Showing posts with label St Tammany Parish. Show all posts
Showing posts with label St Tammany Parish. Show all posts

Friday, March 28, 2025

Librarians Collude with ALA to Violate Open Government Laws and Dox Citizens; Kelly LaRocca in St. Tammany Parish Library Is a Prime Example

Why might a strong privacy policy be needed in your library?  Librarians collude with American Library Association in Chicago, Illinois, to violate open government records. They even provide ALA with private information about their own citizens.  

In Louisiana, "award" winning St. Tammany Parish Library Director Kelly LaRocca is a prime example.  She began turning records over to ALA then likely followed ALA's direction to use personal emails to hide such submissions from open government laws.  She recently admitted publicly to providing information to ALA but claimed she no longer does.  I believe she still does, only she follows ALA advice to use personal emails.  She says she doesn't.  But the very entity that gave her an "award" trains librarians in how to hide information from the public—and I'm the investigative reporter who uncovered that and reported it.

And all this to hide that the people being doxxed are complaining about access by children to explicit material the whole world thinks is inappropriate for children, except ALA, its member librarians, and the members of the hundreds of local groups it creates, like St. Tammany Library Alliance.  The latter, for example, denied that Kelly LaRocca admitted to turning private information over to ALA, even after Ms. LaRocca admitted she did.

Documents turned over to ALA are then made available to other librarians who use the documents to mock parents in forums like a Facebook group called ALA Think Tank (since renamed Library Think Tank to hide the association with ALA, but it's still in the URL).  Worse, sometimes the documents are used to sue people who are then mocked in court papers for the contents of these confidential documents.

It's like a free gift to ALA.  They get free Freedom of Information Act request responses without even having to ask for the information in the first place.  Then they get to use the documents to feed to their friends to sue parents and teachers who submitted those documents so as to further intimidate other people who dare to ever challenge any inappropriate material for children in any library.

St. Tammany Parish Library Board of Control has put a stop to this waste of local services that only serves to arm an outside group against its own citizens and against children nationwide.  It did so at a public hearing where a resolution to stop sending information to ALA either publicly or privately was passed unanimously.

Hear the entire hearing here:
Here are links to specific points of interest, the first being where discussion of the privacy resolution begins:
  • "Resolution No. 25-003 Resolution to Amend Rules and Regulations of the St. Tammany Parish Library Board of Control Section 202 Regarding Privacy Policy (Branton)" https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=78m08s
  • St. Tammany Parish Councilman David Cougle speaks: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=85m47s
    • He speaks about the specifics of the problem and the connection to ALA and its Unite Against Book Bans and EveryLibrary
    • He says the problem involves the concerns of parents with s3xually explicit materials were required to fill out a form (called a "Statement of Concern") that was ultimately turned over to ALA without notice to the parents
    • He says library director Kelly LaRocca wrote to ALA with confidential documents and ALA's "Office for Intellectual Freedom" wrote back saying the information would be stored in a "confidential" database
    • He points out multiple librarians were involved in the invasion of privacy
    • He says library employees discussed how book challenges were reported to both ALA and its subgroup EveryLibrary, a group also based in Illinois.
    • He discusses documents revealed by FOIA request, and those documents are shown below
    • He points out the violation of privacy may be ongoing because of ALA direction to use personal emails (pictured and linked below)
    • He points out the library employees were using taxpayer time and taxpayer resources to support a political campaign of ALA, including fundraising for ALA's "book ban" hoax organization called Unite Against Book Bans, and US Department of Education recently revealed it was all an ALA hoax 
    • He points out ALA did not request redactions of personal information
    • He pointed out an outside organization in Chicago was obtaining a free service for which local citizens would have to pay
    • He says these activities were a violation of the trust of parish residents and was an improper use of taxpayer funds and time
    • He says parish residents names could still be retained in ALA's "confidential" database
    • David Cougle speaks again here: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=130m14s
      • "There's a public records law that all of the people are supposed to follow and what was happening in this instance is somehow the ALA was skipping the line that the rest of us are obligated to follow"
      • "But for some reason the American Library Association was jumping in front of St. Tammany taxpayers and residents and getting it immediately, and that's what this needs to address and that can't happen anymore"



  • Devin McGee speaks: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=90m43s
    • He speaks in favor of the privacy resolution regarding PII and exposes just how harmful is ALA, including a man bullied by "loud, aggressive, well funded activists" who "swarm" people then threaten them. "Our reaction is their real action."
    • He says library director Kelly LaRocca lied to him that the library has nothing to to with ALA, yet public records says otherwise
    • He says the language of "book banning" is an intentional misuse of language to deceive
    • "The entire ALA organization is rotten from the root and steeped in leftist communism milieu control"
    • He says shelving books properly based on content is not "bans"
    • Here he is with his signs before the meeting started:



  • St. Tammany Parish Library Director Kelly LaRocca speaks: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=100m07s
    • ALA has an online form to fill out
    • "I did fill out the form which is why you have it in public records request"
    • "I was not using my personal email address"
    • "I don't have time for that"
    • "we have a spreadsheet on the website" - has the name but other information is redacted
    • As to the Statements of Concern about books (not about displays), "no, they were not reported to the ALA"—although that contradicts written evidence that library employees discussed how book challenges were reported to both ALA and its subgroup EveryLibrary, a group also based in Illinois
  • St. Tammany Parish Library Vice President of Library Board of Control Charles Branton speaks: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=112m55s
    • He drafted the privacy resolution and he now goes into detail on his support for the resolution
    • He points out how he has "a problem" with ALA requesting and getting private information while their stated goals are not in conformity with the people of the parish
  • Privacy Resolution read out in full: https://vimeo.com/1069935835#t=140m33s
Here is where ALA tells librarians to use private means to submit the private documents, emphasis in original:
  • Personal email address *
  • Please provide a personal email address to protect the confidentiality of our communications. We encourage you to review your state's FOIA or Open Records laws concerning your personal email account. ALA is committed to protecting your privacy and the confidentiality of our communications.


Here is where a Louisiana school librarian trains other librarians to use personal devices to hide information (about inappropriate books for children) from open government laws:



Here is that same librarian writing her parent-precluding policies into her book that's a best seller among librarians, such as to use the Signal app to hide things:



Louisiana Library Association training to hide things from open government laws is relevant to the St. Tammany library matter where the library director says they are no longer reporting to ALA.  Yet they are trained to use personal devices.  Does anyone think the pipeline to ALA has been cut off?  Nope, it's just gone underground, in my opinion.

By the way, ALA created the local library "alliance" called St. Tammany Library Alliance.  Because it acts for Chicago's ALA, it flat out lied about what Kelly LaRocca said, "In case you missed it, at last night’s library board meeting, the director officially stated for the record that no personal information of library patrons was shared with the American Library Association."  No, LaRocca said, "I did fill out the form which is why you have it in public records request" and she said she revealed at least names to ALA.  Also, documents prove information was turned over to ALA.



This is why privacy resolutions locking out ALA and all its tentacles are needed.  Essentially it protects citizens from harassment by ALA-created local groups and by ALA itself, its affiliates and partners.  

Librarians need to be clear they work for the citizens, not ALA, and if they are caught lying, it's sayōnara sister.



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ADDED SAME DAY OF INITIAL PUBLICATION:

This page is being modified to remove the graphic in the upper right and replace it with a new one.  This action is taken in response to an official request to remove the graphic that I received on the same day of publication, and I'm responding on the same day:
Dear Mr. Kleinman:

Any use of the St. Tammany Parish Government logo on the “SafeLibraries” blog is a
violation of STPG’s official service mark.  The STPG logo is registered with the Louisiana
Secretary of State and it may not be used by third parties without STPG’s express consent.

Please remove the STPG logo from the SafeLibraries’ March 28, 2025, post, and any other
post displaying the logo at your earliest convenience.  Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.
Here are graphics of the official request:




Well, isn't this interesting:


Who knew?  Seems to me that the parish government acted properly to police and protect its intellectual property.  So no complaints from me.  

If only the library acted properly as well to police and protect the privacy of its citizens, but they answer to a higher power: Chicago's ALA.  Just today, Texas school librarian Carolyn Foote, on a podcast called "School Librarians United," said, "But I also think the strategic behind-the-scenes work right now for, for all of us is so important to moving the issues we care about."  I'm certain Kelly LaRocca would agree with that 100%.


This is the second time I've been asked to remove material by Louisiana governments.  I always respond as soon as I can.  In the first instance I had to removed an entire transcript for which I paid money to obtain an accurate rendition.  See here:

Wednesday, February 19, 2025

Audiotape of St. Tammany Parish Republican Pol Proves Perilous; Trump and Christians Attacked, P-rn Promoted, ALA Protected - CENSORED BY DISTRICT ATTORNEY

In breaking news, here is a transcript of, and audio recording by, former St. Tammany Parish Library Board of Control member William (Bill) R. McHugh, III, speaking with St. Tammany Parish Council District 13 Councilman Jeff Corbin, pictured top right.  This recording was intended for use in a lawsuit Mr. McHugh just lost big as described here:
The recording was discussed in local media here:
And here is the telephone conversation and its politically-charged nature discussed by Citizens for a New Louisiana on 19 November 2024:




My personal favorite parts of the conversation are where they talk about a law defunding the American Library Association.  Love that!  And it's going to happen more and more now that the US Department of Education exposed the "book ban" hoax and DEI is dead.  And they tell themselves they aren't "gr[00]ming" children.  We all wish it were that simple.

Now, below is the transcript and here is the transcript and full recording synched together for your listening and re-listening pleasure: TRANSCRIPT AND RECORDING BY BILL McHUGH OF JEFF CORBIN HERE [CENSORED PER ORDER OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, WASHINGTON — ST. TAMMANY PARISHES, CIVIL DIVISION, 214954 KOOP DR, 2G, MANDEVILLE LA 70471]. 

It's very rare to see a politician, Republican, no less, and a library board member so interested in keeping kids exposed to inappropriate material that they feel people must serve on and stay on library boards to keep out the Christians and the Trump supporters who oppose harming children per American Library Association's 60 years of effort.  But there it is, res ipsa loquitur.  

It happens all the time, it's just rare that it got recorded, reported, and we get to see it.  Sad.  Were I residing there, I know for whom I wouldn't vote, nor for any of their supporters or supporting library "alliances," especially not the one ALA created.


TRANSCRIPT:

[CENSORED PER ORDER OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, WASHINGTON — ST. TAMMANY PARISHES, CIVIL DIVISION, 214954 KOOP DR, 2G, MANDEVILLE LA 70471]

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[inaudible 00:06:34]

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[inaudible 00:07:18]

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[inaudible 00:09:05]

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[inaudible 00:13:35].

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:
(laughs).

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[NOTE: redacted for privacy].

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[NOTE: redacted for privacy].

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:
[NOTE: redacted for privacy]

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:

William (Bill) R. McHugh, III:

Jeff Corbin:



NOTE ADDED 5 MARCH 2025:

Apparently I'm such a good investigative reporter that I have been ordered to censor my report.  So I did.  

Once ALA wanted me to remove something I published, but I didn't, so go read what Chicago's ALA wanted censored and doesn't want you to read:
This time the censorship request comes from a legitimate source and for a legitimate-sounding reason, as opposed to ALA trying to hide its own internalized homophobia, that is still has, by the way.  I don't believe I've distributed this material past an email or so to governmental leaders in the Parishes and this publication, and I'm deleting the text and any associated links from this post.  I will not provide the transcript/audio to anyone even if asked.  I'm aiming to fully comply with the cease and desist letter posted below. And I wish all parties and all sides well.

CENSORED PER ORDER OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT, WASHINGTON — ST. TAMMANY PARISHES, CIVIL DIVISION, 214954 KOOP DR, 2G, MANDEVILLE LA 70471

Given the following, I'll be publishing the censorship order in full: "Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.  The contents of this e-mail reflect the opinion of the writer, and are not necessarily the opinion or policy of the 22nd Judicial District Attorney’s Office or St. Tammany Parish Government."


Cease and Desist Letter


J. Collin Sims
District Attorney 
22nd Judicial District
Washington – St. Tammany Parishes

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

ALA Loses in Louisiana US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: Parr v Cougle

American Library Association has lost another case in the courts, this time in the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit:
Yes, ALA was not directly involved.  But the local group that sued or was supporting the plaintiffs was stood up by ALA, something I've proven and reported, and ALA created hundreds of local groups to sue in this fashion:
Here are choice quotes from the Parr v. Cougle case:
Their substantive-due-process claim is based upon alleged reputational injuries they suffered because of “false  charges” that “they are liberal, activist, members of a political conspiracy to s[*]xualize children.”  But Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries are insufficient to establish standing because (A) their speech-related injuries are not particularized and (B) their reputational injuries are neither fairly traceable to Defendants’ conduct nor redressable by a favorable decision. 
.... 
Plaintiffs attempt to draw a distinction, arguing that they suffered these injuries in their personal capacities, not as Board members.  But any distinction here is too faint to make a difference.  Indeed, the Article III question whether Plaintiffs have suffered a “particularized” injury necessarily precedes any First Amendment issue raised by Plaintiffs.  

....

At its core, this case is not about viewpoint discrimination, free speech, retaliation, or substantive due process.  Plaintiffs lost their Board positions and thereby lost the power to wield the levers of influence over St. Tammany’s libraries—and they want that control back.  But rather than pursue that aim through the political process, they have “dragged that fight into federal court by tricking it out in [constitutional] colors.”  Jones, 121 F.4th at 537 (citation and quotation marks omitted). 
Here's my take.  People who follow ALA advice and create a local group to say and do what ALA wants get burned in the end, so why expose yourselves to this?  ALA's biggest loss was United States v. American Library Association that allowed libraries to use Internet filtering software.  ALA sought to allow children unfettered access.  ALA lost $1.5M in that fruitless effort.  

ALA lost against me when it had some library employee sue me for defamation ten years ago and lost, twice.  She ultimately lost her beloved job at her library since they lost confidence in her, besides her homophobia that ALA funded and promoted.  ALA even helped fund raise for her.  Meanwhile, she was photographed vacationing in Florida with her family at a beach, so she clearly didn't need the funding.  See her vacationing here:

Now in this St. Tammany Library Alliance case they got told by the 5th Circuit:
Plaintiffs lost their Board positions and thereby lost the power to wield the levers of influence over St. Tammany's libraries—and they want that control back.  But rather than pursue that aim through the political process, they have "dragged that fight into federal court by tricking it out in [constitutional] colors."

That's brutal.

Don't let ALA convince you to file losing lawsuits that trick out minor cases in constitutional colors.

And, to show how devoted this ALA-created local group is to ALA goals, even in the face of a brutal loss, they lie about it, using language that could have come straight from ALA:
February 11, 2025

Joint statement of Anthony Parr, Rebeca Taylor, and Bill McHugh:

We are disappointed that the appeals court ordered our case dismissed on jurisdictional grounds and did not resolve the claims of legislative privilege raised by defendants.  Defendants asserted legislative privilege in this case to hide evidence that demonstrates the merits of plaintiff's case.  Plaintiffs lost their positions on the St. Tammany Parish Library Board because members of the Parish Council disfavored their views on certain library materials.

This outcome is a loss for libraries and the communities they serve.  Library board members must be allowed to perform their roles without fear of retaliation and discrimination for defending the public's right to read and access information.
You see, these people have completely lost the plot.  The Courts of Appeals spoke directly against what they are saying here, but they are so blinded by ALA-colored glasses that that can't see what they said is completely false.  Instead, they decry the loss of the "public's right to read and access information."  That has absolutely zero to do with this case.  The Court said, "At its core, this case is not about viewpoint discrimination, free speech, retaliation, or substantive due process."  "But rather than pursue that aim through the political process, they have 'dragged that fight into federal court by tricking it out in [constitutional] colors.'"

People, don't listen to ALA.  ALA gives bad advice.  ALA gives loser advice that leads to losing.  Groups ALA starts don't even see it because they completely believe the ALA propaganda hook, line, and sinker.

By the way, now that US Department of Education has exposed ALA's "book ban" hoax, these ALA-engendered cases are only going to become faster losers than they would have been initially.  My advice is to stay away from ALA's advice.  Your pocketbook and your brain will thank you.


NOTE ADDED 12 FEBRUARY 2025:

Others have written about this matter and the excuses of those pushing the ALA agenda:




In light of the total loss by the ALA astroturfers, it's interesting to look back at their claims and how media portrayed them essentially uncritically and with loaded language:



NOTE ADDED 28 MARCH 2025:

Graphic top right changed at government request.

URL of this page: 


Join World Library Association:

WorldLibraryAssociation.org

Sunday, December 29, 2024

How Chicago's ALA Co-Opts Local Governments: St. Tammany Parish Louisiana

I have published steadily on how American Library Association co-opts local and state governments to drive its Chicago Way across America, by any means, whatever it takes.  Governing bodies often hear from no one other than the community-organized multitudes ALA creates, funds, and empowers to create the illusion of local support and to provide a base for ALA to sue via surrogates anywhere across America.  

Locals and taxpayers are often not even aware there's any "sustained messaging" nor "long-term inoculation" going on to pressure a government into acting as ALA would if it only had real power.  ALA needs to get the locals to pull the switch.  And ALA's approximately 60 year goal has been to take away parental rights to better indoctrinate and s[]xualize school children.

As a result, given I'm being sued twice for defamation by a Louisiana school librarian, I've become aware St. Tammany Parish in Louisiana is suffering from the above fate, basically by reading the librarian's book.  She also seems to gloat about ALA pressuring St. Tammany Parish Library in the past:
Therefore I wrote to its governing leaders to open their eyes that Chicago's ALA was about to get its way there via some local groups it created, to the detriment of everyone, but especially the children.  I wrote to give them some balance.  And I provided hard evidence from reliable sources, not just slogans like children have to be able to see themselves in libraries or kids will get it on their smart phones anyway so they might as well learn how to do it right from a trusted and professionally trained source, or books provide windows, mirrors, and sliding glass doors.

Here is what I sent, and I'm republishing it because basically it applies to everyone, everywhere.

Dear St. Tammany Parish Council,

St Tammany Library Alliance [ALA's STLA] is an organization created and funded by the American Library Association [ALA] in Chicago, Illinois, to give the appearance that it is a local group in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana.  It is not.  It is an astroturfed group created by ALA, initially funded by ALA, currently empowered by ALA, to carry out the work of ALA, such as by inundating library boards with hundreds or thousands of emails to give the appearance that local citizens support ALA goals instead of local law, common sense, and community standards.  Do not be swayed by this bullying campaign.  Its website says, "The St. Tammany Parish Library Alliance is a grassroots group of people and organizations defending our parish libraries."  That's false.  It's astroturfed by ALA, and it's a lie to make people think it's grassroots.

ALA has worked for about 60 years to take away the rights of parents so that their children are more easily manipulated.  See: Koganzon, Rita. “There Is No Such Thing as a Banned Book: Censorship, Authority, and the School Book Controversies of the 1970s.” American Political Thought 12, no. 1 (January 2023): 1–26.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PZ2pDhKhRAtlNgR7gek_1kcdGFoskHpa/view?usp=sharing.  ALA has more recently began creating, funding, and empowering local groups to give local boards the appearance that local citizens support this or that when it is really ALA.

In Louisiana, for example, ALA has created, at a minimum:
ALA even brags about its ties with ALA's STLA. ALA holds up ALA's STLA as an example for its entire 48,000 members.  ALA's President Emily Drabinski gave a speech to ALA members saying:
I met yesterday with a pair of activists in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, to learn more about what was happening on the ground uh in Louisiana, which has been a a hotspot for book bans and getting to know uh the organizing work that they were doing, which included the legislative active, ad, you know, advocacy work that we're all familiar with, as well as more direct action on the ground kinds of organizing.  And those tools that people are using to pull people together in their local communities, making sure that we surface those stories and share them is my priority uh in the member leader spot right now.
Source: a 60 minute video of ALA President Emily Drabinski and ALA Interim Executive Director Leslie Burger (a former ALA President) saying the quiet part out loud, on March 19, 2024, at an ALA Town Hall meeting for members only:

So I am writing you this email to say how much you are being or will be manipulated by ALA's STLA, and now you know why I call it ALA's STLA, but I am providing you with hard evidence directly from the President of ALA to prove it.  It's the ALA President talking about St. Tammany Parish Library, about "the organizing work that they are doing," about "those tools that people are using to pull people together in their local communities, about "making sure that we surface those stories and share them."  Right from the horse's mouth you are hearing about how you are being manipulated, and your manipulation is setting an example for librarians across the nation.

This "organizing work that they are doing" completely drowns out locals and local interests.  That is by design of ALA to get the Chicago Way into libraries.  There are no groups creating, funding, empowering locals who wish to follow Louisiana law and St. Tammany Parish community standards.  They are essentially voiceless.  The few who do get involved are then labeled as "extremists."

Louisiana school librarian Amanda Jones recently gave a speech at a meeting of ALA's STLA, I've been told.  She wrote a book about her defamation case against Louisiana parents that she's lost four times in the courts, so far, with a final appeal before the Louisiana Supreme Court.  In full disclosure, she is currently suing me for defamation as well while her other case is still proceeding.  In her book, Amanda complains about "St. Tammany Parish Library Accountability Project" and people in the Parish like one who "put on her tinfoil hat to inundate the librarian snitch line."  She also wrote about the Parish about two dozen times, talking about "the pro-censors were working overtime spreading moral panic."  So ALA's STLA can work to organize people but locals are "pro-censors."  This is the person who ALA's STLA invites to give a speech to motivate people to write to you to manipulate you.

In Amanda's book she makes several acknowledgements.  These include, "John Chrastka and EveryLibrary--you swooped in and offered support right from the get-go.  None of my success would have happened without you.  Your help to librarians and citizens all across the country, real plans of action when we need it, are vital.  Thank you."  ....  "To all of my friends in ... St. Tammany ... Parishes who refuse to see their libraries go down without a fight.  They won't because of you.  You matter and you're making a difference."  To me, that means she's telegraphing how ALA's EveryLibrary "offered support right from the get-go" with "real plans of actions," and the St. Tammany Parish Library employees are fully on board with ALA's Chicago Way.

Above, I wrote about ALA having created ALA's STLA and other local groups in Louisiana.  (It's nationwide, actually.)  Now I'm going to back that up.  Here is the leader of ALA's EveryLibrary, a hidden ALA organization:
Um, we put to work our value system right now in a couple of key ways that we help, we hope people who who can join us can do. We have a, an a, [00:20:30] uh, a platform called Fight for the First. Uh, fightforthefirst.org is a, uh, it's basically change.org for libraries. You know, we, we've set this up so that if there's a problem, thank you for putting that out.

(20:42):
There's a problem, uh, in a local community. Somebody can, can say, we have a problem. We'd like some, some assistance. Here's what our problem looks like. We can platform that call to action very quickly. What we do is, uh, train, coach and guide and support the good people who are in that community who wanna [00:21:00] stand with either the library or for the First Amendment, depending on how things are going. Um, and then we need folks who are outside of the zone. You know, if you're in it, man, if you're in, if you're in the trenches on this, it's exhausting. It's hard. It is, uh, it's community organizing. It's union organizing. It's the, the fights are akin to the anti-nuclear, you know, uh, reproductive justice, um, you know, civil rights fights. I mean, these, these people are in it. So, if [00:21:30] you're outside of that zone, what we do as a national organization is we put money to work from donors, from vendor donors, individual donors.

(21:38):
We've kind of a Bernie Sanders model for our donor base, and we help them, we help them, yep, help make their voice heard. Uh, we spend money on every single campaign advertising on social. Um, nothing goes viral anymore. You know, if anybody's doing marketing knows, you gotta be able to put that out in front of folks, you know? Um, and we, we show up. We, we show up, uh, sometimes with, [00:22:00] uh, direct donations. Right now we're doing a, a fundraising drive in Prattville, Alabama, where the, the library director and four members of the staff quit rather than implement unconstitutional, bigoted policies on the part of that library board. I mean, these these, this is how we do it when there's, when, when you're in a, when you're in a green zone, like, like a San Francisco. If you're in a hot zone, though, like a Prattville, what you can do if you haven't, if you're just coming around to understanding this situation, [00:22:30] is, again, a Fight for the First kind of flight framework. Join in, you know, join in. We've got opportunities for people to articulate, you know, a, a value system when it comes to the watchdog work. We've got our opportunities for people to be guard dogs for the First Amendment and for the library and for the schools. That's really, you know, hardcore activism. Um, there's, there's a chance for people to bird dog this digitally. Uh, and Jim, we're trying to give 'em different pathways to, to put their role [unintelligible] to work.
Source: "ALA Details How It Controls Communities Nationwide: The Quiet Part Out Loud Now In Transcript Form," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 4 June 2024. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2024/06/ala-details-how-it-controls-communities.html

ALA's EveryLibrary's leader John Chrastka is so confident that his "hardcore activism" is a success that at the School Library Journal's 2024 Summit he provided librarians with "a playbook for statewide strategies to prioritize and protect school libraries and librarians."  "Advocacy, he said, is co-creation; activism is about crisis and seizing opportunities."  Regarding the groups like ALA's STLA that ALA is building, he said, "Coalition work:  Disciplined engagement among library organizations and stakeholder groups has overcome anti-library legislation."  He's literally crowing about how ALA has bulldozed over local populations and he's promising to make it more widespread.  

Source:  "Time to Turn Talking Points to Policy, 2024 SLJ Summit; EveryLibrary Executive Director John Chrastka Spoke at the 2024 SLJ Summit, Providing a Playbook for Statewide Strategies to Prioritize and Protect School Libraries and Librarians," by Kara Yorio, School Library Journal, 17 December 2024.  https://web.archive.org/web/20241218124641/https://www.slj.com/story/Time-to-Turn-Talking-Points-to-Policy-2024-SLJ-Summit

He wants "municipal momentum to push against where things are going in other states."  Is the Chicago Way the future for St Tammany Parish Library?  Is ALA's STLA pushing the "municipal momentum"?  Are you going to allow that?

And Emily Drabinski has promoted St. Tammany Parish another time as a model of how to take control of local communities:
We sure are. We've got a campaign right now called Unite Against Book Bans that includes, uh, tools for people, everything from uh yard signs that you can print out and have have printed and and put in your yard, uh, proclaiming that you oppose book banning and censorship in your community, talking points for talking with the media, uh, as a concerned citizen, guidelines for how to show up at a school board meeting, how to show up at a library board meeting, um, lots of tools like that that you can use, uh. Mostly we’re wanting everybody to get involved. This is an issue that has been right on the, for the front line library worker front and center for the past couple of years and it’s been really really intense. And what, what we’re seeing is that when community members and people who believe in their public library use it, which is the vast majority of us, right, uh, uh, toolkit also include statistics about public support for libraries and the pat, it’s a minority of people that want books out of the collection, and so we need the majority to show up and stand up. And the strategy is, right, for how we're going to win is, um, they’re they’re different and they change every day, and we never know in advance, right, and so we’re asking the toolkit there’s lots of ways for people to get involved. We’ve seen cases in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, where community members have banded together to support the librarian. Really really effective ways, uh, we’ve seen in, uh, Lincolnwood, uh, in the Chicago area, uh. People organizing to ensure that the library board members represent people who care about the library and promote the library as a way of keeping people who want to ban books from taking over those kinds of positions. And so the toolkit gives lots and lots of information about how you can do that organizing in your own community.
Source: "Emily Drabinski Threatens State Library Commissions After Montana Drops ALA Membership: 'There Are More of Us Than There Are of Them,'" by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 20 August 2023.  https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/08/emily-drabinski-threatens-state-library.html

A third time ALA used you as an example:

"And in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, extremists attacked a library director, claiming she conspired with me to peddle p[]rnography to children in the community. (That director and I do not know each other, have never met, and, indeed, have never even corresponded.) In the hands of extremists, I am a weapon. The project for me now is to find out how I can be a tool."  

Source:  "The Fight for Libraries; Libraries and Higher Education Face a Shared Battle," by Emily Drabinski, American Association of University Professors, Spring 2023.  https://www.aaup.org/article/fight-libraries

You see, anyone who opposes ALA is an "extremist."  The leader of a group from Chicago, Illinois, that's been working for about 60 years to ensure children have access to inappropriate material, complains that locals in St. Tammany Parish who oppose ALA are "extremists."  If you yourselves oppose ALA, you to will be labelled "extremists."  But who do you serve, the public, or some group from Chicago working for decades to harm children?

ALA's EveryLibrary has even come to the aid of ALA's STLA in a legal case: "Statement in Support of Dismissed St. Tammany Library Trustees in Lawsuit Against the Parish; EveryLibrary Stands in Support of William R. McHugh III, Anthony Parr, and Rebecca Taylor, the Plaintiffs in the Lawsuit Against the St. Tammany Parish Council in Louisiana," by ALA's EveryLibrary, ALA's EveryLibrary, 21 May 2024.  https://www.everylibrary.org/statement_st_tammany_trustees_lawsuit.  Naturally, ALA's EveryLibrary is also based in Illinois, only in a suburb of Chicago.  Yet somehow all the way from Chicago it knows, "plaintiffs have demonstrated an unwavering commitment to their roles and to upholding the values of inclusivity and intellectual freedom."  Coming from ALA's EveryLibrary, that means plaintiffs have demonstrated an unwavering commitment to Chicago's ALA.

And it doesn't help that the St. Tammany Parish Library employees report directly to ALA.  Do they work for ALA or for the citizens?  On 20 September 2022, Sally McKissack, MLS <sally@stpl.us> emailed Tanya DiMaggio <tanya@stpl.us> asking, "Have we reported our challenges to ala or everylibrary?  Just curious," and the response was, "Yes."  Why is anyone reporting anything to ALA or ALA's EveryLibrary?  Might that have something to do with why both ALA and ALA's EveryLibrary repeatedly bragged about how ALA got its way in the St. Tammany Parish Library?

STPL reports to ALA.jpg

That's why I'm writing.  Seeing the manipulation in action, I am writing to say you have been or are about to be played so you'll be maneuvered into imposing the Chicago Way and think you're doing it of your own free will.  I am showing you the evidence of manipulation directly from the ALA President and others to prove it.  ALA doesn't have the power to force you to do anything, but if it can get you to think what it thinks, then you'll do what it wants without even realizing it.  That's the whole purpose of the "hardcore activism" and the "community organizing."

When the ALA bullying begins, you'll know to ignore it and instead do what you know is right, even if your local citizens who support you aren't community organized enough like ALA's STLA to say so.  ALA created St Tammany Library Alliance.  ALA's STLA is not to be trusted for anything, except for revealing what is ALA's Chicago Way.  Consider doing the exact opposite of what ALA's STLA wants, and when the bullying deluge of emails comes in, like Amanda Jones got about 44,000 emails to the Louisiana legislature, just ignore it all.  It's all fake astroturf.

Thank you for your consideration and I hope this helps you.

--
----------
Dan Kleinman, Owner of SafeLibraries® brand library educational services


Dear St. Tammany Parish Counsel,

I wrote yesterday about ST. TAMMANY LIBRARY ALLIANCE [ALA's STLA] and how it is a stalking horse for AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION [ALA], as shown in detail in yesterday's email shown below.  

Now I wish to add additional evidence, even more outrageous but true.  And I add some CCs given the seriousness of the threat of subversion of local governments by some organization from Chicago, Illinois, and I ask the CCs to read yesterday's email as well as today's.

Here's another direct quote from "That Librarian: The Fight Against Book Banning in America," the new book from Louisiana's school librarian Amanda Jones: 

"One thing I love about the St. Tammany Parish Library Alliance is that the members of the alliance show up very early to pack the front of the meeting space as much as possible."

So this is a Chicago ALA created and funded and empowered local group, of which most local citizens likely aren't even aware, absolutely bulldozing over the unprepared public to mislead boards into thinking the locals want what Chicago's ALA wants.  As Amanda Jones puts it, the thing she loves most about ALA's STLA is how they get to public meetings a half hour early to be sure to crowd out anyone not associated with ALA's STLA.  She's just coming out and revealing the manipulation.  

This is an ALA tactic used in many places, now including St. Tammany Parish.  I attended a public library meeting in Glen Ridge, NJ, where so many ALA people showed up early and with professional signs have ALA slogans like "United Against Book Bans" and organized coordination to crowd the room and crowd out others from speaking that the locals seeking relief from the government didn't even get a chance to speak.  I was the only person to get a chance to speak from the locals side since I knew of the tactic ahead of time and made sure I was there first.  Even then the ALA crowd pushed past me without a care since I wasn't one of them.  And when I finally spoke, the NJ ACLU publicly shamed me for being the only speaker to side with the locals who brought the complaint in the first place.  To see the results of the ALA tactic as applied in Glen Ridge, watch here, because it's coming to St. Tammany Parish: https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/essex/glen-ridge/2023/02/09/glen-ridge-library-nj-ban-lbgtq-books-protest/69889598007/

Besides the above and what's in yesterday's email it gets even worse.  There's a Louisiana school librarian currently on a national tour with her book that I quoted above.  She just appeared at a meeting of ALA's STLA to talk about her book.  In her book she exposes how St. Tammany Parish gets steamrolled by ALA's STLA, again, as quoted above.  

Lest you think this is no big deal, just idle talk, Amanda Jones will be the central character in a film called "The Librarians" to be revealed at the Sundance Film Festival in January, according to the film's executive producer, Sarah Jessica Parker.  Yes, the famous actress.  Yes, Amanda is the central character.  So how ALA's STLA steamrolls over St. Tammany Parish may be an example for the lead character in a worldwide film produced by a Hollywood superstar.  That's how serious this is and how much pressure is going to hit you in waves.

ALA, building and community organizing for about 60 years, is gathering all tools available, even Hollywood stars, to bulldoze over local communities.  St. Tammany Parish is patient zero of the mind virus.  I'm trying to activate your antibodies now to help you prepare for what's coming.  

Here's a quote from Variety about how Amanda Jones is the central character of a film to be shown at Sundance:
The documentary’s central character is Amanda Jones, a school librarian in southern Louisiana, who recently wrote “That Librarian — The Fight Against Book Banning in America,” published in 2024 by Bloomsbury. “It’s a fantastic book, and we follow her struggles,” explains Parker.
Source: "Sarah Jessica Parker on Producing Sundance Doc About Librarians Fighting Book Bans: ‘They Have Put Their Lives at Risk,’" by Martin Dale, Variety, 12 December 2024.  https://variety.com/2024/film/global/sarah-jessica-parker-the-librarians-sundance-executive-producer-1236246900/

I have informed you how ALA bribes locals and funds them to create local library alliances: "ALA Details Bribes to Convince Governments to Sell Out Children," by Dan Kleinman, SafeLibraries, 12 March 2024.  https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2024/03/ala-details-bribes.html.  
We'll support your campaign against book bans with:  
1) Up to $1k in funding 
2) Pro-bono consulting 
3) Digital tools like http://fundlibraries.org
4) Media attention 
5) Training and resources for the skills and knowledge that you need to win.  
And more!
I have shown you that ALA set up ALA's STLA in yesterday's email.  Now I just found a new ALA site: "Help Fight Against Censorship in St Tammany, LA," by ALA's STLA, https://www.fundlibraries.org/SaveStTammanyLibraries

I have shown you Amanda Jones holds up ALA's STLA as an example of how to pressure communities.

I have shown you multiple ALA leaders bragging about how ALA pulled the wool over the eyes of the local government in St. Tammany Parish.

I've shown you Amanda Jones who makes St. Tammany Parish ground zero for ALA meddling is herself the leading character in a Sarah Jessica Parker movie to be shown at the Sundance Film Festival.  I'll bet St. Tammany comes up in that movie at least once--to benefit ALA, not St. Tammany Parish.

I've shown you St. Tammany Parish Library employees are working directly with and for ALA and ALA's EveryLibrary to oppose "book bans."

Now you know.  Now you must stand up to the bullying of ALA and the locals like ALA's STLA that ALA has accreted with thousand dollar bribes, free counseling and fundraising and community organizing tools, and media attention.  

When the email deluge occurs and the people show up in crowds with professional signs to crowd out the few locals who might show without any community organization like the ALA does, what will you do?  Will you bend to the pressure?  Will you stand strong and apply local law, common sense, and community standards?  Do your ethical standards allow you to be swayed by out-of-state influence even if it is designed to appear as in-state?  Will St. Tammany Parish children be protected from outsiders having a 60 year plan to take away parental rights?  Or will ALA's St. Tammany Library Alliance overpower the Board?

Time will tell.  At least now you have reliable sources in this email and yesterday's to truly understand that ALA's STLA is not your friend--it's created by and subservient to ALA.  And it's metastasizing.  And it is children who are the target.

Thanks again for your consideration.
--
----------
Dan Kleinman, Owner of SafeLibraries® brand library educational services



NOTE ADDED 30 DECEMBER 2024:

Already, based on the above, the coverup by ALA's STLA and now apparently St Tammany Parish Library employees themselves is underway with cleverly worded responses to continue to hide the truth in the face of the evidence.  

They talk about the present tense, not the past.  They talk about ALA, not ALA's EveryLibrary.  They say no documents exist, they leave out the training by ALA and even by Amanda Jones to use phone calls instead of documents precisely to evade FOIA, then claim innocence or that no documents exist.  They leave out that they are trained to provide evasive answers intentionally to deceive, just as Amanda Jones trained them at the recent Louisiana Library Association meeting.  And on and on with the deception:



NOTE ADDED 28 MARCH 2025:

Graphic top right changed at government request.

URL of this page: 



Join World Library Association:

WorldLibraryAssociation.org

Sunday, August 20, 2023

Emily Drabinski Threatens State Library Commissions After Montana Drops ALA Membership: 'There Are More of Us Than There Are of Them'

Emily Drabinski is the President of the American Library Association and, as a result, libraries and state library commissions are dropping their memberships so as to defund ALA.  There are lot of reasons why, but for this publication, I present below a transcript of Emily speaking on August 14, after the Montana State Library Commission has already canceled its $15,000 membership with more states about to follow.  Source:

Ferenc, Ed. “Fighting Against a Nationwide Attack on Libraries and Education: Interview of Emily Drabinski S4 E160.” America’s Work Force; Union Podcast, August 14, 2023. https://awf.labortools.com/listen/fighting-against-a-nationwide-attack-on-libraries-and-education. (Transcript below.)

Think about what she is saying.  Listen or read closely.  Everything she is saying is why people are dropping out of ALA.  Now I will discuss what's in the transcript provided below and why state library commissions should drop ALA membership immediately.

Overall, these statements by the President of the ALA reveal that ALA's top goal is equity—literacy is never mentioned.  Not even once.  And it shows.  Reading scores are crashing all across America, with black students having a 4th grade reading proficiency level of 17%.  Never mind literacy, Emily wants librarians to organize for change against communities she calls "a small but very loud minority."  Per Emily, librarians should spin challengers/parents/state library commissioners as being hateful, racist and homophobic, and she says ALA rarely gets involved locally when the opposite is true.  Most importantly, she threatens state library commissions, because this is how ALA works.  

So more state library commissions should drop out and drop out now using this new evidence.

Emily starts out by describing ALA as "an association that advances access and equity, uh, for all."  Equity means, per Dr. James Lindsay, "something pretty close to Marxism."  See picture of Emily Drabinski above right.

Emily then does projection.  She calls parents, "a sort of movement being led by a small but very loud minority of people."  That's a lie.  Parents are the vast majority, and the librarians who allow the s3xualization of children, those are the people who literally are the small but very loud minority.  So she's gaslighting.

And how does she describe these parents? As "people who want to restrict access to information about black life and experience, about queer life and experience."  So as racists and homophobes.  That's more lying.  It's simply not happening but claiming it is has been a decades-long tactic of the American Library Association because it works to fool people.  And black students having a 4th grade reading proficiency level of 17%, something not even on ALA's radar.

Here's more projection: "organized efforts to pull books off the shelves."  The reality is the s3xualization of children in libraries is an organized effort to push books onto school shelves, and ALA is organizing that effort.  And ALA's organization is so strong and well entrenched it goes right up to the White House, so it's projection to complain about Moms for Liberty and the like: "Library Boards Trained to Lie by ALA; Banned Books Wedge Issue Adopted by White House."

Here's comes the victim role: "the professional sort of nature of our work is part of what’s being attacked here."  Parents speaking up about their children being s3xualized by librarians is an "attack."  And ALA wants more funding for this?

Then she makes the parents look stupid: "So I think there’s also a real disconnect between the attacks that are happening and the daily work of the librarian who, in many case, of these cases doesn't even have the book on the shelf."

More outright lies: "The um part of the talking points that these, uh, loud, pro-censorship activists and organizers is that the American Library Association sets policies for individual libraries and we really don’t do that."  Go to any school's materials reconsideration form.  Compare it with ALA's model form.  They all ask essentially the same accusatory questions or are substantially similar and people don't even realize ALA essentially wrote the forms.  This is why newly formed World Library Association has an online reconsideration form, but I digress.  Further, ALA set the policy for librarians to ignore child p*rn viewers then deleted it but only after I personally challenged ALA on that very point.  So don't tell me "we really don't do that."  You really do.  And I'll prove it further below.

Now here's a joke: "We have, uh, professional standards and practices and recommendations."  First, librarianship is not a profession.  Second, they have no standards.  They train librarians to use personal devices to bypass open government laws.  They order librarians to delete and destroy public documents already requested via FOIA.  They plagiarize censorship maps for Banned Books Week.  They hire and rehire a homophobe to train for ALA then have her file two defamation suits against me in federal court where the settlement offer was that I delete my exposing ALA's own homophobia.  They add the word "age" to the Library Bill of Rights to s3xualize children.  They train librarians to lie about challenged books.  They defame an MLB player (Alfonso Soriano) on Wikipedia claiming he cheated on his wife, which is defamation per se.  They fake claims about LGBT discrimination on Banned Books Week just to promote themselves.  They make hundreds of anonymous edits on Wikipedia about Net Neutrality just to circumvent IRS tax laws.  They spend over $1.5M to keep Internet p*rnography in public libraries, allying with a man from the ACLU who possessed sadistic and masochistic child p*rnography and went to jail for seven years.  They write for SIECUS and Playboy.  They train librarians that they know material is s3xually inappropriate for minors but it is to be "reframed" as diversity and inclusion.  They give scholarships to nonwhite people and have conference break rooms for nonwhite people.  I could go on.  These people have zero standards, let alone professional standards.

More lies: "We have an Office of Intellectual Freedom uh that ... do[es]n’t set policy at individual libraries."  OIF makes personal appearances at libraries across America to help libraries defend their policies that are essentially copied from ALA model policies.  One library that defended the crime of child p*rnography for 2 1/2 years was given an "intellectual freedom" award on OIF's insistence.  Watch: "2014-8-18 Diane Jennings Admits Child Porn and LIES about Staff Action," by Megan Fox, YouTube, 11 November 2014.  This was the very incident, where the PR Director admitted on a radio station that the crime of child p*rnography had occurred, that ALA started training librarians not to speak with media except under very strict conditions that would guarantee mishaps like this would never again occur.  It's why ALA will never debate me or anyone.  So at that library that defended admitted child p*rn crimes, ALA OIF said:
So as to Emily's lie that OIF "do[es]n’t set policy at individual libraries."  Its leader admitted, reiterated actually, "I do want to reiterate that I work with libraries on developing policies on a regular basis."  So there you go, yet another Emily Drabinski lie so she can spin ALA as a harmless organization that's just there for moral support.

And I'm not even half way through the short interview she gave.  The provably false lying is simply nonstop.  Oh yes, the lies are repeated from one speaking engagement to the next.  Example, FYI:

Keynote 1- Emily Drabinski: Organizing for Change, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-umq7phyB54.

Then there's more gaslighting: "This is an issue that has been right on the, for the front line library worker front and center for the past couple of years and it’s been really really intense."  It's not getting more and more intense.  What it is is that librarians are pushing more and more s3xually inappropriate material reframed by ALA as diversity and inclusion, and more and more parents are waking up to that.  Are we supposed to stay silent?  Yet Emily casts it as the censors are getting bolder and censoring more, when reality is the librarians are getting bolder and s3xualizing more.

Here's the lie/joke of the century she tries to slip in like it's true: "And what, what we’re seeing is that when community members and people who believe in their public library use it, which is the vast majority of us, right...."  No, public library use is dropping and it was a trickle during the Covid lockdown years.  And certainly the "vast majority of us" do not use public libraries.  Further, many parents are now avoiding libraries precisely because ALA has s3xualized it.  Did you know ALA trained librarians to "sneakily" push Drag Queen Story Hour into libraries?  Meanwhile, ALA trains librarians to block actor Kirk Cameron and readings in public meeting rooms of his Brave Books series.  This women Emily just cannot stop the lies.

Truth finally!  "People organizing to ensure that the library board members represent people who care about the library and promote the library as a way of keeping people who want to ban books from taking over those kinds of positions."  She's saying her Unite Against Book Bans group is organizing to win board seats just to block out the locals running for the board.  So finally she tells the truth while revealing ALA is working to subvert communities.  Nice, huh?  Funding ALA is like funding your own destruction.

Oh yes, sinking the hook, she attacks the parents again, the vast majority, remember, that she belittles as a tiny minority: "it’s uh really inspiring that they haven’t, that the book banners and censors haven’t taken over the library."  Then the parents are called hateful: "And uh I'm not sure quite why, ha ha, it doesn’t garner the same clicks as hate does?"

Now comes the big lie.  The big lie is that the vast majority of Americans oppose censorship so keeping books from children is wrong.  It's a big lie because it's based on truth, people do oppose censorship.  This is America, after all.  But the vast majority also opposes s3xually inappropriate books in school, and that she doesn't mention, and that's a separate question from book banning generally.  Here's how she puts the big lie: "Uh, but I believe that we we the major vast majority of Americans agree that children should have access to books."  It's a lie to say that.  Yes, we all agree children should have access to books, just not explicit ones in school libraries—and even the United States Supreme Court agrees with that per the Pico case.

Then, in her coup de grâce for the state library commissions dropping out of ALA, she has a message, a threat actually, and here comes the reason every library commission should drop ALA now.  First, the interviewer asks: "as we know there's some states that are pretty vocal right now, what would that message be Emily?"  He's clearly referring to Montana and other states considering dropping out of ALA.  (Texas dropped out too but after this interview.)  Emily responds, "We're all in this together.  There are more of us than there are of them."  Emily responds with defiance, then with a threat to organize librarians against the state library commissions, "We're all in this together.  There are more of us than there are of them.  It’s just a matter of getting together and standing strong for what our communities need.  And there are lots and lots of ways to do that.  Everyone just needs to do something."  The community organizer is organizing against communities.  Her answer to a question about states dropping ALA membership is confrontational, that there are more librarians than there are state library commission members and parents who oppose how ALA harms communities and especially children.  It's a threat—from the President of the American Library Association.

There you go.  This is why state library commissions should drop ALA membership.  The ALA leader Emily is not there for literacy nor to serve the public, she's there to organize opposition against them.  Do not spend another dime on any group organizing against you and explicitly so.  

Drop all affiliation with ALA now.


T R A N S C R I P T

Ed "Flash Ferenc" (Program Host) [39:34]:
When we come back Emily Drabinski will be joining us. She head’s the American Library Association. We’ll talk about all the censorship and book banning going on in the United States of America. Back in a few.  

Program Host: [42:29]:
Let's go to New York City right now. Joining us on our live line is Emily Drabinski who is President of the American Library Association. She's here to talk about the book banning and censorship that's been going on in America in the past couple of years. There's always some of that going on but it's off the charts right now. Emily welcome to uh America's Work Force. Before we get into that maybe you could uh tell us a little bit about your background, your association with the American Library Association, what it's all about and what you do. Go ahead, let’s pick it up right there. 

Emily Drabinski:
Sure. I'm a librarian, and have been for more than twenty years and a member of the American Library Association for about that long. Uh, I’m involved with the organization uh as a volunteer and a member leader, and was elected President last year. And I’ll serve a term, uh, this year. I’m about six weeks into it and working hard on behalf of library workers across the country trying to raise awareness and, about the issues that library workers are facing every day on the job. 

Program Host:
Yeah you uh you have entered in a very difficult time in America, no doubt about that.

Emily Drabinski:
I sure have.

Program Host:
Uh let me ask you, now do all libraries belong to the American Library Association? Does it work that way? 

Emily Drabinski:
No, it is a member organization and you can join, right, but it isn’t mandatory and we aren’t a a governing body of any kind. We’re a an affiliation of members who, uh, come together to generate probla, solutions to the problems facing American libraries. Uh, some libraries are organizational institutional members, but the vast majority of us are, uh, working librarians who want to be a part of an association that advances access and equity, uh, for all. 

Program Host:
Yeah, we've done a couple of shows with uh some unions that are organizing at libraries, we did that during uh National Library Week which was back in April, so we're seeing a lot of that going on. And a lot of that's happening because of what's happening in libraries, and the pandemic, of course, changed everything too. Uh, but let let's talk about the the book banning and the censorship that's going on and I I read earlier in the show some of the data, the numbers here, which uh is the highest since you started compiling data on censorship in libraries, goods going back 20 years ago. So, um, what's going on here in in your opinion, this. Is it like local school boards that are being really vocal? Can you explain the dynamics of what we're dealing with right now? 

Emily Drabinski:
I think it's really important first to note that this is a, uh, a a sort of movement being led by a small but very loud minority of people who want to restrict access to information about black life and experience, about queer life and experience, and are targeting, um, materials based on those identities. These are, uh, organized efforts to pull books off the shelves that give access to the stories of many of our lives. And it’s happening everywhere and is coordinated and organized in a way that I think we haven’t seen before. Libraries have always deal with patrons who, community members who have suggestions about the kind of books we collect and concerns about some of the books on our shelves and that’s a very ordinary part of library work. What’s different right now is the highly organized nature of the attack, uh, which is something we haven't seen before.

Program Host:
So it it's not your choice, you go to the community to find what books belong in libraries there? Is that is that pretty clear? 

Emily Drabinski:
Well, so if I'm a librarian, right, I went to school and got a masters degree in library science and I, my, part of my job is to develop, uh, physical collections, other kinds of resources, electronic and digital resources, services and programming that, uh, can connect to the people in my community. And every library is different, and so the library in Brooklyn, New York, is different from the library in Boise, Idaho, where I grew up, but in both places the library is tightly linked to the needs of the community. I’ve spent most of my life in higher education and so my library always meets the needs of the students and faculty at the University where I'm working, so the professional sort of nature of our work is part of what’s being attacked here. Uh, in the case, there’s a case in Boundary County, northern Idaho, uh last year where the library director was, uh, sort of organized attack on her institution, looking for, uh, her to remove 300 titles that, uh, the sort of activists in that area had pulled together, and those 300 titles weren’t even books that she had on the shelves. She didn’t own them at all. So I think there’s also a real disconnect between the attacks that are happening and the daily work of the librarian who, in many case, of these cases doesn't even have the book on the shelf. 

Program Host:
Hmm. OK let's take that that that case, for example. When you are alerted to something going on, you mentioned Idaho your your home state, does the American Library Association kind of gather, go over there, counsel and try to um moderate the situation, does does it work that way, Emily? 

Emily Drabinski:
You know it doesn't work that way and I think there’s been a lot of confusion about that. The um part of the talking points that these, uh, loud, pro-censorship activists and organizers is that the American Library Association sets policies for individual libraries and we really don’t do that. We have, uh, professional standards and practices and recommendations and we assist in cases where our assistance is requested. We have an Office of Intellectual Freedom uh that works very hard on behalf of individual libraries uh when they, when their assistance is requested, doing things like providing talking points, uh, press training, sort of connecting people to the resources that we have inside the organization, uh, but we don’t set policy at individual libraries. 

Program Host:
I see.  

Emily Drabinski:
That’s a local concern.

Program Host:
Now, now you do have an action tool kit. In fact I downloaded it. It's pretty uh significant. You can get it if you Google American Library Association. Those of you listening right now, and we have a pretty broad audience, they can take part in this action tool kit which um. Well let's let's talk about that. So so this is, if if somebody is in a respective community and they're banning books or censoring books uh they can download this kit and fight back? Can you can kind of kind of walk us through the the process on that? I'm sure you’re getting a lot of feedback on this, uh, on this toolkit, right?  

Emily Drabinski:
We sure are. We've got a campaign right now called Unite Against Book Bans that includes, uh, tools for people, everything from uh yard signs that you can print out and have have printed and and put in your yard, uh, proclaiming that you oppose book banning and censorship in your community, talking points for talking with the media, uh, as a concerned citizen, guidelines for how to show up at a school board meeting, how to show up at a library board meeting, um, lots of tools like that that you can use, uh. Mostly we’re wanting everybody to get involved. This is an issue that has been right on the, for the front line library worker front and center for the past couple of years and it’s been really really intense. And what, what we’re seeing is that when community members and people who believe in their public library use it, which is the vast majority of us, right, uh, uh, toolkit also include statistics about public support for libraries and the pat, it’s a minority of people that want books out of the collection, and so we need the majority to show up and stand up. And the strategy is, right, for how we're going to win is, um, they’re they’re different and they change every day, and we never know in advance, right, and so we’re asking the toolkit there’s lots of ways for people to get involved. We’ve seen cases in St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, where community members have banded together to support the librarian. Really really effective ways, uh, we’ve seen in, uh, Lincolnwood, uh, in the Chicago area, uh. People organizing to ensure that the library board members represent people who care about the library and promote the library as a way of keeping people who want to ban books from taking over those kinds of positions. And so the toolkit gives lots and lots of information about how you can do that organizing in your own community.

Program Host:
Well you point out it's a small but vocal group.

Emily Drabinski:
There is that.

Program Host:
And somehow they get they get national media attention, some networks more than others, I'm not gonna name names, I think you know who I’m talking about here. But uh the the pushback here. Now is that, you you mentioned some success stories. Is that garnering some media attention, the fact that, you know, citizens are saying, "hey, enough is enough, we don’t want this banning anymore." Is that happening? 

Emily Drabinski:
We’re seeing some of that, I wish we saw more of that. Ya know? There’s a lot of winning happening across the country. A lot of communities where uh the the push for censorship is failing, uh, that Lincolnwood example I just shared with you, it’s uh really inspiring that they haven’t, that the book banners and censors haven’t taken over the library, but they were, they were able to see that that might be coming and, uh, organize really effectively in advance, and it’s the kind of, um, win that’s a little harder to frame and celebrate? And uh I'm not sure quite why, ha ha, it doesn’t garner the same clicks as hate does? Uh, but I believe that we we the major vast majority of Americans agree that children should have access to books. It’s, uh, for someone who’s worked in libraries my whole career it’s been shocking to see people oppose things that it’s hard to imagine anyone being against. I was visiting a library in Rhode Island a few weeks ago, and you walk in the door and there's a a shelf there with little tiny plants on it and it’s painted and it says, "take a plant, leaf a plant," and it’s the cutest thing you’ve ever seen and it's a community partnership between the branch library and the local Girl Scouts to provide greenery to the community. When you see something like that in the library and you don't understand how anyone could be against it and it doesn’t make any sense, and it, I think, um, that’s the piece that’s the most challenging for me. If we could amplify the stories of good work that libraries are doing every day that you probably know about from going to the library, I know about from going to libraries, those are the stories that I’d love to see getting more press coverage, cause that's the real work of uh America’s library workers. Connecting people.

Program Host:
Absolutely. Absolutely. Well you got a friend here at America's Work Force. We appreciate what you're doing there. This is a really, really tough job and just in closing Emily, Emily Drabinski joining us, she is President of the American Library Association, your message to those communities that are affected, um, and and as we know there's some states that are pretty vocal right now, what would that message be Emily?

Emily Drabinski:
We're all in this together. There are more of us than there are of them. It’s just a matter of getting together and standing strong for what our communities need. And there are lots and lots of ways to do that. Everyone just needs to do something. 

Program Host:
There you go.

Emily Drabinski:
And we’re glad to have all of you in the fight.

Program Host:
Alright, Emily, please keep in touch with us. Emily Drabinski, President of American Library Association. Stay strong and stay safe, okay?

Emily Drabinski:
Thank you. 

Program Host:
That'll be it for another addition of America's Work Force. Tomorrow I’m gonna check in with the Ohio Federation of Teachers and the Insulators, that would be Local 45. Until then, all of you have a safe and wonderful day.

# # # 30 # # #



Source of transcript of Emily Drabinski interview:

Ferenc, Ed. “Fighting Against a Nationwide Attack on Libraries and Education: Interview of Emily Drabinski S4 E160.” America’s Work Force; Union Podcast, August 14, 2023. https://awf.labortools.com/listen/fighting-against-a-nationwide-attack-on-libraries-and-education.

Source of graphic of Emily Drabinski and Karl Marx, upper right:

Monger, Craig. “‘Marxist Lesbian’ American Library Association President Not Backing Down Despite Alabama, Other States Seeking Separation.” 1819 News, August 16, 2023. https://1819news.com/news/item/marxist-lesbian-american-library-association-president-not-backing-down-despite-alabama-other-states-seeking-separation.