In a comment to a recent post of mine she wrote:
I am probably the only librarian in Idaho that totally supported the filtering legislation. I made my legislators aware of my career and my backing of the bill.
Every librarian knows full well that non-filtered computers are used for pornographic purposes. No one denies it. I have yet to encounter the person who is doing breast cancer research, thus needs filter turned off.
Why should public tax dollars go to support porn addicts? That is the bottom line, not freedom of information. Is porn information? NO!
I expressed my views to the Idaho Library Association and was quite disappointed that they chose to fight filtering. All filters can be turned off NOW for legitimate research.
Jo Ellen Ringer, Notus Public Library, Notus, ID
Thu Apr 07, 04:28:00 PM 2011
Library Porn Removal Roadmap; NCRL Director Dean Marney Details How to Legally Remove Legal Porn from Public Library Computers and Advises that the ALA Relies on Outdated Dogma." Or like Will Manley; see, "The Anything Goes ALA is Out of the Mainstream by Defending the Right of Children to Access Pornography in Public Libraries."
Maybe it is time that librarians and library directors rise up and speak out about what they know to be true. I will make that happen as best I can. For example, here's an open invitation to guest post on this SafeLibraries blog. You are not alone. The American Library Association's anthem need no longer be "Smut!" if enough people speak out.
And thank you, Jo Ellen Ringer, for commenting on my blog post and getting this ball rolling.