Texas Freedom to Lie Project

Texas Freedom to Read Project (TXFTRP) has been caught in a Texas-sized lie.

But first, a bit of background.

If you’ve never heard of TXFTRP, it’s the main ALA astroturf group operating out of Texas. EveryLibrary, a de facto subgroup of ALA, is heavily involved in TXFTRP and has been from the beginning. Both organizations openly acknowledge their close ties.

From TXFTRP:

"The support of EveryLibrary has been instrumental in the launch and the ongoing work of the Texas Freedom to Read Project. As attempts at censorship and book banning have skyrocketed across the state of Texas, the need to protect our First Amendment rights is more important than ever. We are incredibly grateful for and look forward to a continued partnership with EveryLibrary. We are optimistic about the future of Texas as we FightForTheFirst [sic]." - Laney Hawes, Texas Freedom to Read Project. (emphasis added)

Statement from TXFTRP founder thanking EveryLibrary

From EveryLibrary:

EveryLibrary works to support communities who are fighting against book bans and censorship by providing a wide range of pro-bono tools, data, funding and training. We previously provided the Florida Freedom To Read Project with a sophisticated website built on the NationBuilder platform. Now, we are excited to provide the same tools to a group of advocates in Texas who are fighting against censorship in school and public libraries across the state. This group is called the Texas Freedom to Read Project and you can visit their website at txftrp.org and sign their petition to get involved. We are also providing them with many of the tools and resources that they need to win! See their press release below for more information. (emphasis added)

Statement from EveryLibrary on TXFTRP launch

Note the mention of “Fight for the First” in TXFTRP’s blurb. Fight For The First is—in the words of EveryLibrary founder and Executive Director John Chrastka—“basically change.org for libraries.” It’s a plug-and-play platform developed by EveryLibrary to get ALA astroturf groups up and running in minutes (source).

Fight for the First “About” page citing EveryLibrary’s role

As an EveryLibrary clone with a Texas twang, TXFTRP is scarcely different from the many other ALA-inspired, ALA-funded, ALA-trained organizations around the country. (For a refresher, here are the ALA/EveryLibrary agenda and playbook.)

To be clear, there’s nothing wrong with an advocacy group seeking outside help with its operations or funding. But just know that TXFTRP is no more organic or independent than any other ALA astroturf group.

Which brings us to the present day.

On March 11, TXFTRP published an article saying that, as of February 2026, New Braunfels Independent School District (NBISD) had “banned” 600+ books and aged up 800+ books (i.e., moved them from middle school to high school libraries).

TXFTRP article with scary headline and even scarier subhead

TXFTRP allegation that NBISD has removed or aged up nearly 1500 books

NBISD’s supposed actions were in response to SB 13, a bill passed in the 89th Texas Legislature that was signed into law June 2025 and took effect September 2025.

That bill strengthened protections for public school children by prohibiting library materials that are harmful, obscene, pervasively vulgar, educationally unsuitable, or contain indecent or profane content. Naturally, TXFTRP fought it tooth and nail.

NBISD, along with other school districts around the state, undertook a review of its library collection to ensure it was in compliance with SB 13. TXFTRP, sensing a scoop, requested records from the district pertaining to this review.

After analyzing the data provided to it by NBISD, TXFTRP thought it had a bombshell on its hands. Instead, it had a nothingburger.

Here’s why: At the time the article was published, TXFTRP didn’t know the real number of books NBISD had supposedly removed, since they were going off spreadsheets instead of querying the catalog directly. And in fact it had no way of knowing, since NBISD’s review wouldn’t be completed for another 3 months.

TXFTRP admitted as much, albeit in the final paragraph:

A note on our data and information provided.

We acknowledge there are discrepancies between the "Books Pulled by Who and Why" spreadsheets and NBISD Library Catalogs which still show some of the "weeded: SB 13," aged up, and restricted titles listed as "available." New Braunfels ISD provided the "Books Pulled by Who and Why" spreadsheets in response to a request for records of books "removed" or "deleted" since June 1, 2025, so that is what our conclusions and statements are based on. Unless we are otherwise informed, we anticipate the books listed as "weeded: SB 13" in the spreadsheets provided by NBISD have already been, or will imminently, be removed. (emphasis added)

Disclaimer at bottom of TXFTRP article on NBISD “book bans”

While the disclaimer attempted to clarify what was and wasn’t known, the article itself showed no such restraint. Here’s a sampling:

[Headline] New Braunfels ISD bans 600+ books, ages up 800+ titles using AI & overly-restrictive selection criteria.

[Subhead] Lonesome Dove, The Tattooist of Auschwitz, Guinness World Records & The Three Musketeers among hundreds of books removed from school library collections. ...

The school libraries may be open- but according to public documents obtained by a volunteer for Texas Freedom to Read Project- books are being removed and restricted at an alarming rate. ...

As of February 2026, New Braunfels ISD has removed more than 600 books from its high schools in response to new laws. Additionally, over 800 books have been removed from district middle schools and aged up to the high schools and approximately 60 titles have been removed from New Braunfels ISD elementary school libraries.

While over 450 books are publicly listed as “under review” on the district website, others have been quietly removed behind the scenes. In total, 678 titles are listed on internal tracking logs, obtained through public information requests, as “weeded: SB13.” (emphasis added)

TXFTRP made hay of the titles in the NBISD spreadsheets, stoking alarm across its platforms that beloved classics like Charlotte’s Web and The Three Musketeers were being removed from school libraries in an unprecedented act of censorship.

The sensationalistic narrative was amplified by friendly media outlets like KSAT (ABC affiliate in San Antonio) and the San Antonio Current. Even ALA fellow traveler PEN America got in on the action. They all repeated TXFTRP’s claims uncritically.

When confronted with their methodological errors and NBISD-sourced data showing far lower numbers than those in the article, TXFTRP doubled down.

Finally, on May 1, NBISD published the results of its review: 72 books were preemptively removed before the review commenced; 161 books were deemed non-compliant; 28 were aged up; and 218 were deemed compliant.

Those numbers were rather different from those cited by TXFTRP, to put it mildly. Here are both sets of numbers for comparison:

	TXFTRP Number	NBISD Number	Difference
Preemptively Removed	?	72	?
Non-Compliant	660+	161	500+
Aged Up	800+	28	~800
Compliant	?	218	?

It turns out TXFTRP over-reported the number of books removed by more than five hundred and the number of books aged up by around eight hundred.

TXFTRP will argue that they based their conclusions on data provided by the district—which, technically, is true.

However, they failed to ask some (pretty important!) questions:

1. Does the presence of a book on a spreadsheet mean it has been or will be permanently removed from the library’s collection?
2. What exactly does the “Weeded: SB13” label mean?

The answer to the first question is “Probably not,” or if one wishes to be charitable, “Not necessarily.” In fact, the answer was no, but TXFTRP never checked. Instead, it presented its assumptions as faits accomplis.

The answer to the second question would have been readily provided by the district, had TXFTRP bothered to ask. That job fell to a reporter for the New Braunfels Herald-Zeitung, who dropped this nugget in a story published after the NBISD review was complete:

The district stated that books labeled “weeded: SB13” were not necessarily removed for noncompliance, but because SB 13 prompted librarians to conduct a deeper review of their collections. One major factor in removal was age appropriateness, which could include considerations such as reading level, interest level or catalog “adult” designations.The district also notes that publisher’s reviews evolve over time, so librarians make judgments based on the most up to date information and move books as appropriate. (emphasis added)

It’s now clear that TXFTRP (willfully?) misinterpreted the internal labels the district assigned to books during its review. They thought—or rather, assumed, because it fit the narrative—that “Weeded: SB13” meant the book had been or would be removed. This turned out to be false. Nevertheless, it formed the basis for the article’s most sensational claims.

But the article was not just inaccurate; it was pure fear-mongering. TXFTRP’s objective was to generate outrage over a law designed to protect children in order to secure its repeal. And they were willing to spread falsehoods to achieve it.

That ain’t right, y’all.

—

URL of this page: https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2026/05/texas-freedom-to-lie-project.html

Follow Protect Salado Kids on X: @ProtectSaladoKs

Follow Kelly on X: @patriotesse

Follow Dan on X: @OccupyLibraries @SafeLibraries @WLibraryA

Join World Library Association: WorldLibraryAssociation.org

Legal Defense for SLAPP Suits Against Free Speech

Librarians Who Intentionally, Knowingly, or Recklessly Expose Children to Harmful Content Should Be In Fear; Toni Morrison May Be Inappropriate In Schools

Rare to hear it stated out loud, "teachers and librarians that intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly expose children to harmful content should be in fear in the state of Texas."  This was stated by Texas Representative Mitch Little in support of Texas Senate Bill 412 (2025) relating to defenses to prosecution for certain offenses including penal code 43.24 involving material or conduct that is obscene or otherwise harmful to children.  

SB 412 is currently awaiting the Texas Governor Greg Abbott's signature.  

See also:

• "Bill Targeting Explicit Library Materials in Schools Clears House and Senate; It's the First Texas GOP Priority Bill to Make Its Way To the Governor," by Brandon Waltens, Texas Scorecard, 2 May 2025:

The bill removes broad exemptions in Texas law that currently shield school officials, librarians, and others from prosecution for distributing material deemed harmful to minors, so long as it is for an "educational purpose." 

....

Christin Bentley, who chairs the party’s subcommittee on protecting Texas children, celebrated the win.

“There is NEVER a reason to give a child p[*]rn and there is NEVER a reason to have a child perform s[*]xually for an adult. For 52 years, Texas law has said otherwise, allowing ridiculous legal justifications for both of those things. Today, that changed,” said Bentley.

Texas is taking away the legal exemption that allows school librarians to s[*]xualize school children in schools using public taxpayer money to carry out American Library Association goals it's been working on to indoctrinate school children for about 60 years.

Other states need to follow suit.  It is notable that American Library Association tries to insert such exemptions into state laws with laws like the Freedom to Read Act or the Right to Read Act—because they know that makes it easier for school librarians to indoctrinate and s[*]xualize school children using taxpayer funding.

Any school librarian or library organization or local parents group created by ALA who opposes this comprises you-know-whats.  

Oh look, they oppose Texas SB 13 as well.  They say it will "destroy public school libraries in Texas."  No, it will destroy ALA's ability to get school librarians to indoctrinate Texas children in their schools.  So submit public comment in favor of SB 13 here: https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c400.  SB 13 is by Senator Paxton.  The bill lays out specific language that schools cannot have s[*]xually explicit, vulgar or other harmful materials in their libraries.

Here is a transcript of exactly what was said by Rep. Mitch Little about SB 412 in his video shown below.  Enjoy.  He even indirectly exposes the Toni Morrison lie, you know, where American Library Association says if you oppose her prize-winning books in schools, the ones with bestiality, etc., it's because you're racist and hate black skin.

T  R  A  N  S  C  R  I  P  T

Mr. Speaker:

Mr. Little in support of the bill.

Mr. Little:

Thank you, Mr. Speaker, members. I'm going to try to bring the temperature down a little bit and talk about just the legal aspects of this bill, which I think are very important for you to consider. Um. With great uh respect and consideration for my esteemed colleague, Representative Zwiener, this is not a complex bill. It is a very simple bill. It's two pages long. One of the sections dealing with the revocation of affirmative defenses deals with sexual performance by a child. As a lawyer, it is very difficult for me to understand how a legislature in the past implemented or wrote into law affirmative defenses to sexual performance by a child that included bona fide educational, psychiatric, or other governmental purposes besides judicial and law enforcement. It simply makes no sense. It never should have been there.

I understand that a lot of our discussion so far has revolved around harmful content and what constitutes harmful content under Texas law. Respectfully, that is not the purpose of the bill. And one thing I want you to consider is, should there ever be an educational, a scientific, or psychiatric or psychological reason to display harmful content for a child. And I would contend that the answer to that is, no, there should never be a reason for that. It is called harmful content for a reason. Because it is harmful. 

Representative Zwiener expressed concerns that this is going to put teachers or librarians in fear. And ladies and gentlemen, I would submit to you humbly, teachers and librarians that intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly expose children to harmful content should be in fear in the state of Texas.

I know there is extreme concern also from our colleagues on the other side of the aisle that Nobel Prize winning literature should be offered to children. And I think, of course, in most situations, it should. However, there are situations where unbelievably accomplished authors, such as Toni Morrison, will have written pieces of literature, and that's what they are, pieces of literature, that are not appropriate for a school-aged child. And I think we, as reasonable people, should agree that certain works of literature are too mature for children to be subjected to in schools. As accomplished as those authors are and as important as those works of literature are, they shouldn't be exposed to children in schools.

Representative Zwiener, in our chamber here, expressed concern that we need to, quote, I had to write these words down because I was shocked that they came out of her mouth, "show children what sexual assault looks like." That is not the purpose of the school. It is not the purpose of a school in the state of Texas; it should not be the purpose of a school anywhere in the United States of America.

We have written many bills this legislative session about sexual assault. I have co-authored and joint authored many of them by many of you in here. There are important changes that have been made to the law by Representative Johnson, Representative Howard, many of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle. And there is an appropriate time and place to make changes to the law about sexual assault. Educating people through pictures of sexual assault in a school is a bridge too far, and I hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will agree. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

Speaker 3:

Well done.

O  R  I  G  I  N  A  L   S  P  E  E  C  H

My floor speech in favor of @mayes_middleton and @JaredLPatterson’s Senate Bill 412, an @TexasGOP priority bill protecting Texas children. Thank you @Bentley4Texas for your tireless advocacy! pic.twitter.com/VCU9MawDCZ

— Rep. Mitch Little (@realmitchlittle) May 2, 2025

—

URL of this page: 

safelibraries.blogspot.com/2025/05/librarians-who-intentionally.html 

On Twitter: 

Follow @SafeLibraries Follow @SexHarassed Follow @WLibraryA

Join World Library Association:

WorldLibraryAssociation.org

If you like reporting like this, chip in a little please:
Legal Defense for SLAPP Suits Against Free Speech