 |
Amanda Jones with the Emmy
awarded to The Librarians—
a juried prize for the film,
not for the librarians on stage.
|
The Librarians is not an investigation of school collections. It is a permission slip.
A shorter version of this argument appeared in the Washington Examiner, Sept. 16, 2026.
The director said the quiet part. After the PBS premiere, Kim A. Snyder told The Advocate she wanted viewers “both outraged and activated to get civically engaged,” and that librarian organizations should be treated as “the firewall protecting one of the most fundamental rights in our democracy.” Amanda Jones, one of the film’s featured faces, pictured top right, said the screenings had already started “a movement” the team planned to run through 2026.1
Outrage at parents. Activation onto boards. A firewall between the collection and the community that pays for it. That is not how a documentary talks. That is how a recruitment film talks.
The whole purpose is to give the appearance that school librarians are under assault by parents who are making their lives miserable for political gain and “Christian nationalism.” The opposite sequence—parents and credentialed teachers harassed until they drop the complaint—was left out on purpose. Jennifer Tapley is on the tape. The first mother at North Hunterdon got a lawyer letter. Vicki Baggett and Crystal Marull put their names on that record in The Hill this week. None of them are in the film as victims.
The Emmy Is the Point, Not the Rebuttal
On September 5–6, 2026, at the Creative Arts Emmys, The Librarians won the Primetime Emmy for Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking. It beat National Geographic’s The Tale of Silyan. The Television Academy lists Kim A. Snyder, Janique L. Robillard, Maria Cuomo Cole, Jana Edelbaum, and Independent Lens executive producer Lois Vossen. Wikipedia now records the film as the current holder of the prize.2 Amanda Jones holding that statue and smiling is not an Emmy in her name. The Academy decorated the film. The subjects walked the stage. EveryLibrary Action then wrote “Librarians Won the Emmys!” and opened the call list. That is a juried film prize treated as a professional medal—the slogan, not the record.46
Do not treat that statue as a fact-check. Exceptional Merit is not “Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special.” It is a juried award. Entrants submit a written statement of why the film has exceptional merit. The Academy’s own rules say the category exists “to both honor and encourage” three things, in this order: profound social impact, significant innovation of form, and remarkable mastery of technique. Judging includes the “filmmaker’s expressed vision” and the capacity to “impact” and “enlighten.” The International Documentary Association, describing the same prize, asked whether the film is “a ‘greater good’ kind of documentary.”2
That is the lane that rewards films built to move a public, not films built to steelman the other side. Past winners run to cause pictures—Death in Gaza, Spike Lee’s When the Levees Broke, The Territory on Indigenous land defense in the Amazon. An Emmy in that box is a jury saying the film landed as a social-impact weapon. Snyder had already said that was the job: outrage, activation, librarian groups as the firewall. In August she told The Hollywood Reporter the team was preparing an impact campaign to push down-ballot voting among book-club members, a Banned Books Week streaming drop, and a Penguin Random House graphic-novel adaptation.3 Nine days after the statue, EveryLibrary Action opened “Librarians Won the Emmys!” and told the list: “An Emmy doesn’t stop a book ban.” Send the legislator the email. Share it. Donate.44
So the statue does not answer Eisenhower’s missing sentence—the cut is below. It does not put the challenged pages on screen. It certifies the use Snyder named. If you hear “it won an Emmy, therefore the parents are the mob,” you are hearing the category working as designed.
The after-credits meeting is not an encore. Hosts are handed a discussion guide and told to walk the room to the film’s own Resources page: ALA tools, PEN’s “report a book ban,” Unite Against Book Bans, EveryLibrary and Fight for the First (“find a local group or start your local grassroots campaign”), the Freedom to Read Project organizer guide. That URL is the second reel—the conversion page the statue was built to fill.45
The week of the ceremony, the people on stage and the profession off stage said the same thing in their own words.
From the podium Snyder called the librarians “true heroes” and said the award “honors them all.” They did not walk up empty-handed. Producer Janique Robillard had them carry challenged titles—a “red carpet reading list” chosen on a Zoom call. Carolyn Foote, retired Texas school librarian and cofounder of FReadom Fighters, held a book in the air and told School Library Journal it made her “feel very victorious.” “People know this is wrong.” Jones carried the Reynolds/Kendi Stamped remix. Hickson carried Harriet the Spy. The filmmakers handed the statuettes around for pictures.4
Robillard would not let the night stay a party. She told SLJ it “didn’t feel right to finish the film and walk away.” The Emmy “gave the documentary new life, and advocacy a much larger spotlight.” Then the calendar: “extra momentum going into Banned Books Week” and “this critical midterm year where we know that freedom to read is on the ballot.” Streaming on October 6. “We’re still very focused on in-person activations because we know that that’s where change can happen.” The rooms she named: school boards, library boards, city councils, “perfectly timed before early voting.”4
The same day, Carolyn Foote’s FReadom Fighters, with Becky Calzada, wrote it without a reporter in the room. Snyder found them after a 2021 CNN hit. The filmmakers, they said, “work tirelessly to use the film as call to action” for “the freedom to read and the importance of voting in local elections.” “Standing on the stage together with an Emmy felt like victory.” Under the joy, a checklist: send a letter to a school board, serve on a committee, speak at a meeting, donate to the groups. “Moving from awareness to actions.” “Our democracy depends on us.”5
ALA’s own I Love Libraries shop reprinted Snyder’s hero line, posted Jones’s pictures with Hickson, restated the Academy’s impact language, and asked readers to donate so the Association can “fight back.”6 Offstage, New Jersey school librarian Elissa Malespina—who appears in the film—wrote that the statue felt personal, that she now gets to say she appeared in an Emmy-winning picture, and that the record exists so that “years from now, people should not be able to look back at this period and pretend it did not happen or that librarians were overreacting.” In her telling, librarians were “accused of harming children for simply doing their jobs.”7 That is the ripple Robillard wanted: isolated staffers seeing themselves on the stage and treating the prize as a verdict on the parents.
Trade paper, movement newsletter, Association donation page, friend of the principals. Four outlets. One message. The statue is not a review. It is a turnout machine timed to Banned Books Week and the midterms.
PEN America has already stood up the machine. Its “PEN America x The Librarians Action Hub” calls the work an “impact campaign” for “hyperlocal civic engagement”: free community screenings, watch parties, talk-backs, workshops on school-library and legislative advocacy, letters to boards, and “vote down ballot.” The Texas Freedom to Read Project is named as a partner. That is Snyder’s “outraged and activated” with a sign-up sheet.32
I said so when the film hit PBS. I said the Eisenhower quote was chopped. I said the product was agitprop—agitation plus propaganda—built to last for years.8 The transcript of the film, the 1953 Dartmouth speech, and Jones’s own 2021 training remarks now sit side by side. They do not flinch.
They Stopped Eisenhower Mid-Sentence
On June 14, 1953, at Dartmouth College, President Dwight D. Eisenhower said:
Don’t join the book burners. Don’t think you are going to conceal faults by concealing evidence that they ever existed. Don’t be afraid to go in your library and read every book as long as any document does not offend our own ideas of decency. That should be the only censorship.9
The film’s spoken version dies at “read every book.” That is the same mutilation already circulating as a meme. Snopes noted years ago that the popular short form drops the decency clause.10 In the film, if the rest of the sentence appears at all, it is background text a viewer would have to catch on the fly—not the line you hear.8
That is paltering: true words, false impression.11 Eisenhower was warning Dartmouth seniors not to fear ideas—communism, in 1953—and he immediately carved out indecency as the one limit. The 2021–2026 school-library fight is almost entirely about that carved-out category in collections for minors. Using him as a character witness against parents, while muting the clause that names their claim, turns a president into a prop.
Even the full quote is a stretch as a school-library holding policy. He was talking about adult access to political argument, not a duty to keep illustrated s[*]x acts on a middle-school shelf. The truncated quote is a different speech.
They Hid the Narrator Until the Last Half Minute
For most of the picture the main voice is captioned as an anonymous Texas librarian. At about 1:26:13 the caption flips to Audrey Wilson-Youngblood of Keller, Texas. She says she can no longer stay in the shadows and that “our story is still being written, but now it’s everyone’s story.” Runtime is about 92 minutes.12
The production had her name the whole time. Holding it for the last thirty seconds is not news. It is a button: convert a witness into a martyr-hero and send the audience out on a mission statement. “Now it’s everyone’s story” is a recruitment line. Pair it with Snyder’s “outraged and activated,” and the last reel is the ask.
They Gave Parents Three Minutes and Librarians the Hour
Parents appear as angry or prayerful school-board speakers, as the mother who sent a child for Lawn Boy then named Martha Hickson at the microphone, as a few local conservatives, and as Courtney Gore—who starts on the “wrong” side and defects. Moms for Liberty declined to sit for the film.12 That is their choice. It does not relieve the filmmakers of the duty to represent the strongest version of the other argument.
The film’s subject is harassment of librarians. It then runs police-station footage of a parent who asked that her name not be made searchable. In October 2023 Jennifer Tapley of Santa Rosa County, Florida, was in a sheriff’s lobby about a high-school title. On the tape she asks that her name not be easy to look up. Judd Legum obtained the bodycam by public-records request, posted a narrated short, and the clip moved from local papers to the Daily Mail and The Independent in a day. The film uses that picture as proof the parent is the mob. Tapley’s own account—written for publication and printed below—is the opposite sequence: a detective asked that the book be brought in; she says she was told she would have anonymity; the librarian, she says, was not the target; the short package omitted that; the aftermath was death threats against her and her daughter, a sheriff’s car in the driveway, a dropped school-board race, and a child moved to another school.33 A movie about crying librarians put the clip back on a national stage and said nothing about the child who came home crying. PEN America’s September 2026 report Out of Circulation cites Snyder’s film as documentation of “attacks” on librarians and says nothing about the parent on that tape.34
The film then puts that tape under another librarian’s voice. Immediately after the Santa Rosa line “The governor says this is child p[*]rnography,” Clay County librarian Julie Miller says: “In June, one of the Moms for Liberty in our area had posted a video about the second book in the Court of Thorns and Roses series, and she tagged all of the schools that had the book in their library. So then the district decided to just quietly pull the books from the shelves and delete them.”38 Santa Rosa is not Clay County. Storm and Fury—the title on the sheriff’s tape—is not book two of Sarah J. Maas. Tapley, in the statement below, says she was not a Moms for Liberty member yet. “Tagged the schools” is how the picture says raid; it is also how a parent tells other campuses a title is on the shelf after the statute’s clock has started. “Quietly pull… and delete them” is motive-talk. The cut does the smear by association and the smear by omission in one breath: group label on a woman who says she did not have it, compliance narrated as a purge, and nothing about the child who came home crying. Judd Legum is still in that business. In March 2025 Mother Jones ran his Popular Information package on pastor John Amanchukwu as a “book-banning” touring act. Same beat as the Tapley short: the parent or pastor is the operation; the shelf is not the subject.47
What the Tape Left Out: Jennifer Tapley’s Account
Tapley sent the following statement for publication through Vicki Baggett. Facts and judgments are hers. This brief does not treat the statement as a court finding. It treats it as the testimony the film did not sit with, and the truth the media didn't investigate nor report. It's reported here exclusively:
My Harassment Over Books
A mom approached a community member at her church with a very inappropriate book her daughter had checked out of the school library and turned it over to see if she could do something about it, because she was advocating against the p[*]rnography found in our schools. That person gave the book to a friend, Tom, who was also advocating for removing the books from our school libraries. He had spoken with a detective at the sheriff’s office, who asked him to bring the book in so they could talk about what was going on with the school board’s refusal to follow the law.
I was running for school board because I was sick of its refusal to listen to parents. Tom asked me to come with him to explain the ins and outs of the law to the detective, but when we arrived at our appointment, the detective was out on a call and the receptionist told us to use the lobby phone to let dispatch know to send someone else over to get the book and information.
Tom was not feeling well that day, so I told him to sit down and I picked up the receiver to talk to dispatch. This was not a 911 call nor a call to the sheriff’s office. This was the recording used when they said I “called 911 on a school librarian.”
I was only there to explain the law at the request of the detective and my elderly friend. When the deputies arrived, they promised me anonymity. They recorded everything anyway.
While trying to explain the law and why we were there, I told them the librarian probably had no idea what was in the book and that our issue was with the school board, as members were aware of what was in the book and what was in the law and refused to follow it. Of course that part got left out.
A couple of days later, the mom who gave the book to her friend at church said that she wanted the book back. She said the librarian’s husband, who was running for county commissioner and who was also a high school teacher, left the school and went to her work and demanded she bring the book back or her daughter would be in trouble. He went further, demanding she call the news station to tell them Moms for Liberty took advantage of her daughter and set her up (his opponent was a member of Moms for Liberty). He told her what she had done was ruining his reputation and that she needed to do this to save both his reputation and to keep her daughter out of trouble.
The same thing happened to my friend’s daughter who had checked out a book that was given to the local police station. The police department took that book and sent it to the prosecutor’s office to look into charging the school-board members for breaking state laws.
But my friend’s daughter was called into the principal’s office and threatened with criminal theft charges for giving the book away and insisted she bring it back or be charged. He also made fun of her Christian faith. She called her parents in tears afterward.
Someone from the school district—I suspect the librarian’s husband, the politician—called a liberal blogger determined to take down and harass any conservative Christian trying to make a difference in the world, and he especially had his sights set on Moms for Liberty members and Trump supporters. I was not a Moms for Liberty member yet, but he didn’t care for the truth. He had his sights set on winning a political race and he didn’t care who he hurt in the process.
That blogger called me up with a fake story about being a small-town newspaper reporter doing a story on how corrupt these school boards can be with these p[*]rnographic books in our schools, took some statements from me, and then twisted everything I said and made up his own story about what happened.
He got the body-camera footage and what he claimed was the “phone call” I made and published it all on YouTube with a fake narrative that Moms for Liberty called the cops and demanded a librarian be arrested. He only posted parts of the video, of course, as none of this was true. I didn’t go to the cops; I was asked to come in. And I didn’t demand the librarian be arrested; I stuck up for her, but knowing now what her husband did, I wish I hadn’t.
But he got what he wanted. He had smeared his opponent and made himself look good at the expense of two high-school girls, my own daughter (who was in the body-camera footage), and many parents fighting the school board to protect our kids.
The false narrative spread quickly as news stories ran locally, citing the gossip blogger’s “facts,” then nationally, even hitting gossip sites around the U.S. and Europe within a day: the Daily Mail, Daily Kos, NewsNation, the Daily Beast, the New York Post, HuffPost, The Independent, the Irish Independent, American Libraries Magazine, Miami New Times, and the list goes on. TikTok went wild.
My phone started ringing nonstop. Callers would yell at me and hang up. They told me they wanted me dead. They told me I should kill myself. They told me my daughter should kill herself. They attacked me for what I looked like. One crazy liberal woman showed up to a school board meeting, screaming at me that I shouldn’t be allowed to live.
My email got flooded. People signed me up for spam. Hundreds of spam emails flooded my inbox every day. They stuffed my campaign volunteer list with fake names so I couldn’t tell who was real and who was fake.
Social media went crazy. People were sending threats not just to me, but to my family members as well. My private messages were so full I couldn’t keep up with them all.
A producer from The Daily Show reached out to me asking me to do a segment on the show. I declined. The show has a history of making fun of conservatives and I just wanted the attention to go away.
Even my physical mailbox was flooded with hate mail. I got a greeting card from the Church of Satan on printed letterhead threatening my child. Someone sent me a published manifesto blaming school shootings on Christians along with a letter about all school shootings being my fault. I got so many hateful letters.
Due to the number of threats, we kept our guns loaded and propped against the doors. We had a loaded gun in every room of the house within easy reach. The sheriff’s office sent patrol cars out to sit in front of my house at night and increased patrol during the day. I dropped out of the school-board race and moved my child to a different elementary school. She was coming home crying at night, and while I care very much about what kids are learning at school, my family is most important to me.
I locked down my social-media accounts and stayed away from them for two years, making a post every once in a while to update distant friends. My husband found a reputable trainer and bought a Belgian Malinois professionally trained in personal protection and bite work to keep us safe while he is at work. I quit going out in public because I didn’t want to be recognized anymore.
There was support, too. The World Library Association reached out, and other parents who had gone viral fighting school boards reached out to me. People would send me encouraging words and messages. When I did go out in public, people would recognize me and give me encouragement, but I just wanted to fade into the background and make everything go away.
Eventually things died down, but the hate on social media didn’t stop for a couple of years. There are still new things that pop up now and then. I don’t see it, but I hear about it sometimes. I don’t even go look. Those opinions aren’t worth my time. I recently began posting to social media again—an update here and there—but I keep busy now with studying, work, and family time.
I feel shame for my profession—journalism—because of the way our local news reporters blindly followed a gossip blog and a local politician with a goal to win without checking the proof for themselves. I expect it from the gossip sites, but it really makes me glad I left broadcast news. It wasn’t like that when I started. We had our code of ethics and we lived by it. As a journalist, your words are everything, but they mean nothing without truth and integrity, and the trust in that has certainly eroded.
I feel sorry for the ignorant people who blindly believe the “news” they read from sites like the ones that went viral. And I really feel pity for those who took the time to reach out with hate mail, phone calls, and who made social-media posts about someone they don’t even know. What sad, boring lives they must live.
I shouldn’t be surprised about any of the things that happened, though. The Bible warned us these days would come.
In 2 Timothy 3:2–7, Paul wrote, “People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God—having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people. They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth.”
I am not ashamed of what I have done because I didn’t do anything wrong. The only criticism that hurt was that against my child and what I looked like. And while it hurt at the time, God used it for good.
We put our daughter in a private Christian school and I stopped working and went back to school. I graduate in May with a master’s in nursing. My husband got me to come train jiu-jitsu with him and I started living away from social media and the Internet. It’s been amazing. I lost all my weight and am now a healthy and fit size four, so I don’t even have to worry about being recognized anymore, and since that’s what they made fun of the most, I guess I get the last laugh; it was the catalyst I needed to start living my best life.
—Jennifer Tapley37
The Experts Who Became Targets
On September 22, 2026, Crystal Marull and Vicki Baggett said the quiet part in The Hill: “trust the experts” was never a commitment to expertise. It was a demand for a specific conclusion. Between them they held the credentials for which the profession asks. The credentials made them targets.48
Marull holds a Ph.D. in second-language acquisition, a master’s in education, and media-specialist certifications in four states. She was told her objections lacked merit because she did not hold that library card. She earned it. Nothing changed. After her 15-year-old brought home Beyond Magenta, the Alachua district released her name, title, and affiliation to the press. A colleague dressed her down at the bus stop in front of her child, then asked that Marull’s six-year-old be kept away from hers for the year. The district complied and first blamed the child’s behavior. Hearing videos went to activist pages and staff inboxes. Her older son was harassed by peers. At Gainesville High a history teacher let students vote him “Most Likely to Become a Dictator.” Another student called him a Hitlerphile. Marull reported it in 2023; the state moved in 2025 after she spoke to the Board of Education. The aftermath, she wrote, included slander of the boy and veiled death threats dressed as school-shooting talk. She took that to local police. The film’s “parents made our lives miserable” frame has no shot of that child.49
Baggett has taught high-school and college English for 35 years. She read the optional novel, found the pages, and kept finding more in the catalog. The Hill records what followed: a national media campaign built on twisted quotes, more than 12,000 emails demanding she be fired, two lawsuits, death threats. An internal investigation cleared her. The heat rose after the board started pulling titles. PEN America’s Escambia complaint treats her challenges as the opening act of the case. Popular Information had already made her “notorious.”48
The profession’s alibi is the review. Kirkus and School Library Journal already vetted the shelf, the parent is told; to object is to be a banner. Marull and Baggett point to a 2026 School Library Research study—AASL’s own journal—in which a Texas school librarian says, “It’s almost like we can’t go on our reviews. I’ve been reading a lot more books.” The finding around that quote is not that Kirkus was formally withdrawn. It is that collection work now means double- and triple-checking reviews and reading the book. Those reviews still score theme and genre. They do not rate s[*]xual content, violence, or language the way movies and music are rated. ALA rejects that kind of rating calling it “censorship.” Sites that do the work parents actually use—Rated Books, the old BookLooks sheets—are denounced as unprofessional by the same circle that AASL commended in Kelly Jensen’s weekly “censorship” roundup.50
That is the one-two punch the film cannot show. First the objector lacks the credential. Then she earns it and the credential is the problem. Tapley, the North Hunterdon mother, Marull, Baggett: four women, four jurisdictions, same omission. A picture about librarians under assault by Christian nationalists has no room for teachers the Association sued and mothers the district outed.
The same day their Hill piece ran, Florida’s education commissioner told every superintendent the pages are still on the shelf and that districts will be held to the harmful-to-minors statute. The letter names Beyond Magenta—the title that started Marull’s fight—and lists Escambia among the counties that already pulled after review. The film calls that compliance a purge. The state calls it the law.51
A school library is not the New York Public Library. It sits inside compulsory schooling, serves minors, and is paid for by the parents being told they are censors. A film that never sits with that distinction is not balanced. It is a brief.
The historical rhyme is doing the rest of the work: Nazi book-burning montages, McCarthy, Bette Davis in Storm Center (1956), Fahrenheit 451. Challenge procedures, relocation, and age-gating are not book burning. The montage exists so you will feel that they are.
Hickson’s “Fifth Graders Have Penises” Is a Category Error
New Jersey school librarian Martha Hickson is used as the researcher who “connected the dots” from Texas to Virginia to Hunterdon and who midwifed New Jersey’s Freedom to Read Act. In the film she recounts that she would have answered Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia—who said a penis is inappropriate for fifth grade—by reminding her that fifth graders have penises.13
Fantasia was talking about s[*]xual content placed in school collections for minors, not whether children have genitals. Hickson was a high school librarian. Fifth graders were not her patrons. The contested titles in her district were not anatomy charts. Parents cited graphic s[*]xual material in books such as Lawn Boy, Gender Queer, This Book Is Gay, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and later Let’s Talk About It.14
In other writing Hickson has gone further on Lawn Boy: “boys of every age touch each other’s penises. It happens.”15 That is not an answer to age, consent, parental notice, or whether a school library is the right venue. It is a smear-reversal: if you object to the pages, you must be scandalized by the existence of a body part. The film presents “there is no p[*]rnography for minors in school libraries” as a profession-wide fact. It does not put the pages on the screen and let the audience decide.
Hickson’s own Censorville monologue names the North Hunterdon-Voorhees Intellectual Freedom Fighters as her creation—library groupies and a family Democratic network, reactivated when “the fur is flying”—and is silent on EveryLibrary and Unite Against Book Bans, which her allies and the ALA president put in writing.43
The film uses a parent from the September 2021 North Hunterdon board meeting as the face of the attack on Hickson. The New York Times quoted that parent from the meeting video: the books “groom our kids”; “It grooms them to accept the inappropriate advances of an adult”; Hickson named for the checkout.39 That is not the same sentence as calling the librarian a s[*]x offender. Four and a half months later, Hickson’s counsel sent that parent a Rule 408 letter: potential defamation suit, accusations characterized as s[*]x crimes, fourteen days to talk, a hold on her social media, texts, and email. The parent did not return to the microphone.40 The picture keeps the board-night attack. It does not keep the letter, or the silence that followed it.
The film’s moral is that parents harass librarians. The record in this brief runs the other way. A North Hunterdon parent spoke, got a lawyer’s letter, and left the microphone. Tapley asked not to be searchable and then lived with the tape. Orland Park Public Library—the war Megan Fox and Kevin DuJan later put in Shut Up!—is the same sequence with the Association in the room: Office for Intellectual Freedom visits, a library spokesperson who sued the critics (this author among them; the case against him was dismissed), a trustee on tape using anti-gay slurs at a gay man.41 The profession tells the audience the parent is the bigot—racist, homophobic, anti-black, anti-LGBT. The same picture leaves black librarians off camera. The same institution’s local allies, in Orland Park, used anti-gay slurs at a gay man who was asking what was on the public terminals. The 2013 workshop notes already named Fox and DuJan as the people to sue. The charge the film levels at the parent is the conduct the record keeps finding on the other side of the desk.
It also does not tell you that Hickson was not a lone local. She is the librarian ALA held up to its own members as proof the national toolkit works.
On March 19, 2024, in a members-only ALA Town Hall, then-President Emily Drabinski walked through Unite Against Book Bans, chapter toolkits, and OneClickPolitics. Then she named Hickson:
The Unite Against Book Bans campaign … provide[s] information and toolkits about how to fight back, but it’s also a platform used to mobilize interested and concerned citizens when we see cases of censorship happening. … I was at a conference and Martha Hickson was there who some of you may know as school librarian in New Jersey. And when she faced a challenge at her school through that UABB platform, and other forms of organizing, 400 community members came and joined her to stand with her in that moment. So the Unite Against Book Bans platform facilitates that. … We know that local organizing is what wins the day, that ALA can’t come in and save places, but what we can do is provide the tools to the people who are on the ground doing that kind of organizing work.16
Interim Executive Director Leslie Burger, on the same call, added the Office for Intellectual Freedom, the UABB resource pile, chapter advocacy conferences, and ALA amicus briefs. Unite Against Book Bans states on its own site that it is “an initiative of the American Library Association.” It publishes an action toolkit with voter-tested talking points, instructions for packing school- and library-board meetings, and Book Résumés—downloadable one-pagers written to be handed to administrators and read at microphones so a challenged title has a pre-built defense.16
Hickson’s line in the film is that the parent campaign “is not organic.” Drabinski’s line to the membership is that when Hickson was challenged, a national ALA platform and “other forms of organizing” produced a crowd of 400. Both things can be partly true. Only one of them is in the movie. The film will show you Moms for Liberty and Patriot Mobile. It will not show you UABB, OneClickPolitics, Book Résumés, OIF, or the president of ALA using Hickson as the success story. That is the other half of “organized.”
Sitting next to that half is EveryLibrary, the 501(c)(4) library PAC founded by John Chrastka—ALA’s former Director for Membership Development. The two shops were not an accident of geography. An ALA executive-board document on the new PAC said the 501(c)(3) could not fund the 501(c)(4) directly, then added the point of the design: “We want to make sure that ALA members with a comprehensive understanding of ALA’s mission and advocacy goals are involved in EveryLibrary mission development, governance and ongoing work, and that the activities of the new 501(c)(4) complement the work of the ALA Office for Library Advocacy, Chapter Relations Office and Development Office.”17
Chrastka has said out loud, for years, how cheap and fast a “local” fight becomes once that shop arrives. In 2013 he told Publishers Weekly a Montana library campaign needed about a thousand dollars, not a hundred thousand: “We don’t need a $100,000, we need about $1,000 for materials and signs,” plus consulting and voter-segmentation training. EveryLibrary’s own FightForTheFirst pitch later put the offer on a flyer: up to $1,000, pro-bono consulting, digital tools, media attention, training. In 2026 he told Publishers Weekly the group is “the digital, fundraising, and financial backbone” for state Freedom-to-Read groups; a New Mexico site was “up in six hours,” with tech support, issue briefs, and PR. Form 990 filings describe creating and supporting local “Alliances” and writing checks to ballot committees. He has described more than 170 local campaigns.17
That network is not a credit in The Librarians. It is in the surrounding paper. EveryLibrary’s own media kit cites the North Hunterdon–Voorhees fight—Hickson’s district—and the “NH-V Intellectual Freedom Fighters” who formed to support “the school librarian.” Amanda Jones, in That Librarian, lists Chrastka among the organizational leaders who rallied to her. He does not have to walk on camera. The film’s “local librarian versus national right-wing money” frame collapses if the audience also sees a former ALA membership director seeding locals with a four-figure check, a website before lunch, and a fundraising stack.17
In April 2026, during National Library Week—after the film had already been on PBS—EveryLibrary launched Read. Lead. RUN! (ReadLeadRun.org). Chrastka’s line: “If we want strong libraries, we need more library champions in office.” The site and the companion posts name the offices that matter for collections: library boards, boards of trustees, school boards. They offer a two-hour course on how to file, fundraise, and find voters; a NationBuilder search for open seats; and a handoff to the Pipeline Fund, which Library Journal noted helps candidates “advance progressive policies once elected.” EveryLibrary says it will not endorse a named candidate. It will train the people who want the seat.18
Hold that next to Snyder. She told The Advocate she wanted viewers “outraged and activated.” She told The Hollywood Reporter the impact campaign would push down-ballot voting among book-club members. Read. Lead. RUN! is that activation with a filing packet. The film never has to say “crowd the parents off the board.” The PAC built the course that does the next step.
Follow the money and you get two letterheads, not a mystery billionaire. EveryLibrary the PAC is a 501(c)(4), EIN 46-1534149. Gifts are not tax-deductible; Schedule B names on a (c)(4) are usually stripped from the public 990. Revenue is modest and lumpy: about $421,000 (2023), $423,000 (2024), $213,000 (2025), all booked as contributions. Cause IQ’s grant table still shows $50,000 from the Long Ridge Action Fund and $10,000 from the Crawley Family Foundation in the 2024 cycle. The PAC’s own older annual report thanked vendor partners—Follett, Bibliotheca, Gale, EBSCO, SirsiDynix—as “capacity-builders.” Chrastka’s reported compensation from the PAC in the 2025 extract is $20,000, with more from the related (c)(3).19
The EveryLibrary Institute NFP is the 501(c)(3), EIN 81-4351204—tax-deductible research and “librarian training,” and the pot that can take foundation money. In August 2025 Mellon announced a $600,000 general-operating grant to the Institute to sustain work into 2026. The Institute’s 2025 annual report also thanks the Nora Roberts Family Foundation and Nora Roberts for Fight For The First, and author Julia Quinn for Fight For The First plus policy research. The published donor roll includes Crawley, Bookey, the Tow Foundation, the Dwight D. Opperman Foundation, and a string of donor-advised funds. The Institute’s donate page says it “create[s] tools and resources and provide[s] support for the activities of” the PAC. Mellon did not have to cut a check labeled Read. Lead. RUN! General operating on the (c)(3) side, plus a (c)(4) that exists to put people on ballots, is the structure.19
This is why the film can exist and a parent film usually cannot. Snyder had Independent Lens, ITVS, festival slots, an Emmy jury built to reward “profound social impact,” and a built-in profession that will screen the picture in 200 theaters then hand the viewer a board-filing packet. Parents get three minutes at the microphone and a clip in which they look angry. They do not get Mellon general operating, a 501(c)(4) that stands up a website in six hours, Book Résumés written in advance of the challenge, or a national PAC course on how to take the seat. Some parent groups exist. They are not an equivalent machine. Calling that “grassroots versus grassroots” is how the imbalance hides.
The missing witness is the kind of former child the collection actually touched. Maia Poet has said it in her own syntax: “I was 12 years old, struggling to accept I was gay. My school library didn’t help me—it pushed me to believe I was a boy.” On Substack she wrote that she spent hours in that library on books and articles that “reinforced the idea that my feelings of being ‘different’ and uncomfortable in my body meant I was actually a boy.” She later named “activist librarians” among the adults who, in her telling, derailed the childhood and will face no consequences.20 You do not have to appoint her the last word on every shelf. You do have to notice that The Librarians has no room for that testimony. An honest film would have sat her across from Hickson and Jones. A recruitment film cannot.
If the other side of the table is going to be funded—Mellon on the (c)(3), a PAC on the (c)(4), a PBS hour, an impact campaign into book clubs—then parents who want age-gating and notice will stay ornamental until they build something that can hire counsel, film their own record, and run for the same seats with more than a laptop and a three-minute clock. That is not a call to copy UABB’s morals. It is a description of why the present fight is fixed.
Jones Already Told the Profession How to Work Around “Not Modern” Parents
Amanda Jones is not a mystery witness the film discovered. She is the 2021 School Library Journal National School Librarian of the Year, former president of the Louisiana Association of School Librarians, an ALA award recipient, author of That Librarian, and a featured subject of The Librarians.21
In 2021, on Amy Hermon’s School Librarians United podcast, Jones described a summer program she built after “social unrest.” She said she had to be “very delicate” because “my district is not modern.” She did not mean her school. She meant “my community and some of the thinking.” “Some of the thinking is still back in the ’50s.”22
Then the method:
I knew that I wanted to teach my students some things, but I couldn’t outright say it, “This is what I’m teaching.” So I developed a program called the MESH Society to incorporate media literacy which we all should be teaching anyway. But ethics, sociology and history, but infuse some social justice in there without outright teaching social justice, if you read between the lines of what I’m saying.22
She defined the job:
I think a modern school librarian pushes things like graphic novels and audiobooks and social justice.22
And on routing s[*]x and consent past the parent base at elementary age:
Because I can’t teach, outright teach s@xual harassment and consent at a fifth grade school. My community would just, you know, even though it needs to be taught. But they can read Maybe He Just Likes You by Barbara Dee, which is written on a level four, the age group of my students. And I can encourage them to read that, and they can tell me what they have learned themselves.22
Read those lines again. The community is the problem. “Modern” is the librarian. Social justice rides in through a program that is not to be announced as social justice. A subject she says she cannot “outright teach” because parents would object is moved into a book she can encourage, after which the child reports what the book taught. That is not a conspiracy theory about Jones. That is Jones, training other librarians, in her own voice.
She has since described MESH in national press as a reading challenge “featuring books that I have chosen that are very diverse.”23 The 2021 version is the one that matters for the film. It is the version that says the quiet part about the parents.
I published those remarks in 2024 and called her ALA’s poster girl for a reason: the national script is that parents who object are a “tiny minority,” “not modern,” or a Christian-nationalist machine, while the professional reserves the right to decide what the child needs and how openly to say so.22 The Librarians is that script with a Nico Muhly score.
The Psychologists Already Have Names for That Script
The move is not a trademarked trick. It is a documented cluster. Albert Bandura called the main engine moral disengagement: people rarely drop their standards. They uncouple those standards from one act so they can keep the self-image of a decent professional while continuing the act. Leon Festinger described the rest. When two thoughts will not sit together—“I protect children” and “I am defending this page for this age”—the discomfort has to go somewhere. The reliable exits are to change the attitude so it matches the behavior, and to recruit other people so you are no longer alone with the flinch.24
Jones’s 2021 training is the uncoupling in one workplace. The film is the uncoupling sold to a nation.
Moral justification. The shelf decision is no longer a collection call about a minor. It is “the fight for democracy.” Snyder’s own letter says she did not expect “to be documenting a battle for the soul of American democracy.” Once the room is the soul of the republic, ordinary adult judgment about decency looks small.
Euphemism. “Ban” for a school library that relocates a title, age-gates it, or does not buy it. “Challenge” for a parent filling out the form the district printed. “Intellectual freedom” for a room that serves children who cannot vote and cannot leave. Eisenhower’s decency clause is the word the euphemism was built to erase.
Advantageous comparison. Nazi book burnings, Goebbels, McCarthy, Storm Center, Fahrenheit 451, a librarian sentenced to death on The Twilight Zone—then a mother at a microphone. The filmmaker does not have to say the parent is a Nazi. The montage asks the nervous system to finish the sentence.
Distortion of consequences. The page stays off camera. Harm to the librarian—harassment, firing, fear—replaces harm to the child who finds the drawing. If you never show Gender Queer or Let’s Talk About It, you never have to defend the page. Hickson’s “fifth graders have penises” is the same swap: anatomy for the actual objection.
Diffusion and displacement. “We follow process.” “We follow the Library Bill of Rights.” Jones’s later line is “librarians without borders.” UABB, Book Résumés, OIF, EveryLibrary, a PBS hour, an Emmy jury built for “profound social impact.” The more hands on the decision, the less any one hand has to feel it. In United States v. American Library Association (2003) the Court said libraries may make content-based collection decisions and that protecting minors from inappropriate material is a legitimate—even compelling—interest.25 The film does not sit with that holding. Responsibility moves upward onto a profession and outward onto a threat.
Festinger explains why the last reel has to be an ask. Public advocacy is not a side effect. It is the treatment. Once a librarian has testified, joined FReadom Fighters, appeared at Sundance, or accepted an Emmy as a class, going back to “maybe that image does not belong in the middle-grade section” would reopen the discomfort. Recruiting the next cohort spreads the cost. Snyder’s “outraged and activated,” Jones’s “now it’s a movement,” Wilson-Youngblood’s “now it’s everyone’s story,” Read. Lead. RUN!—those are not four separate campaigns. They are one exit from dissonance.
Diane Vaughan called the slow version normalization of deviance: a practice once recognized as a problem is gradually treated as ordinary. A supervisor agrees an image is inappropriate. A year later it “mirrors an experience tween readers may themselves experience.” A year after that it is an ALA award and a test of loyalty. The film presents the end state as the baseline. It does not show the earlier flinch.
“Intellectual freedom,” used this way, is a sacred value. Sacred values do not do cost-benefit analysis. That is why the Dartmouth sentence has to die at “read every book,” why the pages stay off screen, and why “developmentally appropriate”—a phrase the discussion guide still uses—is never allowed to disqualify a specific drawing. Christian nationalism, in the next reel, is what the sacred value needs as its opposite.
Christian Nationalism as the Master Key
The film does not treat “Christian nationalism” as one faction among several. It treats it as the hidden engine. Amanda Jones says she will not quite call her parents white Christian nationalists, then puts KKK and Aryan Nation density in the same parish. Chris Tackett is shown with a graphic of the alleged effects of Christian nationalism. Audrey Wilson-Youngblood asks whether the agenda is “power and money” or “a Christian theocracy,” or “one and the same.” A pastor warns that the danger is that book banning is “led by people who say they love God.” Steve Bannon on school boards, Patriot Mobile, Farris Wilks, and Moms for Liberty money fill in the rest.13
Some of the money-and-organization reporting is real. Coordinated challenge language traveled. School-board PACs exist. What the film then does is collapse every parent who does not want Gender Queer in a middle-school library into a theocratic project. Catholic and Baptist librarians are used as proof that good religion is on the librarians’ side. That is a moral sorting hat, not a map of American religion, and it is the same move Jones made when she ranked her neighbors as “still back in the ’50s.”
What the Film Is For
Wikipedia lists the production companies as K.A. Snyder Productions, Cuomo Cole Productions, ITVS, Ideal Partners, World of HA, Artemis Rising, and Pretty Matches. Independent Lens retained broadcast rights. Sarah Jessica Parker is an executive producer. Kim A. Snyder directed. It is not an ALA studio picture in the credits. It does not have to be. The heroes are ALA-aligned school librarians. The professional ethic is ALA’s. The use Snyder named—outrage, activation, support the librarian organizations as a firewall—is ALA’s use.12
Watch it that way and the devices line up:
What you are shown—Nazis, McCarthy, book burning; Eisenhower saying “read every book”; a hidden narrator unmasked at 1:26; parents as three-minute villains; “no p[*]rnography in school libraries”; Christian nationalism as the engine; Jones as the wounded hero.
What is left out—challenge forms, relocation, age-gating; “as long as it does not offend our own ideas of decency”; they had Audrey’s name the whole time; no interview that reads the page; the pages of the challenged books; parents who want notice and a line on s[*]x acts; Jones saying she “couldn’t outright say, ‘This is what I’m teaching’”; Board of Education v. Pico’s vulgarity and educational-unsuitability lane; the difference between a school shelf and a criminal obscenity trial; Judith Krug’s “get it out of there” (below); Tapley’s aftermath; the lawyer letter to the first North Hunterdon mother; Marull outed by her district; Baggett’s 12,000 emails and two lawsuits; the 2026 admission that the professional reviews do not do the work parents were mocked for doing.31
The professional story is that the parent is a bigot—racist, homophobic—for objecting to authors the Association has decided must stay. The same picture leaves black librarians off camera. Edith Campbell, writing on School Library Journal’s Pearl’s and Ruby’s while the film was new, said it opens on white women in Texas, Florida, New Jersey, and Louisiana, notes one Latine librarian, and that “Black librarians weren’t present in this movie.” She saw the documentary “replicating” the disappearance of the lives it claims to defend. You do not have to take her larger brief. You do have to notice the double standard: the parent is the racist; the cast is the default.36
The Granbury closed-door recording of a superintendent telling staff to pull titles to stay “out of a bind” is actual evidence. It does not need a Nazi montage behind it. The film wraps that evidence in a closed moral universe so the only adult with standing is the librarian.
What the Film Has to Erase: Pico
The disaster is not that an Emmy rewrites the United States Reports. It cannot. The disaster is that the film trains school boards, journalists, and voters to behave as if the only lawful off-ramp for a school book is a criminal finding of obscenity under Miller v. California (1973)—a test designed for adult speech in the marketplace, applied one title at a time by a judge, with a “serious value” prong that almost any published novel can meet. Unite Against Book Bans and ALA’s Office for Intellectual Freedom already talk that way. An OIF blog post in this fight says school and public libraries “do not circulate or possess materials ‘harmful to minors,’” that “p[*]rnography” has no legal meaning, and that none of the challenged titles have been adjudicated under Miller or Ginsberg. Therefore, the post says, the parents are lying.26 The instruction is older than the blog. Handwritten notes from a 2013 ALA/ILA crisis workshop: “ALA has advised not using word ‘p[*]rnography’ in policy.” That is why the people on camera keep saying there is no p[*]rnography in libraries. It comes from the Association.35 If that is the standard, nothing comes off. There are thousands of titles. There will never be thousands of trials. Stuart Baggish—the Florida prosecutor who won one of the rare modern obscenity convictions that survived to a cert denial, Mike Diana’s Boiled Angel zine—has spent this school fight saying the same thing in plainer English. Miller requires the work, taken as a whole, to be “utterly bereft of redeeming value.” “They will include a passage… a quote from Benjamin Franklin or something to give it political value, and that means it’s not obscene.” “Avoid using the term obscenity because they are choosing a battlefield that the left wants to fight on because they know they can win on that battlefield.” Use s[*]xually inappropriate for minors, or educationally unsuitable. Do not volunteer for Miller.27
That is not the Supreme Court’s school-library rule. In Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico (1982) the Court split. Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens, with Blackmun in part, said a board may not strip a school library simply because it dislikes the ideas in a book and wants to “prescribe what shall be orthodox.” That is the sentence UABB puts on posters. It is not the whole page. In the same opinion the students’ side implicitly conceded that an unconstitutional motive would not be shown if the books were removed because they were “pervasively vulgar.” The plurality treated “educational suitability” the same way: a legitimate ground. Justice White supplied the fifth vote only to send the case back for trial on motive. Four justices would have given boards still more room. There is no majority opinion announcing a student’s right to keep every title on a compulsory-school shelf.28
Steven Pico, the named student, went to an American Library Association meeting on Long Island to find a lawyer. ALA has been inside this case’s story from the start. What it sells now is the half of Brennan that forbids idea-suppression, detached from the half that leaves vulgarity and unsuitability in the board’s hands. The film does the same job with pictures. Nazi montages and “First Amendment heroes” collapse every age-gating request into orthodoxy-enforcement. Miller is then wheeled in as the only remaining test, because Miller is a test almost no school book will ever fail in court. That is the switch. It does not overrule Pico. It teaches the public to forget the part of Pico that still lets a district take Gender Queer out of the middle-school room without pretending the book has no ideas.
New Jersey wrote that forgetting into statute. The Freedom to Read Act (P.L. 2024, c. 96) recites Pico as if the Court had said only this: boards “may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books.” That is one sentence of a plurality. The statute does not quote the next sentence the film also needs you to forget—that removal for pervasive vulgarity or educational unsuitability was not before the Court, and was not barred. “Censorship” is then defined as removal for viewpoint or because someone finds the content offensive. Educational unsuitability is not in the definition. The off-ramp Pico left open is not in the finding. That is the permission slip in statutory form.42
Lower courts that actually read the whole page have said so. In 2022 the Eastern District of Missouri, in C.K.-W. v. Wentzville R-IV School District, refused to treat Pico as a majority rule and noted that later cases call its “rule of decision” unclear. It then did what the film will not do: it quoted the pages. Fun Home—illustrated oral s[*]x. All Boys Aren’t Blue—a first-person anal-s[*]x scene. Heavy—a child at a penis. “It is quite easy to see why a librarian would conclude that these books were not age appropriate.” The court added the sentence the film’s vocabulary cannot survive: a district “does not ‘ban’ a book when it decides not to continue possessing [the] book on its own library shelves.” Eugene Volokh flagged the decision the week it issued. Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) had already looked back at Pico and treated the authority to pull pervasively vulgar school material as something the Pico Court had not taken away.29 Wentzville is not an outlier theory. It is Pico applied to the titles UABB puts on Book Résumés.
The other Pico lane—educational suitability—has already been to the Supreme Court and come back intact. In 2009 the Eleventh Circuit, 2–1, upheld Miami-Dade’s removal of ¡Vamos a Cuba! / A Visit to Cuba from elementary and middle-school libraries. The board’s stated ground was factual inaccuracy about life in Castro’s Cuba, under a written criterion that nonfiction be “correct, recent, and objective.” Assuming Pico applied, the court held the First Amendment “does not forbid a School Board from removing a book because it contains factual inaccuracies.” The Freedom to Read Foundation—ALA’s litigation arm—filed an amicus brief with the ACLU side. The Supreme Court denied certiorari. The removal stood.30 So both grounds the Pico plurality left in the board’s hands have been used in real districts, on real shelves, after real lawsuits. Vulgarity in Wentzville. Unsuitability in Miami-Dade. The film mentions neither case. It cannot. Either one breaks the story that the only lawful move is to leave the book where Jones put it.
ALA has already lost the case it most needed to win on this point. In United States v. American Library Association (2003) the Association went to the Supreme Court to stop Congress from tying federal library funds to filters that keep p[*]rnography off public-library internet terminals. It lost. The Court said libraries may make content-based collection decisions and that protecting minors from inappropriate material is a legitimate—even compelling—interest.25 The Association’s subsequent practice is to talk as if that holding were a rumor. Recent Eighth Circuit work on Iowa’s bar of “descriptions or visual depictions of a s[*]x act” from school libraries has treated a school library as closer to curriculum than to a public square. The law is not frozen where the film needs it. The film is the tool for freezing the audience.
The profession once said the quiet part in its own voice. Judith Krug, the Office for Intellectual Freedom director who built Banned Books Week, was asked in 2006 whether a school should ever remove a book. “If it doesn’t fit your material selection policy, get it out of there.” She cabined the fight to materials “that adhere to the material selection statement that every school has, and that have been duly selected.”31 That is not UABB. That is not Snyder’s firewall. That is the woman whose project the Emmy night is now selling. The film cannot quote her either. “Get it out of there” is the sentence that makes “true heroes” with challenged books in the air look like a later invention.
That is why this picture is the crowning object in a sixty-year professional project. Not because it is a statute. Because it is the permission slip that tells the next board: if you touch the shelf, you are the book-burner, and the only way off the hook is a judge applying Miller to one title while a thousand others wait. UABB’s toolkits, Book Résumés, and packed meetings exist to make that the political reality even where it is not the legal one. Snyder wanted viewers “outraged and activated.” Activated against the half of Pico that still names decency.
Do Not Cede the Room
A school library is a room inside a school. The school is an agent of the public. The public includes the parents Jones ranked as not modern. If the professional ethic is “we know what the kids need, and we will not say it outright,” then handing collection policy to that ethic is not neutrality. It is a transfer of custody.
The Librarians wants you to feel that transfer as courage. Watch the movie. Then read the sentence they cut. Then read Jones in 2021. If you still want the national librarian script writing the shelves, do it with your eyes open. Get on the board yourself. Do not let the only adults in the room be the people who already told you they will work around you.
Follow the primary sources. Follow the pages. Follow who is asking you to be outraged, and at whom.
Related:
- Dan Kleinman, “The Librarians’ Emmy Win Is a Loss for Parents and Kids,” Washington Examiner, Sept. 16, 2026.
- “Shame on PBS: ‘The Librarians’ is one big lie to parents and kids,” The Hill, Feb. 2, 2026.
- “The Librarians Film is Agitprop…,” SafeLibraries, Feb. 9, 2026.
- “Poster Girl for ALA,” SafeLibraries, Feb. 16, 2024.
- “ALA Details How It Controls Communities Nationwide,” SafeLibraries, June 4, 2024.
- “ALA Details Bribes to Convince Governments to Sell Out Children,” SafeLibraries, March 12, 2024.
Endnotes
- Joy Holden, “Louisiana Librarian Who Fought Against Book Bans Will Be Featured on New PBS Documentary,” The Advocate (Baton Rouge), Feb. 6, 2026, quoting Kim A. Snyder (“both outraged and activated… organizations of librarians as they are the firewall”) and Amanda Jones on the 2026 screening campaign. https://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/entertainment_life/books/the-librarians-documentary-on-pbs-with-amanda-jones/article_3c8ce356-b77c-48df-92d5-e497956ec984.html.
- Television Academy, “Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking,” 78th Primetime Emmy Awards (2026), winner The Librarians (PBS); nominee The Tale of Silyan (National Geographic). https://www.televisionacademy.com/awards/nominees-winners/2026/exceptional-merit-in-documentary-filmmaking. “Primetime Emmy Award for Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking,” Wikipedia (current holder: The Librarians, 2026; first awarded 2005; 2005 winner Death in Gaza; judging language). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primetime_Emmy_Award_for_Exceptional_Merit_in_Documentary_Filmmaking. Academy of Television Arts & Sciences, Emmy Rules and Procedures, juried award no. 91: purpose “to both honor and encourage” (1) profound social impact, (2) significant innovation of form, (3) remarkable mastery of filmmaking technique; written statement required; ineligible for Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special. https://emmys.com/rules. Matthew Carey, “NatGeo’s ‘The Territory’… Wins Emmy for Exceptional Merit,” Deadline, Jan. 8, 2024 (same three-part purpose quoted from the TV Academy). https://deadline.com/2024/01/creative-arts-emmys-the-territory-exceptional-merit-in-documentary-filmmaking-award-1235698731/. Tom White / IDA, “Going for an Emmy: Exceptional Merit Award a Primetime Opportunity for Docmakers,” International Documentary Association, Apr. 27, 2016 (“greater good” kind of documentary; social impact as a judging pillar). https://www.documentary.org/blog/going-emmy-exceptional-merit-award-primetime-opportunity-docmakers. IMDb awards page for the film: 2026 winner, Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt34966678/awards/.
- Katie Kilkenny, “‘The Librarians’: War on Literature Is Still Being Waged,” Hollywood Reporter, Aug. 14, 2026 (impact campaign for down-ballot voting among book-club members; Banned Books Week streaming; Penguin Random House graphic-novel adaptation). https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-features/the-librarians-war-literature-1236670583/.
- Kara Yorio, “An Emmy Win and Powerful Moment of Collective Joy and Resistance,” School Library Journal, Sept. 10, 2026 (Snyder acceptance line; Foote “victorious”; Robillard on the “red carpet reading list,” midterms, “freedom to read is on the ballot,” school boards / library boards / city councils before early voting; Jones with Stamped; Hickson with Harriet the Spy). https://www.slj.com/story/An-Emmy-Win-Powerful-Moment-Collective-Joy-resistance.
- Carolyn Foote / Texas FReadom Fighters and Becky Calzada, “Joy & Determination: A Night at the Emmys!,” Sept. 10, 2026 (CNN origin; film as “call to action” for local elections; stage “felt like victory”; board-letter / committee / donate checklist; October 6 streaming; Banned Books Week theatrical window). https://txfreadomfighters.substack.com/p/joy-and-determination-a-night-at.
- “‘The Librarians’ Documentary Wins an Emmy,” I Love Libraries (American Library Association), Sept. 2026 (Snyder hero line reprinted; Jones photos; donate-to-ALA ask). https://ilovelibraries.org/article/the-librarians-documentary-wins-an-emmy/.
- Elissa Malespina, “The Librarians Won an Emmy. And This One Means Something.,” The AI School Librarian, Sept. 6, 2026 (personal claim on the prize; “appeared in an Emmy Award-winning film”; “accused of harming children for simply doing their jobs”; film as a record so no one can later say librarians overreacted). https://aischoollibrarian.substack.com/p/the-librarians-won-an-emmy-and-this.
- Dan Kleinman, “Shame on PBS: ‘The Librarians’ Is One Big Lie to Parents and Kids,” The Hill, Feb. 2, 2026 (Eisenhower chop; indecency as the live issue). https://thehill.com/opinion/education/5715291-shame-on-pbs-the-librarians-is-one-big-lie-to-parents-and-kids/. See also Dan Kleinman, “The Librarians Film Is Agitprop to Produce Outrage So American Library Association Librarians Can Continue Harming Children,” SafeLibraries, Feb. 9, 2026. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2026/02/the-librarians-film-is-agitprop.html.
- Dwight D. Eisenhower, Informal Commencement Remarks, Dartmouth College, June 14, 1953. Contemporary Transcript: “Don’t Join the Book-Burners,” Dartmouth Alumni Magazine, July 1953. https://archive.dartmouthalumnimagazine.com/article/1953/7/1/dont-join-the-book-burners. Library of Congress broadside printing of the same sentences, including “As Long as Any Document Does Not Offend Our Own Ideas of Decency. That Should Be the Only Censorship.” https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbpe.0980090c.
- Snopes, “Did Eisenhower Say, ‘Don’t Join the Book Burners’?,” Apr. 29, 2022, documenting both the authentic speech and the truncated meme that omits the decency clause. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/eisenhower-dont-join-book-burners/. Quote Investigator, Sept. 5, 2023, same full text from the next-day New York Times transcript. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2023/09/05/book-burners/.
- James Lindsay, “What Is Agitprop?,” New Discourses, May 2025 (agitprop as agitation plus propaganda; paltering as true-but-misleading presentation). https://newdiscourses.com/2025/05/what-is-agitprop/.
- The Librarians (2025 film), Wikipedia (director Kim A. Snyder; EP Sarah Jessica Parker / Pretty Matches; ITVS / Independent Lens broadcast rights; ~92-minute runtime; Moms for Liberty declined interview requests; production companies). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Librarians_(2025_film). Official site: https://thelibrariansfilm.com. Public transcript circulating as “The Librarians - Transcript, Film by Sarah Jessica Parker 2025,” Google Doc, including the 1:26:13–1:26:15 caption change from anonymous Texas librarian to Audrey Wilson-Youngblood. https://tinyurl.com/TheLibrariansTranscript. Film end mark in that transcript: 1:26:45.
- Same Circulating Transcript (Note 6): Hickson at North Hunterdon, the Freedom to Read Act / Dawn Fantasia Exchange and “Fifth Graders Have Penises”; Jones on white Christian nationalists / KKK-Aryan Nation density; Chris Tackett graphic; Wilson-Youngblood on theocracy; Rev. Dove on people “Who Say They Love God.” Cross-check Hickson’s NJ role and 2021–22 challenges: American Library Association, “Martha Hickson,” Lemony Snicket Prize biography. https://www.ala.org/winner/martha-hickson. Office for Intellectual Freedom Blog, “Martha Hickson, Students, and School Board Save 5 Challenged Titles,” Feb. 24, 2022. https://www.oif.ala.org/martha-hickson-students-and-school-board-save-5-challenged-titles/.
- Mike Deak, “North Hunterdon-Voorhees NJ School District Book Ban Rhetoric Returns,” MyCentralJersey / USA Today Network, Jan. 22, 2024 (titles named in the district fight; later Let’s Talk About It challenge). https://www.mycentraljersey.com/story/news/education/2024/01/22/north-hunterdon-voorhees-school-library-book-ban/72254361007/. Out In Jersey, “North Hunterdon-Voorhees Keeps ‘Let’s Talk About It’ on High School Library Shelves,” Aug. 9, 2024. https://outinjersey.net/north-hunterdon-voorhees-keeps-lets-talk-about-it-on-high-school-library-shelves/.
- Martha Hickson, in the collected essay volume excerpted at BibliOpen / associated pagination discussing the Lawn Boy board-meeting reading: “I Hate to Tell People, but Boys of Every Age Touch Each Other’s Penises. It Happens.” https://bibliopen.org/p/bopen/9781964098074/pdf.
- Emily Drabinski, ALA Town Hall (members only), March 19, 2024, on Unite Against Book Bans, the Hickson / 400-person mobilization, OneClickPolitics, and “Provide the Tools to the People Who Are on the Ground”; Leslie Burger on the same call on OIF, UABB, chapter advocacy training, and amicus briefs. Transcript as published and timed in Dan Kleinman, “ALA Details How It Controls Communities Nationwide: the Quiet Part Out Loud Now in Transcript Form,” SafeLibraries, June 4, 2024. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2024/06/ala-details-how-it-controls-communities.html. Shared Rev transcript of the town hall: Rev shared link. Unite Against Book Bans, “About Us”: “Unite Against Book Bans Is an Initiative of the American Library Association.” Action toolkit and Book Résumés described on the same site. https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/about/ and https://uniteagainstbookbans.org/toolkit/. ALA press release, “Unite Against Book Bans Announces a Free Book Résumé Resource,” Feb. 20, 2024, Deborah Caldwell-Stone, OIF. https://www.ala.org/news/2024/02/unite-against-book-bans-announces-free-book-resume-resource. Becky Calzada, “Unite Against Book Bans: Book Résumés,” OIF Blog, March 26, 2024. https://www.oif.ala.org/unite-against-book-bans-book-resumes/. ALA, Lemony Snicket Prize biography of Martha Hickson (association honor after the North Hunterdon fight). https://www.ala.org/winner/martha-hickson.
- John Chrastka Bio: Former ALA Director for Membership Development; Founder and Executive Director, Everylibrary (501(c)(4)). https://www.everylibrary.org/meet_our_staff. ALA Executive Board document on the creation of EveryLibrary (ebd12_7): the 501(c)(3) “Cannot Provide Direct Support to the New 501(c)(4),” but ALA members who understand “Ala’s Mission and Advocacy Goals” should be involved in EveryLibrary governance so its work “Complement[s]” the Office for Library Advocacy, Chapter Relations, and Development. https://alair.ala.org/bitstream/handle/11213/7035/ebd12_7_everylibrary.pdf. Calvin Reid, “Everylibrary Works to Help Libraries Raise Funding,” Publishers Weekly, June 28, 2013 (“We Don’t Need a $100,000… We Need About $1,000 for Materials and Signs”). https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/57979-everylibrary-works-to-help-libraries-raise-funding.html. EveryLibrary FightForTheFirst offer as documented in Dan Kleinman, “ALA Details Bribes to Convince Governments to Sell Out Children,” SafeLibraries, March 12, 2024 (up to $1k, pro-bono consulting, digital tools, media attention, training), with ProPublica 990 for EIN 46-1534149. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2024/03/ala-details-bribes.html and https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461534149. Nathalie op de Beeck / PW, “Everylibrary Assesses 2025 and Looks Ahead,” Jan. 21, 2026 (“Digital, Fundraising, and Financial Backbone”; site “Up in Six Hours”). https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/libraries/article/99514-everylibrary-assesses-2025-and-looks-forward-in-impact-report.html. David Masciotra, interview with Chrastka, Washington Monthly, May 14, 2026 (FightForTheFirst.org; “172 Local Campaigns”). https://washingtonmonthly.com/2026/05/14/library-book-bans-limited-government/. EveryLibrary media kit highlighting North Hunterdon–Voorhees / NH-V Intellectual Freedom Fighters “To Support the School Librarian.” https://assets.nationbuilder.com/votelibraries/pages/5618/attachments/original/1663348661/Everylibrary-MediaKit.pdf. Jonathan Haupt, review of Amanda Jones, That Librarian, Post and Courier, Nov. 3, 2024 (Jones lists “Everylibrary Founder John Chrastka”). https://www.postandcourier.com/features/book-review-amanda-jones-that-librarian/article_9c42e47a-939c-11ef-964a-7bc063e09645.html. Freedom to Read Foundation / ALA Executive Director report, Dec. 11, 2014: $1,000 grant to West Bend Parents for Free Speech; $5,000 grant to HP Kids (Highland Park, Texas), plus OIF letter and logistical support. http://www.ala.org/aboutala/sites/ala.org.aboutala/files/content/governance/officers/eb_documents/2014_2015ebdocuments/ebd12_12_exec_dir_rpt_11dec14.pdf.
- EveryLibrary, “Read. Lead. RUN!” campaign hub and redirect. https://readleadrun.org and https://www.everylibrary.org/readleadrun. EveryLibrary press release, April 19, 2026, quoting John Chrastka: “If We Want Strong Libraries, We Need More Library Champions in Office—at All Levels of Government.” Resources: how to file, campaign plan, fundraising, voters. https://www.everylibrary.org/readleadrunpr. EveryLibrary Action, “Want to Save Libraries? Run for Office,” April 21, 2026 (explicit list: library boards and boards of trustees; school boards; low filing fees). https://action.everylibrary.org/want_to_save_libraries_run_for_office. Lisa Peet, “Everylibrary Launches Read. Lead. RUN!,” Library Journal, May 11, 2026 (free resources; will not endorse individual campaigns; Pipeline Fund helps candidates “Advance Progressive Policies Once Elected”; NationBuilder open-office search). https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/everylibrary-launches-read-lead-run.
- EveryLibrary 501(c)(4), EIN 46-1534149, Propublica Nonprofit Explorer (FY 2023–2025 Revenue All Contributions; 2025 Revenue $213,499; Officer Pay Extract). https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/461534149. Cause IQ grant table: Long Ridge Action Fund $50,000 (2024); Crawley Family Foundation $10,000 (2024). https://www.causeiq.com/organizations/everylibrary,461534149/. EveryLibrary “Transparency and Political Action” page (claims it does not receive funding from large grantmaking organizations; points donors to GuideStar 990s). https://www.everylibrary.org/transparency-action. EveryLibrary 2020 Annual Report (vendor partners Follett Learning, Bibliotheca, Gale, EBSCO, SirsiDynix). https://www.everylibrary.org/2020annualreport. EveryLibrary Institute NFP 501(c)(3), EIN 81-4351204, ProPublica. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/814351204. “Mellon Foundation Awards Everylibrary Institute a $600,000 General Operating Support Grant,” Aug. 25, 2025. https://librarytechnology.org/pr/31644. EveryLibrary Institute 2025 Annual Report (Mellon general operating into 2026; Nora Roberts Family Foundation / Nora Roberts; Julia Quinn; donor roll). 2025 Annual Report PDF. Institute donate page: tools and support “For the Activities Of” the PAC. https://www.everylibraryinstitute.org/donation_form.
- Maia Poet (@thepeacepoet99), X, Feb. 15, 2025: “I Was 12 Years Old, Struggling to Accept I Was Gay. My School Library Didn’t Help Me—it Pushed Me to Believe I Was a Boy.” https://x.com/thepeacepoet99/status/1890649043933532480. Maia Poet, “How a Normal Adolescent Experience Sent Me into a Gender Identity Crisis,” Substack, March 1, 2025 (hours in the school library; books and articles that “Reinforced the Idea That … I Was Actually a Boy”). https://maiapoet.substack.com/p/how-a-normal-adolescent-experience. Rikki Schlott, “October 7th Made Me Realize Being Trans Is a Luxury Belief—so I’m Detransitioning,” New York Post, Feb. 20, 2025. https://nypost.com/2025/02/20/us-news/i-decided-to-detransition-after-living-in-israel-on-oct-7/. Columbia County, Ga., library-board coverage quoting her “Ideological Influences in My School Library” post: Erin Weeks, Augusta Press, June 4, 2025. https://theaugustapress.com/library-board-hears-citizens-as-debates-over-shelving-guidelines-continue/.
- Amanda Jones (librarian), Wikipedia (SLJ 2021 National School Librarian of the Year; LASL presidency; ALA Paul Howard Award; That Librarian, Bloomsbury 2024; The Librarians subject; 2022 Livingston Parish public-library speech and subsequent litigation). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amanda_Jones_(librarian). Alexandra Alter, “From School Librarian to Activist: ‘The Hate Level and the Vitriol Is Unreal,’” New York Times, Sept. 3, 2024. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/03/books/amanda-jones-librarian-book-bans.html.
- Amanda Jones, interview with Amy Hermon, School Librarians United podcast, 2021; transcript and sourcing as published in Dan Kleinman, “Poster Girl for ALA: ‘that Librarian’ Amanda Jones Indoctrinates Students Without Parents Knowing,” SafeLibraries, Feb. 16, 2024, including the “not modern” / “Back in the ’50s,” “Couldn’t Outright Say, ‘This Is What I’m Teaching,’” MESH / “Infuse Some Social Justice… Without Outright Teaching Social Justice, If You Read Between the Lines,” “Modern School Librarian Pushes… Social Justice,” and fifth-grade harassment-and-consent / Maybe He Just Likes You passages. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2024/02/poster-girl-for-ala.html. Contemporary report of the same remarks: Michael Lunsford, “Caught: Librarian Concealing Social Justice Push from Parents,” Citizens for a New Louisiana / NewLouisiana.org. https://www.newlouisiana.org/caught-librarian-concealing-social-justice-push-from-parents/. Podcast home: https://schoollibrariansunited.libsyn.com/.
- People Magazine Interview with Amanda Jones on MESH as a Reading Challenge “Featuring Books That I Have Chosen That Are Very Diverse,” Aug. 31, 2024. https://people.com/librarian-amanda-jones-fights-book-ban-memoir-exclusive-8703168.
- Albert Bandura, “Selective Activation and Disengagement of Moral Control,” Journal of Social Issues 46 (1990); “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities,” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 (1999); Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves (2016)—eight mechanisms, of which the film leans on moral justification, euphemistic labeling, advantageous comparison, displacement and diffusion of responsibility, and distortion of consequences. Leon Festinger, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957); Festinger and James M. Carlsmith, “Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58 (1959). Diane Vaughan, The Challenger Launch Decision (1996), on normalization of deviance. Kim A. Snyder, filmmaker letter in the Independent Lens / The Librarians engagement guide, on documenting “A Battle for the Soul of American Democracy.”
- United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003). ALA challenged the Children’s Internet Protection Act and lost. Libraries may make content-based collection decisions; Justice Kennedy, concurrence: the interest in protecting young library users from material inappropriate for minors is legitimate and, as the Court appeared to agree, compelling.
- Office for Intellectual Freedom, “Lies About Libraries (Part Two),” ALA Intellectual Freedom Blog, Jan. 16, 2026 (libraries “Do Not Circulate or Possess Materials ‘Harmful to Minors’”; “p[*]rnography” said to lack legal meaning; challenged books have not been adjudicated under Miller or Ginsberg; therefore parental claims are “lies”). https://www.oif.ala.org/lies-about-libraries-part-two/. Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (criminal obscenity test for adult speech: prurient interest, patent offensiveness under community standards, and lack of serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value when the work is taken as a whole). Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (1968) (variable obscenity / harmful-to-minors). Unite Against Book Bans is “an initiative of the American Library Association”; see note 15.
- Stuart Baggish, remarks transcribed in Dan Kleinman, “Details on Stopping Indoctrination in Schools and Libraries…,” SafeLibraries, Jan. 5, 2023 (Miller as “virtually impossible”; Franklin-quote example; “avoid using the term obscenity”; use s[*]xually inappropriate / educationally unsuitable instead). https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/01/details-on-stopping-indoctrination.html. The underlying conviction is the Pinellas County prosecution of Mike Diana for the zine Boiled Angel; the U.S. Supreme Court denied review in 1994.
- Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982). Brennan plurality (joined by Marshall and Stevens; Blackmun in part): boards may not remove school-library books “simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books.” Same opinion: respondents “implicitly concede that an unconstitutional motivation would not be demonstrated if it were shown that petitioners had decided to remove the books at issue because those books were pervasively vulgar”; educational suitability treated as a legitimate ground. White, J., concurred in the judgment only, to remand for trial on motive. Burger, C.J., joined by Powell, Rehnquist, and O’Connor, dissenting. No opinion commanded five votes on the First Amendment rule. Steven Pico’s account of going to an ALA meeting on Long Island for a lawyer: Newsday, June 25, 2022. https://www.newsday.com/long-island/education/book-ban-island-trees-schools-libraries-supreme-court-ps4vd5d5.
- C.K.-W. by & through T.K. v. Wentzville R-IV Sch. Dist., 619 F. Supp. 3d 906 (E.D. Mo. 2022) (no majority rule in Pico; “rule of decision” unclear; removal of Fun Home, All Boys Aren’t Blue, and Heavy for lascivious / age-inappropriate content; “does not ‘ban’ a book When It Decides Not to Continue Possessing [the] Book on Its Own Library Shelves”). Eugene Volokh, “Removal of Books With ‘Lascivious Content’ from School Libraries Likely Constitutionally Permissible,” Reason / Volokh Conspiracy, Aug. 9, 2022. https://reason.com/volokh/2022/08/09/removal-of-books-with-lascivious-content-from-school-libraries-likely-not-unconstitutional/. Bethel Sch. Dist. No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986) (looking back at Pico on a board’s authority over vulgar school material). See also Griswold v. Driscoll, 616 F.3d 53 (1st Cir. 2010); Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
- ACLU of Fla., Inc. v. Miami-Dade Cnty. Sch. Bd., 557 F.3d 1177 (11th Cir. 2009) (2–1) (assuming Pico, removal of ¡Vamos a Cuba! / A Visit to Cuba for factual inaccuracy did not violate the First Amendment; “does not forbid a School Board from Removing a Book Because It Contains Factual Inaccuracies”), cert. denied, 558 U.S. 1023 (2009) (No. 08-1564). Freedom to Read Foundation amicus with the ACLU side: OIF Blog, Feb. 6, 2009. https://www.oif.ala.org/court-upholds-removal-of-a-visit-to-cuba-from-miami-schools-decision-to-be-appealed/. Contemporary write-up: Dan Kleinman, “Cert Denied: Vamos a Cuba…,” SafeLibraries, Nov. 17, 2009. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2009/11/cert-denied-vamos-cuba-cuban-americans.html.
- Judith Krug, interview in “Marking 25 Years of Banned Books Week,” Curriculum Review 46 (Sept. 2006): 12: “If it doesn’t fit your material selection policy, get it out of there.” Contemporaneous reprint and discussion: Dan Kleinman, “Marking 25 Years of Banned Books Week: An Interview with Judith Krug,” SafeLibraries, Sept. 23, 2011. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2011/09/marking-25-years-of-banned-books-week.html.
- PEN America, “PEN America x The Librarians Action Hub” (screenings, watch parties, advocacy trainings, letters to boards, “vote down ballot”; “impact campaign” for “hyperlocal civic engagement”; Texas Freedom to Read Project named). https://pen.org/the-librarians-screening-series/.
- Jennifer Tapley, Santa Rosa County, Fla., Oct. 25, 2023, sheriff’s-office visit and request that her name not be searchable: Judd Legum, “Moms for Liberty Members Call the Cops on Florida Librarians,” Popular Information, Nov. 6, 2023 (call and bodycam obtained by public-records request; narrated short posted to YouTube). https://popular.info/p/moms-for-liberty-members-call-the. Full sheriff video as posted: archived YouTube. Contemporary naming and Tapley’s post-leak statement that release was “an epic failure of the sheriff’s anonymous reporting program”: Madison Arnold / Brittany Misencik, Pensacola News Journal, Nov. 8, 2023. https://www.pnj.com/story/news/education/2023/11/08/school-board-candidate-calls-cops-on-librarians-over-pornographic-books/71487021007/. UK syndication of the short package: The Independent, Nov. 8, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7RAohjYbT4.
- Philomena Polefrone et al., Out of Circulation: Expanding Censorship in Public Libraries, PEN America, Sept. 1, 2026 (“Many of these attacks were documented in the 2024 film from Kim A. Snyder, The Librarians”). No mention of the Santa Rosa sheriff’s-office parent, the request for anonymity, or the bodycam. https://pen.org/report/out-of-circulation/.
- Handwritten notes, ALA/ILA crisis-communications workshop, Dec. 17, 2013: “ALA has advised not using word ‘p[*]rnography’ in policy”; also “Defimation Attorney costs up to 5 hundred thousand.” Document as published: Google Drive scan. Contemporaneous publication and later destroy-the-record mail: Dan Kleinman, “Brave Librarian Speaks Out…,” SafeLibraries, Jan. 21, 2017, https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2017/01/brave-librarian-speaks-out.html; “Librarians Ordered to Destroy Public Documents…,” SafeLibraries, Apr. 26, 2018, https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2018/04/librarians-ordered-to-destroy.html.
- Edith Campbell, “The Librarians and the Censorship of the Black Child,” Pearl’s and Ruby’s / School Library Journal, Feb. 20, 2026. https://pearlsandrubys.slj.com/2026/02/20/the-librarians-and-the-censorship-of-the-black-child/.
- Jennifer Tapley, written statement, “My Harassment Over Books,” provided for publication via Vicki Baggett to Dan Kleinman, Sept. 2026. Printed above. Allegations concerning an unnamed librarian’s husband, a principal, and Judd Legum’s self-identification on the phone are her account.
- PBS / THIRTEEN transcript of The Librarians: the Santa Rosa lobby line “The governor says this is child p[*]rnography” is followed by Julie Miller, Clay County: “In June, one of the Moms for Liberty in our area had posted a video about the second book in the Court of Thorns and Roses series, and she tagged all of the schools that had the book in their library. So then the district decided to just quietly pull the books from the shelves and delete them.” https://www.thirteen.org/programs/independent-lens/the-librarians-ubgpbk/. Miller later described the Facebook video to WJCT as “a mom of a local school” tagging high-school pages (First Coast Connect, Feb. 24, 2026). Clay County (Jacksonville area) and Santa Rosa County (Milton / Pensacola) are not the same “area.”
- Elizabeth A. Harris and Alexandra Alter, “With Rising Book Bans, Librarians Have Come Under Attack,” New York Times, July 6, 2022 (archived). Names Gina DeLusant and quotes the September 2021 North Hunterdon meeting video. https://web.archive.org/web/20220706091112/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/books/book-ban-librarians.html.
- Letter of Gregg L. Zeff, Zeff Law Firm, to Gina Delusant, Feb. 15, 2022, Re: “Martha Hickson’s Potential Lawsuit,” marked for settlement under N.J.R.E. 408 / Fed. R. Evid. 408; litigation hold on electronic content. In the author’s possession; printed with counsel’s approval. Street address omitted. The letter characterizes the September 2021 comments as calling Hickson a “s[*]x offender” and claiming she was “grooming children for s[*]xual abuse.” Compare the Times quotations from the same meeting in note 39.
 |
| Redacted Feb. 15, 2022 letter from Gregg L. Zeff to a North Hunterdon parent, Re: “Martha Hickson’s Potential Lawsuit.” Settlement marking and litigation hold on the original. |
 |
| Page 2 of 2. |
 |
| Cover of book by FoxDuJan. |
Megan Fox and Kevin DuJan, Shut Up!: The Bizarre War That One Public Library Waged Against the First Amendment (CreateSpace, 2016). July 8, 2014 sidewalk tape and description: Megan Fox, “OPPL Spokesperson commits Disorderly Conduct…,” YouTube, July 8, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idu0lur4OCc. Bridget Bittman v. Fox, DuJan, Kleinman, et al., No. 14-cv-8191 (N.D. Ill.); Kleinman dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, May 16, 2016 (Tharp, J.). Contemporaneous reporting: Lisa Peet, Library Journal, Aug. 2, 2016. The 2013 workshop notes naming Fox and DuJan are in note 35.- Freedom to Read Act, P.L. 2024, c. 96 (A3446/S2421), signed Dec. 9, 2024, N.J.S.A. 18A:34A-1 et seq. Legislative findings quote Bd. of Ed. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982), only for the “dislike the ideas / prescribe what shall be orthodox” sentence. They do not recite Brennan’s reservation that the case did not involve removal for educational unsuitability or pervasive vulgarity, and they do not note the judgment was a plurality. Definition of “censorship”: block, suppress, or remove “based on disagreement with a viewpoint, idea, or concept or solely because an individual finds certain content offensive,” excluding only restriction of material “deemed developmentally inappropriate for certain students.” Chaptered text: https://legiscan.com/NJ/text/A3446/id/3122231. DOE summary: https://www.nj.gov/education/standards/ftra.shtml.
- Trouble in Censorville, “Martha Hickson,” video testimonial (actor or first-person per the project’s method), YouTube, https://youtu.be/v1UqPMUgG-I. Printed chapter matches: Hickson assembled NHV-IFF in 2019 from “library groupies” and her brother’s Democratic network, then reactivated it. EveryLibrary, “The Book Stays at North Hunterdon High,” May 16, 2024: “stood alongside Martha Hickson … and the North Hunterdon-Voorhees Intellectual Freedom Fighters (NHV-IFF) since the beginning”; Hickson later joined the EveryLibrary Institute board; Fight for the First petition for the district. https://www.everylibrary.org/book_stays_north_hunterdon_high. Fight for the First petition: https://www.fightforthefirst.org/petitions/stop-the-nh-v-book-ban. Emily Drabinski, ALA members-only town hall, March 2024, as quoted in the Examiner cut: UABB and “other forms of organizing” produced 400 people; “What we can do is provide the tools.” Hickson on EveryLibrary’s FFTF anniversary page: the platform put “hundreds of community members … by my side” and at the state level for the Freedom to Read bill.
- EveryLibrary Action, “Librarians Won the Emmys!,” posted Sept. 15, 2026. https://action.everylibrary.org/emmys. Copy: “But an Emmy doesn’t stop a book ban.” “Turn this moment of recognition into a moment of action.” Email or postcard legislators to “oppose book bans and defend librarians and the freedom to read”; share; donate. The page is the impact campaign in one URL: the juried statue as a call list.
- The Librarians Film, “Resources,” https://thelibrariansfilm.com/resources/. Official discussion guide (v260216) tells hosts to “guide activated audience members” to that URL: https://thelibrariansfilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/LIB_Discussion-Guide.pdf. Independent Lens engagement guide: moderated discussion and local-librarian panel after the credits. Film Facebook / Gathr captain steps: “Invite your community’s school and public librarians to participate in a post-screening conversation.”
- Television Academy listing for Exceptional Merit in Documentary Filmmaking credits the filmmakers, not the on-screen librarians; see note 2. School Library Journal, “An Emmy Win and Powerful Moment of Collective Joy and Resistance,” Sept. 10, 2026 (Phil McCarten photos of the stage party). https://www.slj.com/story/An-Emmy-Win-Powerful-Moment-Collective-Joy-resistance. EveryLibrary Action slogan: note 44.
- Judd Legum, “Trump Allies Are Deploying This ‘Book-Banning Pastor’ to Local School Districts,” Mother Jones / Popular Information, March 7, 2025. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/03/trump-john-amanchukwu-book-banning-pastor-turning-point-usa-tour-school-district-board-meetings/
- Crystal Marull and Vicki Baggett, “In Education, ‘Trust the Experts’ Is a Scam to Silence Even Expert Dissent,” The Hill, Sept. 22, 2026. https://thehill.com/opinion/education/6102004-ala-school-library-book-controversy/. PEN America et al. v. Escambia County School Board names Baggett’s May 23, 2022 reconsideration form as the start of the removals at issue.
- Crystal Marull, “My Nightmare Fight with School to Protect My Kids,” Christian Post, Sept. 23, 2024. https://www.christianpost.com/voices/my-nightmare-fight-with-school-to-protect-my-kids.html. Alachua Chronicle letters, 2024–25, on hearings and later retaliation against her son. Crystal Marull, letter, Alachua Chronicle, Aug. 24, 2025 (diplomat/dictator confusion; threats reported to police). https://alachuachronicle.com/marull-allegations-that-student-wanted-to-be-a-dictator-result-from-former-friends-confusion-between-diplomat-and-dictator/. WCJB, Oct. 24, 2025 (teacher Watts’s filing; 2023 “Most Likely to Become a Dictator” superlative; Hitlerphile remark). https://www.wcjb.com/2025/10/24/alachua-county-teacher-accuses-state-violating-her-due-process-dictator-award-complaint/
- Misty S. Schattle and Johnny R. O’Connor, Jr., “Books and Barriers: The Influence of Book Censorship on the Role of School Librarians, Their Self-Efficacy, and Well-Being,” School Library Research 29 (2026). Quote is participant “Anna,” theme “Spending Significantly More Time on Collection Development.” PDF: https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2026-06/schattleandoconnor.pdf. Marull and Baggett, The Hill, note 48 (they cite this line as librarians admitting the reviews don’t work; ALA rejection of content ratings). Kelly Jensen, “The Tools Book Banners Are Using to Target Books in 2026,” Book Riot, July 24, 2026 (RatedBooks.org as a “tool” of banners; BookLooks as predecessor). https://bookriot.com/tools-used-by-book-banners-2026/. AASL, “AASL Commends Book Riot’s Weekly Censorship Roundup and Archives by Kelly Jensen,” Aug. 2023. https://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2023/08/aasl-commends-book-riots-weekly-censorship-roundup-and-archives-kelly-jensen
- Florida Department of Education (@EducationFL), Sept. 23, 2026. https://x.com/EducationFL/status/2102898445812187619. Commissioner Henry Mack letter to superintendents and charter leaders, same date: age- and developmentally appropriate materials only; harmful-to-minors statute; training, collection-integrity review, 30-day clock, funding consequences. PDF: https://www.fldoe.org/file/20966/cc-drsrmslcm.pdf. Letter excerpts include Beyond Magenta and notes Clay, Escambia, and Nassau as districts that have already removed or discontinued substantial numbers after review.
Note on wording: Jones has sued critics over characterizations of her speech and of library holdings. The block quotations above are her words from a professional podcast, already published. This post does not restate third-party epithets. It asks the reader to watch the film with those sentences in the other hand.
The above is so damning of the ALA that librarians are spreading the word to not even look at this post because of the claim it's a "screed" and nothing new has been presented, despite the breaking news of two separate families harassed by librarians and the details they provide. There is never honest dialogue with these people. The goal is whatever it takes to indoctrinate children.
