“NJ Democrats Protect ‘Freedom’ to Give Obscene Material to Children,” by Alex Newman, Liberty Sentinel, October 30, 2024:
The so-called “Freedom to Read Act,” passed by the State Senate on Monday after it was approved in the House earlier this year, is being portrayed by Democrats and their far-left media allies as a measure aimed at limiting “book banning.” The lawmakers behind it also claimed it would protect librarians and teachers from alleged “threats.”
Under current New Jersey law, giving “obscene material” to a minor is considered a felony of the third degree. Obscenity is described in the statute as any material that includes audio or visual picture or description of s[]xual intercourse, s[]x acts, and more. Numerous books being distributed to children in the state fit that description well.
An example of the books stirring controversy in New Jersey is “This Book is Gay.” It includes, among other outrages, tips on how children can meet up with adults for homos[]xual encounters without letting their parents find out. The book also features detailed and extremely graphic instructions for sodomy and various other s[]x acts.
Because of obscenity laws, which exist nationwide to protect the innocence of children, some librarians and teachers have hesitated before providing such material. Parents and concerned citizens have also warned librarians and “education” officials that they could be running afoul of obscenity laws by giving children access.
But lawmakers in New Jersey think children need access to such material. “In recent years, public and school libraries have come under attack by a small number of individuals hoping to erase diverse materials from bookshelves, usually targeting works focused on race and LGBTQ+ themes,” argued bill sponsor NJ Senator Andrew Zwicker, a Democrat.
“A library is a place of voluntary inquiry and provides equitable access to learning resources,” continued the far-left senator without acknowledging concerns. “Through the ‘Freedom to Read Act,’ local school boards shall implement policies that ensure our libraries still have an array of content while including the public in that process.”
Ironically, protecting those seeking to corrupt minors with perversion and s[]xual fanaticism was portrayed by Senator Zwicker as a “defense of freedom.” Critics, however, warned that the legislation was an attack on constitutionally protected freedoms including parental rights and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
One leading opponent of the bill was Victoria Jakelsky, director and founder of NJ Parental Rights. In her testimony before lawmakers against the legislation, Jakelsky read the legal definition of obscenity and warned that this “freedom” legislation was aimed at stripping parents, taxpayers, and the community of the right (and duty) to protect children.
“This bill is incorrectly named,” she continued. “The legislation is not advocating for any right, except the right of state employees to be exempt from the consequences of committing a crime — a crime that could have lifelong implications upon hundreds if not thousands of innocent children.”
Jakelsky, who has been battling the indoctrination and s[]xualization of New Jersey children in public schools for years, blasted the notion of giving state employees immunity from criminal liability for breaking the law. “Should employees of the NJ Department of Education not be held accountable if they commit this crime?” she asked rhetorically.
GOP lawmakers denounced the bill during debate, too. “How exactly does a person distribute obscene materials to a child in good faith?” asked Senator Michael Testa (Republican) on the floor of the Senate, a reference to protections in the bill for those acting in “good” faith. “I don’t want adults promoting explicit stuff to children.”
“I also think it’s incredibly telling that if some of these very same explicit materials were shown to a child by a neighbor, that individual would be charged with a Megan’s Law offense, and rightfully so,” continued Senator Testa, a reference to a law protecting children named after a 7-year-old girl who was raped and murdered by a predatory neighbor.
Of course, many Democrats claimed there was no obscene material being given to children in schools. Testa was not buying it: “To my colleagues across the aisle that are so adamant that there is no obscene material being pushed in our schools, and that there never will be under this bill, then why do you need an exemption from the obscenity law?”
While bill sponsors and supporters claimed it was the government officials corrupting minors who were being “harassed” and “threatened,” the reality is just the opposite. In fact, as The Newman Report documented last year, parents who advocate for their children have been targeted by law enforcement, lawfare, unions and even the military.
Under current state policy, children in New Jersey are s[]xualized and indoctrinated with LGBT ideology starting as soon as Kindergarten. From being encouraged to experiment with sodomy and other perversions to being taught that they can pick new “genders,” the abuse begins as soon as government gets its hands on the children.
It appears giving children grotesque and obscene s[]x materials is now a higher priority than teaching basic academics in the Garden State. Just last year, Governor Phil Murphy signed a law eliminating a basic-skills test to ensure government-school teachers know how to read, write, and do basic math. He is expected to sign the new obscenity measure soon.
Civilized societies have always used the law to protect children and punish those who seek to corrupt them with obscene material. Unfortunately, the veneer of civilization is rapidly disappearing, especially in Democrat-controlled states. For the sake of children and society, it is imperative that these horrific trends be reversed — fast.
For more great content like this, visit FreedomProject Media.
—
4 thoughts on “NJ Democrats Protect “Freedom” to Give Obscene Material to Children”
LIBERTY
Thank you very much for covering this. It truly is a fight of good against evil here in NJ, but we must not grow weary.
We were thankful for one no vote from one Democrat and that the Democrat from LD-15 Shirley Turner did not vote. The NJ Democrat leadership found a way to block many emails from getting to the legislators. If the democrats had even listened to 20% of those concerned and were willing to look at the facts and the pictures that are in many of the books currently in the school libraries, they would have voted no. The leadership blocked us for being able to tell the the truth.
Thank you for showing this and covering this. God help NJ.
LINDA GOUDSMIT
Always dressed up in positive sounding language, “Freedom to Read” is a license to legally s[]xualize children in schools, libraries, and predictably entertainment, as young as possible. Why? Because a basic tenet of liberal/leftist/Marxism is the deliberate destruction of childhood innocence. The best sentence in the entire article is this: “To my colleagues across the aisle that are so adamant that there is no obscene material being pushed in our schools, and that there never will be under this bill, then why do you need an exemption from the obscenity law?” The essential issue is one of language and definition. The liberal/leftist/Marxist Democrats do not consider any s[]xual act, no matter how perverse or age-inappropriate, to be obscene. Words matter.
TED WEILAND
....
FENICIA REDMAN
Happening next door in PA too. I’m done with legislative hearings. We now have a President who will prosecute these crimes and my Defendants should buckle up!
SOURCE OF ABOVE:
- Newman, Alex. “NJ Democrats Protect ‘Freedom’ to Give Obscene Material to Children.” Liberty Sentinel (blog), October 30, 2024. https://libertysentinel.org/nj-democrats-protect-freedom-to-give-obscene-material-to-children/. [Note: Regarding "Freedom to Read Act" S2421 A3446 2024.]
—
URL of this page:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments of a personal nature, trolling, and linkspam may be removed.