Showing posts with label Guns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Guns. Show all posts

Saturday, May 6, 2023

NLTE to Governor DeSantis: Make Public School Libraries Safer

Dear Governor DeSantis and Commissioner Diaz - and Ladies and Gentlemen all:

As I am one of a very few de facto community leaders charged with making the content of our Florida public school libraries safer for America's children, I implore you to prepare an edict or strongly worded directive to more effectively help protect our children.  I'll provide an example below.
  • The FLDOE training for Media Specialists, that thankfully now includes the words "err on the side of caution," is NOT having the desired effect.
  • In each district, subject to the whims of the school board and many other entities, we are seeing some truly terrible titles be reviewed then retained.
  • Our children continue to be exposed to porn and other horrors.
  • The keyword, "caution," is the issue.
  • Some of the Media Specialists and purchasers (and authors and publishers) are actively aligned with the ALA [American Library Association] agenda (avowed Marxism).
  • Sadly, this is sometimes also true of superintendents and teachers and school board members.
  • Many of these persons are still denying ANY book is inappropriate for ANY child.  Their "free speech absolutism" is the opposite of caution.
  • In my rather conservative county (Clay) there have already been 97 titles permanently removed.  The resistance to these removals has been, and is today, extraordinary.
  • These same persons are screaming about "censorship" and "book banning" yet all 97 of these books can still be found at public libraries and bookstores and even online.
  • I do not feel we have truly banned a single book.  We just moved them further away from innocent children.
  • I am never going to apologize for my passion to "err on the side of caution" and protect innocence.  I expect so far we agree.
The sample below stems from my experience fighting (and often losing) the same battle for the last 10 plus years.  I hope this serves you and is found worthy of your consideration.

SAMPLE EDICT/DIRECTIVE: 
(My apologies for the length)

To the attention of every Florida public school Superintendent and Principal and Attorney and School Board Member, as well as interested parties of the ALA; NEA; NEFEC; FSBA...:
Whereas Florida State Statutes and Laws provide guidance regarding all books in any location on public school grounds, this directive is issued to clarify the cumulative intent of these Florida State Statutes and Laws. 
Further clarification may be included in your local district policies.  Note that the subtle differences in definitions between a book in any teacher's personal public school classroom library, and a book in the common public school library, and any book that is a relevant part of the curriculum, are not to be treated as justifications for failing to "err on the side of caution" as noted in the Media Specialists training.

1. PORN: Books may not contain pornography.  One single passage or page with pornographic content is sufficient to disqualify a book from purchase.  The book's "artistic value" or "serious literary value" is not relevant.  Regarding books previously purchased, a pornographic passage or page is sufficient for its immediate deselection and/or removal.  Such books should not require any further analysis or committee review prior to deselection.  Such books should not be resold or gifted or destroyed.  They should be returned to the publishers with the explanation that the publisher failed to provide sufficiently accurate product summaries, and that since these items violate our Laws, the publisher may be held accountable and *disqualified from any future sales. 
I personally suggest requesting a ZERO dollar credit - for dramatic effect.
Note that an image or description of breast-feeding is not porn.
See Fl. S847.001 [explicit sex/obscenity] and S847.012 [harmful to minors] and HB 1467 [transparency in book selections - with *accountability]

2. GENDER THEORY AND COMPREHENSIVE SEX ED: While the world is a dynamic place and family structures vary, Humans are almost always specifically male or female. Fl S.1003.46 (2a and all) direct public schools to teach "abstinence from sexual activity outside of marriage as the expected standard for all school-age students while teaching the benefits of monogamous heterosexual marriage." Books in any location on school grounds ought to reinforce, or at the very least, not conflict with this statute. Books that mention or promote a sense of gender fluidity; (pre-marital or post-marital) promiscuity or other reckless sexual activity; homosexuality or non-heterosexual sexuality; alternate sexualities; multiple sexual partners or group sex, casual abortions; are in conflict with this statute and should be immediately deselected. Again, these are contrary to statute and should be expedited and returned as above. Generally, there should not be a romance section in a school library. Romance is rarely platonic. Ensure your purchasers select books that deal with more educational subjects and, as above, return the deselected items to the publisher. Note that a book may contain a person that is confused about their sexuality or is not a heterosexual. In general, any book in any public school should not be focused on any person's sexuality.
See HB 1557 [The Parental Rights in Education Act, commonly/incorrectly referred to as the "Don't Say Gay" Bill]; See also HB 7 and SB 300 [both relating to pregnancy and parenting support]

3. UNSOLICITED THEORIES/Critical Race Theory/DEI/WOKENESS: The U.S. Constitution and Florida Law requires that no child (or Adult) be made to suffer for their race or religion. Florida Law does require we teach the true history of uncomfortable topics such as the Holocaust and slavery. The "anti-racist" theory of CRT is in conflict with law. CRT is a theory designed to CAUSE division rather than promote a harmonious environment for education. Many books are known to have been intentionally infused with passages that support CRT. These books will only rarely include the words "critical race theory" or "culturally responsive training." In order to more efficiently deselect these CRT items, they should be read or searched for the keywords that often reveal CRT content. Same applies to the modern tussle over wokeness. Same remedy required. Return the deselected items to the publisher.
A fairly comprehensive list of suggested search terms is provided here: https://www.noleftturn.us/crt-code-words/ - I'd add "belonging" to the list as this term is likely to be abused by some people.
Note that historical or current references to racist behavior are acceptable unless they promote that racism or intend to increase disharmony overall.
See Fl. HB 1467 [transparency in book selections - with *accountability]

4. HISTORICAL LIES/PROPAGANDA/ANTI-POLICE/ANTI-GOVERNMENT SENTIMENT: We pledge allegiance to the American flag. We stand for the National Anthem. We honor our Veterans. We respect our police. We live in a Constitutional Republic.
Books that call America a "Democracy" or promote the benefits of Socialism or Communism, should be purchased sparingly and only as needed for a curriculum designed to show that the use of propaganda is dangerous.
Note that judicious use of "The Communist Manifesto" and "Mein Kampf" can be helpful in this regard.
Whenever possible, unless crucial to a lesson about the danger of historical lies, apply the same treatment. Expedite and return the deselected items to the publisher.
See US Constitution - Article 4 Section 4 [The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government]

5. VIOLENCE and GUNS: There have been mass shootings at some of our schools. Many schools are occasionally locked down for a variety of sound efforts to maintain safety. Our children now regularly participate in "active shooter drills."
It's terrifying to most parents and our children that such drills are even required.
Accordingly, there is no good reason to provide books to children that glorify murder or trivialize weapons or death. Please apply the same treatment. Expedite and return the deselected items to the publisher.
Note that books detailing the horrors of an historical war or armed conflict, are not required to be deselected.
Note that books that describe the safe handling and operation, as well as the mechanical design of weapons, are not required to be deselected.
See Fl. 1006.28 [Duties of district school board, district school superintendent; and school principal regarding K-12 instructional materials]

6. MANGA and Graphic Novels: Picture books are appropriate for children learning to read. Manga and young adult graphic novels (comic books) often contain the prohibited content discussed above. Unless a graphic novel is found crucial to higher learning and free of the inappropriate content above, it should be removed from school grounds.
Literate students should access these types of books in a public library outside of our schools, if desired.
They are a distraction and hindrance to learning. Please apply the same treatment. Expedite deselections and return the items to the publisher.
See Fl. 1006.28 [Duties of district school board, district school superintendent; and school principal regarding K-12 instructional materials]

7. SHADES OF GREY: We recognize that some books may offer contrary perspectives on topics as varied as serial monogamy; Global Warming; politics in general.
When choosing books for America's children, please continue to "err on the side of caution!"
I hope you all find this informative and helpful.

Commissioner Diaz: Please reach out to me by phone or email at your earliest convenience.

Respectfully,
Bruce

--
Bruce Friedman - concerned parent
Chapter President
No Left Turn in Education - Florida
bruce.friedman@noleftturn.us




TO:
GovernorRon.Desantis@eog.myflorida.com
mannydiaz@fldoe.org
Brandy.Brown@eog.myflorida.com
parentalrights@fldoe.org



###     30     ###     30     ###


Above is a letter submitted to Governor Ron DeSantis as shown, active links, formatting for the web, and graphics from Bruce Friedman added by me.

Below is the same Bruce Friedman being silenced by his school board for daring to read aloud the books his school board approves for school children to read.  The adults aren't allowed to hear it, not even those sitting on a governing school board, but the school children get it from school librarians?  

Notice the huge engagement numbers because everyone knows this is wrong while the librarians keep falsely claiming it's a First Amendment right guaranteed by ALA's so-called "Library Bill of Rights," as if it were the real thing, as if it trumps community standards, state law, and US Supreme Court cases.


By the way, school boards violate open government laws by silencing parents reading school books:

Kleinman, Dan. “Parents May Legally Read Explicit Books at School Board Meetings: Mama Bears of Forsyth County v. McCall.” SafeLibraries® (blog), February 7, 2023. https://safelibraries.blogspot.com/2023/02/parents-may-legally-read-explicit-books.html.

—
URL of this page: 



Thursday, June 29, 2017

'No Guns' Signs in Libraries Don't Work

Photo Credit: Adrian D. Garcia of The Beacon
"No Guns" signs in libraries don't work.  Criminals and law-abiding citizens still bring in their guns:
"No Guns" signs don't even apply in many cases:
By the way, the American Library Association tries to take away Second Amendment rights, even blaming guns and the National Rifle Association for terrorism, and working to force the Florida Library Association to reverse its position in support of Stand Your Ground gun laws:
Likely as a result of ALA interference, local libraries sometimes have to be officially ordered to take down the phoney "No Guns" signs or threatened into doing so:
So if you see a sign saying "No Guns" in your library, that's like a magnet for criminals with guns, and you, as a law-abiding citizen, can feel free to ignore the sign, depending on your state laws. "No Guns" signs in libraries don't work.

Happy hunting!



NOTE ADDED 21 FEBRUARY 2018:

—
URL of this page: 
safelibraries.blogspot.com/2017/06/no-guns-signs-in-libraries-dont-work.html

On Twitter:
@ALALibrary @NRA @TweetFLAlibrary

Sunday, June 12, 2016

ALA Blames Guns, NRA for Terrorism at Orlando Gay Bar

American Library Association [ALA] leaders are blaming guns for the Islamic terrorism at the gay bar Pulse in Orlando.  ALA "Councilor" Patrick Sweeney even used the Orlando "gun violence" to fundraise [source link]:
Whenever something like this happens, I always feel like people need something to bring some balance back and take some action against this kind of horrific violence. Gun violence is a very real and terrible thing in this country. We need to take a stand and make sure that we love each other and gather together to do what is right whenever we can.  That was why we were having a fundraiser....

Another librarian specifically blames the National Rifle Association [NRA].  It's the first target of blame, as shown in this graphic [source link]:


ALA has in the past so strongly supported opposition to the Second Amendment that, when the Florida Library Association [FLA] refused to follow ALA diktat to oppose Stand Your Ground laws in Florida, ALA then began building infrastructure to force FLA to comply.  Resistance is futile:
ALA is scheduled to have an annual convention in Orlando, FL, in 2016.  As a result, ALA Council is now discussing whether to move the convention out of Florida or to use the event to oppose Florida's gun laws and guns generally.
Of course the thought never occurs that if the citizens were armed, someone might have disabled or killed the terrorist before he killed so many.

Also completely silent is the matter of ALA's support for homophobia.  We are talking about Islamic mass murder at a gay nightclub, after all.

ALA's "Office for Intellectual Freedom" [OIF] hired someone to train librarians how to thwart child pornography whistleblowers.  Her training included asking why a woman would let her small children around a gay man (both the woman and the gay man were the whistleblowers).

After the homophobic training became clear to OIF, it hired the same person to train again for ALA.  That's homophobia, in my opinion.  If ran a company and had a trainer spreading homophobia during training, I would never hire that person again and would immediately cancel all existing contracts and sever all ties no matter the costs.  Homophobia must never be tolerated nor condoned—except at ALA where it can be used to stop child porn whistleblowers.

When OIF learned of efforts to collect evidence of its homophobia, its Deputy Director (and former Acting Director) used her personal email to order public librarians who saw the homophobic training to destroy all evidence of the training (in violation of state record retention laws—and if any librarians still have this evidence, please send it to me). That's also homophobia, in my opinion.  Read the private email here:
See generally:
ALA and absolutely all of its foot soldiers have continued to maintain a wall of silence to hide OIF's promotion of homophobia.  It's been going on for years.  In the rare instance anyone is finally forced to speak on the subject, it is invariably to malign those trying to expose the homophobia, including even the gay man who committed the sin of being a public library child pornography whistleblower.

Indeed, even a federal lawsuit had been launched and lost to attempt to silence me and the authors of the book I linked immediately above.  They tried to force us to delete evidence of homophobia, including "Gay Hate @ Your Library" and "2014-07-08 = OPPL Spokesperson commits Disorderly Conduct/Breach of Peace according to Ofc. Schmidt":

"I don't like gays, ok? ASSHOLES!"
So here's the same homophobic ALA absolutely overlooking the issues of terrorism, the killing of gays within the terrorist community, and the Islamic terror in the Orlando gay nightclub to blame guns.  It's "gun violence," not religious hated of freedom and gays.

To me, when people hide evidence of homophobia and overlook evidence of homophobia—to blame guns, no less—that's just more homophobia, more silence.

I come to no other conclusion than ALA blames guns, NRA for terrorism at the Orlando gay bar.

On Monday ALA will make an announcement about this.  I predict it will officially blame guns.


NOTE ADDED 13 JUNE 2016:

ALA's President Sari Feldman has her response published.  While it does not openly blame guns, the matter of this being the second most deadly Islamic terror attack in the USA is completely absent.  Rather, it's "tragic" and must be addressed with "diversity and inclusion resources" due to "fear, ignorance and intolerance."

"We will work collaboratively with the leaders of ALA’s Task Force on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion; Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender Round Table (GLBTRT); ethnic caucuses; and executive office to discuss our expressions of support."  And that means blaming guns, as ALA has done in the past.  Here's ALA's response:
If ALA were truly interested in the truth instead of using the slaughter as a means for political gain, it would recognize the issue of Islamic terror and the role libraries play in encouraging that, like when former ALA de facto leader Judith Krug told the New York Times she wished the Delray, FL, librarian had protected a 9/11 terrorist's privacy instead of reporting him to the police.

If ALA were truly interested in the truth it would recognize the terror threat and order libraries to stop deleting browser search histories in violation of state record retention laws.  Yes, privacy is important so browser histories should not be made public, but they should be stored for a time for retrieval by law enforcement sources having a properly executed subpoena.

But truth is not the goal here.  The goal is to set up "[l]ibrarians and library workers [as] community leaders, motivators and social change agents."  Social change agents?  They don't see the second largest Islamic terror attack in the USA for what it is and instead blame "intolerance" and "gun violence," and they what to change our communities?

And here's ALA's Internet filtering expert who fakes that filters do not work, censors comments saying otherwise, and destroyed a man's career, never apologizing for false "sexual predator" accusations though the rest of Team Harpy did.  This is a typical "change agent" ALA wants in our communities:


NOTE ADDED 18 JUNE 2016:

Here's an example of the hatred librarians hold for free speech and opinions differing from their own. They will force their opinions down your throat even if it means being the nastiest censors themselves:
Librarians hate free speech if it varies from
librarianship's political correctness.

NOTE ADDED 9 JANUARY 2018:

Nothing says I was spot on accurate like being publicly attacked by James LaRue, ALA's leader of the Office for Intellectual Freedom—so much for intellectual freedom:


The above is a graphic of Jamie LaRue's tweet about this publication from @jaslar that I include in case he deletes the tweet so it will not show below:


URL of this page: safelibraries.blogspot.com/2016/06/ala-blames-guns-for-orlando.html

On Twitter: @ALALibrary @HillBuzz @MeganFoxWriter @NRA +National Rifle Association @OIF @PCSweeney @PulseOrlando @TweetFLAlibrary

Friday, July 24, 2015

Old Navy v. Orland Park Public Library: Convicted Child Killer Arrested at Indianapolis Public Library



Making sure you saw this: convicted child killer arrested at Indianapolis Public Library

Story Time Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:30 PM

To: Orland Park Public Library Board of Trustees
Re: Convicted child killer arrested in Indianapolis Public Library today

-- Board Action Needed --

I am making sure that the OPPL Board of Trustees (OPPL-BoT) is aware of this news story from today (7/23/15), where a convicted child killer was arrested at the Indianapolis Public Library. You can read the full story here:  http://abc7chicago.com/news/convicted-child-killer-arrested-at-indianapolis-library-/876009/

This is a predator who had recently been released from prison after serving 7 years for child molestation and child porn charges. One of the first things he did upon release was to head to the public library, where it appears he accessed child porn again or did something else in the library to violate his parole. 

The OPPL-BoT has never seemed to take the safety of children very seriously in your library, which is one of the big areas of criticism that Megan Fox and I have had for the OPPL-BoT since we started coming to your board meetings in October 2013. You really do not seem to care about children at all and instead seem to always want to side with the guys who masturbate in your library or who access illegal things like child porn. 

You seem proud of winning that ALA award for continuing to allow access to illegal materials on your computers…and you seem unashamed that as a Board you continue refusing to apologize for or address all of the incident reports where children were put at risk because of sexual activity or behavior in your library. 

Mary Weimar, as Library Director, has particularly seemed disinterested in the safety of children at the OPPL. Members of the Orland Park Police Department and reporter Dennis Sullivan from the Chicago Tribune both told us that for years Mary Weimar was informed by the police that registered sex offenders were violating their paroles by coming into the OPPL and being around children…but Weimar chose over and over again not to call the police when these men were in the library. 

This is on top of Weimar choosing not to call the police when child porn was reported to have been accessed on 3/8/11 and your own internal incident report shows that Weimar spoke with the man who did that, the man then admitted that child porn had been on his screen, and Weimar simply told him not to do it ever again (or, if he did, he would banned from the library…but the police would still not be called). This Board has admitted that Weimar did not call the police but should have, as any sane person would have done. 

The Board has now promised to never again allow child porn to go unreported to the police (and you seem to have an attitude of "the past is the past" and "oh, well"). 

When you factor in all the other incident reports showing sex crimes having been committed in your library and you look at Mary Weimar's response time and again as Director, you will see a troubling pattern of Weimar choosing wherever possible not to call the police and doing things that allow these men to get away. Why? 

Why does Mary Weimar keep doing that? 

Shouldn't you be mindful of things like what just happened today in Indianapolis and look at the OPPL and ask, "Are we really doing everything to remedy the past mistakes that were made here by Mary Weimar?". 

I would like the OPPL-BoT to finally address this.


Photo by Kevin DuJan (cropped by me).

I would also like to draw your attention to something that the Old Navy store in downtown Chicago does that might be a great idea for you. On the entrance doors to Old Navy on State Street in the LOOP, there is a notice posted to the glass doors stating that Old Navy is a Family Friendly establishment and that any criminal activity will be reported immediately to the police. This seems to serve as an effective deterrent to at least some segment of criminal element (or why would Old Navy have bothered doing this?). Old Navy communicates to anyone entering the store that children will be protected inside Old Navy…so anyone who would hurt a child should go elsewhere because Old Navy is a place where staff will vigilantly call the police on anyone attempting to hurt a child or engage in illegal activity. 

Old Navy's sign says:  "OLD NAVY PROMOTES A SAFE, FAMILY SHOPPING ENVIRONMENT. Criminal activity will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." 

The OPPL has no such notice on its doors. But, you should have one. 

I think the OPPL should have signs that say: "THE ORLAND PARK PUBLIC LIBRARY PROMOTES A SAFE, FAMILY ENVIRONMENT. Criminal activity will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law." 

Your entrance doors currently have more signs saying "No Smoking" than I can count. You have that posted over and over and over and over again. You must have gotten a bulk discount on the number of NO SMOKING signs you purchased for your entrance doors. I think you unofficially hold the Guinness World Record for the number of NO SMOKING signs plastered on a single entranceway. 

Similarly, you have countless "No Guns" signs on your doors. You don't have as many as you have NO SMOKING signs, but NO GUNS is a message you clearly want to send to anyone entering your building. In all the incident reports I have reviewed about crimes happening at the OPPL through the years, not once have I seen anything involving guns. Yet, you make a big production of telling people that there will be all sorts of negative consequences if they bring firearms into your building. 

So…considering the fact that you are a library where child porn was reported to have been accessed, where incidents of open public masturbation and other sex crimes have occurred, and where known sex offenders like David Varlotta have been known to roam (in violation of their parole, according to what Dennis Sullivan told me)…why don't you have anything on your doors as a notice that the OPPL is a safe place for children where police are called whenever anyone attempts to harm a child? 

Why aren't you, at bare minimum, at least doing what Old Navy does? 

Old Navy has no smoking signs. Old Navy has no gun signs. Old Navy has a prominent notice to any would-be creeps that Old Navy protects children. 

Why doesn't the OPPL do that? Can you look into it, at least? 

I've attached a picture I took of the Old Navy sign today so you can see what they have done. I truly believe that if you posted something like this on your doors alongside the NO SMOKING and NO GUNS signs that you would send a strong message to creeps that the OPPL staff has become serious about protecting children from harm. 

That has not been the message that Mary Weimar has sent for all these years of not calling the police when she should have and for looking the other way on things so that creeps could get away. But, you have the chance to turn the page and make a positive change. 

Will you follow in Old Navy's footsteps and do that? This is not a rhetorical question. I'd like an answer from the Board on this. 

Kevin DuJan
Story Time Digital Media

**************************************************
Story Time Digital Media is a digital news service in electronic format presenting video content and in-depth articles to the public (free of charge) as well as newsletters distributed to the public on a regular rolling basis. Our motto is "we cover the news that the Old Media refuses to cover" and our focus is on topics pertaining to the welfare and safety of children and being a watchdog exposing government abuse, graft, and corruption in the state of Illinois and nationally. Subscribe to our video channel to view news reels, cartoons, and other motion picture news clips that we produce to educate the public on the affairs of local government and elected officials' treatment of the public. For more information on who we are and the stories we cover, click below: 

https://www.facebook.com/MeganFoxWriter


URL of this page: safelibraries.blogspot.com/2015/07/indylibrary.html

On Twitter:  @IndyLibrary @MCSO_IN +Old Navy @OldNavy #OldNavyStyle @OrlandPkLibrary @StoryTimeDigita

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

FLA Flips ALA the Bird on Florida's Stand Your Ground Law

Northern Mockingbird
Mimus Polyglottus
Florida State Bird
The Florida Library Association [FLA] has flipped the American Library Association [ALA] the bird, and in Florida, that means the mockingbird.  FLA mocks ALA for taking political positions that have nothing to do with librarianship.  And ALA is already mounting a response to attempt to force FLA to act as ALA wishes, similar to what ALA does in local communities, only this time it applies to a state library association.

ALA's ruling "ALA Council" (one that, for example, bullies its conservative Christian members) has recently decided to take on yet another non-library issue, like fried librarian giblets, but in this case, it's Florida's Stand Your Ground law.  This started after ALA's "Black Caucus of the American Library Association, Inc." [BCALA] published the following:
  • "Black Caucus of ALA Denounces ALA's Decision to Hold 2016 Annual Conference in Orlando, Fla," by BCALA, American Library Association, 17 March 2014:
    The Black Caucus of the American Library Association (BCALA), condemns the American Library Association's (ALA) decision to continue with plans to hold the ALA 2016 annual conference in Orlando, Fla. in the wake of the George Zimmerman verdict and that state's refusal to revise or repeal "Stand Your Ground" laws, which were included in jury instructions in Zimmerman's trial for second degree murder for fatally shooting unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla. in 2012.
ALA is scheduled to have an annual convention in Orlando, FL, in 2016.  As a result, ALA Council is now discussing whether to move the convention out of Florida or to use the event to oppose Florida's gun laws and guns generally.

ALA is frequently mocked for allowing a few people to drive the entire organization to support progressive causes having nothing to do with librarianship.  The latest example is the Annoyed Librarian writing for the Library Journal in "An Idea For a Resolution":
I have a suggestion for the Socially Responsible Round Table.  The next time you want to push a meaningless resolution about something unrelated to the libraries, why not instead push a meaningless resolution in support of the third of Americans that have no library access at all.  That actually has something to do with libraries and it's a worthy cause.  It's just not very sexy.
Well ALA decided to pressure FLA to provide input on whether to move the conference out of Florida or to suggest how FLA proposes going about using the conference to pressure Floridians and conference visitors on their own gun laws.

FLA was having none of that.  It responded ever so politely by telling ALA that FLA addresses issues facing Florida libraries and librarians.  See the FLA letter to the ALA or read it below.  And FLA's Alan Kornblau wrote, "As a member of the FLA Executive Board and Florida Chapter Councilor, I support FLA's position and encourage lovers of libraries to attend our state conference at the beautiful Buena Vista Palace in Lake Buena Vista, Florida from May 7 – 9, 2014, as well as the 2016 ALA Annual Conference in Orlando, Florida."

Given ALA was subtly pressuring FLA to take a position on a non-librarian and progressive political issue of gun control and tossing aside the Second Amendment, FLA's response that clearly defines its mission as one of libraries and librarians is basically mocking ALA for taking on those progressive, non-library political issues.

And since the Florida state bird is the Northern Mockingbird, it appears FLA is flipping ALA the bird and mocking its northern ALA.

Well, ALA is not used to people telling ALA off.  So ALA Councilor Gladys Smiley Bell responded to Alan Kornblau—you see, library workers and users "fear" living in Florida so that makes opposing gun laws and the "struggle for equality and fairness" into "library advocacy" and "an opportunity to promote change":
This is about library advocacy which I support.  This is an opportunity to promote change in states that includes library workers, libraries, library users in light of BCALA and others fight for safety, a safe environment, and other discriminating acts regarding the struggle for equality and fairness.  I don't like living with fear for myself or my teenage grandsons.
And ALA Councilor Al Kagan steamed, "Alan, Thanks for forwarding the Florida Library Association letter.  Unfortunately, it does not address the issue at hand."

So you know ALA received the message loud and clear that FLA was not going to be ALA's political hatchet man and was not going to take on non-library issues.

The night is young and the typical Chicago Way pressure from Chicago's ALA is only just beginning to build.  The conference is in 2016.  We'll have to wait to see if it the conference is moved or not.  I doubt it, but it won't be for a lack of trying.

Read FLA's letter to ALA for yourself to see FLA is sticking to library issues only:



March 18, 2014

Dear Colleagues and Friends at ALA,

On behalf of the Florida Library Association, our Executive Board thanks you for your recent inquiry about our Association's focus.

Our mission statement notes that our association:  "develops programs and undertakes activities to earn it a leadership position for all areas of librarianship.  To do this, the Association works with other professional organizations and professions that are relevant to librarianship; provides increasing opportunities for librarians and support staff in Florida to advance their skills so that they can maintain their effectiveness in the new information age; works closely with the information industry, facilitating productive links with the library community; and continues its role as legislative advocate for excellence in all types of library service within the State of Florida and beyond."

Since we are an organization with finite funds and limited staff we focus all our resources on issues directly supporting libraries and librarians in the state of Florida.   Keeping libraries open and librarians employed so that our libraries can provide the best library services possible to their users is our primary focus.  Our legislative platform focuses on funding libraries of all types.

The Florida Library Association supports the position that libraries are forums for information and ideas and that their resources should be available to all.  We encourage people to exercise their rights as individuals and support free speech.  We have a very active Intellectual Freedom Committee that was so effective it spawned a new member group last year, "Readers Rights and Privacy."  We have adopted supporting positions on "Public Library Funding," "Freedom to Read," ALA's "Library Bill of Rights," "Code of Ethics," and "Ethics Statements for Public Trustees," and have statements on "Privatization" and "Professional Education."

The Florida Library Association is looking forward to the 2016 ALA Conference in Orlando and the opportunity for Florida librarians, friends, and staff to attend.

We also encourage you to attend our FLA Conference this spring, May 7-9 at the Buena Vista Palace in Orlando.

Sincerely,
/s/
Gladys Roberts, President

The FLA letter may be downloaded here:  http://tinyurl.com/FLAflipsALAtheBird

By the way, since FLA appropriately sticks to library issues, I hope it addresses these:


NOTE ADDED 25 MARCH 2014:

As presaged, and this didn't take long, ALA has struck back at FLA.  Only days ago I wrote, "The night is young and the typical Chicago Way pressure from Chicago's ALA is only just beginning to build."  Sure enough, ALA President Barbara Stripling (a very nice lady from what I can see, by the way) is striking back and hard.  In big, Chicago Way style.  She is organizing the full power of ALA to community organize all librarians to punish FLA for insolence and promote progressive causes in libraries nationwide, starting with opposing guns laws.  What does this have to do with librarianship?  Nothing, but the ends justifies the means, no?

She is charging directly at any state library association that would dare do what FLA did, using FLA as the whipping boy.  "ALA's Executive Committee and BCALA's Executive Board decided that the best way to respond to the Florida situation is by turning it into an opportunity to educate, build awareness, and advocate for equitable treatment, inclusion, and respect for diversity.  We have agreed on the following actions: ... Support for conversations and actions at the state level facilitated by state library associations or other organizations within the states."

So, FLA, the full weight of ALA will "support conversation and actions at the state level facilitated by state library associations...."  That means you, FLA.  You will support "conversation" and "action" on the very progressive political cause you politely avoided.  If you do not acquiesce, there will be more and more "conversation" and "action" until you come to heel.

"Most troubling is the growing prevalence of Stand Your Ground laws," writes Barbara Stripling et alia.  So even though you, FLA, said you will not engage in that political activity because you wanted to spend limited resources instead on libraries and librarians, you will soon learn the most cost effective move will be to give in to the ALA instead of constantly fending off the "conversation" and "action" that ALA is gathering to bring to bear in Orlando as a direct result of your giving ALA the bird.  ALA's flipping you back a bigger bird.  No other state library association will dare defy ALA further.

This is how ALA pushes porn in libraries nationwide, like this: http://tinyurl.com/DirtyDozenALA

This is how ALA pushes state library associations to come to heel.  Even to the point of teaching them the opposite of the law so they will promote porn in libraries.

And, it's already working!
As the Councilor from Louisiana and one of the councilors who originally suggested state-level action, I will be bringing this statement with me tomorrow to the Executive Board Meeting at the Annual Conference of the Louisiana Library Association, where I will recommend that we have our own chapter-based Task Force devoted to issues of diversity within our profession—well in advance of any upcoming ALA conferences in New Orleans. 
I would also like to put my name forward as being interested in working with the your Special Presidential Task Force, Barbara—in whatever way you deem appropriate. 
Stephanie 
Stephanie Ganic Braunstein, MA MLIS
Head Government Documents/Microforms Librarian
& Liaison to Political Science
Louisiana State University
Middleton Library
Regional Depository #222

Louisiana State University.  A public university.  What a coincidence.

Does anyone know if this political activity violates ALA's 501(c)(3) tax exempt status?  Are taxpayers supporting an organization that calls itself the American Library Association but that instead works to promote progressive political causes, much like Media Matters for America and the like?  Is there something wrong with libraries and librarians that ALA needs to come out openly as promoting progressive causes, like opposing Stand Your Ground laws, having nothing to do with librarianship?

ALA membership is shrinking.  I have to wonder if this non-library, non-librarian political activism is part of the reason why.  "The goal is to use the Orlando conference platform to provoke a national dialogue."  Oh really?  State library associations like FLA far better serve the needs of librarians, I have heard.  And seeing FLA's willingness to keep its focus on library and librarian issues, I can see why.

Here is the ALA statement of 25 March 2014 that represents ALA reacting strongly to a state library association, in this case FLA, daring to express an interest in sticking to issues affecting libraries and librarians:

CHICAGO —The values of diversity, equity, and inclusion form the foundation of the library profession and our professional associations.  Those values have been challenged by the discriminatory enforcement of the "Stand Your Ground" law in Florida and the fact that ALA's 2016 Annual Conference is scheduled for Orlando.  The Executive Committee members of ALA and the BCALA Executive Board have actively engaged in conversation to determine the best solution to this challenging dilemma.  That conversation has been extended to the Executive Boards of AILA, APALA, CALA, and REFORMA with a decision to issue a joint statement of commitment and action. 
In response to BCALA's concern regarding holding the ALA Annual Conference in Orlando, Florida, in 2016, the ALA Executive Board thoroughly explored the options for moving the conference.  ALA started by clarifying the facts underlying conference site selection, the implications of trying to move the Orlando conference, and the prevalence of Stand Your Ground laws across the United States.  The contracts for Orlando were negotiated originally in 2000; the Stand Your Ground law in Florida became effective on October 1, 2005.  Cancelling the hotel and convention center contracts would result in a minimum fine of $814,000.  Conferences as large as ALA must be scheduled for specific sites and contracts signed at least 7–10 years in advance.  At this late date, it would be highly unlikely that ALA would be able to find another site with availability during our window of late June/early July 2016. 
Most troubling is the growing prevalence of Stand Your Ground laws. Twenty-two states have laws that allow for that self-defense provision to be asserted (as of August 2013).  An additional 21 states have enacted laws that allow for self-defense within one's home (called Castle Doctrines).  However, each state has implemented and applied the Stand Your Ground laws differently, and it is the interpretation and application of the Stand Your Ground Law in the Zimmerman and Dunn cases, as well as the Marissa Alexander case, that has heightened the urgency for discussion and action. 
With that information in hand, our ALA's Executive Committee and BCALA's Executive Board decided that the best way to respond to the Florida situation is by turning it into an opportunity to educate, build awareness, and advocate for equitable treatment, inclusion, and respect for diversity. We have agreed on the following actions:
  • Town Hall discussions of racial diversity and inclusion in our profession, association, and communities.
    • Major topic of Membership Meeting at 2014 ALA Annual Conference in Las Vegas.
    • Topic of discussion during Virtual Membership Meeting on June 5, 2014.
  • Support for conversations and actions at the state level facilitated by state library associations or other organizations within the states.
  • Formation of a Special Presidential Task Force involving members of the ethnic affiliates and ALA to (1) develop programs and other opportunities for members to learn about and engage in the issue, (2) build strong advocacy and awareness while at the Orlando conference, and (3) develop communications directed toward the public.  The Task Force will be formed immediately.  The goal is to use the Orlando conference platform to provoke a national dialogue. 
  • Collaboration with local Black and Hispanic/Latino community members and organizations in Orlando to determine the best ways for ALA members to be supportive of them.  This will include compilation of a list of African-American and Hispanic/Latino businesses in Orlando for ALA members to patronize.
  • Outreach to national organizations with vested interest in the Stand Your Ground laws to build alliances and collaborative efforts in advocacy and public awareness (e.g., NAACP, La Raza, Urban League).
Most important to all the ethnic caucuses and ALA is the public and honest conversation that will be generated by our actions.  We are committed to building more diversity and inclusion among our members, the field of librarianship, and our communities.  We invite all members of AILA, APALA, BCALA, CALA, REFORMA, and ALA to engage with us in moving toward a more just society. 
With respect,
Barbara Stripling
President
ALA
(American Library Association) 
Jerome Offord, Jr.
President
BCALA, Inc.
(Black Caucus of the American Library Association) 
Heather Devine
President
AILA
(American Indian Library Association) 
Eugenia Beh
President
APALA
(Asian Pacific American Librarians Association) 
Lisa Zhao
President
CALA
(Chinese American Librarians Association) 
Isabel Espinal
President
REFORMA
(The National Association to Promote Library and Information Services to Latinos and the Spanish-Speaking)
See that call for "diversity"?  "We are committed to building more diversity"?  What, ALA does not already have diversity?  For example, it doesn't already promote Islam in hundreds or thousands of libraries nationwide?  Of course it does.

By "diversity" ALA means uniformity.  They do not mean diversity.  If they did, they would not work with the racist or supremacist organization "La Raza" (The Race, like there's only one).  If they did, ALA would stop making it a regular practice to support basically all libraries blocking collections from containing materials on exgays, or ALA would stop libraries from discriminating against Christians and written materials having a Christian slant.  If they were really interested in diversity or "inclusion" ALA would not exclude librarians who speak out about sexual harassment that results from unfiltered computers.  Etc.

No it's not diversity ALA wants, it's uniformity.  It's progressive political activity, using the name "American Library Association" as cover.


NOTE ADDED 27 MARCH 2014:

NBA basketball star Kobe Bryant catches hell for saying its wrong to make knee jerk reactions to jump to one politically correct view on Trayvon Martin:
I won't react to something just because I'm supposed to, because I'm an African-American," he said.  "That argument doesn't make any sense to me.  So we want to advance as a society and a culture, but, say, if something happens to an African-American we immediately come to his defense?  Yet you want to talk about how far we've progressed as a society?  Well, we've progressed as a society, then don't jump to somebody's defense just because they're African-American.  You sit and you listen to the facts just like you would in any other situation, right? So I won't assert myself."
The American Library Association, now tossing aside pretense of being a library association, is doing just that and making it the centerpiece of ALA' efforts.  Not porn in libraries harming children, not sexually harassed librarians, not the massive fraud in the CIPA E-rate program, but Trayvon Martin, stand your ground laws, "diversity," and other progressive causes having nothing to do with librarianship.

I'll list a few stories here, and I hope the few remaining librarians interested in librarianship and willing to speak up can wrest control from the many progressives driving the ALA:


NOTE ADDED 14 OCTOBER 2014:

Today ALA made public an announcement of how it is continuing to community organize its political activity having nothing to do with librarianship.  In the case below, it's mainly opposition to Stand Your Ground laws.

The issues of sexual harassment are roiling the librarian community now, thanks to #TeamHarpy, yet political goals trump that as the more serious, coordinated effort is put into non-library issues like Stand Your Ground instead of sexual harassment of librarians:

[alacoun] update from the ALA Task Force on Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion

Garnar, Martin Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:51 PM
To: "ALA Council (alacoun@ala.org)"
Dear colleagues, 

ALA’s Task Force for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, co-chaired by Martin Garnar and Trevor A. Dawes, has begun its work to ensure committed and sustained attention to equity, inclusion, and diversity issues within ALA, in the profession, and in our communities.  The Task Force was formed earlier in 2014 when members of the Black Caucus (BCALA) raised serious concerns about the scheduling of ALA’s 2016 Annual Conference in Orlando, Florida, a state where the implementation of Florida’s Stand Your Ground law has been critically flawed. 

After some discussion with several concerned members, the ALA and the affiliated Ethnic Caucuses issued a joint statement, available at http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/blog/joint-statement-presidents-ethnic-caucuses-ala-aila-apala-bcala-cala-reforma-and-american.   In the joint statement, we shared our concern about the reasons there was a call to change the conference location; affirmed our commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion; and recognized that moving the conference at that point was not possible.

Task Force members have heard that there is still some concern being expressed about the fact that the American Library Association will hold its 2016 annual conference in Orlando, FL.  We believe that moving forward with the conference in Orlando presents us with opportunities to engage with the communities in Florida in ways clearly not possible if we are not there.   The Task Force will be developing plans for the association not only to address actions at the 2016 conference, but also to plan more generally for how we can be a more inclusive association and profession.

The Task Force members will be reaching out to ALA members and non-members in the coming months to gather information and feedback and we all hope you will share your thoughts.  The first piece where we would appreciate your feedback is to the definitions of equity, diversity, and inclusion that will frame our work.  The definitions are below and have been posted to ALA Connect for public comment (http://connect.ala.org/node/229669).   You are, of course, welcome to contact the task force members (http://www.ala.org/groups/node/4471) at any time if you have questions or concerns.

Preface to the definitions:

In framing the definitions of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion for our work as a task force, wanting to change the world by and beyond the Annual 2016 Conference, and realizing we *may* fall short of that  goal, we offer the following definitions  for consideration. We have decided to maintain a fairly global perspective in these definitions, i.e. not to attempt an exhaustive list of descriptors or qualities of disenfranchised groups comprising ALA membership and by extension our various stakeholders and patron populations. We are striving for social justice for *All* - and with these definitions desire to achieve a larger rather than smaller common and inclusive denominator.

Equity

Equity is not the same as formal equality. Formal equality implies sameness. Equity, on the other hand, assumes difference and takes difference into account to ensure a fair process and, ultimately, a fair (or equitable) outcome. Equity recognizes that some groups were (and are) disadvantaged in accessing educational and employment opportunities and are, therefore, underrepresented or marginalized in many organizations and institutions. The effects of that exclusion often linger systemically within organizational policies, practices and procedures. Equity, therefore, means increasing diversity by ameliorating conditions of disadvantaged groups. . 

The Task Force believes that everyone deserves equitable rights and opportunities.  Our goal is to create a just and equitable Association, profession, and society where everyone has access to social power, resources, and physical and psychological safety.
(Adapted from ALA Office for Diversity “Strategic Planning for Diversity”: http://www.ala.org/advocacy/diversity/workplace/diversityplanning , and National Association of Social Workers:http://www.socialworkers.org/practice/standards/cultural_competence.asp)

Diversity

Diversity can be defined as the sum of the ways that people are both alike and different.  Visible diversity is generally those things we cannot change and are external.  However, diversity goes beyond this to what we call ‘invisible’ diversity.  Invisible diversity includes those attributes that are not readily seen. So, when we recognize, value, and embrace diversity, we are recognizing, valuing, and embracing the uniqueness of each individual. 

The Task Force has chosen to define “diversity” in all its complexity in order to recognize and honor the uniqueness of each ALA member, all members of our profession, and our very diverse communities.  The Task Force also agrees with the National Education Association that, “While diversity itself is not a value-laden term, the way that people react to diversity is driven by values, attitudes, beliefs, and so on.  Full acceptance of diversity is a major principle of social justice.” 
(Adapted from National Education Association): http://www.nea.org/tools/diversity-toolkit-introduction.html

Inclusion

Inclusion means an environment in which all individuals are treated fairly and respectfully; are valued for their distinctive skills, experiences, and perspectives; have equal access to resources and opportunities; and can contribute fully to the organization’s success.  
(Adapted from Society for Human Resources Management http://www.shrm.org/diversity  and Hewlett Packard: http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/about-hp/diversity/meaning.html)

The Task Force believes that, to be inclusive, our association, profession, and society must recognize the inherent worth and dignity of every member of the community; involve and empower all members to participate and contribute; promote and sustain a sense of belonging; and value and practice respect for the talents, beliefs, backgrounds, and ways of living of all members.

Again, we welcome your comments on the definitions and any questions you may have for the task force.

Sincerely,

Martin Garnar and Trevor A. Dawes

---
Martin Garnar
Reference Services Librarian and Professor of Library Science
Dayton Memorial Library, Regis University -- www.regis.edu/library
3333 Regis Blvd., Mail Stop D-20
Denver, CO 80221


On Twitter:  @ALALibrary @BCALA_Inc @FLGovScott @LibraryJournal @TweetFLAlibrary #libchat #2A #syg #StandYourGround

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Active Shooter in the Library: How to Plan for, Prevent, and Survive the Worst (and Selected Bibliography)

"Active Shooter in the Library: How to Plan for, Prevent, and Survive the Worst (and Selected Bibliography)," by Amy Kautzman and Jennifer Little, Library Leadership & Management, 25:1, p1-4 (2011).

Table of Contents:
  • What is an Active Shooter?
  • No Surprises
  • Follow Your Gut
  • Write Behavioral Policies
  • Best Practices/Survivor's Mindset
  • Prevention/Change the Ending of the Story
  • Training Plan/Response Plan
  • Collaboration/Partnerships
  • Surviving an Active Shooter Event
  • Conclusion
  • Selected Bibliography
.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Librarians With Guns

Librarians with guns means safe libraries, at least in the Library of Congress [LOC]. SafeLibraries.org calls for supporting the LOC's Office of the Inspector General. Read more:

Library of Congress Agents Ask Lawmakers to Give Them Back Their Guns

Investigators with the Library's Office of the Inspector General have raised a string of objections after Congress stripped them of their ability to buy and carry firearms in the fiscal 2009 omnibus spending bill. They could get their wish.

FOXNews.com

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Don't try to swipe a book from the Library of Congress -- library investigators might soon be getting their guns back.

Investigators with the Library's Office of the Inspector General have raised a string of objections after Congress stripped them of their ability to buy and carry firearms.

Though the office has carried firearms in the course of its duties for the past 15 years, and inspector general agents at other federal agencies do the same, lawmakers inserted language into the fiscal year 2009 omnibus spending bill, which was signed into law in March, that prohibited the library's officers from using federal funds to "purchase, maintain or carry" firearms.

They cited an apparent "separation of powers" concern -- the library's investigators are deputized by the U.S. Marshals, which falls under the executive branch, but they investigate abuses in the Library of Congress, which falls under the legislative branch.

Inspector General Karl Schornagel cried foul.

"It's never been questioned until just recently," he told FOXNews.com. "Consider that we've been doing this for 15 years, we're very successful."

The office wrote in its semiannual report to Congress in March that the decision would "impede" investigations. It also received an opinion in April from the Government Accountability Office that there is no legitimate "separation of powers" concern.

Schornagel said the IG's agents just want to be "made whole again."

Crimes against the Library of Congress take many forms. The IG's office investigated child pornography, embezzlement, identity theft and credit card fraud in the last fiscal year, according to its own accounting. It executed 13 search warrants and served 19 subpoenas, while winning one guilty plea and conviction.

While investigating crimes in and against the Library of Congress might not sound like the most dangerous job, another official in the inspector general's office said most of their investigations take them off site, into some dangerous neighborhoods in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia and other states.

Though no agent with the Library's IG office has ever fired a gun in the course of duty, Schornagel said much of his agents' work "requires a firearm." He said there's always the chance a suspect could get violent -- plus the guns can be a deterrent to violence during searches and arrests.

"It's a big safety issue," he said.

The agents, while not historically trigger-happy, nevertheless brandish their guns on raids.

"We unholster our weapons whenever we enter a property," the other official said. "It's mostly for defense purposes -- most of these people are felons anyway."

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., chairwoman of a House appropriations subcommittee, originally inserted the firearms language into the omnibus -- but aide Jonathan Beeton told FOXNews.com that she only did so at the request of another member on the panel, and that no such requests have been made this year for the fiscal 2010 appropriations bill.

Calling the debate "moot," he wrote in an e-mail that the fiscal year 2010 budget should allow the IG agents to again carry firearms, as early as the beginning of the fiscal year on Oct. 1.

It won't come soon enough for Schornagel, and won't necessarily satisfy all his grievances. His office wants the ability restored immediately as well as some kind of legislative assurance that this won't happen again.

Aside from the concern about his agents' safety on the job, he said the lack of firearms has "crippled" investigations.

Not having firearms means the agents can't execute searches or arrests, he said -- and that means they have to seek outside help when it comes time to get a warrant. That's problematic for a couple of reasons, Schornagel said. First, outside agencies like the FBI are a little too busy to help in Library of Congress investigations; second, outside officers would have to take time to retrace the steps of the original investigative team because they have to swear to the credibility of evidence when they seek a warrant.

He said one identity theft case has been put on hold for these reasons.

"This person has committed a crime against the Library of Congress and he is not being arrested," Schornagel said.

"We are the only ones who can conduct, really, effective investigations at the Library of Congress," he said.

The IG office's latest semiannual report detailed one other peculiar investigation in which an individual allegedly swiped two 1920s reference books from a Library reading room.

The other IG official, who wished not to be identified, said the objection over the firearms could be connected with ongoing friction between the Librarian of Congress, James Billington, and the IG's office.

Billington's office recently chided the IG's office for the tone of its investigations. The official said that objections over the agents' use of firearms also originated in Billington's office. "We connected the dots," the source said.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, addressed the friction between the two offices in a letter last week to Billington, in which he said he is "increasingly alarmed" by apparent attempts to "obstruct" the IG's office. He cited an instance in which the Library of Congress' chief operating officer complained to the inspector general's office about the tone of a press release announcing the 10-year prison sentence of a former Library employee for possession of child pornography.

Jo Ann Jenkins, in an August 2008 e-mail attached to Grassley's complaint, scolded the IG's office for what she called the "outrageous" press release headline.

"Why does the IG feel it necessary to get publicity on this," she wrote, according to the e-mail.
She apparently didn't realize the press release came out of the Department of Justice, not the IG's office -- which the IG's office pointed out to her.

In his letter, Grassley urged Billington to "refrain from interfering either directly or indirectly" with the inspector general's operation.

Though Grassley did not address the firearms controversy, a Grassley aide suggested the senator does support Schornagel on that issue.

A representative for Billington could not be reached for comment. But he also came under pressure recently from the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association to change his position on the firearms issue.

Jon Adler, president of the association, urged Billington to reconsider in an April 29 letter.

In the letter Adler wrote that his organization was "deeply concerned" by the "disarming" of the Library's IG agents. He said their duties are not "interchangeable" with other law enforcement agencies and that the situation would lead to a "less secure environment" at the Library of Congress.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/09/library-congress-agents-object-congress-takes-away-guns/

Reprinted under US Copyright §107 Fair Use.



.