Showing posts with label GuestBlogPost. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GuestBlogPost. Show all posts

Friday, December 20, 2024

Insider Reveals Truth on Why New Hampshire Defunded American Library Association

An insider has revealed the truth on why the state of New Hampshire dropped out of the American Library Association.  I have permission to republish.  Here is the original story:


New Hampshire Defunds the American Library Association

A Very Newsworthy Story

A recent article on the New Hampshire Public Radio (NHPR) website regarding Governor Sununu’s withdrawal of his state librarian nominee confirms that the previous state librarian withdrew the New Hamphire State Library (NHSL) from the American Library Association this year.  While the reason given for this withdrawal was that “the yearly dues were not worth what the association provided,” there is more to this story.

Last February, as a New Hampshire State Representative and a librarian opposed to the ALA’s agenda, I wrote the letter below to Sarah Stewart, the Commissioner of the New Hampshire Department of Natural and Cultural Resources that oversees the NHSL.  This letter was co-signed by 100 other state representatives who shared my opposition.  Along with fellow Representative Mike Drago (Raymond, NH), I met with Commissioner Stewart and State Librarian Michael York at the State House.  We explained the reasons for withdrawing from the ALA as detailed in the letter that I presented to Commissioner Stewart at the end of our meeting.  It appears that our demands were heeded and that New Hampshire has joined the growing list of states that has defunded the ALA!

Here is the text of my letter:

29 February 2024

Dear Commissioner Stewart,

Recently, a bill that sought to prohibit egregiously obscene materials from being included in public school library collections (HB1419) failed on the House floor.  Rather than just trying to pass legislation to remove such books, however, perhaps we should be asking how these books get on school library shelves in the first place.  For example, how did such a notoriously inappropriate book as Gender Queer ever get into numerous school libraries in New Hampshire to begin with?  Part of the reason is likely the glowing review that appeared in the American Library Association’s publication Booklist, in which the reviewer gushed, “Highly recommended reading for those on their own journey of exploration or those supporting the explorers in their own lives.”  In addition to the ALA’s stellar review of Gender Queer, this infamous graphic novel also won the 2020 ALA Stonewall Award, which annually recognizes books on LGBTQ+ themes, as well as one of its Alex Awards which are given to adult titles that “have special appeal to young adults, ages 12 through 18.”  The ALA gives out numerous other awards each year that disproportionately honor and publicize books on racial and sexual themes, while its review source Booklist similarly celebrates such books.  Meanwhile, Deborah Caldwell-Stone, the Director of ALA’s “Office for Intellectual Freedom,” who has worked for the ALA for almost a quarter century, recently admitted to carrying out a “sustained messaging” program to “reframe” and “promote” inappropriate books especially on sexual themes as “diverse materials ...that are about inclusion and fairness.”


The American Library Association is clearly a political organization far more than a professional one.  Its political agenda is further reflected in the “professional” literature it publishes for librarians and library staff.  In a recent ALA Publishing catalog, the vast majority of the books included were on topics such as EDISJ (“equity, diversity, inclusion, and social justice”), “cultural humility," and so-called “book banning.”  The ALA has clearly revealed its liberal agenda that seeks to undermine parental authority and destroy the family.  To quote its own website, it “opposes all attempts to restrict access to library services, materials, and facilities based on the age of library users.”  It promotes and defends “drag queen story hours” by providing resources on its website for librarians to use when patrons object to these events.

The American Library Association, as those who follow the news regarding this organization already know, currently has a self-proclaimed Marxist, Emily Drabinski, as a president this year.  While she will be replaced next year by a new elected leader, this will not stop the ALA from promoting its insidious agenda.  Because Drabinski is merely a symptom of the ALA agenda rather than its cause, the next president will likely espouse similar views.  The ALA also has around three hundred permanent employees, many of whom support the agenda that has been promulgated by their employer for years, most notably the aforementioned lawyer, Deborah Caldwell-Stone.  The ALA’s connections with the infamous George Soros also reveal its long-standing political agenda.  In 1997, Soros was awarded the ALA’s James Madison Award, which honors individuals “who have championed, protected and promoted public access to government information,” and in 2008, his organization, Open Society, gave the ALA a $350,000 “seed grant.”  The ALA’s egregious agenda obviously started long before Emily Drabinski became president and will continue after her departure; she merely exposed it for all to see, especially last September when she asserted at the Socialism 2023 conference that public schools and libraries need to become “sites of socialist organizing”!



The American Library Association, like many organizations, offers discounts on products and provides a variety of services to its members.  Some supporters might argue that these socalled “benefits” justify the small amount that the New Hampshire State Library pays in dues each year for membership.  In light of the organization's true agenda, however, this argument falls flat because membership is ultimately injurious rather than beneficial.  If the state library discontinues its membership with the ALA, as we believe it should, it may technically only save a few thousand dollars, but this action will send a clear message to library trustees and school boards throughout the state that they don’t need to support the ALA and that, in fact, they should not.  If New Hampshire cuts its ties with the ALA, as Montana, Texas, Alabama, Missouri, South Carolina, and Florida have already done, this will send an even stronger message to the entire country that this pernicious organization needs to be defunded.



The American Library Association, a political organization that clearly promotes principles that are toxic to our republic, is truly an enemy of our state, and we believe that any support of this organization with taxpayer dollars must stop immediately.  Following the withdrawal of Texas last August from the ALA, State Representative Brian Harrison wrote in a letter to all Republican governors, “By sending tax dollars to the ALA, you are forcing your constituents’ money to be weaponized against them, their values, and their children.”  To prevent our constituents’ tax dollars from being used to attack our state, we, the undersigned representatives of the General Court demand that you, as Commissioner of the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, which oversees the New Hampshire State Library, order the NHSL to cut all financial ties with the American Library Association.

Respectfully, Rep. Arlene Quaratiello and 100 fellow members of the New Hampshire House of Representatives (some of whom agreed to sign this letter as long as their names were not made public which is why I have not included the names of the signers here).

Thanks for reading No Shushing Now: Exposing
Today's Woke Libraries! Subscribe for free to
receive new posts and support my work.


See also:

Friday, November 8, 2024

Freedom to Read Act: NJ Democrats Protect 'Freedom' to Give Obscene Material to Children, by Alex Newman

NJ Democrats Protect ‘Freedom’ to Give Obscene Material to Children,” by Alex Newman, Liberty Sentinel, October 30, 2024:

Democrat lawmakers in New Jersey just passed a bill granting government employees immunity from civil and criminal liability when giving children access to obscene materials at school or in libraries, sparking outrage among those seeking to protect minors. Predators, groomers, and perverts rejoiced at the news.

The so-called “Freedom to Read Act,” passed by the State Senate on Monday after it was approved in the House earlier this year, is being portrayed by Democrats and their far-left media allies as a measure aimed at limiting “book banning.” The lawmakers behind it also claimed it would protect librarians and teachers from alleged “threats.”  

Under current New Jersey law, giving “obscene material” to a minor is considered a felony of the third degree. Obscenity is described in the statute as any material that includes audio or visual picture or description of s[]xual intercourse, s[]x acts, and more. Numerous books being distributed to children in the state fit that description well.

An example of the books stirring controversy in New Jersey is “This Book is Gay.” It includes, among other outrages, tips on how children can meet up with adults for homos[]xual encounters without letting their parents find out. The book also features detailed and extremely graphic instructions for sodomy and various other s[]x acts.

Because of obscenity laws, which exist nationwide to protect the innocence of children, some librarians and teachers have hesitated before providing such material. Parents and concerned citizens have also warned librarians and “education” officials that they could be running afoul of obscenity laws by giving children access. 

But lawmakers in New Jersey think children need access to such material. “In recent years, public and school libraries have come under attack by a small number of individuals hoping to erase diverse materials from bookshelves, usually targeting works focused on race and LGBTQ+ themes,” argued bill sponsor NJ Senator Andrew Zwicker, a Democrat.

“A library is a place of voluntary inquiry and provides equitable access to learning resources,” continued the far-left senator without acknowledging concerns. “Through the ‘Freedom to Read Act,’ local school boards shall implement policies that ensure our libraries still have an array of content while including the public in that process.”

Ironically, protecting those seeking to corrupt minors with perversion and s[]xual fanaticism was portrayed by Senator Zwicker as a “defense of freedom.” Critics, however, warned that the legislation was an attack on constitutionally protected freedoms including parental rights and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

One leading opponent of the bill was Victoria Jakelsky, director and founder of NJ Parental Rights. In her testimony before lawmakers against the legislation, Jakelsky read the legal definition of obscenity and warned that this “freedom” legislation was aimed at stripping parents, taxpayers, and the community of the right (and duty) to protect children.

“This bill is incorrectly named,” she continued. “The legislation is not advocating for any right, except the right of state employees to be exempt from the consequences of committing a crime — a crime that could have lifelong implications upon hundreds if not thousands of innocent children.”

Jakelsky, who has been battling the indoctrination and s[]xualization of New Jersey children in public schools for years, blasted the notion of giving state employees immunity from criminal liability for breaking the law. “Should employees of the NJ Department of Education not be held accountable if they commit this crime?” she asked rhetorically.

GOP lawmakers denounced the bill during debate, too. “How exactly does a person distribute obscene materials to a child in good faith?” asked Senator Michael Testa (Republican) on the floor of the Senate, a reference to protections in the bill for those acting in “good” faith. “I don’t want adults promoting explicit stuff to children.”

“I also think it’s incredibly telling that if some of these very same explicit materials were shown to a child by a neighbor, that individual would be charged with a Megan’s Law offense, and rightfully so,” continued Senator Testa, a reference to a law protecting children named after a 7-year-old girl who was raped and murdered by a predatory neighbor.

Of course, many Democrats claimed there was no obscene material being given to children in schools. Testa was not buying it: “To my colleagues across the aisle that are so adamant that there is no obscene material being pushed in our schools, and that there never will be under this bill, then why do you need an exemption from the obscenity law?”

While bill sponsors and supporters claimed it was the government officials corrupting minors who were being “harassed” and “threatened,” the reality is just the opposite. In fact, as The Newman Report documented last year, parents who advocate for their children have been targeted by law enforcement, lawfare, unions and even the military.

Under current state policy, children in New Jersey are s[]xualized and indoctrinated with LGBT ideology starting as soon as Kindergarten. From being encouraged to experiment with sodomy and other perversions to being taught that they can pick new “genders,” the abuse begins as soon as government gets its hands on the children. 

It appears giving children grotesque and obscene s[]x materials is now a higher priority than teaching basic academics in the Garden State. Just last year, Governor Phil Murphy signed a law eliminating a basic-skills test to ensure government-school teachers know how to read, write, and do basic math. He is expected to sign the new obscenity measure soon.

Civilized societies have always used the law to protect children and punish those who seek to corrupt them with obscene material. Unfortunately, the veneer of civilization is rapidly disappearing, especially in Democrat-controlled states. For the sake of children and society, it is imperative that these horrific trends be reversed — fast.  

For more great content like this, visit FreedomProject Media.


4 thoughts on “NJ Democrats Protect “Freedom” to Give Obscene Material to Children”

LIBERTY

Thank you very much for covering this. It truly is a fight of good against evil here in NJ, but we must not grow weary.
We were thankful for one no vote from one Democrat and that the Democrat from LD-15 Shirley Turner did not vote. The NJ Democrat leadership found a way to block many emails from getting to the legislators. If the democrats had even listened to 20% of those concerned and were willing to look at the facts and the pictures that are in many of the books currently in the school libraries, they would have voted no. The leadership blocked us for being able to tell the the truth.
Thank you for showing this and covering this. God help NJ.


LINDA GOUDSMIT

Always dressed up in positive sounding language, “Freedom to Read” is a license to legally s[]xualize children in schools, libraries, and predictably entertainment, as young as possible. Why? Because a basic tenet of liberal/leftist/Marxism is the deliberate destruction of childhood innocence. The best sentence in the entire article is this: “To my colleagues across the aisle that are so adamant that there is no obscene material being pushed in our schools, and that there never will be under this bill, then why do you need an exemption from the obscenity law?” The essential issue is one of language and definition. The liberal/leftist/Marxist Democrats do not consider any s[]xual act, no matter how perverse or age-inappropriate, to be obscene. Words matter.


TED WEILAND
....


FENICIA REDMAN
Happening next door in PA too. I’m done with legislative hearings. We now have a President who will prosecute these crimes and my Defendants should buckle up!



SOURCE OF ABOVE:


URL of this page: 


Join World Library Association:

WorldLibraryAssociation.org





Saturday, April 15, 2023

Let America Read: Hollywood Gives Librarians Shiny New PR Sheen to S3xualize School Kids

#LetAmericaRead is Here

What happens when Hollywood joins forces with librarians and left-wing focused education advocacy groups?  The push to get grossly s3xualized books into kids' hands takes on a shiny new PR sheen. 

Texas Library Association (TLA) is pushing librarians to take part in the #LetAmericaRead campaign, which uses the cover of fighting censorship and book banners to further distort the important and necessary work of getting p0rnographic materials out of schools. Through the power of celebrity and trending social media content, the organizations behind this hope to get s3xualized material into kids' hands.  

(Click on pictures to make them larger for clarity.)




So, who all is involved?  Let's start with the official sponsors of this PR campaign:

Creative Artists Agency (CAA)  

The CAA is an American talent and sports agency based in Los Angeles, California.  While CAA does its best to stay out of the news, it has been linked to claims of aiding and abetting Harvey Weinstein in preying on female actors, per an exposé by Variety.  This exposé, and others, claims numerous agents were not only aware of Weinstein's actions but deliberately placed female actors in positions that increased their chances of being victimized.

In the world of politics, OpenSecrets.org notes that CAA donates almost exclusively to American politicians and organizations associated with the left wing of the American political landscape.

Campaign for Our Shared Future

The Campaign for Our Shared Future (COSF) lists itself as a "non-partisan, not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization."  Its founders, Heather Harding, Ed.D., and Eliza Byard, Ph.D., cite a desire to focus on intersectional issues relating to education, racial equity, and LGBTQ+ issues.  Byard was the Executive Director of GLSEN (formerly the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network) from 2008 to 2021. 

COSF has a noticeable slant to the content published on its website, as exemplified by casting Florida's House Bill 1557 “Parental Rights in Education” as “Don't Say Gay,” a name created and used by US media to reframe and distort the focus and purpose of the bill.





#LetAmericaRead

Examining the organizations listed on the #LetAmericaRead website is very revealing.  The American Library Association is deeply embedded in this organization, as is FReadom Fighters, an advocacy organization created by the Texas Library Association.  While it maintains a publicly separate identity from TLA, it is heavily promoted and discussed on the TLA listservs and maintains a very noticeable presence at the TLA Annual Conference. 





What Should Parents Do About #LetAmericaRead?

Let everyone know who is behind this campaign—a Hollywood talent agency linked to Harvey Weinstein's crimes, a leftwing education advocacy group, and librarian organizations actively working to keep p0rnographic content in schools. 

Use Twitter's “Community Notes” feature to provide important context on #LetAmericaRead posts and fill the comments on other social media websites with that information.

Talk to other parents about who is driving this PR campaign and call your representatives to let them know not to be taken in by literal Hollywood spin.

#LetAmericaRead is attempting to take historical cases of censorship and apply them to the current grassroots campaign in America to remove s3xual content from school libraries and to get schools and librarians to stop grooming kids.  It strips all context regarding the content of the books being challenged to try and make parents the enemy of children and schools. 

Protect our kids – Hollywood and librarians want p0rn in schools.



The above was submitted to me for anonymous publication so parents, legislators, and librarians could get valuable inside information not available from other sources where such voices are silenced.  This is another in a series of anonymous publications from librarians, library board member, library school professors, and library directors calling out for reform.  Send submissions to me at SafeLibraries@pm.me.

In addition, Campaign for our Shared Future is a "partner" in ALA's "Unite Against Book Bans," a coalition of organizations, created by ALA, dedicated to ensuring children retain access to s3xually exploitive material in public schools and libraries by any means, including censorial legislation.  So no surprise COSF supports s3xualizing children.

It is also noteworthy that after I reported this story below, TLA made their @TXLA Twitter account private to allow time for it to delete damning evidence of its s3xualization of children.  It took about a month before the account was opened against to the public.  And @TXLA blocks me to this day.  Here's what I reported that caused them to go private/silent:


Texas Library Association At It Again

And TLA is at is again, now at #TXLA23 telling its groomers to be cautious, keep a low profile, and censor out any possibility of a challenging response to their propaganda:
Just a friendly reminder to be aware of who is following you on your various social media accounts and what you may be posting on your accounts especially as we gather for important learning opportunities and multiple social events during next week's conference.  We know our colleagues from across the US have been misrepresented on social media and we absolutely do not want any of us to go through similar experiences.
Handy tip – did you know on Twitter you can limit who responds to your tweets to only those accounts you follow?  Go to any of your posts and look for the three dots on the top right and select "change who can reply".  There you will have the option to select everyone, people you follow, or only people you mentioned as those who can respond. 
Instagram has something similar where you can either allow or restrict comments on posts.  
I am certainly looking forward to seeing everyone next week and celebrating a year of hard work!

Lucy

----------------------------------------
Lucy Podmore
TASL Chair


Remember, to get rid of these groomers from your schools and remove the grooming material, follow these instructions:

Kleinman, Dan. “Details on Stopping Indoctrination in Schools and Libraries: Guide for Parents and Legislators on Obscenity, Drag Queen Story Hour, 1619 Project, Etc.” SafeLibraries® (blog), January 28, 2023. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/01/details-on-stopping-indoctrination.html.

And here's why you must remove any policy referencing the so-called "Library Bill of Rights":

Kleinman, Dan. “Librarians Attempt to Legislate 1960s Radical View That Age Is Not Morally Relevant.” SafeLibraries® (blog), April 10, 2023. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/04/librarians-attempt-to-legislate-1960s.html.

I thank the brave librarians and others who come forward—anonymously—to let others know what's going on.  You at TXLA23 and AASL23 can contact me for confidential assistance as well:

Kleinman, Dan. “Librarian Warns Parents and Librarians About S3xualization of Children; Texas SB13 Legislative Efforts by TXLA Criticized.” SafeLibraries® (blog), April 4, 2023. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/04/librarian-warns-parents-and-librarians.html.


URL of this page: 


On Twitter: 

Hashtags: #LetAmericaRead #LibrariesUnite #TXLA23 #FReadom #txlege  

and

Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Librarian Warns Parents and Librarians About S3xualization of Children; Texas SB13 Legislative Efforts by TXLA Criticized

Texas Library Association Annual Conference Logo
The Librarian Dodge and Weave
by Anonymous

As a school librarian a quiet corner in the state of Texas, I felt fortunate to be away from the battle lines currently being drawn through libraries throughout the United States of America.  I'm blessed to have the full confidence of my institution's administration and board, freedom to curate the library collection as I see fit, and a supportive school community that does not feel that their children's library is a potential source of damaging content. 

I am a rarity in the field of librarianship.  I am a fiscal and social conservative, and as such, were I “out” and active in my field, I would be castigated and attacked from every corner.  I have read countless messages and overheard conversations at professional events castigating people of my political and personal beliefs as a modern-day devil who must be run out of town and destroyed.  Needless to say, I keep my head down, my mouth shut, and listen hard.

One of my more fascinating sources of professional word comes through the Texas Library Association. The rot is just as deep in TLA as it is in ALA (American Library Association) and having eyes on the internal list servs, professional programming, and more is very revealing. 

In the state of Texas, the state legislature meets every other year and this year is one of those years.  As all professional organizations do, TLA is tracking proposed legislation that would impact libraries and librarians within the state.  The conversation around these proposals is grimly illuminating.

Texas SB13 Legislative Efforts by TXLA Criticized

Look how the Texas Association of School Libraries newsletter (promoted and shared within the TLA list serv) frames one such bill:


What is this “affirmative defense”?  KXAN has an excellent definition in this (https://www.kxan.com/news/texas-politics/texas-librarians-alarmed-over-book-review-bill/) article, Texas Librarians Alarmed Over Book Review Bill, by Ryan Chandler (Posted: Mar 29, 2023 / 05:37 PM CDT, Updated: Mar 29, 2023 / 07:29 PM CDT):

“A person has an affirmative defense to the crime of distributing harmful material to minors if they do so with an educational justification.  SB 13 would remove that justification.  Exposing children to harmful material is penalized as a Class A misdemeanor.”


This definition implies that TLA believes there is educational merit in books and graphic novels depicting underage s3x, drug use, and alcohol consumption. 

Mumbling About Censorship and Diversity While S3xualizing Kids

When All Boys Aren't Blue by George M. Johnson has pages long scenes of underage oral and anal s3x (one example starts on page 266 of the paperback edition), that's educational. 

Out of Darkness by Ashley Hope Pérez is recommended for kids starting at age 14 by Kirkus Reviews and can be found in school libraries.  The graphic scenes of a father violently beating and raping his daughter before murdering her and her boyfriend are educational, apparently.

What does TLA have to say about these scenes, about these books?  Nothing specific.  They'll mumble about censorship, diversity, and needing LGBT+ content.  But they won't specifically cite or defend this horrifying content and explain why it is necessary for children to have access to it.

Let's look at what another TLA-promoted resource has to say, this time the What If... Forum hosted by the Cooperative Children's Book Center, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The Importance of Considering Content in Context
Posted on February 21, 2023

Q: I’m struggling with how to explain why words or a scene or images in a book taken out of context should not be used to discount the book as a whole.  Can you offer some ideas for talking about why it’s so important to consider content in context, and not judge a book in a library based on material that’s been excerpted, often with the intent to get people upset?


[snip]

[snip]

There is no possible harm in providing materials to children depicting violent scenes of familial rape and murder, it seems.  It's educational and how else will all the school's students feel represented? 


Everyone knows LGBT+ children require graphic s3xual content to feel represented.

Librarians refuse to acknowledge the true issue at hand.  They won't take responsibility.  They wiggle and squirm and whine when confronted about the materials they share and promote.  They exclaim they can't let parents censor books for other kids.  They're changing lives.

Librarians on Facebook Mock Parents

Librarian groups on Facebook are no better.  Librarians bringing up book challenges and concerns brought to them by parents are answered with sneering derision being aimed at said parents.  “If people are too conservative to even READ A BOOK about other people who might have different lifestyles than them, that's a problem and it's one of the reasons we have such an important job to do as a librarian...  Keep it on the shelf; it could change a life.”

I even saw one horrifying post once from one high school librarian determined to ensure that the child s3x workers in her school feel represented.  There was very little push back from other librarians or even people pointing out that if this librarian knew about child s3x workers in her school, then she was failing her legal responsibility to serve as a mandatory reporter of child abuse.  (This matter did get brought to the attention of local authorities and the librarian was removed from her position, I believe.)

These aren't new issues to anyone who's been following these stories.  But it hit me hard today when I followed the link TLA provided to the What if... Forum and saw how the s3xual content families are rightfully concerned about being minimized and endorsed.

Texas Library Association is Part of the Problem

TLA is one of the largest library professional organizations in the world, and as such it has an out-sized-influence on the current state of the library profession.  Matters in this profession are not improving and are not going to improve without both real-world consequences and a shift in the demographics of the profession—not towards any one racial category but one of political diversity. 

Much of the work librarians do also honestly isn't something that requires graduate-level training, as the TLA forums recently had a frantic session assuring themselves about.  That matter, at least, got some push back from non-degreed librarians frustrated at the lack of respect towards them and their work.

Suggestions for Parents and Librarians

In closing, I can only make a few suggestions, both to parents and other librarians.

To the parents, I say this: Keep making your voices heard.  These libraries are yours, not the librarians.  It can be easy to fall into a censorship trap where materials that should be handled at the family level get targeted, but by and large that isn't what's happening.  Keep going.  Keep pushing.  Clean up these school libraries.

To the librarians, I pray that something causes your ears and eyes to open.  Harm is being done.  We have an incredible influence over children's developing minds and that influence is currently being used to hurt these children.  We can do better.  The children deserve it. 

Addendum

I used ChatGPT to run some numbers per the data it had available to it in 2021.  Here are some revealing numbers:

Q:  Can you rank the state-level library associations in the United States such as the Texas Library Association by available or estimated membership numbers?

A:  Sure, based on the available or estimated membership numbers, here are the top 10 state-level library associations in the United States, ranked by membership size:
  • Texas Library Association (TLA) - over 6,000 members
  • New York Library Association (NYLA) - over 4,500 members
  • California Library Association (CLA) - over 3,000 members
  • Illinois Library Association (ILA) - over 2,500 members
  • Pennsylvania Library Association (PaLA) - over 1,400 members
  • Michigan Library Association (MLA) - over 1,800 members
  • Florida Library Association (FLA) - over 1,800 members
  • North Carolina Library Association (NCLA) - over 1,500 members
  • Ohio Library Council (OLC) - over 1,000 members
  • Georgia Library Association (GLA) - over 900 members
Q:  Which library associations at the state, US-state equivalent, or national level have the most members in the world?

A:  The library associations with the most members in the world are typically national-level library associations, and the following are some of the largest and most prominent:
  • American Library Association (ALA) - over 57,000 members
  • Library Association of the United Kingdom (CILIP) - over 12,000 members
  • Australian Library and Information Association (ALIA) - over 5,000 members
  • Canadian Library Association (CLA) - over 3,000 members
  • New Zealand Library Association (LIANZA) - over 1,000 members
As for state-level or US-state equivalent library associations, the Texas Library Association (TLA) is one of the largest, with over 6,000 members.  However, it is important to note that membership numbers for state-level library associations can vary greatly and may not be as large as those for national-level library associations.




The above was submitted to me for anonymous publication so parents, legislators, and librarians could get valuable inside information not available from other sources where such voices are silenced.  This is another in a series of anonymous publications from librarians calling out for reform.  Send submissions to me at SafeLibraries@pm.me. 

If you wish, retweet this:



URL of this page: 

#txla23 #txlege

Thursday, May 19, 2022

Opinion: Eating Poop and Golden Showers Now Taught to Minors by ALA Librarians

Campbell County, Wyoming. OPINION: Eating Poop and Golden Showers Now Being Taught to Minors by ALA Librarians and Their Sympathizers

One of the first books challenged in Campbell County was This Book Is Gay, by [Juno] Dawson. It educates kids on the use of sex toys, portrays illicit sex between an older married man and a teenage boy, gives advice on how to give hand jobs and blow jobs to others, and contains reference material on where to go to participate in these activities.

Terri Lesley, Sue Knesel, Darcy Acord, Charlie Anderson, Nancy Stovall, and Miranda Finn all went publicly on record that this is appropriate reading for minors, and denied the removal of the book when it was challenged. They now believe that kids should be schooled in rimming, eating poop, golden showers, and group sex, and therefore multiple copies of the updated version containing those topics are now available in Wyoming, being trafficked between libraries, compliments of Campbell County.

The American Library Association believes there should be no age limit for any material, so according to current library policy, it is acceptable for any age person to review that book, although the updated version is recommended for ages 14-17.

Even if you believe kids ages 8+ are ready for detailed instruction on how to engage in sex practices, do any of you actually believe that teaching eating poop and golden showers is legitimate sex education?

I totally understand that sex offenders get off on exposing kids to pornography and to taboo materials. What I don't understand is why those illegal activities are being condoned by current Wyoming elected officials and Law Enforcement. 



Above publication and below message is ©Painter Enterprises 2003-2022 reprinted with permission from its author:

Painter, Sara. “Eating Poop and Golden Showers Now Being Taught to Minors by ALA Librarians and Their Sympathizers.” Wyoming Issues, American Issues. Accessed May 18, 2022. https://www.wyomingissues.com/Campbell+County+Public+Library/2022-05-18_1641/.

Thank you for reading. The purpose of my campaigns is to highlight corruption and to get assistance from anyone who is able and willing to help return Gillette and Campbell County and Wyoming to American Ideals, and hopefully a culture that applies the law equally to all citizens regardless of position or social class. Thank you so much for the efforts you are making and have already made. Please forward to everyone that you know who might be interested in the information I share. God Bless You, and God Bless America. 

See also:

MassResistance. “Excerpts from ‘This Book Is Gay’ - Available in Teen Section of Campbell County Public Library, Gillette WY.” MassResistance, September 13, 2021. https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen4/21c/WY-MR-Library-Books/1-Gay-book.html.
URL of this page: 









Saturday, November 16, 2013

Library Porn Results From ALA Minority Silencing Good Librarians; Boy's Death From Auto-Erotic Asphyxiation Results From ALA's 'Freedom of Information' Line; Allowing Porn In Libraries Is a Mistake

Librarian silenced by her leaders pushing "freedom"
I have been watching the recent porn incident at the Orland Park library with great interest.  There have been many similar problems, at many different libraries; and every time I hear of another porn incident,  I wonder “What is wrong with these administrators?”

I think the “freedom of information” line is a lazy argument.  Even if you could argue that we have a constitutional right to access porn under the guise of information, you cannot argue that it is the library’s responsibility to provide that information.  There is a lot of “information” we don’t provide to people.   We don’t provide conspiracy theory information; we resist pointing people to information on how to kill themselves; we don’t allow viewing of child pornography in the library.  We don’t allow political solicitations or protesting.  Like all freedoms, there are limits to what the library has to provide to people.

I’ve always thought that the “freedom to view porn” librarians were wrong, but a recent tragedy in our area has underlined that belief and confirmed it for me.  I am a director of a library in a poor, rural area.  We have a large population of home-school families.  Many of these families do not own computers or have access to the Internet, so they come to the library on a regular basis to allow their children to do research, and do their studying.  One such family, the Smiths (not their real name) came in all the time, and their small children would use our children’s computers, their older kids would use the adult computers.  The Smiths were a deeply religious family, and some of the nicest people you would ever meet.  The children were well-behaved, the parents nice and thoughtful.  These parents were very involved in their children’s lives and we were always happy to see them in the library.

Our library does filter all our computers, so that we can receive e-rate funds.  We would not be able to afford Internet access if we didn’t.  Our children’s computers are very heavily filtered, while the adult computers are less so.  We primarily filter porn sites, but as everyone knows, filters aren’t perfect, and every now and then, we see someone viewing porn and ask them to stop.  If they don’t stop, we cut off their computer privileges and ask them to leave.  I don’t think it is fair to other patrons to have to accidentally see something so inappropriate.

Returning to the Smith’s story, one of their children, we’ll call him Mike, was 12, which is old enough to use the adult computers.  The Smiths knew we filtered, and they did keep an eye on him, but didn’t sit with him every minute he was on the computer.  Mike somehow developed an interest in auto-erotic asphyxiation, and used the computer to learn more.  Unfortunately, he tried it, and ended up killing himself.  In hindsight, his parents were able to figure out how he had gotten the information; and were able to easily find it themselves on our filtered computers.  While they did not blame the library for the tragedy, they did acknowledge that children are not safe on the Internet, even with filters.  And now a 12-year-old with a bright future ahead of him is dead.

This is a real-world example of why allowing porn in libraries is a mistake.  You never hear complaints from people “I went to the library and they wouldn’t let me look at porn.”  Why in the world would these libraries choose the porn enthusiast over everyone else?  Why would they put children at risk of viewing inappropriate things?  We all know parents are responsible for what their children see, but why do some  libraries think that is an excuse to allow a free-for-all on their public computers?  Some things are not appropriate in public places, and pornography is one of them.

Unfortunately, the American Library Association has chosen the side of porn enthusiasts.  They do not speak for most library workers, but it seems that many library administrators feel they must fall in line. Most library workers do not want porn in their libraries, because they know it’s inappropriate and don’t wish to be subjected to seeing it, or to deal with the inappropriate behaviors associated with porn-viewing (patrons exposing themselves, masturbating, etc.)  They certainly don’t want to deal with the complaints from parents and other patrons who don’t wish to be subjected to pornographic images.  We all want our libraries to be pleasant, comfortable places for ALL our patrons, not just the porn enthusiasts.

I’m writing this article anonymously, because I like my job, and don’t wish to hurt my chances for future employment by speaking out against the ALA.  The ALA unfairly charges those of us who refuse to provide access to porn as “censors.”  We are not trying to ban pornography everywhere, just in our libraries.  Just in places where the public comes to read, study, play on the computer, and relax.  Porn has no place in that.

I'm glad [that SafeLibraries provides free speech for silenced librarians], and can only hope it makes some difference to someone.  This is a subject that bothers me greatly, but in libraryland, you have to be careful about what you say.  Sometimes I feel like there are probably more of us who fight against porn in the libraries, than those who fight to allow it.  But they've made us defensive by calling us censors.  They've controlled the argument for a long time, it seems.

### 30 ###

The above is from an anonymous library director who asked me to publish it.  SafeLibraries started from day one over a decade ago in part because I noticed my own public library made ALA's recommended auto-erotic asphyxiation web site available to my child:
  • "Porn and Sex Abuse In Our Public Libraries: Public Library Porn Harms Children, Patrons, Librarians, and Porn Industry Actors," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 24 July 2011 (hyperlink omitted):
    So I investigated my local public library and found it had a page called "Fun Sites for Kids and Teens."  On that page was an ALA-recommended web site about bestiality and how to have a better orgasm by strangling yourself, and so on.  The library director agreed the link was inappropriate and agreed to remove it, but it was never removed.

    I went to the library board meeting and was told citizens are not sophisticated enough to make decisions—that why libraries have boards.  So I started a web site to get people in the town organized.  I suppose I'm a community organizer.  Anyway, that led to my being noticed nationally.

Come to find ALA may have been involved in the equation that lead to the death of a boy, according to what the anonymous library director just revealed.  "Mike somehow developed an interest in auto-erotic asphyxiation"?  In my library that "somehow" was the ALA.  As ALA said about what it recommended that described auto-erotic asphyxiation, "The friendly, anonymous format is probably quite appealing to young adults."  I apologize I could did not put a stop to this in time to prevent what happened to "Mike" though I tried.  But I'm one person against over four decades of ALA propaganda that began with an Illinois ACLU board member joining ALA and changing it from within to promote porn and silence opposition.

I need more anonymous librarians to contact me and to speak out to stop this craziness.

The image at the top of the page comes from the following, and note the quote and the need for a pseudonym:

"Freedom," by CCL, Concerned Librarians of British Columbia, 1 June 2012:
librarians themselves have no protection against those would would silence and censor an opinion that is different from opinions held by those in positions of authority and power.

See also:
  • "The Anything Goes ALA is Out of the Mainstream by Defending the Right of Children to Access Pornography in Public Libraries," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 2 March 2010, citing the great Will Manley:
    Why is there such a disconnect between our profession and everyone else on this particular issue?  More specifically, how could we have allowed ourselves to be put in such a publicly disadvantageous position as defending the right of children to access pornography?  The answer is simple and ironic.  Our profession preaches intellectual freedom but does not tolerate its practice within our own ranks.  Librarians imbued with common sense and good political judgment are afraid to espouse even a moderate position that advocates the limited use of filters.  There is a great fear within librarianship of being branded a censor.  No librarian wants to be wounded by that bullet.  That's why we can never really initiate an open and honest dialogue among ourselves on issues involving even the most obvious need for limitations of intellectual freedom.  As a result, the extremists always dominate, and we end up with an "anything goes" official policy that distances the library profession from mainstream America.

"If you don't like it, leave,"
from Wilson v. Birmingham
While it is extremely rare for librarians to speak out, one librarian retired from the Orland Park Public Library mentioned by Anonymous did finally speak out against the library's porn pushing.  And note she was basically told if you don't like it then leave:


NOTE ADDED 23 NOVEMBER 2013:

This post has been cited by Megan Fox here:

On Twitter:  @LindaZec @OrlandPkLibrary @OIF @VillageOrlandPk

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

The Battle for Public Libraries: Censorship and Law in Missouri; Guest Post by Lisa Grant

The Battle for Public Libraries: 
Censorship and Law in Missouri
by Lisa Grant

Anyone familiar with the American Library Association [ALA] will know that it is at the forefront of a raging debate about privacy issues and censorship regarding public library access.  On one side, the ALA believes that any public citizen using the library computers or literature is afforded a basic right of privacy when it comes to the kind of content they are looking at.  This sounds acceptable enough, but what if this content is illegal in nature or pornographic?  This is of concern to many parents and community leaders who believe that their community should decide what kind of content is available in their public libraries, so as to protect children from inappropriate material and prevent access to websites or reading material that could be considered dangerous or illegal.


The Nature of the Problem

In essence, this debate comes down where we draw the line on individual privacy and freedoms.  Should for example, the Koran not be available in public libraries because it can be linked to fundamental Islam, which in turn can be linked to terrorism?  Should pornographic material that is legal be blocked by library regulations, to prevent children and others from viewing them in such a public and easy to access place?

These are difficult questions to answer.  On one hand, we might say that it is an infringement on personal liberty and censorship to remove these examples.  On the flip side, if these materials are used to further some illegal or terrorist activity, then surely such things can be prevented by introducing a small amount of careful censorship.  The ALA has made its position clear on the matter, invoking much controversy and outrage among communities when it claimed that a suspected terrorist who was reported by a local librarian for accessing what was thought to be dangerous and potentially illegal material had his rights infringed by the librarian in question, by being reported to the police.  It is known that a number of 9/11 terrorists did use public libraries prior to the attack.


Recent Missouri Case

A few months ago a case was brought to the Missouri courts involving access to certain websites on the Internet.  A local resident of Salem was unable to fully access websites that contained information on Native Americans and the Wicca belief system, as the library had used federal Internet filters to block access to these sites on the grounds they were 'occult' and 'criminal.'  The court ruled in favor of the resident, as the library was found to be misusing the filter system and didn’t have the right to block such material.  This does raise some interesting questions, because while most conscious citizens and by extension, librarians, will want to make sure they are doing what they can to stop potential problems by reporting and limiting access to some Internet material, where do we draw the line?  Supposing a library decides to block reading materials and Internet access to drugs for example.  While this may have the desired affect of limiting the exposure of children and adults to drugs in general, it could also have a detrimental effect.  If the Missouri library had taken these steps, for example, any addicts in the area may have been unable to find materials when looking for treatment, help, or ways to battle their addiction in the local area.  These are difficult decisions to be sure, and ones that need to be carefully thought through before any action is taken.


Should Communities Have More Power?

Despite the Missouri case, there are still strong arguments that support local communities having more say in how their libraries are run.  Firstly, a community normally knows its demographics and needs much better than any large federal body, which cannot possibly have a working knowledge of all the local cultures in the country.  In this respect, it would make sense to let local communities decide what kind of content is available in their local libraries as they know local needs best.  Also, it falls on local communities and residents to take action to prevent illegal activities and behavior in their own locale—residents often know each other and can spot someone suspicious, and in cases of suspected illegal or terrorist activity, are they really expected to sit and do nothing?  Either way, and whatever your view on the matter, this is a hot topic that looks set to continue while the ALA and local communities battle for control of their local libraries.



Copyright Lisa Grant 2013.  All rights reserved.  Hyperlinks inserted by the author.  Graphics added by SafeLibraries.  If anyone wishes to contact her, such as for publication approval, send me an email and I'll pass it along, or comment below.


Sunday, April 7, 2013

Censorship, Parenting, and YA Literature: The Perks of Being a Wallflower; Guest Post by Katelyn Bright

The Perks of Communication
by Katelyn Bright

Katelyn Bright
The teenage years prove to be one of the most testing periods of life, for both children and parents.  While adolescents are still in the house, parents should take the opportunity to discuss subjects that are questioned at this age.  The Perks of Being a Wallflower covers many topics, some of which may be more comfortable to talk about within the privacy of one's family, as well as being discussed in the classroom.  These topics might include sex, rape, homosexuality, and drug and alcohol use, among others.  Some groups of people, including parents, worry about their children reading about these topics, for they want to protect their children from the graphic details.  Often times books with these subjects have had attempted bannings and censorships.  The Perks of Being a Wallflower should not be banned because it has educational benefits for adolescents on how to come to terms with adulthood.

The banning of a book happens when someone tries to censor it.  Censorship is defined as the suppression of speech or other public communication which may be considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient as determined by a government, media outlet, or other controlling body.  When a book is banned, it is removed so that no one has access to it.  Before a book can be banned, it must first be challenged ("About Banned & Challenged Books").  When a book is challenged, a person or group has expressed their view point of concern towards a book being inappropriate for whatever reason.  They then go on to use their reasoning in an attempt to have the book removed from access to others ("About Banned & Challenged Books").  

All kinds of people challenge and attempt to ban books.  Most often it seems that parents challenge different books.  The American Library Association says, "According to the Challenges by Initiator, Institution, Type, and Year, parents challenge materials more often than any other group" ("About Banned & Challenged Books").  The American Library Association is the oldest and largest library association in the world ("About Banned & Challenged Books"). The ALA does not ban books, but instead is in support of keeping free access to books for all ages.  The ALA's Office for Intellectual Freedom receives reports from schools, libraries, and the media on different challenges that occur across the nation ("About Banned & Challenged Books"). They then come up with lists of information on the challenges in order to inform and spread awareness to the public on censorship ("About Banned & Challenged Books").

The reason that people try to ban books is for protection.  If someone believes that a book is inappropriate for certain people to read, then they voice their opinion and try to have it removed from this certain group of people.  Many parents do not want their children reading risky subjects.  The top three reasons books have been challenged includes:  being "unsuited to any age group", "containing offensive language", and being "sexually explicit" ("About Banned & Challenged Books").  These three reasons have been included in the reasons why Perks has been challenged in recent years ("Frequently Challenged Books").  

Cover of The Perks of Being a Wallflower
A recurring subject in Perks is sex.  This is a normal and healthy topic for adolescents to be pondering about at this stage in their lives.  When reading about sex in Perks, adolescents may become curious and have questions to ask.  Nevertheless, teens may also be embarrassed about the new feelings they have, and are scared to share them with others.  Perks’ protagonist Charlie definitely has a curious, but embarrassing moment:  "I feel ashamed, though, because that night, I had a weird dream.  I was with Sam.  And we were both naked...  And I woke up.  And I had never felt that good in my life.  But I also felt bad…." (Chbosky 21).  If parents complain about the sex topics in this book, their children may translate that into it being a bad thing that they have new desires.  When parents talk of sexual desire being a natural behavior, children can feel calmer about their changing bodies.  According to psychologist David Walsh, president of the National Institute on Media and the Family, "only about 19 per cent of American teens say they can talk openly with a trusted adult about sex" ("Sex in the City" 1).  When parents allow their teen to read Perks, teens may feel more comfortable with talking to their parents about the subject, which can boost their confidence when living out daily situations.

Perks teaches that conversing in the classroom can also be a way to boost teen confidence.  Besides parents, teachers can be one of the most influential people in a student's life.  When Charlie befriends his English teacher, Mr. Anderson (whom he calls Bill), Charlie is able to confide in him about his life, "I thought Bill and I were going to talk about the book" (On the Road), "but we ended up talking about 'things'" (Chbosky 107).  By reading about the relationship Charlie had with Mr. Anderson, students may realize that befriending one of their own teachers can be a good idea.  When students create a bond with teachers, they can be more comforted about coming to the teacher for help on class work, which in turn can improve grades.  If a teacher gives Perks to read either for a class assignment or even just for suggested reading, this could also show students that their teachers know what kind of changes they are going through in their teenage life and that it is OK to feel confused.  Discussing Perks with a teacher can give teens the opportunity to talk about their own struggles, like Charlie did with Mr. Anderson.

One of the confusing parts of teenage life can include identifying with sexual orientation.  In many cases, Perks has been challenged because of homosexuality and positive gay themes (Marshall University).  Arguing whether or not it is right to challenge the rights of homosexuals is not the argument being made here, however; no matter how one feels towards that discussion, there will be absolutely no tolerance for bullying.  If parents challenge Perks for the "threat" of homosexuality being read by their adolescents, they might as well be wearing a sign that says "Advocate of Bullying".  When a parent states that teaching on homosexuality is wrong, it can instill the thought that homosexuality itself is wrong inside a child’s head.  This thought could lead to a teen's way of thinking that disrespect towards a certain sexually oriented person is okay, whether the disrespect comes from themselves or others, simply because of the way someone has chosen to live his or her life.  In the article "Title IX Liability For Anti-Gay Bullying" J. Dalton Courson and Abigayle C. Farris state that:

According to Mental Health America and Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), LGBT teens hear anti-gay slurs about 26 times per day, or once every 14 minutes.  Nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT youth reported being verbally harassed at school because of their sexual orientation.  Nearly half reported being physically harassed, and about a quarter reported being physically assaulted.  (Courson and Farris)

Parents are not the only promoters being found within the realm of oppression.  A lot of the times LGBT youth have testified the disregard of harassment coming from school employees.  "Title IX Liability For Anti-Gay Bullying" says, "In Martin v. Swartz Creek Community Schools, an openly gay student alleged that sex-based harassment occurring persistently during his freshman and sophomore years but largely ignored by teachers and school officials brought him to the 'brink of suicide'" (Courson and Farris).  In Perks, a main character Patrick, who is gay, gets in a school fight when a student hurdles the word "faggot" at him in the cafeteria (Chbosky 150).  Perks can be used as a proponent in bringing up the subject of bullying to teenagers, especially in the case of homosexuals.  By reading this book, students can become more aware of this kind of behavior going on in school around them and look for ways to help out these individuals who may feel like they have no power in the matter.  Students can also self-reflect so as to determine whether they may be adding to the problem of ostracization instead of hindering it.  Comparing bullying of one class of people to another, as people are making pledges to "say no to the r-word", parents and educational staff should support the nix of intolerant language.

Within the pages of Perks lies another controversial topic adults often have trouble knowing that their child is reading about—rape.  In 2008, the book was challenged on the Commack High School summer reading list because it contains a rape scene (Marshall University).  Many people feel that this scene is very graphic and is not suitable for high school students.  While this topic is difficult to discuss, it is one that young adults need to be fully aware of.  By the time they reach a certain age, adolescents will have come to learn what rape is, but they may not be fully aware of how often it happens and what can count as sexual abuse.  According to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network ("Statistics | RAINN"), every two minutes someone in the United States is sexually assaulted.  Despite the "stereotyped" rapist being a complete stranger, thirty-eight percent of rapists are a friend or acquaintance to the victim ("Statistics | RAINN").  The girl who is raped in Perks is done so by her own boyfriend (Chbosky 30-31).  Hearing these facts alone can cause teenagers to realize things they might never have thought before.  Discussing the rape in the book and comparing it to real life situations can cause adolescents to do several things.  They may learn the signs of abuse and be able to point out and report when they believe that someone could be a victim.  They may feel inspired to start an awareness organization.  A teen may even decide to speak out about an assault that has happened or is happening to them in their own life.  According to Colleen Curry of ABC news, "Katherine Hull, spokeswoman for RAINN, said it is helpful for many survivors of sexual abuse to speak out about their attacks and help others feel less alone".  By reading Perks and discussing this graphic scene, adolescents can become stirred to want to speak up and speak out about sexual assault.

After looking at arguments such as these, parents and others may feel that their viewpoints have been overlooked, that the reasons for why they want Perks banned from bookshelves has been misunderstood.  However, looking at the supporting arguments without analyzing parents' reasons is very close-minded, and all considerations should be taken into effect.

Excerpt from The Perks of Being a Wallflower
Parents need to read Perks before they can judge it.  A potential situation could be that a parent has come to find out that their teenager is reading Perks.  Another parent may hear of this, and fill the first parent in with their side of the plot behind this book is, which may not necessarily be a good side.  This might cause the parent to react solely based on what the other parent has said, and might choose to follow someone else’s idea of good parenting over what they think good parenting is.  What one parent says is provocative may be coming-of-age to another.  Emily Nixon, former English teacher and current Coordinator Recruitment and Selection at District of Columbia Public Schools, can testify to parents being weary of students reading Perks when assigning this book for an after school book club.  Nixon says:

I told the parents who disapproved of the book to read it first before making an opinion.  You can't judge a book you haven't read.  One parent in particular was critical of my book choice.  However, he read the book and agreed to meet me to discuss it.  After reading the book and discussing it over with me, he agreed to let his child read the book. (Email Interview) 

Until an understanding is made, one cannot rely on word of mouth as to what is appropriate or not.  If parents reads Perks, they can be refreshed of the issues teens deal with and how this book can help their child realize that they are not the only ones going through them.  Parents can make their own list of pros and cons to this book and determine whether or not it is a good read for their adolescent.

One reason that so many parents have claimed that Perks is not a good read for adolescents is because of references to substance abuse.  Perks delves into Charlie's new world of partying and tells of his exploration of the matter, which includes teen drinking and Charlie's drug use.  When educators encourage their students to read this book, they are not condoning the use of drugs and alcohol.  Discussions of partying can help teens examine different ways young adults feel that they need to express themselves.  Drug use by teens can often be a form of conquering insecurities or a means of social acceptance (Mayo Clinic Staff).  For example, in the novel Charlie often turned to drugs whenever he was feeling upset or depressed.  Parents often imagine that if their child reads about this, they might decide to try substance abuse too, but just because someone reads about a certain event does not mean that they will commit the same act.  By reading and discussing drug and alcohol use in Perks, adolescents can come to an understanding of why others choose to engage in this behavior, as well as being advised as to why this would not have the best consequences.

Adolescents may also come to an understanding of the importance of safe sex through reading Perks.  At one point in the book, Charlie’s older sister becomes pregnant (Chbosky 116).  Parents may believe that teen pregnancy is on the rise, and they may blame it on sex found in the media.  However, according to Guttmacher Institute, an institute seeking to advance sexual and reproductive health, the U.S. teen pregnancy rate has declined within the past few years ("Facts on American Teens' Sexual and Reproductive Health").  Guttmacher states, "Overall, 68 pregnancies occurred per 1,000 women aged 15–19 in 2008.  The 2008 rate was a record low and represented a 42% decline from the peak rate of 117 per 1,000, which occurred in 1990.  The majority of the decline in teen pregnancy rates in the United States (86%) is due to teens' improved contraceptive use; the rest is due to increased proportions of teens choosing to delay sexual activity" ("Facts on American Teens' Sexual and Reproductive Health").  Declining rates of teen pregnancies come from more education and more discussions with parents.  Once again, reading a popular book like Perks can be a great way for parents and educators to bring up strained subjects such as this.

One of the biggest reasons for controversy and ridicule for banned books by parents might not even come from the book itself, but from the supporters of the book.  The ALA acts as a huge activist towards helping fight those who want to ban a book.  Dan Kleinman is a blogger who goes by the name of SafeLibraries to prowl the Internet for sites that need information on some subject matters about banned books and the ALA.  He has often pointed out how the ALA likes to only mention certain sides of a case to make people stay on their side, then attacks people who point out the misinformation (Email Interview).  In a particular case, a girl was actually bullied by a school who wanted her to read Perks as part of school curriculum.  A video taken of the girl's parents stating why they did not want their daughter reading this book was played by a teacher in an English class.  A friend of the girl told her of this; she was humiliated (Kleinman).  This kind of act is extremely inappropriate and unprofessional for the School Staff.  This is an example of how organizations such as the ALA can give very one-sided arguments of keeping challenged books part of the school curriculum and keep other opinions, to not keep the books in school, in the dark.  But most educators would realize that this is a wrong way to approach a certain situation.  No one needs to be forced to read something they do not want.  This just shows the importance of parents' involvement in their children's education. 

The Perks of Being a Wallflower is categorized as a coming-of-age, or bildungsroman novel.  The definition of bildungsroman is a type of novel concerned with the education, development, and maturing of a young protagonist.  The point of a bildungsroman novel is not only to tell the story of a maturing protagonist, but also to help the reader develop, mature, and be educated themselves!  Educators and other groups fight for students' easy access to Perks because they feel that this book will be of assistance to adolescents by highlighting difficult and stressful events in teen life.  Parents have a hard time with letting their children read books such as this because they want to protect their child from the hard aches and tragedies that the "real world" comes with.  But the controversy in banned books is often the essential element that causes a child to think and ponder.  This is how teenagers can expand their horizons and open up a world they never even thought about before.  Parents may not be willing to let their children grow up just yet; but children grow, and parents can either stand beside their children to guide the way, or they can let their children take the hard route and let them find out on their own.


Works Cited

"About Banned & Challenged Books." American Library Association. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2012.

"Banned Book Week." Marshall University Libraries. N.p., 25 July 2012. Web. 11 Dec. 2012. 

Chbosky, Stephen. The Perks of Being a Wallflower. New York: MTv, 1999. Print. 

Courson, J. Dalton, and Abigayle C. Farris. "Title IX Liability For Anti-Gay Bullying." Children's Rights Litigation 14.3 (2012): 20-24. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Nov. 2012.

Curry, Colleen. "Unbreakable Blog Helps Rape Victims Heal." ABC News. ABC News Network, 01 Feb. 2012. Web. 06 Dec. 2012.

"Facts on American Teens' Sexual and Reproductive Health." Facts on American Teens' Sexual and Reproductive Health. N.p., n.d. Web. 06 Dec. 2012.

"Frequently Challenged Books of the 21st Century." American Library Association. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Nov. 2012.

Kleinman, Dan. E-mail interview. 02 Dec. 2012.


Nixon, Emily J. E-mail interview. 02 Dec. 2012.

Staff, Mayo Clinic. "Teen Drug Abuse: Help Your Teen Avoid Drugs." Mayo Clinic. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 05 Mar. 2010. Web. 11 Dec. 2012.

"Statistics | RAINN | Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network." Statistics | RAINN | Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2012.

"Sex in the City - and Among Teens." The New Zealand Herald. N.p., 04 Nov. 2008. Web. 30 Nov. 2012.



SafeLibraries Note:  I am so happy to present the above writing for your consideration.  I am especially happy to see young people taking an interest in the topic.  Even better, she went out of her way to track down and speak with various sources from different points of view, then summarize them and present them in an evenhanded fashion.

Truly this is outstanding.  She is returning to Illinois State University in the coming school year.


If anyone else would like to submit similar work to be published, please let me know.

The picture is courtesy of Katelyn Bright.  She granted me and only me written permission to display it.  Her work is hers, republished here with permission.  The other pictures I inserted on my own.  The hyperlinks are mine. 

Copyright Katelyn Bright 2013.  All rights reserved.  SafeLibraries note excepted.  If anyone wishes to contact her, such as for publication approval, send me an email and I'll pass it along, or comment below.