Showing posts with label PresidentObama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PresidentObama. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

ObamaCare Pushing Librarians Out of Work; What Goes Around Comes Around

As a direct result of ObamaCare, librarians in Brevard County, FL, may be losing their hours:
  • "Brevard County to Cut Back Hours for Some Part-Time Employees," by Bob Opsahl and Melonie Holt, WFTV 9, 23 July 2013 (hyperlink omitted):
    Brevard County has over 300 part-time workers, many of whom are in the library and parks systems.

    While officials don't necessarily want to reduce hours for those employees, they'll be forced to unless the county wants to pay for full-time health benefits.




Librarians had been ordered by the American Library Association [ALA] to push ObamaCare, that is until it cut back on the severity of its message to make it appear optional after librarian push back, as only I reported, and the self-arrogated censorship police voluntarily agreed to suppress President Obama's speech to #ALA2013 and the video has not yet been made available:



ObamaCare is a larger invasion of privacy than the National Security Agency [NSA] scandal:

Although ObamaCare is a worse invader of privacy than the NSA, ALA is exhorting people to oppose NSA on privacy grounds:
  • "Ask Your Representative to Vote YES on Amash Amendment," by Action Alert, American Library Association, 23 July 2013:
    On Wednesday, July 24, the U.S. House of Representatives will vote on the Defense Appropriations Bill (H.R. 2397).

    Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) has introduced an amendment to the bill that would stop funding for the NSA's warrantless surveillance programs.

    Please ask your Representative to vote YES on the Amash amendment.  This amendment is a strong vote against the NSA's warrantless surveillance programs and bulk metadata collection.

    Click "Call Now" for calling information and talking points.
  • "Act Now: Support the Amash Amendment to Stop Funding NSA Surveillance," by Jazzy Wright, American Library Association, 23 July 2013.
  • "Act Now: Support the Amash Amendment to Stop Funding NSA Surveillance," by Choose Privacy Week, American Library Association, 23 July 2013.   [In full disclosure, Choose Privacy Week has a single major donor who paid for and enabled the work the ALA does to give the impression ALA cares about privacy while promoting Open Society Institute messages the public would not otherwise accept.  That person is George Soros.  See "Know the ALA" for details.  The Choose Privacy Week site is basically a wholly owned subsidiary of the Open Society Institute, though it is not promoted as such.]
  • "FTRF, ALA Join Efforts to Protect Privacy and Increase Transparency Around Surveillance," by American Library Association's Office for Intellectual Freedom, OIF Blog, 18 July 2013.

As to Brevard County, its library already bowed down to the ALA's demand to allow pornography into its public libraries:

Now it is bowing to the ALA again, this time on ObamaCare:

So librarian hours are being shrunk by ObamaCare, the so-named Affordable Care Act.  Not for Brevard County librarians it's not affordable.  They supported ALA's porn push and more recently ALA's ObamaCare push, and now they may lose work and medical benefits as a direct result.  Sad to say, but what goes around comes around.



Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Full Frontal Nudity Coming to a Public Library Near You; Why I Oppose Tom Wheeler, President Obama's Nominee to Chair the Federal Communications Commission

Photo Credit Chris James / Flickr, h/t Associations Now
Full frontal nudity is coming to broadcast TV if Tom Wheeler, President Obama's nominee to chair the Federal Communications Commission [FCC], is confirmed by the US Senate.  A vote for Tom Wheeler is a vote for full frontal nudity on TV right during family hour.  Inevitably, that will make its way into public libraries despite libraries traditionally blocking out or not selecting such material.

Once it gets into libraries, the American Library Association [ALA] will do everything in its power to force local public libraries to ignore local law and policy to allow the full frontal nudity.  Indeed:



I oppose Tom Wheeler for the FCC chair to prevent full frontal nudity from breaking into broadcast TV so that I can attempt to keep the ALA from pushing it into libraries in the first place.  Nothing will be "fleeting."  It will be shown again and again and again—in public libraries—in full view of children.  Like in:



So now you know why I signed the letter to oppose the nomination of Tom Wheeler for FCC chair.

Here is news that does not name me but that covers the letter I signed:

Below is the text of the letter I signed (graphic and hyperlinks added by me) (click here for original):



July 9, 2013

Dear Senator,

Tom Wheeler
Photo Credit Getty Images, h/t Newsmax
We are writing to ask that you oppose Tom Wheeler, President Obama's nominee to chair the Federal Communications Commission, unless he agrees to lead a vigorous effort to enforce the federal decency law, 18 U. S. C. 1464, which prohibits indecency and profanity on broadcast TV and on radio.

Mr. Wheeler was given the opportunity to take a stand on decency enforcement during his nomination hearing but instead sidestepped the issue.  Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) asked Mr. Wheeler, "Where would you take the broadcast decency policy?"  In response, Mr. Wheeler's recognized that indecency is a problem, referencing concern for his grandchildren, but did not discuss enforcement. Mr. Wheeler can't just say there is a problem; he needs to say how he will use his enforcement authority as FCC chairman to fix it.

The American public has a right to decency at home. No network or shock jock has any right to invade that sacred space with indecent programming. Yet, the immediate past chairman of the FCC, Julius Genachowski, refused to bring even one enforcement action on indecency during his four years in office.

The FCC is the guardian of decency on broadcast TV and radio. The next FCC chair needs to show leadership on the issue and enforce the law, which he is free to do after the U. S. Supreme Court decision in FCC V. Fox of last June. It is time for the Commission to do its job and ensure the public airwaves are not filled with nudity and profanity.

There is no question that broadcast decency is a critical issue with the American public. More than 100,000 people submitted comments recently to the FCC in opposition to a proposed weakening of decency enforcement standards.  Only the networks and a handful of their supporters were for the proposal.

The American people have had enough.  We will be patient no longer.  We will not sit by while the public airwaves are filled with pornographic images and profane speech.

Senator, you have an opportunity to clarify Mr. Wheeler's views on the enforcement of the Federal decency law before the U. S. Senate votes on his confirmation and we ask you to do so now.

Sincerely,

L. Brent Bozell III, President
Media Research Center

Patrick A. Trueman, President
Morality in Media

Tim Winter, President
Parents Television Council

Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association

Mat Staver, Chairman
Liberty Counsel Action

Tom North
Decent TV

Frank Cannon, President
American Principles Project

Larry Jacobs, Managing Director
World Congress of Families

Don Feder
Don Feder Associates

David Barton
WallBuilders

Penny Young Nance, President, CEO
Concerned Women for America

Jan Garbett, President
Women for Decency

Chuck Hurley, Vice-President & Chief Counsel
The Family Leader

Cathi Herrod, President
Center for Arizona Policy

Tom Shields, Chairman
Coalition for Marriage and Family

Mike McManus, President
Marriage Savers

Rick Schatz, CEO
pureHope

Tony Perkins, President
Family Research Council

Phyllis Schlafly, President
Eagle Forum

Dr. Josh D. McDowell. Author, Speaker.
CEO Josh McDowell Ministries

Dawn Hawkins, Executive Director
Morality in Media

Dr. Ted Baehr, Chairman
Christian Film & Television Commission

Tom Minnery, Senior Vice President
Focus on the Family

Morton Blackwell, Chairman
The Weyrich Lunch

Michael P. Farris, Chancellor
Patrick Henry College

Phil Burress, President
Citizens for Community Values Action

John D. Foubert, Ph.D., National President
One in Four

Jim Backlin
Christian Coalition of America

David Caton, President
Florida Family Association, Inc

David E. Smith, Executive Director
Illinois Family Institute

Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Director and Senior Fellow
The Beverly LaHaye Institute
Concerned Women for America

Phillip Cosby, State Director
American Family Assoc. of KS & MO

Gene Mills, President
Louisiana Family Forum

Joe Ortwerth
Missouri Family Policy Council

Kris Mineau, President
Massachusetts Family Institute

Bill Johnson, President
American Decency Association

Dan Kleinman, Library Watchdog
SafeLibraries

Robert Kammer, President
Maryland Coalition Against Pornography

Judith Gelernter Reisman, Ph.D., Visiting Professor of Law
Liberty School of Law

John Helmberger, CEO
Minnesota Family Council

David Fowler, President,
Family Action of Tennessee, Inc

Rev. Jason J. McGuire, President
New Yorker's Family Research Foundation

C. Preston Noell III, President
Tradition, Family, Property, Inc.

Tiffany Leeper, President, Girls Against Porn & Human Trafficking
Chief Liberation Officer
The Gentlemen's Posse

Diane Gramley, President

American Family Association of Pennsylvania

Kent Ostrander, Executive Director
The Family Foundation (KY)

Karen Testerman
First Principles New Hampshire

Patrick E. Mangan, Executive Director
Citizens for Community Values of Indiana

Micah Clark, Executive Director
American Family Association of Indiana

Pamela Atkinson, Chair
Utah Coalition Against Pornography

Tony Nassif, President & Founder

Preventing Abuse Foundation

Gary Glenn, President
American Family Association of Michigan

Monica Boyer
Kosciusko Silent NO More

John Stemberger, President
Florida Family Policy Council

Sharon Slater, President
Family Watch International

Rita G. Covelle, President
Morality in Media of Massachusetts

Jeffrey J. Ford MS, LMFT
UCAP Board Member

Jill Geigle, President
Arizona Family Council

Carol Soelberg, President
United Families International

Jill C. Manning, Ph.D., LMFT
Family Therapist & Researcher

Michael Geer, President
Pennsylvania Family Institute

Julaine K. Appling, President
Wisconsin Family Council

Janet M. LaRue, Esq.
Jan LaRue & Associates

Maurine Proctor, Editor-in-chief
Meridian Magazine

Daniel Weiss, President
The Brushfires Foundation

Elaine Silodor Berk, Co-director
JONAH

Arthur Goldberg, Co-director
JONAH

William J. Murray, Chairman
Religious Freedom Coalition

Ann Redding, President,
Christian Action League of Minnesota

Derek A. McCoy, President
Maryland Family Alliance


NOTE ADDED 16 JULY 2013:





Friday, July 5, 2013

Librarians Refuse ALA Obamacare Push; Wanted: Video of President Obama Speech at ALA Conference; Lenny Kravitz's Message for Librarians

President Obama still from video
displayed at ALA conference,
photo credit ALA.
Wanted:  video of President Obama telling librarians to promote Obamacare.  Somebody must have recorded that video on an iPhone or something.  Please send me the recording for publication in the interests of equal access and free speech.

Despite the American Library Association's [ALA] support for equal access and free speech, ALA agreed to allow the President to make a video statement to hundreds of librarians at the annual ALA convention, then to never display nor distribute it ever again.  Some librarians bristle at this and related ALA problems with mishandling the message; it seems Lenny Kravitz also recorded a message for such librarians, as explained below.


Libraries and Communities Are Refusing to Follow ALA Diktat on Obamacare

And indeed, some libraries have already announced they will not follow ALA diktat: "we have to be careful that we do not push people either way."

Local governments are balking too, and he means the ALA: "In addition - the Board of County Commissioners should decide - not the National Library Association - they were not elected to represent Brevard residents."


Reported Nowhere Else: Behind-the-Scenes Talk About the ALA Obamacare Push

With coverage only SafeLibraries can provide, here is a revealing behind-the-scenes conversation amongst librarians about the new Obamacare directive to librarians and ALA's responses.  Librarians from across the USA are not at all happy.  Watch how the ALA "Press Officer" is forced to changed her message to add that libraries need not take part in ALA's efforts to assist in the promotion of Obamacare:
Just to be clear, the "partnership" between IMLS and the Center for Medicare Services was created only so that the government agency could provide informational resources specifically tailored to libraries—libraries are not forced into a commitment or obligation of any kind.  ALA is only providing information to help libraries prepare to answer questions that their patrons may have.  ALA is providing resources on the health law so that libraries can fulfill their mission to make information available to their patrons.  We are working with the agency to provide free resources so that librarians would not be caught off guard by patron questions.  Again, we are only providing information.
My favorite quote: "ALA doesn't speak for all libraries, but the politicians believe they do."  There are other money quotes as well.  Speaking of the "digital divide," ALA says, "The session was recorded and will be available for sale soon."  So much for free speech and equal access!

And now, read the inside truth for yourselves, in chronological order, followed by links to many related stories and more:


NEBRASKA LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 1:37 PM

I wanted to attend the ALA session (http://www.ala.org/news/press-releases/2013/06/libraries-health-insurance-preparing-october-1) “Libraries & Health Insurance: Preparing for October 1,” from 1 - 2:30 p.m. on Sunday, June 30, but I had a conflict.  Since this effort provides a great opportunity for libraries—and maybe a bit of a challenge for our communication efforts—I'm hoping that someone on this list attended the session and would be willing to share the information?  We really want to get out ahead on this one and as you can see (http://bigstory.ap.org/article/apnewsbreak-librarians-help-health-law), people are already talking about whether this is an appropriate role for libraries, etc.  Please share with this list if you have any information, marketing materials, etc….thanks

ILLINOIS LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 2:50 PM

I second [NEBRASKA LIBRARIAN]'s request.  We're already getting calls from local media about what we're going to be doing, as a result of the ALA news release, and don't have a plan in place yet.  Illinois is one of the states that will be expanding Medicaid, but we don't know yet what the insurance exchanges will look like or what kind of assistance we'll be providing, beyond computer access.  Anyone who has dealt with the public knows the process is going to be more complicated than that.

In my opinion only, ALA jumped the gun by releasing a blanket statement before libraries had the pieces in place - or had a chance to see whatever this training is going to be.

NEW HAMPSHIRE LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 2:53 PM

I read the other day that Obama administration officials were meeting with state librarians on this. Although the article didn't specify, I suspected they were meeting at ALA over the weekend.  Perhaps state librarians will be distributing more information?

ALA PRESS OFFICER JAZZY WRIGHT
2 JUL 2013 3:14 PM

Hello everyone,

I want to apologize for the confusion.  The partnership between IMLS and the Center for Medicaid Services means that both groups will work in the next coming months to prepare librarians for the number of patrons who will need help enrolling in the Affordable Care Act.  ALA is only providing resources on the health law so that libraries can fulfill their mission to make information available to their patrons.

Many of you have attended the ALA Conference “Libraries and Health Insurance: Preparing for Oct 1” on Sunday.  The session was recorded and will be available for sale soon.  We're sending updates to all of our ALA Washington Office subscribers: http://capwiz.com/ala/mlm/signup/  You can also get Washington Office news at www.districtdispatch.org.

Additionally, IMLS announced that they will work with Webjunction to host online educational seminars about the new health enrollment requirements (see this press release http://www.imls.gov/imls_and_centers_for_medicare_and_medicaid_services_to_partner_with_libraries.aspx).

Warm regards,

Jazzy Wright
Press Officer
American Library Association, Washington Office

KANSAS LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 3:43 PM

I believe that since ALA made this decision to be a part of this initiative on behalf of the public libraries in the U.S – without our knowledge or consent- that this conference should be available for download to libraries WITHOUT cost.—At the very least ALA members should be able to have access without cost.

I understand the value that libraries can contribute to this process and look forward to being able to offer this assistance to my community.  However, there will be considerable expense in staff training and staff hours of assistance to the public.  We need to have all the resources we can in preparing for this initiative.

NEW YORK LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 9:36 PM

For those of us who were able to attend ALA and have already paid, I would hope we are not going to be charged for this as you note below.  In fact I do not think any library should be charged for something as important as this piece of information.  At a time when we are in survival mode and needing to justify to those who are controlling our budgets, that libraries still are relevant, this could be the perfect tool to do so.  I think it would also strengthen ALA's position in general and the value of being a member that you can provide us with critical information our communities need.  Those with dwindling staff do not have time to do some of this, but your assistance in putting our best foot forward in our communities would be a great help.  This topic will be getting tremendous attention in the press and will affect many Americans.  We should be out front at the leaders and source of information.

Please do not charge!

ALABAMA LIBRARIAN
2 JUL 2013 10:10 PM

IMO

One of the prime issues is that no press release should have been sent out until all state agencies had an opportunity to discuss this with its libraries.  We are now in a situation of appearing uninformed (which most of us are) and out of touch.  As we argue that libraries and librarians are relevant in this age of information over load this PR puts us in the "clueless" column.

My husband saw the news story this evening.  I haven't even returned home and had a chance to talk to my staff yet about the little information I have.

WISCONSIN LIBRARIAN
3 JUL 2013 1:09 PM

I highly doubt that ALA will provide this for free.  And certainly not free to non-members.  ALA doesn't speak for all libraries, but the politicians believe they do.  Our library will certainly help people find their way with this.  However, ALA is brokering these partnerships, committing us to additional programs but NOT fighting for financial aid to do them.

ALA PRESS OFFICER JAZZY WRIGHT
3 JUL 2013 2:10 PM

Hello,

Thank you all for expressing your concerns.  Resources on the Affordable Care Act will be provided by OCLC’s Webjunction at no cost to members and non-members (everyone).  IMLS has awarded $286,104 to OCLC to support the effort—learn more about the grant to Webjunction: http://www.oclc.org/en-US/news/releases/2013/201337dublin.html.

We are working with every government agency to look for resources that can prepare libraries for the health enrollment changes to come.  Look for an update from the ALA Washington Office with more information soon.  And again, if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to give me at a call at (202) 628-8410, ext. 8208.

Warm regards,

Jazzy Wright
Press Officer
American Library Association, Washington Office

ALA PRESS OFFICER JAZZY WRIGHT
3 JUL 2013 2:25 PM

Hello [KANSAS LIBRARIAN],

Thank you for expressing your concerns.  Resources on the Affordable Care Act will be provided by OCLC’s Webjunction at no cost to members and non-members (everyone).  IMLS has awarded $286,104 to OCLC to support the effort—learn more about the grant to Webjunction: http://www.oclc.org/en-US/news/releases/2013/201337dublin.html.

Just to be clear, the “partnership” between IMLS and the Center for Medicare Services was created only so that the government agency could provide informational resources specifically tailored to libraries—libraries are not forced into a commitment or obligation of any kind.  ALA is only providing information to help libraries prepare to answer questions that their patrons may have.  ALA is providing resources on the health law so that libraries can fulfill their mission to make information available to their patrons.  We are working with the agency to provide free resources so that librarians would not be caught off guard by patron questions.  Again, we are only providing information.

We are working with every government agency to look for resources that can prepare libraries for the health enrollment changes to come.  Look for an update from the ALA Washington Office with more information soon.  If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to give me at a call at (202) 628-8410, ext. 8208.

Warm regards,

Jazzy Wright
Press Officer
American Library Association, Washington Office

SOUTH CAROLINA LIBRARIAN IN RESPONSE TO ALABAMA LIBRARIAN
3 JUL 2013 8:04 PM

Amen to that.

[In response to ALABAMA LIBRARIAN who said, "One of the prime issues is that no press release should have been sent out until all state agencies had an opportunity to discuss this with its libraries.  We are now in a situation of appearing uninformed (which most of us are) and out of touch.  As we argue that libraries and librarians are relevant in this age of information over load this PR puts us in the 'clueless' column."]



Stories Related to ALA's Obamacare Push

For stories related to this issue, see, in reverse chronological order:
  • "Local Libraries To Help Feds in ObamaCare Outreach," by Charles Parker, Brevard Times, 4 July 2013:
    Thompson said this in an email exchange with District 5 County Commissioner Andy Anderson, after the question was raised by Brevard Times.

    Anderson has asked to “review the plan for dissemination and materials. I may need to discuss with board if the information is accurate or just political propaganda.

    “In addition - the Board of County Commissioners should decide - not the National Library Association - they were not elected to represent Brevard residents.
  • "White House Vetoes Public Seeing Obama's Thanks to Librarians," by Gabriella MorrongielloThe Washington Examiner, 3 July 2013.
  • "No ObamaCare Partnership at MontCo Public Libraries, MCLINC Says; The Montgomery County Library and Information Network Consortium Will Not Set Aside Computers for Heath [sic] Care Sign-Ups, According to Library Leadership," by Brittany Tressler, Hatboro-Horsham Patch, 3 July 0213:
    According to a Montgomery County-Norristown Public Library representative, the Montgomery County Library and Information Network Consortium will not participate in the new partnership between the American Library Association and the White House, which will promote ObamaCare.

    During a recent municipal presentation, Perkiomen Township Commissioner Richard Kratz questioned Montgomery County-Norristown Public Library Executive Director Kathleen Arnold-Yerger about the recently announced campaign, in which 17,000 U.S. libraries will help to spread the word about the new health care law, and will give the public access to computers to sign up.

    Arnold-Yerger said she was “shocked” when she heard about the partnership.

    “I thought, ‘Gee, they think libraries are going to put the few computers that we have aside for people to sign up for health care?’ ” Arnold-Yerger said.

    According to the Obama administration, libraries are a great place to learn about the new healthcare system before its October kick-off, when Americans can start shopping for insurance online.

    "Libraries are a tremendous resource for people in their communities," U.S. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services spokeswoman Julie Bataille said, according to Fox News. "They're already a destination many individuals go to when they're seeking out information and understanding on a variety of issues."

    However, library employees have to be very careful when it comes to asking questions from customers, according Arnold-Yerger.

    “When people come in with health questions and legal questions, we, as a profession, have to be very careful has [sic] we respond to them,” Arnold-Yerger said. “We will send them to the law library, to medical sites, but we have to be careful that we do not push people either way.”
  • "Abilene Public Library Could Become a Helpful Source for Obamacare Sign Ups," by Tiffany Walden, Abilene Reporter-News, 3 July 2013:
    Ricki Brown, Abilene chief librarian, remained unsure Wednesday on how involved APL will be in a federal program to assist residents with Obamacare sign ups.
  • "Librarians to the Health Care/Insurance Literacy Rescue," by Ann Treacy, The Twin Cities Daily Planet, 3 July 2013:
    I think it's a great idea – but the last time I checked many libraries had a 30-minue time limit on computers, which is often enforced strictly because of the waiting list to use computers.  Also many libraries are closed on Sundays and other odd hours.  To really position the libraries and librarians to support the effort, I think it might be time to invest in computers, broadband and hours for the libraries!
  • "Administration Seeks Help From Librarians, NFL to Promote ObamaCare," by Jim Angle, Fox News, 2 July 2013.
  • "The Latest Addition to the Obamacare Army:  Libraries," by Becket AdamsThe Blaze, 2 July 2013:
    Let's recap things: Despite a lack of funding, public libraries are being asked to deploy their resources to help educate and enroll people in the president's health care law – and this may actually be a violation of the Library Bill of Rights.

    Yep.
  • "IMLS and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to Partner with Libraries," by Mamie Bittner, US Institute of Library and Museum Services, 1 July 2013:
    Chicago, IL— During the annual meeting of the American Library Association, The Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), together with representatives from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), met with library representatives on Sunday, June 30, to hear more about what librarians can do to get ready to respond to patron requests for assistance in navigating new health insurance options in the Health Insurance Marketplace.

    "We applaud the CMS for recognizing the role that libraries play in connecting patrons with government agencies," said Maureen Sullivan, president of the American Library Association.  "Our libraries look forward to guiding Americans navigate through the new health marketplace."
  • "Obamacare Outreach Recruits Libraries," by Jeffrey YoungThe Huffington Post, 1 July 2013.
  • "The Sellout: American Libraries to Promote Obamacare," by Lindsey GrudnickiNational Review Online, 1 July 2013 (hyperlinks in original):
    So the public library – the institution whose foundational principles are the preservation of intellectual freedom and the unbiased promotion of learning – will become politicized to advance the Obama administration’s agenda.

    This agreement between the ALA and the Department of Health and Human Services violates the so-called “Library Bill of Rights,” which declares that “libraries should provide materials and information presenting all points of view on current and historical issues” and that “materials should not be proscribed or removed because of partisan or doctrinal disapproval.” The partnership essentially dictates that librarians blindly lead those seeking healthcare to the welfare fountain and encourage them to drink – no matter the consequences, and no matter the myriad of concerns raised about the program. “All points of view” about the Affordable Care Act will not be represented; the proscribed materials (HealthCare.gov, marketplace.cms.gov, etc.) will clearly not offer true “health care literacy.”

    As if the corruption of the library’s time-honored purpose is not enough, the institution won’t even receive a reward for its self-betrayal. Susan Hildreth, Director of the Institute of Museum and Library Services, has stated that “there are no federal funds to support this program.” As libraries already face devastating budget cuts and declines in funding, the initiative to serve as Obamacare’s cheerleader in communities could spell disaster. In addition to spending money to train librarians in their new capacity as healthcare experts, the alliance could alienate patrons who disapprove of the healthcare legislation and cause them to reconsider much-needed donations to their local library as it converts into something like “Obamacare Enrollment Station #1234.”
  • "The Prescription for Finding Healthcare Information," by George M. EberhartAmerican Libraries, 1 July 2013:
    Institute of Museum and Library Services Director Susan Hildreth emphasized that “there are no federal funds to support this program,” which could be a hardship for libraries that are already overwhelmed by shrinking budgets and increased use.  She encouraged libraries to seek partnerships with other health organizations in their communities and set aside at least one or two public-access computers for the exclusive use of healthcare seekers.
  • "Council I Supports Whistleblower Edward Snowden," by Laurie D. Borman, American Libraries, 30 June 2013:
    A special video presentation by President Barack Obama encouraging librarians to help disseminate information about new health care insurance options under the Affordable Care Act opened the Council I session.
  • "White House Recruits Librarians to Promote ObamaCare," by Fox News and The Associated PressFox News, 30 June 2013:
    It was hard enough to learn the Dewey Decimal System. Now they've got to learn the health care law?

    In the escalating campaign to promote ObamaCare, the nation's librarians are about to become the Obama administration's latest recruits.
  • "Librarians Being Recruited to Push Obamacare," by Greg Richter, Newsmax, 30 Jun 2013.
  • "Librarian Foot Soldiers Enlisted to Help With Obamacare Enrollment," by Associated PressThe Washington Times, 29 June 2013.
  • "Newest Foot Soldiers for ObamaCare: Librarians," by AllahPundit, Hot Air, 29 June 2013:
    Exit question: If government workers of any and every stripe are really just a free-floating labor force for the feds, ready to be enlisted for whatever policy priority the ruling administration has in mind, how come librarians and mailmen haven’t been coopted to coordinate jobs programs for the unemployed?
  • "Pres. Obama to Send #ala2013 Video Thank You," by Beverly GoldbergAmerican Libraries, 28 June 2013.
  • "Breaking News: President Obama to Reveal Message to ALA Conference," by Jazzy WrightAmerican Library Association, 27 June 2013.
  • "'Libraries & Health Insurance: Preparing for October 1'," by Jazzy Wright, American Library Association, 17 June 2013.
  • "Libraries & Health Insurance: Preparing for October 1," by UnnamedAmerican Library Association, undated (circa 17 June 2013):
    Is your library prepared to deal with the rush of patrons who will need help filling out Affordable Care Act health form applications this year?  In October, library patrons will stream into libraries to learn about new insurance requirements and options available.  Libraries will need to know about the resources that will help library patrons.  Learn how to serve patrons on the new health program in this new session.  Speakers include Jackie Garner Medicaid consortium administrator; Susan Hildreth, director of Institute of Museum and Library Services; Ruth Holst, associate director at the National Network of Library of Medicine Greater Midwest Regional Medical Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Kendra Morgan, senior program manager, OCLC Webjunction.
  • "Anything Goes for America if Seattle Public Library Director Susan Hildreth's Nomination is Confirmed for the Institute of Museum and Library Services," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 26 November 2010.
  • "Fear of Socialism," by Leonard KniffelAmerican Libraries, 23 October 2009.
  • "ALA Council Supports Universal Healthcare," by UnnamedAmerican Libraries, undated (cached by Google 9 June 2013):
    With healthcare costs eating up chunks of shrinking library budgets across the country, the ALA Council during its last meeting in Chicago overwhelmingly passed a resolution supporting affordable, universal healthcare, including the option of a single-payer healthcare program. This is essentially a reaffirmation of a resolution adopted by ALA in June 2006. ALA policy states that "ALA recognizes the importance of comprehensive healthcare for all Americans and its impact on libraries and their users." ALA joined the Universal Health Care Action Network in 2005 and the following year endorsed "expanded Medicare for all," calling for a single-payer, universal healthcare program. Citing the rising cost of providing health insurance and the burden it places on state and local governments, the Council noted that it has become increasingly difficult for them to adequately fund libraries and schools. The Council document notes that 46 million people in the United States have no health insurance. "Without good health, humankind cannot truly exercise intellectual freedom and civic engagement.

Lenny Kravitz's Message to Librarians?

All this reminds me of a Lenny Kravitz song librarians must be thinking to themselves:



"What The Fuck Are We Saying"

Will we ever understand?
Or is the fate of man at hands ?
Will we live or shall we die?
How will we ever know if we never try?

The government's the devil's hands
It's a lie and it's a scam
They wind us up, put us down, and watch us go
And if you close your eyes
There's a big surprise

What the fuck are we saying?
Do we feel what we dream about?
We've got to keep on praying
And one day we'll see the light

I've been lost in the name of love
And we kill our brothers daily in the name of God
We'd better chill before we take on some tribulation
And if we realized
Then we'd make a little love now sing

What the fuck are we saying?
Do we believe what we read about?
We've got to keep on praying
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light

What the fuck are we saying?
Do we believe what we dream about?
We've got to keep on praying
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light
And one day we'll see the light


ALA Is Experienced At Pushing Libraries to Promote Political Agenda

By the way, ALA was already using all American libraries as distribution points for "news" from someone who gives ALA millions to promote his own anti-American propaganda while hiding behind a pretty librarian's face:

NOTE ADDED 11 JULY 2013:

NOTE ADDED 13 JULY 2013:
  • "Libraries and the Affordable Care Act; ALA President Barbara Stripling Releases a Statement on Libraries and the Affordable Care Act," by Mariam Pera, American Libraries, 12 July 2013:
    "Decisions about how libraries will respond to inquiries about the ACA will be made by local libraries. As always, libraries do not promote specific programs or points of view, but provide the public with balanced, unbiased access to information."
  • "Dallas Librarians Study Up On Health Law," by Lauren SilvermanTexas News, 12 July 2013 (hyperlinks in original) (Note the included attractive photo is from Shutterstock, so it is not from the library, not news, and it has nothing to do with the photo's caption):
    At the annual American Library Association conference, on June 26th, President Obama challenged librarians to be on the front line of providing information about the Affordable Care Act. Up to 17,000 U.S. libraries will be part of the effort -- including Dallas Public Library.

    Jasmine Africawala, Dallas Public Library's Community Engagement Administrator, attended the conference.  She says in September, staff will "be trained on what the Affordable Care Act means and also how to guide customers to the resources they need to sign up for health care on the exchange."
  • "State Gears Up for Obamacare with Health Exchange; Assistants Help People Navigate Options of Private Coverage Plans," by Claire Hughes, Times Union (Albany, NY), 11 July 2013:
    Librarians are anticipating a rush among community residents looking for help applying for insurance through the exchange, said Jeremy Johannesen, executive director of the New York Library Association.  But libraries are not expecting money for the efforts.

    "There's a lot of instances where the libraries are called upon to serve as the information office for different government activities, and there typically isn't financial support for that role," he said.
AND LOOK, LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS TO STOP LIBRARIANS FROM PUSHING OBAMACARE:
  • "Librarians to Assist with Implementation of Obamacare in Idaho," by Dustin Hurst, Idaho Reporter, 8 July 2013:
    They understand the Dewey Decimal system, so why not a massive health care overhaul?
    ....
    The Idaho Library Association is partnering with Blue Cross of Idaho to hold trainings for librarians who might have their own questions about how to assist Idahoans. The association trained 22 librarians two weeks ago and plans to train another 22 this week.

    Blue Cross will provide educational materials to libraries, including fliers and bookmarks. Later this year the association plans to hold a health literacy week for libraries statewide.

    Not everyone is thrilled that librarians are hitting the frontlines on Obama’s behalf.

    State Rep. Vito Barbieri, R-Dalton Gardens, pushed a bill in Idaho’s 2011 legislative session that would have essentially banned what the state’s librarians are planning. The measure, which fell victim to Gov. Butch Otter’s veto stamp, would have prevented any public workers from implementing any parts of Obamacare.

    Barbieri told IdahoReporter.com Monday that he’s troubled that the librarians are taking up the health reform mantel. “Any time we use public resources for private gain, that should be a cause for concern,” Barbieri warned.

    Barbieri’s miffed that Blue Cross of Idaho, which stands to gain from development of the exchange marketplace and other facets of the reform law, is asking librarians to stand in the trenches, calling it “disconcerting.”

    Josh Jordan, corporate communication specialist with Blue Cross of Idaho, told IdahoReporter.com Monday that his organization simply wants an efficient avenue for informing as many Gem State residents as possible about Obamacare provisions.

    “We reached out to the ILA because, with branches all over the state, libraries can reach a broad spectrum of residents across Idaho and serve as a resource to the community—providing educational resources about the ACA and access to computers to access more information and the exchange,” Jordan wrote in an email.

    He promised that the materials Blue Cross will soon deliver to Idaho libraries aren’t pushing the carrier’s products and services. Yother said the agreement is merely a public service and not a maneuver to rally around specific politicians, policies or health carriers.

    “For us, it’s not about politics,” Yother said. “It’s not about choosing one side or the other.”

NOTE ADDED 19 JULY 2013:

Here's ALA attempting to clarify its marching orders that I revealed above were being made and remade on the fly as a result of librarians questioning/doubting the ALA's diktat:



Here's a library marching to ALA orders:

"We're kind of at the mercy of the federal government," Kingery said.

Now I see I have been part of the news on this issue:

NOTE ADDED 23 JULY 2013:

REMARKABLE!!:

NOTE ADDED 5 AUGUST 2013:

Of interest, only one person showed up at a public library for an ObamaCare event "convened by the president's foot soldiers," OFA, and that alone apparently made it newsworthy.  Just look at the picture of that sad showing:
  • "Poor Attendance at Obamacare Event in Virginia," by Kyle Cheney, Politico, 4 August 2013:
    CENTREVILLE, Va. — A race to define Obamacare to the masses began today between the stacks at the Centreville Library. ....  Dozens of communities around the country hosted pro-Obamacare events, convened by the president's foot soldiers at Organizing for Action.  The series is the first salvo in what is fixing to be a month of high-stakes health care spin.  .... 
Lynn Duvall was the sole volunteer at the Centreville OFA event.
Photo credit: M.Scott Mahaskey/POLITICO



Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Opposing FISA is the American Library Association's Latest Directive, on September 11, No Less

The American Library Association's [ALA] latest directive is to oppose FISA and its means to help prevent further terror attacks in the USA.  The ALA directive was made on September 11th, the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks.  It uses paranoid scare tactics to motivate people to act, such as: "Watch what you say and do on your phones, emails and other communications":
Oppose H.R. 5949, the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) Reauthorization Act of 2012 
Posted on September 11, 2012 by Lynne Bradley  
URGENT:  September 13th vote pending in the House on FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act)

ACTIVISTS:  Use our legislative action center to send messages to House members opposing H.R. 5949, the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) Reauthorization Act of 2012 or call your congressional representative now!

The message to all House members:  Oppose H.R. 5949 the FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2012, H.R. 5949.  Protect Americans’ privacy and constitutional rights.  Do not extend the FAA sunset until December 31, 2017.

ALA asks library supporters to ask the House to oppose this latest attempt to reauthorize the FAA.  Unexpectedly, a quick vote on H.R. 5949, is scheduled for this Thursday, September 13th.

BACKGROUND:  It’s déjà vu all over again: Watch what you say and do on your phones, emails and other communications because, once again, the House of Representatives appears ready to reauthorize the 2008 FAA law that legalized the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping program and more.  The American public, including our library patrons, will continue to be exposed to needless surveillance under this reauthorization.

The FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2012, H.R. 5949, (yes, this is the correct name of the bill and the law) would extend the provisions of the 2008 FAA to December 31, 2017, rather than letting the FISA sunset on December 31, 2012.  The government is allowed to get 12-month orders from the secret FISA court to conduct “dragnet surveillance of Americans’ international communications—including phone calls, emails, and internet records—for the purpose of collecting foreign intelligence.” *

As we did in 2008, the American Library Association (ALA) continues to argue against the FISA Amendments Act because of the FAA’s lack of transparency and the potential for abuse of the system that has been created.

....

* From the ACLU Washington Legislative Office web site where additional details are available: ACLU’s Washington Markup.

Furthermore, the ALA literally joined as co-signer with the Council on American-Islamic Relations [CAIR] to oppose FISA in the past:

By contrast with ALA, the Obama Administration supports FAA:
  • "President Pushes to Extend Surveillance Law," by Siobhan Gorman, Wall Street Journal, 11 September 2012:
    The Obama administration is lobbying for renewal of a controversial 2008 surveillance law, warning that the U.S. would lose a critical intelligence-collection tool if Congress allows the measure to expire at year's end.

    As President Barack Obama emphasizes his national-security record in his re-election campaign, he's facing strong resistance from some lawmakers who say the law lacks sufficient privacy protections.

    The Republican-dominated House is expected as soon as Wednesday to pass the bill, which would extend the law for five years.  But its fate is less clear in the Senate, where Sen. Ron Wyden (D, Ore.) is blocking Senate consideration, ...
  • "FISA Fight; Congressional Vote to Reauthorize Surveillance Program Highlights Administration Reversals on Spying, Transparency," by CJ Ciaramella, Washington Free Beacon, 12 September 2012.

See also:

Do people realize George Soros is funding the ALA to shill for his own interests in support of terrorists?  Do people realize as self-arrogated "censorship" police, the ALA joined with CAIR to use pro-terrorist censorship to censor Robert Spencer, but parents keeping inappropriate material from children being "censorship" is the message of ALA's "Banned Books Week"?  Do people realize the ALA joined CAIR to oppose radicalization hearings?  And wasn't ALA uncharacteristically silent as terrorists destroyed a famous library in Timbuktu, Mali?

What does any of this have to do with librarianship, the proclaimed mission of the ALA?  Is the ALA in your community library having any influence at all?  Is it okay that a terrorist-friendly organization has influence over your local community library and local school library?

Has ALA political capital just been further attenuated by once again lining up on the losing side of yet another non-library matter?

While it is legitimate to oppose FISA, the ALA that supports terrorists remains true to form.  On September 11, no less.  On the day the U.S. Ambassador to Libya is killed.  On the day the U.S. Embassy in Egypt is attacked and destroyed.  Will ALA members do nothing about this?

The Third Jihad: Radical Islam's Vision for America was used by the NYPD for counterterrorism training.  The ALA is part of the problem described therein when it works with CAIR to censor perceived/presumed opposition such as Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, uses Soros funding to support Soros/CAIR's interests, or directly joins with CAIR to oppose national security interests having nothing to do with librarianship.

Oh, for the people shocked to hear the ALA supports terrorists, here's one more example, showing the ALA wished library patron privacy laws had protected a 9/11 terrorist from being reported to the police:
  • "A Nation Challenged: Questions of Confidentiality; Competing Principles Leave Some Professionals Debating Responsibility to Government," by David E. Rosenbaum, The New York Times, 23 November 2001:  
    When the names and photographs were first released, Kathleen Hensman, a public librarian in Delray Beach, Fla., recognized some of the suspected hijackers in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon as men who had used the computers in her small library.

    She immediately called the police.

    That broke a Florida law that guarantees confidentiality to library patrons.  It also violated a cardinal principle of librarians never to tell the police, in absence of a court order, about who uses their rooms and what books they check out.

    But almost no one thinks Ms. Hensman did the wrong thing.  Of course, she will not be prosecuted.

    ....

    Judith Krug, director of the American Library Association's office of intellectual freedom, said, "I would have felt better if she had followed the Florida law."

ALA has a lot of positive influence in our communities.  However, let's get the negative influence of the ALA's "Office for Intellectual Freedom" out of our public libraries, out of our school libraries, and out of our minds.  Its actions do not warrant our blind acquiescence.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Obama and the ALA Plagiarist

The Obama administration may select an American Library Association [ALA] plagiarist, former ALA president Camila A. Alire, for its National Council on the Humanities [NEH].  "Because democracy demands wisdom, NEH serves and strengthens our republic by promoting excellence in the humanities and conveying the lessons of history to all Americans."  


In addition, Alire lent little support during her time as ALA president or past president while Cuban librarians languished in jail and the civil rights of gay librarians were ignored.  I am not sure how plagiarism, which is intellectual theft, nor how turning a blind eye when she could have made a difference to the Castro regime's book burnings, librarian jailing/torture, and gay librarian abuses meets the stated goal of the NEH to which Alire may be appointed.  


Camila A. Alire is not up to the standards of the Obama administration and should not be selected for the NEH post. 

Here is relevant information:
  • "President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts," by Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 28 June 2012:
    Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key Administration posts: Camila A. Alire – Member, National Council on the Humanities....
  • "ALA Screws Gay Librarians; Gay Civil Rights Community Should Demand ALA Action; Rank and File Rebellion Against the ALA Leadership Needed," by Dan KleinmanSafeLibraries, 15 January 2011, quoting Robert Kent (hyperlinks added):
    But it is to be hoped that those attending her presentation will ask Ms. Alire questions about her adherence to these principles.  Why, during her presidency of the ALA, did Ms. Alire fail to defend library workers in a neighboring country who are being persecuted?  What good does it do to advocate high principles in theory while failing to implement them in practice?

    Among the most recent outrages ignored by the ALA, the association at its just concluded San Diego failed to take action against recent raids on gay libraries in Cuba.  (For details, see the Recent News section of our website.)

    Yesterday civil liberties journalist Nat Hentoff, in his latest column on this subject ("The Endless Shame of the Spineless ALA," see link below) asks some of these questions regarding Ms. Alire's failure to respond to appeals, which Ms. Alire has declined to answer for many months.  The library community has a right to ask Ms. Alire why she refuses to defend in practice the rights she defends in theory.

    We in the Friends of Cuban Libraries urge the people attending Ms. Alire's UCLA presentation to politely insist that she provide answers to these important questions.
  • "ALA Double Standard on Accuracy in Texas State Board of Education Proposal on School Book Content; ALA President Plagiarizes to Promote Matter Outside ALA Purview," by Dan KleinmanSafeLibraries, 18 May 2010 (hyperlink omitted, and my prediction came true):
    Let alone the ALA has no standing in the educational arena, let alone the ALA has a double standard in requiring accuracy, the ALA, President Camila A. Alire herself, has signed a letter to the Texas Education Agency that is nearly 100% plagiarized.   That's theft.

    Shocking as this statement of the ALA's wholesale copying may be, I am just the messenger, not the plagiarizer.  The ALA president's letter is over her signature and is dated 13 May 2010.  It is a near complete copy of a letter dated 11 May 2010 by Martin Garnar, Chair of the ALA's Intellectual Freedom Committee:

    On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Garnar, Martin wrote:
    ....
    Camila A. Alire is not on the Intellectual Freedom Committee.  She has clearly plagiarized.  Both Alire's letter and Garnar's letter are reprinted below.  Go ahead, compare them.  See for yourself.  It's truly disgraceful and I predict there will be no consequences whatsoever.
  • "Will ALA Silence Lead to Death?," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 13 March 2010.
  • "[ifforum] Hunger Strike Appeal: Librarian in Danger," by Robert Kent, The Friends of Cuban Librarians, 11 March 2010.
President Obama, please do not appoint Camila A. Alire for the reasons stated above.  For full disclosure, I made a similar request in the past:

Friday, November 26, 2010

Anything Goes for America if Seattle Public Library Director Susan Hildreth's Nomination is Confirmed for the Institute of Museum and Library Services

Susan Hildreth
"Anything goes" is coming to American libraries if the nominee for the Institute of Museum and Library Services [IMLS] Director is confirmed.   Susan Hildreth has been nominated for this post.  N1, N2, N3.  She is the American Library Association's [ALA] Freedom To Read Foundation [FTRF] Treasurer.  She is also the Seattle Public Library's director.  She should not be confirmed.  Here's why:


Susan Hildreth's ALA is an Anything-Goes Organization Out of the Mainstream

The ALA, in which Susan Hildreth is prominently positioned, is an "anything goes" organization.  As Will Manley of the ALA put it:

It would appear that in the case of keeping children away from Internet p[]rnography, it is the library profession, not the Supreme Court, which has distanced itself from the mainstream.  Our profession's 'anything goes' view of intellectual freedom simply does not square with the values of the communities we serve.  N4.

Will Manley asks:

Why is there such a disconnect between our profession and everyone else on this particular issue?  More specifically, how could we have allowed ourselves to be put in such a publicly disadvantageous position as defending the right of children to access p[]rnography?  The answer is simple and ironic.  Our profession preaches intellectual freedom but does not tolerate its practice within our own ranks.  Librarians imbued with common sense and good political judgment are afraid to espouse even a moderate position that advocates the limited use of filters.  There is a great fear within librarianship of being branded a censor.  No librarian wants to be wounded by that bullet.  That's why we can never really initiate an open and honest dialogue among ourselves on issues involving even the most obvious need for limitations of intellectual freedom.  As a result, the extremists always dominate, and we end up with an "anything goes" official policy that distances the library profession from mainstream America.  N4.

Has an out-of-the-mainstream extremist just been nominated for IMLS Director?  She is from the FTRF, after all.  But let us look at the library that she directs to examine this issue further.  She likely has more sway there as director than in the ALA as treasurer of the FTRF.


Susan Hildreth's Library Approves Internet P0rnography and Opposes Filtering

Susan Hildreth directs the Seattle Public Library.  The library refuses to use Internet filters to cut back on the p0rnography that may attract crime.  N5.  In fact, the library welcomes p0rnography: it's—"okay"!  A shocking statement, yes, but here is the basis for that observation:

"Each individual to have access to constitutionally protected material," Seattle Public Library Spokesperson Andra Addison said.

In Seattle, it's open access to everyone. As long as it's legal, it's okay, even if it's explicit. They're not about censorship, they're about protecting user privacy and confidentiality.

"The library believes it's the right and responsibility of parents and legal guardians to determine and monitor their own children's use," Addison said.

And that's where it comes down to choice: choice for parents, choice for the library.  Libraries try to walk that line, especially since there is a wide range of what people consider explicit.  But all will tell you, filters can be a false sense of security.

"You can be vigilant, and you can be proactive but you cannot prevent it," Rosemary said.  N6.



Susan Hildreth's Outdated Dogma on Internet Filters and Public Library P0rn

Dean Marney
A "false sense of security"?  Does Susan Hildreth believe that?  Yes.  As she put it, "Internet filtering is not 100 percent effective at all.  They're not able to deal with all the wild and crazy sites that are put up at every minute of the day."  N7.

Is it true that filtering is not effective and that legal p0rnography may not be kept out of libraries?  Of course not.  It may be what Susan Hildreth believes, the person nominated to lead the IMLS, but it is not true.  Ask library director Dean Marney, for example.  He revealed that the ALA uses outdated dogma to control local libraries, and good filters work fine.  See, "Library P[]rn Removal Roadmap; NCRL Director Dean Marney Details How to Legally Remove Legal P[]rn from Public Library Computers and Advises that the ALA Relies on Outdated Dogma."  N8.

Susan Hildreth is using outdated dogma as well.  She won't change when she gets to the IMLS.


The Seattle Public Library Run by Susan Hildreth is Riddled with Crime

And what has come of Susan Hildreth's anything-goes policy?  This is an important question because, as IMLS Director, she may bring the ALA's anything-goes, out-of-the-mainstream and outdated dogma to the national stage.  How has the Seattle Public Library been affected by this policy with which Susan Hildreth agrees?  It has been riddled with crime, that's how.  Look:

KIRO7 Library Misconduct
Click for Video
KIRO Team 7 Investigative Reporter Chris Halsne discovered security has already ejected 432 patrons in the first four months this year for offenses like assault, drug dealing, intoxication and lewd conduct.
....
In all, 1,323 conduct violations were substantiated just in 2008, a disproportionate number at the Central Library branch.
....
According to Seattle Library Administrator Marilynn Gardner, nobody has to worry about safety at any branch.  N9.

Right.  Nobody has to worry about safety in a library with thousands of incidents, N9, and where management believes viewing p0rnography is "okay," N6.  No wonder Seattle librarians think there's a "sort of 1984 atmosphere at the library these days."  N10.

The library simply refuses to use Internet filters to prevent p0rnography, N5; indeed, it believes p0rnography in the public library is "okay."  N6.  And the crimes continue by the hundreds.  N11.  Hundreds!  Does anyone see a problem with that?  Does anyone want Susan Hildreth to use her position as IMLS director to bring that to American libraries?


Loss of E-Rate Funding Never Restored; Hildreth Says Go Fish to the Poor

For those who do not know, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Internet filters in public libraries are perfectly legal.  N12.  To get E-Rate funding for "Internet Access," all you need do is use Internet filtering.  The Seattle Public Library used to get money for "Internet Access," but 2003 was the last year as a result of the library's refusal to use Internet filters.  N13.  At least that's better than the nearby King County Library System that is defrauding the E-Rate program of over $1,000,000.  N14. 

Does anyone in the Seattle community know that the Seattle Public Library is intentionally turning down funding it used to get, simply because p0rnography is "okay"?  Has Susan Hildreth, struggling for funding for the library, N15, done anything to restore the lost E-Rate funding?  No.  Instead, the library will shut for a week.  N15.  Apparently, ALA politics trumps local interests.  "[F]or those who aren't familiar with our digital collection, this is a good time to learn how to download books, movies and music, since they will be available during the closure," said Susan Hildreth.  N15.

Librarians, always decrying the "digital divide," N16, suddenly advise people to "learn how to download."  N15.  Will poor populations have computers at home to download during the week?  She could have obtained E-Rate funding by properly filtering the computers but chooses instead to shut the library for a week.  It's just more evidence of Hildreth's ideological bent.  Obviously she cares more about the p0rn people than about the poor people.  Is that IMLS material?


Susan Hildreth Frightens Librarians Into Silence

Remember from above how Will Manley revealed librarians are afraid to speak out for fear of what the ALA might do?  Guess who Seattle Public Library librarians fear?  IMLS director nominee Susan Hildreth:

[M]any librarians feel unrepresented by management, and some fear retribution for speaking their minds against new policies and restructuring.
....
When asked why she didn't include a librarian on the committee to provide perspectives of what day-to-day SPL employees need or believe should be added to service, Hildreth says she didn't want an internal perspective to influence the committee.  "That's why we don't have [library] board members on the committee," she says.
The advisory committee isn't the only place where librarians feel silenced, though.  In recent months, SPL employees have taken to anonymously posting comments on blogs to air their grievances about recent shifts in policy and what they perceive as a newfound institutional inattentiveness to the needs of many patrons.  SPL employees stormed the web in protest when the December 30 edition of American Libraries magazine praised Hildreth and the library board for being "inspiring" and "ambitious."

The Stranger
A number of librarians have contacted The Stranger anonymously because they think the public needs to be informed that they are unhappy with SPL leadership.  Common complaints include anger at the creation of a new level of middle management while entry-level positions are cut and hours are shortened; a lack of librarian input on planning, restructuring, and budget decisions; fear of retribution for negative comments (even if the comments are delivered internally, through proper channels); a lack of communication with the library board; and a long-term plan to replace qualified librarians with volunteers and paraprofessionals.
....
Librarians have their own hopes for [Mayor] McGinn.  The mayor doesn't have much official power over the library-he approves the budget and appoints new members to five-year terms on the five-person library board-but they would like him to advocate for them.  One librarian says, "It's hard for someone in my position not to fantasize about the mayor pulling Susan Hildreth aside at some future meeting and saying, 'I hear your staff is not at all happy with how things are being run lately.  Not enough communication?  Something about bullies?  Might [be worth] watching.'  It'd be nice to imagine there was pressure, however subtle, from above, for her to clean house a bit."  N16.

Wow.  Her own librarians are afraid of Susan Hildreth, and now she's going to be the IMLS director.  Wow.


Conclusion

How ALA and ALA Affiliate Bullies
Get It Done
If Susan Hildreth becomes IMLS director, ALA politics will trump national interests, just like they trumped local Seattle interests with Susan Hildreth at the helm.  She can clearly steer national funding the ALA's way.  N17.  I am certain she will steer national policy the ALA's way as well.  Communities may suffer as a direct result.

I strongly oppose approving Susan Hildreth as IMLS director, and I urge people to contact their leaders [U.S. Capitol Switchboard 202-224-3121].  For example, urge Senator John McCain to oppose Susan Hildreth as IMLS director.  Especially tell members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee before December 1.  N18.

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will be holding a full committee markup at 10am on Wednesday, December 1.  On the agenda for this markup, among other issues, the committee is scheduled to vote on the nomination of Susan Hildreth to be the director of the Institute for Museum and Library Sciences (IMLS).  N18.

And, given what Will Manley (and The Stranger) said about librarians being afraid to speak out for fear of being labeled a censor (like the ALA labels all library patrons who raise concerns, N19), comments below may be left anonymously.  Here's your chance.  Speak out before the ALA policy that has made the Seattle Public Library crime riddled and fear wracked becomes national policy.  The ALA monitors this blog so your comments will be noticed.


End Notes

N1:  "President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 9/29/10," by Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, 29 September 2010.

N2:  "Hildreth To Be Nominated as IMLS Director," by David Rapp, Library Journal, 30 September 2010.

N3:  "President Nominates Former Public Library Association President for IMLS Director," by Jenni Terry, (ALA) American Libraries, 30 September 2010.

N4:  "Intellectual Freedom Begins at Home," by Will Manley, (ALA) Booklist, 1 October 2003.

N5:  "Public Use of the Internet Policy," by Library Board of Trustees, The Seattle Public Library, 22 January 2002.

N6:  "P[]rn at the Public Library: How Do Local Libraries Compare Across the State?," by Chelsea Kopta, KEPR 19, 12 June 2009.

N7:  "P[]rn, Sex Crimes At Libraries," by Dan Noyes, KIRO 7, 19 October 2007.

N8:  "Library P[]rn Removal Roadmap; NCRL Director Dean Marney Details How to Legally Remove Legal P[]rn from Public Library Computers and Advises that the ALA Relies on Outdated Dogma," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 15 November 2010.

N9:  "Library Conduct Violations Reach All-Time High," by Chris Halsne, KIRO 7, 27 May 2009.

N10:  "Not Keeping Quiet; Librarians Speak Out Against Proposed Policies at Seattle Public Library," by Paul Constant, The Stranger, 16 June 2009.

N11:  "Incidents by Primary Rule Violation, 2007-2009," by Seattle Public Library, KIRO 7, data from 3/07-12/09.

N12:  United States v. American Library Association, 539 U.S. 194 (2003).

N13:  "Automated Search of Commitments," by Universal Service Administrative Company, undated.

N14:  "Library Leaves Pedophile Free to Molest Other Children; King County Library System Defrauds Taxpayers of $1,158,253 from CIPA Program; Media Investigation Needed," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 14 October 2010.

N15:  "Seattle Libraries to Shut Down for a Week; Budget Woes for Second Closure in a Year," by Larry Lange, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 22 August 2010.

N16: "Corporate Euphemisms, Angry Librarians, Accusations of Bullying: The Tense Battle for Seattle Public Library's Future," by Paul Constant, The Stranger, 8 April 2010.

N17:  "Among $9.3 Million in National Leadership Grants, IMLS Backs ALA E-Government Project," by Carrie Netzer Wajda, Library Journal, 4 October 2010.

N18:  "HELP Committee is Scheduled to Vote on the Nomination of Susan Hildreth and LSTA Reauthorization," by ALA Washington Office, American Library Association, 24 November 2010.

N19:  "The Parent Trap: ALA Uses Banned Books Week to Ridicule Patrons Complying with ALA Materials Reconsideration Policies," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 29 September 2010.


About the Author

I'm Dan Kleinman and I wrote the above opinion.  I began opposing ALA policy almost a decade ago when the ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom policies forced inappropriate material into the hands of my kindergartner.  The school principal eventually removed the material from the public school library stating she found it twice as bad as I had reported.  Now running SafeLibraries.org, I educate people and politicians about who controls public libraries and what can be done to restore local control.  I am consulted nationwide for my expertise in how the negative aspects of ALA influence can be mitigated, and I appear in numerous media reports.  I write regularly and ask people to consider subscribing to SafeLibraries.  Guest posts are welcome.  I track library crimes on Delicious and broadcast my latest crime additions on my SafeLibraries Twitter.  I may be reached at SafeLibraries@gmail.com.

My efforts and those of my late partner, Mark Decker, have been rewarded by the ALA naming SafeLibraries as one of its "prominent" opponents, if not the top one.  See "Intellectual Freedom Manual, Eighth Edition," Office for Intellectual Freedom, American Library Association, 2010, p.383 [ALA's online version naming SafeLibraries].  Also see:

I am available for media interviews.  This is especially important as the ALA plans a huge propaganda campaign in September 2011 for the 30th anniversary of "Banned Books Week."  I can provide balance with a smile and with solid legal and factual support, as illustrated above.  Hint, no books have been banned in the USA for almost 50 years.

URL for this blog post:  

NOTE ADDED 1 DECEMBER 2010:

Today, the Senate HELP committee was no help.  The nomination of Susan Hildreth to be the director of IMLS was favorably reported from committee.  Her nomination now goes to the full Senate.  When you call your senators, please urge them to oppose Ms. Hildreth’s nomination.  Given this is the lame duck session, I doubt such opposition will prevail.


NOTE ADDED 17 FEBRUARY 2013:


.