as detailed in an ALA Executive Board document dated 24 October 2012, gets indirect support from ALA and is intended to "complement" ALA (italics in original, bold added):

The American Library Association as a separate 501c3 cannot provide direct support to the new 501c4, and the governance will be by definition not under any control by ALA. We want to make sure that ALA members with a comprehensive understanding of ALA's s mission and advocacy goals are involved in EveryLibrary mission development, governance and ongoing work, and that the activities of the new 501c4 complement the work of the ALA Office for Library Advocacy, Chapter Relations Office and Development Office (in the area of fund raising for advocacy and public awareness). 

The point is EveryLibrary is expressly created from and remains an ongoing part of ALA, only using a separate legal entity to operate.  Anything EveryLibrary publishes is essentially what ALA publishes—indeed ALA even acts as publisher for EveryLibrary booksALA issues press releases promoting EveryLibrary.

And EveryLibrary's most recent move is, like ALA itself, to partner with GLAAD to promote s3xually inappropriate books to children in schools, which has been ALA's mission for over a half century.  Notice below it will "engage media with facts and personal storytelling to defeat book bans and challenges," essentially following its own advise to "never mention or directly oppose or attack the person making the original claim.  Simply bury their claim in great stories that tell a counter account of their experience," as I previously reported and linked above:


Library Board Training Provided by EveryLibrary/ALA:

Below is the misleading document I received from a whistleblower library board member (link), along with other documents.  Emphasis and links as shown are in the original:



Activating Support: How to Talk about Book Banning

Voter Perceptions of Book Bans in the United States

The EveryLibrary Institute recently released the results of a nationwide poll that shows that 75% of Americans oppose book banning and are willing to consider book banning when going to the voters this November. Download the report at: everylibraryinstitute.org/bookbanpoll.

Key Points and Suggested Messaging

Common-sense messaging is most broadly effective. It is more effective than saying that proponents of book banning are simply afraid of anyone who is different from them.

Effective messages include:

  • ○  Children shouldn't have their education dictated by the whims of politicians or extreme

    activists.

  • ○  Children’s books are being banned for random reasons.  For example, The Lorax was

    banned because a school board member was a logger, and Walter the Farting Dog was

    banned because it has the word "farting" in it.

  • ○  So many classic novels, such as “The Handmaid's Tale, “Of Mice and Men” and “To Kill

    a Mockingbird,” are being banned.  These are treasured classics one minute and

    banned the next.

  • ○  If you don’t like a book, don’t check it out

  • ○  Parents have the right to decide what their own children can and should read.  But no

    parent has the right to make that decision for all other parents.

  • ○  Legislators do not have the right to restrict your reading or your family’s reading

  • ○  Do you trust other parents to decide what your family is allowed to read?

  • ○  Do you trust the government to decide which books your family is allowed to read?

  • ●  It is effective to make specific books emblematic of this issue as a whole. Of those tested, it’s most effective to highlight children’s books and classic novels.

  • ●  Voters are most offended by the idea that children and classic books are being banned.  Banning classic novels and children’s books are nearly universally opposed.  Support for banning increases to 18% when discussing books that focus on race, and 34% for books that discuss sexuality.  There is the greatest support (34%) for banning books about sexuality.

  • ●  Voters are receptive to describing politicians who support book banning as closed-minded, dangerous, extreme, and short-sighted BUT aside for Democrats, are less likely to use the terms “racist” or “homophobic”.  So effective messaging to middle/right audience will not focus on racism/homophobia.

  • ●  All anti-book banning messages are compelling to a vast majority of Americans. Arguing that proponents are simply scared of anyone different is least convincing.

  • ●  Subject matter related to race/CRT, and particularly sexuality (including LGBTQ+/Gender), soften Republican opposition to banning books. Books related to sex/gender/sexual orientation are seen as not age-appropriate. To effectively speak to the competing impulse to NOT ban books we should not center our arguments or key points in these areas.

Download the eport: everylibraryinstitute.org/bookbanpoll. | EveryLibrary.org | saveschoollibrarians.org

[ page 2 ]

Activating Support: How to Talk about Book Banning

● The possibility of charging library employees emerges as worrying among Republicans and Independents. We should talk about how this is happening around the country – (like Brooke Stephens filing police reports with Farmington Police Department and Davis County Sheriff’s Office)

Additional points

● Just 8% of voters think there are many books that are inappropriate and should be banned.

o Half of voters believe there is “absolutely no time when a book should be banned”. This includes a sizeable portion (31%) of Republicans. This has great potential as a wedge issue. 41% choose a middle position - “there are rare times when it’s appropriate to ban books”.

●  Libraries and librarians are broadly favorably viewed so libraries are entering this issue from a position of strength - American voters have a high regard for libraries, and certainly have more affinity for libraries and librarians than they do for politicians.

●  3 in 4 voters say preventing book banning is important to how they decide to vote. It’s especially mobilizing for college educated women.

●  We won’t need to fight too hard to get people to pay attention. Awareness of the issue is widespread, and book banning is fully opposed by half of American voters (an additionally 41% hold a middle of the road position)

●  31% of Republicans believe there is absolutely no time when a book should be banned. To heighten discomfort for the Republican politicians who support book banning, we suggest focusing on this group for persuasion efforts. (i.e. identify people on the right who oppose all book banning and activate them to speak up.)

Download the EveryLibrary Institute Report

Voter Perceptions of Book Bans in the United States

Download the eport: everylibraryinstitute.org/bookbanpoll. | EveryLibrary.org | saveschoollibrarians.org 



Analysis of Library Board Training:

Here are my comments:

Seventy five percent opposing book banning is a fake poll because the issue is explicit books in schools, not book banning.  He leaves out a Harris poll and a Rasmussen poll showing large majorities oppose explicit books in school.  It's misleading.  Then he says the fake poll will be used to influence voters in November.  It's basically lying, what he's doing.


If EveryLibrary's purpose is "educational," per the IRS filing shown above, does that include flat out lying to keep explicit books in schools for kids to read?  Does flat out lying affect the tax exempt status of an organization?  I wonder if I should file a complaint with the IRS.  But there's more.

The "effective messages" are lies, every last one of them. 

"Education dictated by the whims of politicians or extreme activists"?  First, there's that use of the word, "extreme," something one hears constantly now from those seeking to smear people by association.  

For example, the new Marxist President of ALA, in an effort to sheepishly explain why she deleted her tweet bragging about her being the new Marxist President of ALA, uses the word "extremist" repeatedly, nine times, basically against parents opposing the s3xualization of children, like, "And in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, extremists attacked a library director, claiming she conspired with me to peddle p[]rnography to children in the community."  She even complains about a New York Post story by Dana Kennedy in which I appeared opposite of Emily Drabinski (shown below) for merely reprinting what she tweeted: "A photo of my face and screenshot of my tweet showed up in Breitbart’s extremist media networks and in the pages of the New York Post."

Drabinski, Emily. “The Fight for Libraries; Libraries and Higher Education Face a Shared Battle.” Academe by AAUP, March 21, 2023. https://www.aaup.org/article/fight-libraries.

See also:

Kennedy, Dana. “Librarians Go Radical as New Woke Policies Take Over: Experts.” New York Post, September 10, 2022. https://nypost.com/2022/09/10/librarians-go-radical-as-new-woke-policies-take-over-experts/.  Quote:

After Drabinski won, she posted on Twitter: “I just cannot believe that a Marxist lesbian who believes that collective power is possible to build and can be wielded for a better world is the president-elect of @ALALibrary. I am so excited for what we will do together. Solidarity!”




By the way, @EDrabinski and @ALALibrary block me on Twitter, because free speech has nothing to do with their agenda.

Even media jumps in with the "extremist" parents (and "book bans") lie.  They even put it right in the title so it can't be missed.  And this is in an NPR (WBUR) story about the Louisiana school librarian Amanda Jones who sued parents for defamation and lost:

Fernandes, Deepa. “One School Librarian Who Spoke Out Against Censorship and Book Bans Became a Target of Extremists.” WBUR (NPR) - Here & Now, June 20, 2023. https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2023/06/20/louisiana-librarian-censorship?fbclid=IwAR2meD7M54VcVMAqeLfhP4aBcaSPyDjaLjRuGdD3jtPdxVlFFBVmn9Lvoag.

Second, more insidiously, if anyone's "dictating by whim," it's the American Library Association that gives adult books like "Gender Queer" multiple awards for children to ensure that books spread to every school library.  It's the librarians doing the dictating.  And they don't call it censorship when they do it, they call it selection.  So it's fundamentally dishonest to project onto "extremists" what the librarians themselves are doing. 

For example, librarians are removing books by "dead white guys" including Shakespeare, and obviously they never think their own actions are extremist:

AASL/ALSC/YALSA Interdivisional Committee on School-Public Library Cooperation (SPLC). “Libraries Welcome All Families: A Conversation with Urban High School Students About Representation in the CT Nutmeg Nominees.” ALSC Blog (blog), April 23, 2019. https://www.alsc.ala.org/blog/2019/04/libraries-welcome-all-families-a-conversation-with-urban-high-school-students-about-representation-in-the-ct-nutmeg-nominees/.

Meanwhile, even while knowing librarians are removing "dead white guys," here is EveryLibrary training people to focus on Shakespeare, the classics, and children's books being removed from libraries because that's what fires up voters.  And, librarians, definitely don't talk about the s3xually explicit books because, as the EveryLibrary trainer says as shown in the thirty second clip below, "we might not be winning, we really wanna focus on um the children's books and the um uh the classics um."  This is an example of why I say librarians flat out lie and use projection.  Librarians are banning Shakespeare while training other librarians and library trustees to decry the "extremist" parents banning classics like Shakespeare.  And EveryLibrary is a tax exempt organization for flat out lying?





"Children books are being banned for random reasons"?  He cites two oddball cases.  There are always outliers.  He leaves out the educationally unsuitable and pervasively vulgar works that may be removed immediately from school libraries.  It's deceptive to take outliers and leave out the mainstream problems of librarians s3xualizing children with graphic pedophilic works that even exhort kids to get on s3x apps like Grindr and meet a man for a night.  No, that he doesn't mention.  Just the farting dog case and the Dr. Seuss case.

"So many classic novels are being banned."  False.  Librarians are routinely removing classic novels by, as they put it, "dead white guys," including Shakespeare, and this poltroon claims classic novels are being banned like "To Kill a Mockingbird."  It's just more projection, a complete and intentional deception, an outright lie, but one people won't notice without knowing it's the librarians themselves who are herding children into gender ideology while tossing out classic literature.

"If you don't like a book, don't check it out."  That is completely irrelevant to the issue of whether inappropriate books should be in a library in the first place.  That's like saying, as ALA has, if you don't like seeing p*rnography on a library computer, well just don't look, avert your eyes, sweetie.  Judith Krug said that, including the sweetie part.  Now EveryLibrary says that.  

"Parents have the right to decide what their own children can and should read."  So deeply deceptive.  First, that is not the issue at all of what should be in a library.  Second, ALA works repeatedly and deceptively to keep parents in the dark about what their children are reading.  How?  One way is to advise librarians to use personal emails precisely to keep parents in the dark when they file Freedom of Information Act requests—just as EveryLibrary has done, as discussed below.  Another way is to order the censorship and blacklisting of a book review site by Common Sense Media since it gave parents ratings of the potential for s3xual inappropriateness of books.  So librarians claim only parents can judge, but that's not the issue, and they hide things from parents so they would be misinformed even if they did make their own decisions.  Here's more being hidden from parents by librarians:


"Legislators do not have the rights to restrict your reading."  Oh yes they do.  If your librarians are violating laws, community standards, and common sense by turning libraries into indoctrination centers, lawmakers not only have the right but the duty to act to force the librarians to act within the law.  So don't tell us legislators have no powers.  That's what the librarians want us to think.  As usual it's the exact opposite, legislators do have the power, and they are starting to use it precisely because librarians have gone completely off the rails and kids are being s3xualized and trained nationwide to hate each other as a result.

"Do you trust other parents to decide what your family is allowed the read"?  He's joking, right?  It's projection again.  The real question is do you trust librarians to decide what your family is allowed to read.  Librarians have a "Library Bill of Rights" that contains the Marxist idea that all ages can access all materials.  That's why they allow kids to read pervasively vulgar materials.  So kids would get anything at all from a librarian, and indeed that's what we are seeing again and again in the news.  That "Bill of Rights" sham is in almost every library.  That's the every library in EveryLibrary.  To them EveryLibrary means every library will allow kids access to inappropriate material because some Marxists added the word "age" to the "Library Bill of Rights" over fifty years ago, no one's yet realized, and we're going to damn well keep ramming it down people's throats, especially the easy targets: school kids away from their parents.  So actually yes, parents ultimately decide what goes on in schools and libraries—that's why they elect board members to carry out their wishes, not the wishes of some Marxists from Chicago, IL, called American Library Association.

"Do you trust the government to decide which books your family is allowed to read"?  What cojones these people have.  The ALA is currently getting its "Library Bill of Rights" enshrined into state law where one of the provisions is that states will stop giving money to schools that don't s3xualize their children with inappropriate material.  The law is there to get the governments to decide which books your family is allowed to read!  ALA is for that law!  Yet here is Mr. EveryLibrary saying you shouldn't trust your government as to which books to read.  Can you believe this guy?

So those are his "effective messages."  I just destroyed each one line by line.

To hammer home his lies, he says to "make specific books emblematic of this issue as a whole," emphasis his.  This is just as I pointed out what he did about when he talked about the farting dog book or the Dr. Seuss book and how he left out "Gender Queer" or "This Book is Gay."  He then says the message is market tested to fool people!  "Of those tested, it’s most effective to highlight children’s books and classic novels."  And that's why he talked about "To Kill a Mockingbird."  It's all deception.  It's all delusion.  It's smoke and mirrors.  He's telling people don't be honest, just stick to the script and talk about Theodor Geisel and Harper Lee because that's "tested" and that will fool people, fool them into s3xualizing and indoctrinating kids.  What a groomer this guy is, in my opinion.  And he's the guy writing the guide for library trustees.  Unbelievable, but there it is.

Then he doubles down on the direction to hammer home the lies: "Voters are most offended by the idea that children and classic books are being banned.  Banning classic novels and children’s books are nearly universally opposed."  Emphasis his again.  So leave out that "Gender Queer" is removed from libraries, not "banned" by the way, another deception he uses, and concentrate on Dr. Seuss.  This is pure deception.


So his "advanced training programs" to "boards of trustees" is not really training at all.  He's lying to the Internal Revenue Service now, if you look at the 990 he filed pictured above and linked below.  This is really advanced propaganda training to advance the s3xualization of children.  This is sick.  He's sick.  My opinion, of course.  But there's more.

The next bullet point is to advise boards to make ad hominem attacks against "book banners" as "close-minded, dangerous, extreme, and short-sighted," again, emphasis his.  He goes further!  He characterizes "middle/right" people as "racist" and "homophobic" since he says using such words to sway such people will not be "effective"!  What a racist.  What obvious bias.  What callous disregard for simple honesty.  Everything has to be worded carefully to trick people to side with groomer librarians against parents.  And this guy is running a nonprofit getting tax benefits to s3xualize our children.

The next bullet point tells board members and others what not to say.  Don't say people are "simply scared of anyone different" because he knows from "testing" that that particular lie is no longer effective for "anti-book banning messages."  There's been no book banning in USA since 1963, but the "book banning" scare is never-ending with these people because they know it works.  Well wake up folks, it's a ruse and has been for decades.  As Thomas Sowell put it, "Censorship Propaganda is Just So Much Hogwash":

Sowell, Thomas. “Censorship Propaganda Is Just So Much Hogwash.” The Seattle Times, October 5, 1994. https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19941005&slug=1934214.

Then he turns back to "Republicans" again.  What does he say?  He says DO NOT talk about "race/CRT, and particularly s3xuality (including LGBTQ+/Gender) because those are winning issues for book removals, so don't talk about that: "To effectively speak to the competing impulse to NOT ban books we should not center our arguments or key points in these areas."  Emphasis his.  He is teaching people to be deceptive.  SO EVERYONE SHOULD DO THE OPPOSITE AND KEEP RAISING THE ISSUES HE'S SAYING NEVER TO RAISE.

And it's galling to see this direction, something that could come directly from a groomer: "Books related to sex/gender/sexual orientation are seen as not age-appropriate."  "Seen" as not age-appropriate?  He will never admit they are not age appropriate because the "Library Bill of Rights" eliminates that guard rail.  And as we saw above, parents are never to be trusted to make book selection decisions, only librarians, like this guy, who cannot even admit anything is ever age inappropriate.

"The possibility of charging library employees emerges as worrying among Republicans and Independents. We should talk about how this is happening around the country – (like Brooke Stephens filing police reports with Farmington Police Department and Davis County Sheriff’s Office)."  Well gee, no kidding, age guard rails have been completely eradicated by librarians, and this EveryLibrary guy is training everyone how to fool everyone else into ignoring the guard rails in their local communities.  This is EXACTLY why legislators are right to put some teeth into laws opposing the s3xualization of children.  No one else can protect the children from these liar librarians.  Parents are attacked, like school librarian Roxana Caivano is doing in Roxbury, NJ, in a case in which I am named.  Only legislatures can stop this and restore the guard rails to protect children.  Yet here's EveryLibrary arguing how "we should talk about how this is happening around the country," right in the bullet point after saying we should not talk about "race/CRT" and "s3xuality (including LGBTQ+/Gender)."  So deeply deceptive is this guy, is EveryLibrary, the crypto ALA organization, and to better s3xualize kids.  

Oh my, the guy's not done.  He has "additional points."  Here comes the "wedge" issue the Biden Administration adopted.


Wedge Issue on "Banned Books" Biden Administration has Adopted—It's Based on ALA Lies:

Bullet one about 8% is the same lie from above only reworded and set in boldface.  Then, using the fake book "banning" polls, he says, "This has great potential as a wedge issue."  WHAT A COINCIDENCE!  JOE BIDEN AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE USING "BANNED BOOKS" AS A WEDGE ISSUE!!!

Ordoñez, Franco. “Book Bans Are on the Rise. Biden Is Naming a Point Person to Address That.” NPR, June 8, 2023, sec. Politics. https://www.npr.org/2023/06/08/1180941627/biden-pride-month-book-bans.

Hines, Shawnda. “American Library Association Welcomes White House Actions to Address Book Bans.” Text. American Library Association, June 8, 2023. https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2023/06/american-library-association-welcomes-white-house-actions-address-book-bans.

The White House. “FACT SHEET: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Actions to Protect LGBTQI+ Communities.” The White House, June 8, 2023. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/06/08/fact-sheetbiden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-to-protect-lgbtqi-communities/.  (Contains a citation under "highest number" directly to American Library Association that cites Deborah Caldwell-Stone, Esq, the ALA Director who trains librarians they know material is s3xually inappropriate for kids but it is to be "reframed" as diversity and inclusion, hyperlink in original.  She also plagiarized the Banned Books Week Censorship Map and faked the Banned Books Week list (2010) so badly that after I reported it LGBT books fell off the list for the first and only time ever (2011)). Quote:
III.    Addressing Book Bans
  • Protecting Americans from book banning.  Across the country, our nation faces a spike in book bans – efforts that disproportionately strip books about LGBTQI+ communities, communities of color, and other communities off of library and classroom shelves.  In fact, 2022 saw the highest number of book bans in 20 years.  Book banning erodes our democracy, removes vital resources for student learning, and can contribute to the stigma and isolation that LGBTQI+ people and other communities face.  The Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is announcing that to support its ongoing work to defend the rights of LGBTQI+ students and other underserved communities, it will appoint a new coordinator to address the growing threat that book bans pose for the civil rights of students.  That coordinator will work to provide new trainings for schools nationwide on how book bans that target specific communities and create a hostile school environment may violate federal civil rights laws.

So I just went through line by line the lie by lie of EveryLibrary, an ALA crypto group, and I get to the part where he talks about a "wedge issue" being "banned books," then I realize, that is EXACTLY in the news from just weeks ago.  So Joe Biden and the Democrats' wedge issue is based on ALA lie after lie, and all to s3xualize more school children.  Let that sink in.

The Biden Administration is pushing the views of a plagiarizing homophobic groomer "reframing" s3xually inappropriate books as diversity and inclusion.  Not an exaggeration; that's my opinion based on what I investigated and reported.  Deborah Caldwell-Stone is quoted in the story the White House links.  This nefarious thinking and trickery is the basis for the Biden Administration's "wedge issue" on "banned books."

This is remarkable breaking news—the connection between the "wedge issue" claim by ALA and the White House's adoption of that issue, even citing to ALA—that could affect the upcoming election.  My point here is not an election but the harm done to children if ALA efforts to s3xualize more school children are given the coercive force of government by the Democrats.

Let me move on with completing my analysis of this training document.

Librarians Rely on Good Will Yet They Reframe Explicit Material as Diversity and Inclusion:

In bold and underlined type, the largest text in the document, is the reason librarians get away with doing what groomers cannot do without serious repercussions.  "Libraries and librarians are broadly favorably viewed so libraries are entering this issue from a position of strength - American voters have a high regard for libraries, and certainly have more affinity for libraries and librarians than they do for politicians."  Librarians know they get away with murder, and here it is in black and white.  They can do anything and people will still assume they are fluffy pink rabbits who would hurt a fly.  Just to make this super clear, the trainer points out voters love librarians "more ... than they do ... politicians."  So no need to convince people to s3xualize children since people will side with librarians over politicians anyway, so just plow ahead and do it and you'll get away with it.  Nice.  And that's exactly why today schools are awash with inappropriate materials and grades are plummeting.

"3 in 4 voters say preventing book banning is important to how they decide to vote. It’s especially mobilizing for college educated women."  Remember, they set up a fake poll about book banning when that's not the issue and book banning hasn't happened since 1963, but the goal is political power, not truth.  So it's a great wedge issue, and who cares if it's all based on lies from an organization that knows it's s3xualizing children.  Boy, those "college educated women" really eat this up.

"We won’t need to fight too hard to get people to pay attention. Awareness of the issue is widespread, and book banning is fully opposed by half of American voters (an additionally 41% hold a middle of the road position)."  Again with the fake poll.  What, is this the fourth time that fake poll has been used to fool people?  But as to not "fight[ing] too hard" because "awareness of the issue is widespread," well he leaves out that ALA has been spreading that awareness.  He leaves out that ALA trains librarians that "sustained uh messaging that reframes the issue" is "need[ed]."  And that sustained messaging has been going on for decades, and here we are, "awareness of the issue is widespread."  How convenient and self serving.


He saves his last bullet for the Republicans.  He knows the Democrats are going to accept the lies hook, line and sinker.  So he's training library boards and librarians to "heighten discomfort for the Republican politicians who support book banning," as if anyone supports book banning.  So, "we suggest focusing on this group for persuasion efforts, (i.e. identify people on the right who oppose all book banning and activate them to speak up.)"  Emphasis in original.  Are you getting this?  If Republicans are speaking in opposition to "book banning," they have been "activated" by these people s3xualizing school children.

That's the end of the training documentation I got from a whistleblower.  There was not a single sentence that was truthful.  Everything was geared toward lying to people, toward creating a "wedge issue," toward racist and ad hominem attacks, then "activating" Republicans to "heighten discomfort" on the others.  And all to better s3xualize more school children.

And the Biden Administration has made "book banning" a "wedge issue."

How disgusting.


EveryLibrary Documents from Whistleblower:

Here are the documents provided to me by the whistleblower about the training he received as a library trustee from EveryLibrary, including the IRS Form 990s for the different EveryLibrary entities:


Note:  These documents were given to the whistleblower library board member by EveryLibrary in the course of training it provided to a public library.  So they were legally obtained.  I have to say this to head off any false claims made by EveryLibrary to try to get my report here censored.  That whistleblower sent me those legally obtained documents sua sponte.  So I legally obtained them.  None have proprietary markings of any kind.  Actually, they strongly recommend distribution of the documents—for "Long-Term Inoculation" of "legislators and local leaders" against parents:






Remember, long term inoculation is what ALA trains librarians to do, as displayed above, where it says: 
But ultimately, we found that the thing that needs to happen most, and it needs to happen before these bills are introduced, is sustained uh messaging that reframes this issue um that uh that takes it away from the idea that these are inappropriate for minors, or sexually inappropriate for minors, and promotes them as diverse materials and programming that are about inclusion, fairness, and protection of everybody's right to see themselves, and their families reflected in the books in the public library.
And here's a video of one of the EveryLibrary people giving his training to librarians, training that comprises the documents linked above and that is freely available online (hat tip Haley Kennington @LadyKennington):




Isn't it inspiring when that EveryLibrary trainer, Peter Bromberg, who's training librarians and trustees to use "long-term inoculation" to get people to accept the Marxist-infused "Library Bill of Rights" also uses the Marxist fist to promote the First Amendment and EveryLibrary?  So patriotic!



What a coincidence!  Just like ALA with its Marxist President—there's that Marxist fist again!  #RebelReader!  A child reading child p*rn.  What a rebel!  




Documents Filled with Gold:

The whistleblower-provided documents linked above are filled with gold.  I've analyzed just the one two page one.  The others, eight pages and 133 pages, are equally filled with flat out misinformation and lies, line after line.  

Even the obligatory attack on Moms For Liberty is there, with ALA's signature means of never naming ALA's alleged enemies.  As you read this attack, know it's pure projection (like complaining about "right wing media and social media channels" when they train themselves to cultivate friendly media and improve their own use of social media), uses the typical word definition changes (like "diverse content") and scare quotes (like "'parental rights'"), and it's in reaction to ALA's increasing its harm to children—then they complain and call us extremists when we notice:




So this organization that promotes ALA training that the Biden Administration now uses for its "banned books" wedge issue also trains library boards and librarians to violate law, including open public records laws: "Note: these are roles to be filled by civilians, not librarians.  Any work done to ID or work with citizens acting in these roles should not be done on work time, or with work resources.  Do not use work email or phones."  See page 6 here:



Wow, an organization training people to violate law precisely to hide from parents and politicians how they are s3xualizing and indoctrinating children is the source for the Biden Administration's wedge issue on "book banning."  

And here, on pages 115 and 121, it trains librarians how to lie to parents about the very book "Gender Queer" that has been removed from many schools under the Pico case:





I have to stop because the lies are so many I could write a book.  Librarians should lose all credibility since they operate under these deceptive guidelines that target children.  And I'll be happy to provide anyone with further analysis and detail on any of the other EveryLibrary (ALA) training documents I have provided, as provided to me by a whistleblower.  More whistleblower input is welcome.


Others See the Propaganda As Well:

And others see the pure propaganda as well, like these examples:

Schultz, Madeline Fry. “The Book-Banning Narrative Being Pushed by Democrats and the Media is a Mirage.” Washington Examiner, June 9, 2023. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/book-banning-narrative-democrats-media-mirage:

“The Democrats and the Biden administration are broadly relying on Americans’ first blush instincts being with them, and not unreasonably so,” Eden explained.  “In the abstract, of course, being opposed to book bans polls well.  But they’re also counting on Americans never learning what’s actually going on in these schools and what these parents are actually objecting to.”

Kurpis, Jon. “School Librarians and the False Book Banning Narrative.” Substack newsletter. Jon Kurpis Official Substack (blog), May 26, 2023. https://kurpis.substack.com/p/school-librarians-and-the-false-book:

Providing vivid p[]rnography to underage children does not make you a good school librarian or a progressive educator.  It makes you a groomer and a reckless danger to students.

(Anonymous Whistleblower Library Director) Kleinman, Dan. “The Banned Books Hustle.” SafeLibraries® (blog), September 17, 2022. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2022/09/the-banned-books-hustle.html:

Librarians know “banned books” get traction with the public.  If not in the local area then anywhere they can promote the outrage.  It can be beneficial to a librarian’s career to fight the good fight on the supposed behalf of the community.  They can enhance the woke Marxist agenda of the local school or run a program intended to indoctrinate children into becoming Queer and receive hi-fives, ball gags, and job offers.

Greene, Jay. “Are School Libraries Banning Thousands of Books? Here’s Why You Shouldn’t Trust the Left’s Narrative.” The Daily Signal, May 11, 2023. https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/05/11/fact-checking-dispels-the-book-banning-fiction/:

It is simply false that 2,532 books were removed from schools during the 2021-2022 school year. We know this is false because we examined online card catalogues and found that 74% of the books PEN America identified as banned from school libraries are actually listed as available in the catalogues of those school districts. In many cases we could see that copies of those books are currently checked out and in use by students. 


Call to Action:

I have provided you with smoking gun evidence of training for the s3xualization and indoctrination of children by ALA (EveryLibrary) given to me by a whistleblower library board member.  It's your job to read it, learn it, and recognize it when these exact same lies and misdirection are used in your own communities by librarians and library trustees who are trained to sneak around you and who no longer should have your good will:

Well, did you read them?  Then click above and read them!!

Let me add that, for standing up against the s3xualization of kids in schools, Moms for Liberty has been attacked by ALA as shown above and elsewhere, Southern Poverty Law Center, mainstream media, the Biden Administration, and I just noticed by Big Tech as well, as shown below.  Obviously they are doing something right:



The greatest thing you can do is run for and get on school and library boards!!  Then don't be fooled by EveryLibrary and ALA.  That's the best way to change what these people are doing to harm our children and our country.

Lastly, oppose Secretary Cardona and the US Department of Education plans to implement ALA policy.  So get involved and oppose that as it's based on the pure propaganda laid out above.


Conclusion:

Whatever's happening to s3xualize kids, American Library Association librarians stand at the center of it.  I just proved it's all based on propagandistic training by ALA people (EveryLibrary) that incorporates ALA's, well, extremist policies, like the Marxism embedded in its "Library Bill of Rights" that Illinois just made law.  It's extremist to give children s3xually inappropriate material.  It's librarians who are the extremists, not the parents and legislators trying to stop them from s3xualizing children.

And now the Biden Administration is taking these extremist views nationwide—because groomer librarians said "banned books" would be a "wedge issue" based on faked information.



NOTE ADDED 22 JUNE 2023:

Piling on Moms For Liberty, as discussed above, is none other than, you guessed it, EveryLibrary.  The quote was to make a point about something that's bad, not a quote of support, but don't let facts get in the way of piling on:





NOTE ADDED 23 JUNE 2023:

Now ALA's EveryLibrary is grifting off of Hitler: https://tinyurl.com/EveryLibraryGrift

They accuse Moms for Liberty of "well-funded dark money."  Simply more projection as the reality is the opposite:

American Libraries Magazine. “ALA to Distribute $1 Million to Support Fight Against Censorship,” June 22, 2023. https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/blogs/the-scoop/ala-to-distribute-1-million-to-support-fight-against-censorship/.