Time for Book Ratings on YA Books, Says Dr. Sarah Coyne of Brigham Young University, While ALA Calls it Censorship

Dr. Sarah Coyne of Brigham Young University has recommended that book ratings be used to help parents make informed decisions.  On the other hand, Beth Yoke, Executive Director of the American Library Association's [ALA] Young Adult Library Services Association [YALSA], says book ratings are "censorship":

• "Is It Time To Rate Young Adult Books for Mature Content?  A New Report Finds that Nearly All Young Adult Bestsellers Contain at Least Some Profanity," by Jason Koebler,  U.S. News & World Report, 18 May 2012:

  Coyne thinks a ratings system on book jackets would help parents decide what's appropriate for their kids to read.  It's a subject many are afraid to touch, with the talk of censorship or restricting books conjuring up images of book burnings and infringing on First Amendment Rights.
  
  

  

  "I think we put books on a pedestal compared to other forms of media," Coyne says.  "I thought long and hard about whether to do the study in the first place—I think banning books is a terrible idea, but a content warning on the back I think would empower parents."
  
  While books like Gossip Girl or Pretty Little Liars aren't ever going to end up alongside Catcher in the Rye or Huckleberry Finn in American literary canon, those books' messages are still important, experts argue.
  
  "Books can be a safe way for young people to explore edgier, sensitive, or complicated topics, and they provide parents the opportunity to help their teens grow and understand these kinds of sensitive issues," says Beth Yoke, executive director of the Young Adult Library Services Association, an offshoot of the American Library Association.  "ALA's interpretation on any rating system for books is that it's censorship."

So ALA's YALSA calls it "censorship" to use book ratings to give people/schools the notice needed to make informed decisions as to what's best for their children.  This from the organization that says keeping R-rated movies from children is censorship:

• "Keeping R-Rated Films from Children is Censorship, According to the ALA and the Fountaindale Public Library That Blindly Follows the ALA"

and that every single person who ever complains about any book is a "censor":

• "Banned Books Week Propaganda Exposed by Progressive Librarian Rory Litwin; ALA Censors Out Criticism of Its Own Actions in a Manner Dishonest to the Core"
• "The Parent Trap: ALA Uses Banned Books Week to Ridicule Patrons Complying with ALA Materials Reconsideration Policies"

And the ALA is the organization that intentionally fakes its annual Top 10 List of Challenged Books to inflate the handful of cases into a national tragedy and push political or social buttons to promote its own interests:

• "Banned Books Week is Gay Promotion?  Author Admits ALA Faked 2010 Top 10 Challenged Book List"

Naomi Wolf
"Young Adult Fiction: Wild Things"

As you decide whom to believe, Dr. Sarah Coyne/BYU or Beth Yoke/ALA, please consider:

• "It's Not Censorship, It's Parenting! -- Best Explanation Ever for What's Wrong With the American Library Association and its Effect on Public School Libraries"
• "False Censorship Claims Exposed by WSJ Author Attacked for Exposing Truth About Young Adult Books; Meghan Cox Gurdon Decries Incomplete and Uninformative Book Reviews"
• "Young Adult Fiction:  Wild Things," by Naomi Wolf, The New York Times, 12 March 2006
• "School Excoriates Book Reviews that Fail to Disclose 'Graphic Sexual Details' in Books for Children; Lush by Natasha Friend is 'Wildly Inappropriate' for Certain Children"
• "The Anything Goes ALA is Out of the Mainstream by Defending the Right of Children to Access Pornography in Public Libraries"
• "Will Manley Outs Library Profession as the Only One in the World That Wants Children to Have Access to Pornography; Annoyed Librarian Says Some Librarians Sound Like Smut Peddlars"

See also:

• "Some Teen Books Surprisingly X-Rated, Study Finds"—also involves Dr. Sarah Coyne
• "Student Decries School P-rn Pushing Policy and Calls for Book Ratings"
• "Most Oppose Explicit Books in Public Schools Says Harris Poll"
• "School Removes Squirting Sperm Book After 8-Year-Old Complains To Her Mother"—contains a large list of articles pertaining to schools and books
• "TheBookBuzz.org Provides Parent Ratings of Public School Books"
• "ALA's Anything Goes at Any Age Policy Criticized by University of Missouri Library Science Student"
• "GLSEN Gets It, the ALA Doesn't; ALA Challenged to Provide Notice of Potentially Inappropriate Material in its Book Lists and Awards"
• "Know the ALA"

The decision is yours.  Is it time for book ratings?  Comment below, if you wish.


NOTE ADDED 19 MAY 2012:

Below is the ALA's view on labeling and rating systems—basically, it is censorship.  Keep in mind the ALA also said it was censorship to filter computers in public libraries.  Its bluff was called on that in US v. ALA where the Court found it is not censorship.

• "Labeling and Rating Systems; An Interpretation of the Library Bill of Rights," by ALA Council, American Library Association, 15 July 2009.

NOTE ADDED 20 MAY 2012:

Thanks to an excellent comment below, I am reminded that book ratings are used successfully in many places without being falsely labeled as censorship.  I have previous written about the case in St. Louis, so I'll link those posts now:

• "Big Win for St. Louis Citizens; Library Labels Books For Age Appropriateness After Citizen Protest"
• "Know Your Library"

See also these posts that illustrate how the ALA works to mislead people on book labeling to try to force its way on communities, such as St. Louis:

• "Who's Controlling County Libraries:  Taxpayers or the ALA?  New Teen Sections at County Libraries Stocked with Sexually Explicit Materials," by Dan Kleinman, St. Louis MetroVoice, 21 August 2008.
• "ALA Admits Media Manipulation - Endnote Hyperlinks Provided for St. Louis MetroVoice Cover Story by SafeLibraries"
• "Library Propaganda in Media Exposed - Reporter Presents One-Sided Story with No Balance and Sometimes No Truth"
• "Speaking With Jason Rich, Author of Growing Up Gay in America"

NOTE ADDED 25 MAY 2012:

Oh read this excellent post on the topic:

• "WARNING: On YA, Ratings, and 'Censorship,'" by Rachel Manwill, Book Riot, 25 May 2012.

Follow @SafeLibraries

Moving Porn at BYU is Censorship?

This takes the cake. A university has a collection of soft porn that it promotes front and center in the school library. As a result, many women have ended up in therapy for porn addiction. Students, joined by their therapists, asked the school library to move the books back to the shelves, instead of front and center. The library refused claiming moving the books would be censorship!

See "Therapy: Part 2," by Lauren, The Barnes Family, 27 June 2009. See also "Romance Novels Pornography for Women," by Adrienne, Adrienne Bone, 27 June 2009. I have added these links to "Thomas Sowell on Banned Books Week - BBW is 'Shameless Propaganda ... Now Institutionalized With a Week of Its Own" because the American Library Association's false censorship claims are strikingly similar.

Censorship! Victims of real censorship would laugh about this, then cry that censorship has become so diluted that moving porn back to the shelves is considered the equivalent of, say, jailed Cuban librarians.

Citizens across the nation are beginning to ask public libraries to move material inappropriate for children to the adult section. St. Louis citizens just did this successfully. The false claim that it is "censorship" is made in every case. Children, they claim, have First Amendment rights to inappropriate material. They don't, but that's what they claim.

Along comes Brigham Young University [BYU]. This time the target of the false "censorship" claims is college-age women. So even without the presence of children, the same false "censorship" claims are being made. Result? The BYU Library keeps the porn collection front and center, library patrons continue to be harmed, and it may be a direct result of the library's policy. Potentially, the school may be directly liable for the harm caused to the women after the library refused to move the books using false censorship claims.

When will people stop being intimidated by those claiming moving books is censorship? It is BYU's library, not the library director's library. Get the library director to do what the university community wants, not what the library director wants. If he or she refuses to budge, take appropriate action and move on.

The blog posts discuss the many efforts of students and therapists trying to stop this injustice. The library and school administration has turned them away each time or broken promises. I won't. I hereby offer to assist anyone regarding this matter.

.