Showing posts with label PrivacyInvadedByLibrary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PrivacyInvadedByLibrary. Show all posts

Friday, February 2, 2018

ALA Must Disinvite Sally Yates Else Make a Mockery of Patron Privacy Policies

The American Library Association must disinvite Sally Yates.  Its Public Library Association is having a biennial conference #PLA2018 this March in Philadelphia.  The opening speaker is Sally Yates.  To ALA, the issue of privacy is of utmost importance.  "The American Library Association affirms that rights of privacy are necessary for intellectual freedom and are fundamental to the ethics and practice of librarianship."

Today we learned Sally Yates used her considerable governmental powers to illegally violate the privacy of American citizens by subjecting them to illegal searches in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution, among other violations.  Indeed, the invasion of privacy was so significant and so serious and so illegal that Sally Yates may be going to jail for having significantly participated in a silent coup against the American government.

A core value ALA drives over and over again is privacy:

Along comes Sally Yates who has been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt to have used the full force and weight of the American government to, at a minimum, illegally violate the privacy of various American citizens under knowingly false pretenses:  "The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. .... Then-DAG Sally Yates ... signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ."

Normally I oppose disinviting speakers and have even criticized ALA for disinviting its guests in the past.  But this case is different.  Sally Yates is the very antithesis of ALA's core position on privacy.  She illegally used the full power of the United States government and its spy agencies to violate the Fourth Amendment rights of her victims.  She must be disinvited or she will have forever made a mockery of any claim that ALA is interested in the slightest in privacy.  Any librarian cheering her appearance at #PLA2018 is cheering Sally Yates's part in a massive scandal never before seen in the USA.
I know librarians will be reluctant to drop Yates.  So here, in the words of a Democrat, is the heart of what Sally Yates has done to illegally violate the rights of American citizens in a manner expected only by foreign, oppressive governments:
In the need to develop a capacity to know what potential enemies are doing, the United States government has perfected a technological capability that enables us to monitor the messages that go through the air. …. Now that is necessary and important to the United States as we look abroad at enemies or potential enemies. We must know, at the same time that capability at any time could be turned around on the American people.  And no American would have any privacy left such is the capability to monitor everything – telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would be no place to hide.  
If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology. …. I don't want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capacity that is there to make tyranny total in America.  And we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision so that we never cross over that abyss. That’s the abyss from which there is no return. 
Source: Senator Frank Church, Chairman, Select Committee on Intelligence Activities, NBC's Meet The Press, 17 August 1975, emphasis added.
Watch:


Sally Yates was taking us over the abyss of tyranny before she was fired for insubordination by the President of the United States.  As Frank Church said in 1975, "no American would have any privacy left such is the capability to monitor everything."


I understand Sally Yates was booked by ALA only weeks before today's bombshell exposing her tyrannical (as Frank Church put it) behavior:
But, given the paramount importance of privacy to all that is the ALA, Sally Yates must be disinvited from PLA 2018, else ALA risks forever being viewed as condoning a tyrannical effort to invade people's privacy in the very manner against which Democrat Senator Frank Church warned in 1975.


NOTE ADDED 3 FEBRUARY 2018:

What Sally Yates did "is not just criminal but constitutes treason" worthy of "criminal prosecution against these traitors to our nation":


Hat tip to Jack Posobiec for teaching me about Senator Frank Church:


URL of this page: 
safelibraries.blogspot.com/2018/02/sally-yates.html

On Twitter: 
@ALA_PLA @ALALibrary @PrivacyALA @SallyQYates

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Libraries Harm Sex Trafficking Victims If They Allow Porn Viewing; Megan Fox Outs Orland Park Public Library

Libraries harm sex trafficking victims if they allow porn viewing.  They flout women's rights since digitalized torture makes up a significant percentage of the porn being displayed.  Few speak out about this, until now.  Megan Fox has exposed a public library for harming women in this fashion.  So now that the library and the local government is aware of the harm, let's see if they continue to allow porn viewing.  If they do, it is the War On Women on steroids.

Here is what Megan Fox said on WLS AM 890 with John Kass and Lauren Cohn:
And I also want to say that right now on an unfiltered computer you can access any kind of illegal porn that supports sex traffickers and the rape of women.  And there's no way to tell what kind of pornography you're watching.  Why should the public have to pay for that?  Why should we support these criminals?


She was talking about the Orland Park Public Library [OPPL], Orland Park, IL.  It is proud to make pornography available to its patrons.  So proud that it went on a local radio broadcast to proclaim its vaunted respect for the First Amendment, called the police to silence Megan Fox, and investigate a three year old YouTube song she wrote about Second Amendment gun rights.

Here is a recording of OPPL's Bridget Bittman speaking with Bruce Wolf and Dan Proft on 89 WLS AM, followed by a transcript:





Think about it.  Library filtering opponents scream bloody murder if anyone tries to expose libraries for violating the law, but they could care less about the sex crimes they enable against mainly women.  They care not about the free speech rights of crime victims not to have their crime displayed in public libraries.

I too have exposed the harms some libraries are doing to rape victims, one victim being thrilled that I spoke out on this:

Regarding the American Library Association [ALA], it has praised OPPL and whitewashed rape, and it works actively to facilitate sex traffickers:

The Federal Communications Commission [FCC] has been advised of the sex trafficking issue and ALA's involvement:
  • "In the Matter of Modernizing the E-rate Program for Schools and Libraries, WC Docket No. 13-184," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 16 September 2013:
    Jacqueline S. Homan: It is NOT a "1st amendment right" to view the violation of someone else's privacy.  Many women in porn are TRAFFICKED, and are FORCED.  When I was "broken in" by my traffickers, it was with a brutal gang rape.  I was 14 years old.  My gang rape was captured on film/pictures to satiate others' sadistic voyeurism AGAINST my will.  As a trafficked girl, where was MY right to privacy?  What about MY 1st amendment right to have my "free speech" (my language of "NO!") protected?  The ALA is full of ca-ca.  And I will tell them so!  And I dare them, no I DOUBLE DARE them, to defend that bs to me!  You may quote me, Dan Kleinman.
When libraries falsely claim the First Amendment right of displaying "constitutionally protected material" meaning porn, do they show one iota of concern for the rights of the victims whose forced involvement in sex crimes is displayed in those libraries?  Public libraries?

So, Village of Orland Park, are you going to allow your library to continue to flout the law, further harm rape victims, and continue to enable sex trafficking?  Libraries across the nation, will you too continue to accept this?  And in case you didn't know:



On Twitter:  @CohnTV @IntolerantFox @JacquelineHoman @John_Kass @KassCohn @OIF @OrlandPkLibrary @StopPornCultur1 @VillageOrlandPk @WLSAM890

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Librarian Fired for Authoring Book Set in Public Library; Fiction Includes Known Sex Offenders Using Library Computers to View P-rn Near Children

Here is a librarian exposing the big secret: "She specifically cited instances of known sex offenders using library computers to view pornography – 'Sometimes in close proximity to children,' the report said."

Here is what happens when a librarian exposes the big secret:

"Librarian Writes Tell-All Book, Gets Fired; 'The Absolute Irony is that the Public Library is a Pillar of Free Speech,'" WorldNetDaily, 12 August 2008:

A librarian who wrote a fictional account of library patrons in a made-up town has been fired from her position at the Mason County, Mich., District Library and is appealing the termination.
"The absolute irony is that the public library is a pillar of free speech and leads me to wonder why the administration is so upset. It's fiction," Sally Stern-Hamilton told the Ludington Daily News. [Note: "Ex-Library Employee Awaits Appeals Decision," by Lisa Enos, Ludington Daily News, 9 August 2008. "'In some ways I feel like my privacy was invaded since, after all, I did use a pen name,' Stern-Hamilton said of the brouhaha. 'This is not Russia, this is not China. Apparently we’re not as protected as I thought.'" This article is reprinted below.]

Over the course of three years, she wrote "The Library Diaries" under the pen name Ann Miketa. According to the newspaper report, the book is written as a series of vignettes about "mostly unsavory" characters in a library in a fictitious "Denialville."
However, the book publisher used a small photograph of the Ludington Library on the cover, and in the book's introduction, "Ann Miketa" said, "After working at a public library in a small, rural Midwestern town (which I will refer to as Denialville, Michigan, thoughout this book) for 15 years, I have encountered strains and variations of crazy I didn't know existed in such significant portions of our population."
She was notified of her dismissal in a letter from District Library Director Robert Dickson, when he referred to a prior "Suspension Pending Investigation" letter he wrote.
In that, he stated, "The cover of your book includes a picture of the Ludington Library. Each chapter is devoted to a specific library patron or patrons. Your book portrays these people in a very unflattering manner. You describe individual patrons as mentally ill, mentally incompetent, unintelligent, and unattractive. You label several as 'perverts.' While you stop short of naming the individuals you targeted in your book, your detailed descriptions of their unique characteristics and mannerisms make them easily identifiable in our small community."
Stern-Hamilton told the newspaper the book draws on her personal experiences but remains fiction.
"Most writers, anyone who writes something, some of it's going to come from, be rooted in, your personal experience. I don't think I could have come up with (the characters) on my own. They're bizarre, idiosyncratic, so they are based on some real experiences, but of course there are embellishments," she told the newspaper.
The library picture was just "a great picture," she said. "It epitomizes the American idea of a library."
She doesn't know how Dickson became aware of the book but said she wrote it because of "what goes on in public libraries everywhere."
She specifically cited instances of known sex offenders using library computers to view pornography – "Sometimes in close proximity to children," the report said.
The publisher, Publish America, is a grassroots group that publishes "people who are unknown, without charging the person thousands of dollars some self publishers charge," Stern-Hamilton said.
On the Ludington Daily News comment page, a reader wrote, "Instead of taking pride in a local author, we are criticizing her work of FICTION? What happened to free speech?"


Ex-library employee awaits appeals decision

http://ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=41013
Saturday, August 9, 2008
Sometimes a pen name isn’t cover enough, Sally Stern-Hamilton has learned.
The publication of her controversial book, “The Library Diaries,” written under the pen name Ann Miketa, resulted in her termination as a Mason County District Library employee after 15 years on the job. She is appealing that firing.
Written in the first person and set in what she calls a fictitious Lake Michigan town of Denialville, “The Libraries Dairies” is a series of vignettes about mostly unsavory characters encountered daily at the library.
The Ludington Library is not the purported setting, however a small picture of the Ludington Library is on the cover. “After working at a public library in a small, rural Midwestern town (which I will refer to as Denialville, Michigan, throughout this book) for fifteen years, I have encountered strains and variations of crazy I didn’t know existed in such significant portions of our population,” “Ann Miketa” wrote in the book’s introduction.
Stern-Hamilton was notified of her termination in a formal letter from District Library Director Robert Dickson July 25. In that letter Dickson refers to a prior letter of “Suspension Pending Investigation” that he wrote to Stern-Hamilton July 15 in which he stated:
“The cover of your book includes a picture of the Ludington Library. Each chapter is devoted to a specific library patron or patrons. Your book portrays these people in a very unflattering manner. You describe individual patrons as mentally ill, mentally incompetent, unintelligent, and unattractive. You label several as ‘perverts.’ While you stop short of naming the individuals you targeted in your book, your detailed descriptions of their unique characteristics and mannerisms make them easily identifiable in our small community.”
See THE LIBRARY DIARIES, A3
The Library Diaries
From page A1
Despite the picture in the cover collage, Stern-Hamilton is adamant that “The Library Diaries” — though it draws on her personal experiences as a library employee — is fiction.
“Most writers, anyone who writes something, some of it’s going to come from, be rooted in, your personal experience. I don’t think I could have come up with (the characters) on my own. They’re bizarre, idiosyncratic, so they are based on some real experiences, but of course there are embellishments,” said Stern-Hamilton.
She said she chose to use a picture of the Ludington Library because, “It’s a great picture. It looks just like a library. It epitomizes the American idea of a library. It’s a Carnegie library,” said Stern-Hamilton referring to more than 2,500 libraries built worldwide with money donated by businessman and philanthropist Andrew Carnegie between 1883 and 1929.
Stern-Hamilton said she is unaware how Dickson came to learn about the 150-page book, which took three years to write. She said she decided to write “The Library Diaries” because, “I’m concerned about what goes on in public libraries everywhere.” She said she is particularly concerned that known sex offenders are given library privileges which allow them access to computers where they routinely view pornography— sometimes in close proximity to children.
“I don’t think they should be allowed in (the library) — these sexual predators,” said Stern-Hamilton, who claims that she had no intention of “pursue this as a commercial endeavor in Ludington.”
“Out of a town of 8,000, not many people were meant to know about the book. Publish America, my publisher, asked for addresses of people, and sent out announcements to people giving them a chance to purchase it. Publish America is a grassroots organization, and willing to publish people who are unknown, without charging the person thousands of dollars some self publishers charge.”
Publish America uses a business model known as publishing on demand which keeps costs to a minimum since books are only printed when ordered.
However, people in Ludington did learn of the book.
“I went for a hearing where I was able to respond to the letter of suspension that Bob sent me. I went to that meeting and spoke my piece and got a termination letter two days letter. I haven’t heard from any of my co-workers since.”
“The absolute irony is that the public library is a pillar of free speech, and leads me to wonder why the administration is so upset. It’s fiction,” she said. “If It hadn’t gone in the paper only a handful of people announcements were sent to in this area would have known about the book.”
Stern-Hamilton had contacted the Daily News asking for a review of the book, but before that happened, Dickson contacted the paper to report she had been suspended.

In his July 15 e-mail to Managing Editor Steve Begnoche, Dickson wrote, “As she is actively promoting the book I’m assuming that she has or will be contacting the Daily News to request help in promoting this book. The book is now in the hands of our attorney and we have undertaken steps to see what action we might take, including suspension and/or termination of her employment. While we recognize the difficulty for a library to undertake these actions against an employee who writes a book — the content of the book is such that we feel we have no option.”
The purpose of the e-mail, he said, was to request the library “be given an opportunity to provide a different picture, a more balanced view of ‘life in the library,’ than is offered in this book.”
That story ran July 18.
In the past week Dickson twice said he did not wish to comment at this time.
A call to the library board’s president went unreturned.
“In some ways I feel like my privacy was invaded since, after all, I did use a pen name,” Stern-Hamilton said of the brouhaha. “This is not Russia, this is not China. Apparently we’re not as protected as I thought.”
The surname Miketa is Stern-Hamilton’s maiden name, which may sound familiar to some because her father, Andrew Miketa, according to Stern-Hamilton, was a first string center with the Detroit Lions circa 1952. But Stern-Hamilton does not consider herself a Michigan native, as she spent most of her formative years in Chapel Hill, N.C., where she grew up and subsequently went on to study art history at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. She met her husband, Keith Hamilton — a Ludington area native— in North Carolina and moved to Ludington with him.
“My pen name, Ann Miketa, was chosen because my acquaintances on the East and West coasts would recognize the name Miketa,” she said. “Now that the cat’s out of the bag, the book’s available at Book Mark, Blu Moon and Maude’s Gallery.”
Stern-Hamilton has submitted a letter of appeal. According to grievance provisions contained within the Personnel Policies of the District Library, the library director and board have 10 days to review that letter.
lenos@ludingtondailynews.com
(231) 843-1122 x328


NOTE ADDED 1 AUGUST 2011:

The librarian is now suing.  See, for example, "Librarian Tells It As She Sees It, is Fired, and Sues," where I added the following comment:

"Fiction" Includes Using Computers to View Porn Near Children

I wrote about this matter previously.  See "Librarian Fired for Authoring Book Set in Public Library; Fiction Includes Known Sex Offenders Using Library Computers to View P-rn Near Children," 13 August 2008.

"Once the library learned that Stern-Hamilton wrote the book, it suspended her.  She was then fired."  Wait a minute.  Don't libraries bend over backwards to not find out about the personal lives of its patrons?  Didn't the ALA leader Judith Krug decry the Florida librarian who turned in a 9/11 terrorist to the police instead of respecting Florida state library confidentially law?

So exactly how did a library set aside the overprotectiveness for terrorists to investigate one of its own for disclosing such things as known sex offenders using library computers to view p-rn near children?  I suppose this is part of the continuing pattern of the ALA ignoring librarians who speak out against libraries forcing p-rn on communities despite the law, etc.

I hereby offer my services as an expert on ALA practices and behavior as that may be relevant in this matter, particularly as ALA diktat is applied by local acolytes.  Expect the usual people to attack me here for pointing out what I did, but it won't make the real issues go away, and I will be happy to assist any legal eagle involved.