Showing posts with label LibraryAllowsChildPornViewing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LibraryAllowsChildPornViewing. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Yeah Right, Chicago Public Library

Chicago Public Library allows unlimited child pornography viewing along with "legal" pornography viewing (both of which under Illinois law is illegal in Illinois libraries), and media cover it up, as I have previously reported. But it has policy stating patrons may not, "View child pornography as it is illegal and subject to federal and state prosecution."

Yeah right.  Just useless signs, purely designed to mislead people:

Chicago Public Library - Guidelines Governing Use of the Library

"View child pornography as it is illegal and subject to federal and state prosecution."

If you are the rare librarian willing to stop child porn viewing, then see:


—

Friday, April 3, 2015

Ashamed of What Our Library Has Been Doing

Here's a published letter to the editor opposing child porn in a public library and exposing how the library wins awards for protecting it, "I don't think it's something to brag about that the [Illinois Library Association] gave our library an award for allowing guys to watch porn on library computers":

'I Am Ashamed of What Our Library Has Been Doing'

Dear Editor,

I have lived in Orland Park for most of my life and hate that we are now (and perhaps forever) known as the place where people are allowed to watch porn at the library.  I hate that we're the town where child porn was accessed at our library but the mayor and police really don't seem to care, and nobody feels compelled to do anything to stop that from happening again.

Why hasn't our village leadership ever stepped in and demanded to know why the library looked the other way when things like child porn were accessed in that building?  If ever there was a time for the Village manager to intervene, it is when somebody is not calling the police when child porn is being accessed in a public building.  For crying out loud.

It makes me sad that when I meet new people and they hear I am from Orland, that the first question I get asked is why our library lets people watch porn when there are children in the building.  Nobody I have ever talked to about this thinks it is OK.  Porn belongs at home, on people's personal computers, and not out in public.  Not even the most liberal people I know in New York or California think what our library does is OK.  Absolutely no one agrees with the library that it should be a place that's packed full of little kids but also should offer an X-rated good time upstairs.  People think we are out of our minds in Orland Park to condone this.  And I agree.

I don't think it's something to brag about that the [Illinois Library Association] gave our library an award for allowing guys to watch porn on library computers.

That's not something that deserves an award.  It instead warrants an industrial-strength disinfecting.  It is shameful.  I never knew that porn access in a public building was such an important "must-have" for these board members or that they think it's OK to allow child porn to go unreported in a public library.

They're still talking about it on the news.  I just heard it again on WLS today.  When will someone pay a consequence for this?

I am ashamed of what our library has been doing.

Jean Morrow

Orland Park resident

Source:  "Letters to the Editor April 2, 2015," by Editor, Orland Park Prairie, 2 April 2015.  Republished with permission of Story Time Digital Media.



URL of this page: safelibraries.blogspot.com/2015/04/ashamed-of-our-library.html

On Twitter: @IllLibraryAssoc @OPPrairie @OrlandPkLibrary @VillageOrlandPK @wlsam890

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Informants Needed for Jobs in Public Libraries and to Expose ALA Training Librarians to Hide Sex Crimes

Library; All About Spying
Graphic Credit: Roofman the Spy
Informants are needed for jobs in public libraries to help stem the flow of child pornography occasioned by the American Library Association [ALA] training librarians to destroy all evidence of criminal activity in libraries or not to record it in the first place.  The function will be to fill jobs in libraries and do everything expected, but quietly provide information to me and others about when library crime incidents are being suppressed, where, and what is the information being suppressed.  We want you to keep your jobs so all provided information should come from non-library resources during off times.  Anonymity/confidentiality guaranteed.  Of course protect non-criminal patron privacy.

The Orland Park Public Library [OPPL] in Orland Park, IL, has been making child pornography available to the public for years and refuses to stop doing so.  It recorded hundreds of library incidents including sex crimes per year until 2014, and it recorded that it rarely called police on such incidents, including child pornography.  In December 2013, it received training from ALA to stop recording sex crimes to make the crimes appear to the public to go away, to mislead the public, to further ALA's own goals.  As a result, in all of 2014, OPPL has recorded only four incidents.  Hundreds per year are now four and the crime problem from the unfiltered Internet has suddenly disappeared.  Informants are needed to collect that information of illegality in libraries that ALA orders to stop being collected.  It is ALA diktat to destroy and not collect library crime information that harms patrons and librarians alike and necessitates the need for informants.


Details of the Graphics Information Clerk Job at OPPL

OPPL is now advertising for a job as a part-time "Graphics Information Clerk" (graphics designer?).  We want that job filled by someone willing to spy on the library's censorship of illegal activities, usually sex crimes resulting from the unfettered child pornography on the Internet.

Here are details about the need for an informant to fill the "Graphics Information Clerk" job at OPPL:
Here are details about the job from RAILS:
Here are details about the job from OPPL itself:


Informants Also Needed to Expose ALA Training Librarians to Hide Sex Crimes

Generally, we also need active librarians who attend ALA trainings or conferences to provide us with information about ALA's "Office for Intellectual Freedom" [OIF] training librarians to hide criminal activity from the public.  ALA OIF did this at a 17 December 2013 training in Illinois.  It refuses to release the videotape of the training.  So we need informants to gather this information for us, then we will publicize it.  Such training goes counter to all community standards and past library practices and procedures.  It needs to be exposed to help stop ALA OIF from spreading it.

And if you attend these meetings and take notes, make copies for yourselves that you keep at home as ALA has been issuing orders to have all such notes, recordings, handouts destroyed.  Librarians are complying for fear of losing their jobs.


And to Expose Homophobia

By the way, that ALA OIF training also included homophobic remarks by one of the trainers, namely, the PR employee at OPPL.  ALA OIF knows this, yet that gay hater/trainer is being presented by ALA OIF in additional training.  That's another reason why ALA refuses to release the videotape of the training, ALA President Courtney Young refuses to talk about it, and why informants are needed.

See the homophobic ALA trainer/hater in action in another context here: "Gay Hate @ Your Library."


Sample Incident Report That OPPL No Longer Collects Per ALA Diktat

Here is an actual incident report from OPPL, the very kind OPPL no longer collects because ALA OIF trains librarians to stop making such reports—as if ALA has the power to tell your local librarians what to do—but obviously it does:

Actual OPPL "Incident Report Form" showing public
masturbation at a computer desk, the very kind of
record OPPL no longer keeps per ALA diktat.
Source.

Thank you for your help.

Informants, please contact:

  • SafeLibraries@gmail.com (Dan Kleinman @SafeLibraries)
  • IntolerantFox@gmail.com (Megan Fox @IntolerantFox)




On Twitter:  @IntolerantFox @OIF @OrlandPkLibrary @VillageOrlandPk

Saturday, May 24, 2014

The Ghost of Judith Krug Continues to Haunt America's Libraries Today

ORLAND PARK, IL. (ECWd) - The Orland Park Public Library has been fighting for seven months now to maintain its status quo, where child porn is accessible over the Library’s unsecured internet for pedophiles and predators who know where to find it.  This horror was discovered back in October of last year, when internal incident reports completed by Library staffers and obtained through FOIA requests showed that child porn was accessed in the Library, but employees never called the police, never reported the act to the FBI, and the Board of Trustees never lifted a finger to make sure that this access point to child porn in the southwestern suburbs of Chicago was permanently closed.

In addition to the child porn being accessed in this library, the internal incident reports produced under FOIA pressure also showed instances of men openly masturbating in the Library, men accosting women and children sexually, and many other times when people using computers in this Library committed acts of disorderly conduct that warranted police involvement (yet, Library staff deliberately chose not to call the police!).  An official investigation by the Orland Park Police Department that was conducted in November of 2013 determined that there were at least 22 instances of crimes committed in the Orland Park Public Library that Library staff did not handle properly, with most of these involving women and children accosted by men who had aroused themselves sexually in the Library using its anonymous, unfiltered Internet.

For point of reference, businesses like Starbucks or Kinko’s filter their Internet to block access to sites providing child porn (and instantly call the police if anyone is observed masturbating or accosting women or children in those businesses) but the Orland Park Public Library (OPPL) refuses to do this, citing the policy of the American Library Association (ALA) in keeping child porn accessible and “respecting patron privacy” (even when the “patron” in question is seen breaking the law by viewing, downloading, or distributing child porn!) .

The irony here is that though Village of Orland Park ordinance 8-6-1-1 requires Library staffers to call the police and report a crime when lewd and disturbing acts like open public masturbation occur in the Library, the Library staff chooses to look the other way and enable this criminal activity because the OPPL is run by a Director and Board who are true believers in the preachings of the American Library Association (which just happens to be a radical group funded largely by people like George Soros that sees its main purpose as “transforming communities by transforming libraries”).

The ALA says that child porn is “information” and all such “information” must be available to any person, of any age, with no filters on library computers.  The Supreme Court of the United States, however, ruled in 2003 in the landmark case US vs. ALA that public libraries are allowed to use filtering software to prevent horrors like child porn from being accessed in public libraries.  The Orland Park Public Library is, unfortunately, one of a minority of libraries in this country that listens to the ALA instead of the residents of its surrounding community: most libraries block child porn from being accessed, but the Orland Park Public Library’s Board of Trustees refuses to do this very simple thing to protect children from harm in this library and to shutdown an access point to child porn that attracts sex offenders.  Because of the unsecured, anonymous internet available no-questions-asked in public libraries, criminals know these buildings are places they can evade law enforcement and do whatever they like with little chance of being caught.

The Orland Park Police Department has reported that known sex offenders in the area have been regularly spotted in the OPPL, using the Library’s computers as well as tablets and other mobile devices to anonymously log onto the Internet.  These men are banned from using the internet or computers and the terms of most of their paroles state that they must not be within 500 feet of a school or other place where children congregate.  Yet, they are allowed into the Orland Park Public Library by its Director, Mary Weimar, where these men can evade their parole officers and log onto the Library’s computers and internet any time they want.  This particular Library chooses to use a program called Drive Shield every night to wipe every computer in the building clean (so that authorities can never go back and check what was accessed or downloaded in this public library). Criminals know this and use the Orland Park Public Library as a safe haven for their crimes.

Think of a public library as being a kind of extradition-free zone where cyber criminals of all stripes have automatic sanctuary: library staff will look the other way in places like the OPPL

Judith Krug
The ALA has known for years that this has been happening and they encourage this sort of thing in libraries across the country. You should know that a woman named Judith Krug, the former head of the ALA’s Orwellian-sounding “Office of Intellectual Freedom” said after 9/11 that she hated that some libraries cooperated with the FBI after the terrorist attacks, when the feds were investigating if these libraries were used as access points for terrorist activity over the anonymous, unsecured internet there.

Judith Krug is the woman who encouraged libraries like the OPPL to invest in Drive Shield (to wipe computer records clean nightly so that terrorists and pedophiles can never be caught) but fight the installation of child porn filters (which would end the days of public libraries being used as access points for illegal material).  Though deceased, the ghost of Judith Krug continues to haunt America’s libraries today.  The OPPL certainly seems to need an exorcism to get rid of her influence.

In their prolonged battle to keep child porn accessible in the OPPL, the Board of Trustees has repeatedly violated both the Open Meetings Act and the Freedom of Information Act.  The OMA violations have involved the Board: silencing critics by refusing public comment on topics critical of the Library (January 20th); violating its own rules and shoving public comment to the back of a meeting so most people will leave before Public Comment is allowed (January 20th); holding a surprise special meeting on a legal holiday to ram through a vote on keeping the child porn available when the public wasn’t looking (February 12th); refusing Public Comment altogether at an open meeting (February 12th); improperly voting to “ratify and affirm” agenda items for final action that were void ab initio (“from the beginning“) because they were originally voted on at an illegal meeting (March 17th); allowing a woman who was never legally appointed to the Board to vote at Board meetings (February 12th, February 17th, March 17th, April 21st, and May 19th); inventing new arbitrary and extemporaneous speaking rules meant to discourage public comment (April 21st); and holding a secret “strategy session” before their Open Meeting for the purpose of plotting ways to stage a disruption of their own meeting so that they could invent an excuse to call the police on their critics as revenge for all the recent complaints against them with the Public Access Counselor (May 19th).

Since October of 2013 (when it was first uncovered that child porn was accessed in the OPPL and the staff chose not to call the police and handle the situation properly), around 30 requests for review were filed by various members of the public against the OPPL with the PAC office for OMA and FOIA violations.  The January and February Board meetings were determined to have been conducted improperly and the OPPL is facing several important determinations regarding the March, April, and May meetings in the weeks ahead.  Some of the matters that the PAC is currently investigating (with decisions coming down soon) are:

* the illegal vote taken on February 12th to continue allowing child porn to be accessed in the OPPL = this vote is void ab initio because the February 12th meeting was held improperly on a legal holiday and, thus, everything done on that day is void; the OPPL created a huge mess for itself by ramming through a vote on seven controversial items and installing a new Board member on a day they were not allowed by law to hold a meeting.

* in a related matter, on March 17th the OPPL voted to “ratify and affirm” everything void ab initio that was done at the illegal February 12th meeting, but the OMA requires that recital and deliberation be performed at an Open Meeting before a vote can be taken on an agenda item; since everything the Board did on February 12th was done improperly and no proper recital and deliberation was performed for anything the Board voted to “ratify and affirm” on March 17th, that means that none of the controversial matters (including voting to keep child porn available) were properly handled.

* the PAC is expected to determine that a new vote must be taken on the policies that continue to allow child porn to be accessed at the OPPL, since the February 12th vote (at an illegal meeting) and the March 17th “vote to ratify and affirm” (without proper recital and deliberation) were both bungled

* part of the chaos the Board caused by holding that illegal special meeting on February 12th is the fact that one OPPL Board Member, Beth Gierach, has never been legally appointed or properly sworn-in…and yet the Board continues to seat her and allows her to vote month after month; this means all votes she took in February, March, April, and May should be voided since she was not a properly appointed Board member at the time of those votes.

Judith Krug mocking United States
Attorney General John Ashcroft
The February 12th illegal meeting that the OPPL held was clearly a gambit this Board played to force a vote to continue allowing access to child porn and other evils in this Library on a day that was inconvenient to the public.  Also, this Board was advised by the lawyers of Klein Thorpe Jenkins that if it held a vote on the child porn issue in a special meeting (not a regular board meeting) that the Board would not have to allow public comment at that meeting.  The OPPL was advised in particular by Dennis G. Walsh of the KTJ firm that it could vote on February 12th and prohibit public comment, thereby giving Board members cover to vote to keep child porn accessible without the public being able to shame these cowards for voting the way that the ALA directed them to vote.

The OMA does not allow a Board to prevent public comment at any Open Meeting and all votes for final action must be made in Open Meetings.  This means that no vote on any matter for final action can be taken at a meeting where public comment is not permitted.

The OMA also does not allow a vote for final action on an item to be taken if proper recital and deliberation is not performed for that agenda item…and, once again, recital and deliberation must be performed at a meeting that is open to the public (where public comment is allowed).  This clearly means that a Board cannot on March 17th “ratify and affirm actions it took on February 12th when that February 12th meeting was not a properly held Open Meeting. Proper recital and deliberation needed to have been conducted at the March 17th meeting for any agenda items to have been voted on for final action…as everything done on February 12th was void ab initio,

What a head-spinning mess this Board has made in its increasingly more desperate attempt to keep child porn accessible in a gorgeous, spare-no-expense architectural gem of a library in an upscale Chicago suburb.

Behind the scenes, the real power play at issue here is that the American Library Association cannot afford to allow a plum like the OPPL to shut off the child porn access, since the ALA is based in Chicago and fears losing control of another public facility.  Currently, the ALA in effect controls the OPPL, via the OPPL’s Director Mary Weimar (who is a committed acolyte of the ALA). If the OPPL Board of Trustees voted against the ALA and stopped allowing itself to be an access point to child pornography this would be a clear repudiation of the ALA’s “guidelines” for libraries…and would diminish the ALA’s clout.

The fear in the ALA’s offices is that if the OPPL votes to block the child porn then other libraries in Chicago could follow…and if that happens then the ALA’s entire house of cards could tumble.

This is why every effort imaginable is now being undertaken by the OPPL’s Board of Trustees to violate the OMA and FOIA in our State to thwart the public’s demand that child porn be permanently blocked in this Library.



Source of the above excellent work and the title of this blog post:


Also, see Kevin DuJan's latest filing with the Illinois Attorney General, linked below.  It happens to feature me as Kevin DuJan was threatened with arrest for speaking up for my right to speak, but it is also a detailed description of planning for and committing white collar crime by the Orland Park Public Library board and its attorneys.  It's really an eye opener, all to defend child pornography, and the police are eventually called by the library to further harass those trying to stop the child porn:


The ghost of Illinois ACLU board member and ALA de facto leader Judith Krug continues to haunt America's libraries today.  In Orland Park, both of her successors (Deborah Caldwell-Stone and Barbara Jones) are actively involved in the deception and the criminality.  As I pointed out in the past, Tom Lehrer's "Smut!" is ALA's anthem.  As Jim Kraft points out, "The OPPL certainly seems to need an exorcism to get rid of her influence."


NOTE ADDED 9 JUNE 2014:

Here is a graphic of one library removing the ghost of Judith Krug and her ACLU/porn legacy:

Library removing the ghost of Judith Krug and her ACLU/porn legacy.
Photo Credit:  Kevin DuJan; Used with permission.

URL of this page:  tinyurl.com/GhostOfJudithKrug

On Twitter:  @ECWDogs @HillBuzz @ILAttyGeneral @IntolerantFox @OIF @OpenSociety @OrlandPkLibrary @VillageOrlandPk

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Child Porn Scandal in Orland Park: A Summary

After well over a half a year of effort, the Orland Park Public Library, Orland Park, IL, has continued to make child pornography available to the public and does not report such crime to the police.  The American Library Association has seen that as an opportunity to train libraries nationwide on how to thwart the law—unless I am present, no kidding, but more on that in the future—so libraries can maintain access to porn despite the law.

And the whistleblowing patrons Megan Fox and Kevin DuJan have won the first of likely many rulings from the Illinois Attorney General that the library has violated free speech and practiced censorship by not complying with the Open Meetings Act.

Here's a summary of the matter directly from Megan Fox:



On Twitter: @HillBuzz @ILAttyGeneral @IntolerantFox @OIF @OrlandPkLibrary @VillageOrlandPk

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Libraries Aid and Abet Pedophiles, Destroy Evidence, Retaliate Against Whistle Blowers, Claim Dubious Privacy and Free Speech Rights; ALA At Fault

In a scathing report, a self-described "recovering librarian" has reported how American Library Association [ALA]-accredited schools indoctrinate students, and, as a direct result, her eastern university school library, for example, allegedly aided and abetted pedophiles, destroyed physical evidence, retaliated against a whistle blower, all the while claiming dubious privacy and free speech rights under the First Amendment for a child pornography viewer.

Please read "Liberals, Libraries, and Child Pornography by Jenn Q. Public," by Afrocity, Autographed Letter Signed, 3 May 2009, which references "Librarians Still Enabling Pedophiles," by Jenn Q. Public, Red Alerts, 16 March 2008.

I have already reported:
but this "recovering librarian" story is truly shocking.

I have already reported:
but now you will hear how she "discovered that this extremely liberal east coast college had disappeared the incident." Another whitewash? The library ensured "network logs had been wiped clean, the hard drive had been destroyed," all to protect the child porn criminal. Compare that treatment to the library employee who reported the child porn: "[N]ot so subtly, he was pressured into resigning his position."

You must read this. It is very specific and detailed. It will make your blood boil.

Isn't it time we knocked members of the American Library Association off their high horses, or at least ripped those First Amendment cloaks from their shoulder?

Here are shocking quotes from Jenn Q. Public (2008) that may literally scream out for a criminal investigation of the libraries and of the ALA, emphasis mine:

  • She helped officers catch Chrisler in the act of viewing kiddie porn images, resulting in his arrest. .... When she told her supervisor what she had done, Biesterfeld was admonished for lack of loyalty to the County, and even threatened. .... Two days later, Brenda Biesterfeld was fired....

  • But I do want to impress upon all of you that this type of situation is more common than you think, and is symptomatic of a larger problem with the “professional ethics” drilled into future librarians by graduate programs and the American Library Association. I ought to know - I’ve been through it.

  • If nothing else, my indoctrination into librarianship drove home one point: never, ever give law enforcement officials information about a patron.

  • Those who obstruct law enforcement are deified as defenders of First Amendment rights, while those who adhere to legal mandates by cooperating with local or federal officials are pariahs in the library world.

  • And then it happened. A technically savvy coworker came to me, pale and visibly shaken, and told me he had found horrible, unspeakable images of children on a library computer. The hard drive, he said, was completely filled with movies and stills. He also said he knew who had downloaded the pornographic content.

  • Weeks later, I discovered that this extremely liberal east coast college had disappeared the incident. The network logs had been wiped clean, the hard drive had been destroyed, and my questions about whether the FBI had been notified were skillfully evaded.

  • I watched my coworker, the guy who initially found the child porn, literally make himself sick as he struggled with whether or not to circumvent the academic administration by reporting the issue directly to law enforcement. Unlike me, he wasn’t sure we should trust they had been notified. I decided he was probably right when subtly, and then not so subtly, he was pressured into resigning his position.

  • Today my concern is that [a subset of] librarians continue to aid and abet pedophiles in the name of free speech and that highly dubious sweeping right to privacy that I have yet to find in the Constitution or Bill of Rights. Their mission to promote intellectual freedom by ensuring patron confidentiality nearly always seems to trump their responsibility to protect our children from pedophiles.

  • Librarians cite the protection of personal liberties as a reason for withholding records or failing to report crimes to law enforcement.

  • Isn’t it time we knocked members of the American Library Association off their high horses, or at least ripped those First Amendment cloaks from their shoulders?

  • Unfortunately, after attending library school, I can tell you unequivocally that critical thinking and good judgment are not part of the curriculum.

  • And that’s what makes supporting librarian heroes like Brenda Biesterfeld and decrying public library policies that enable criminality all the more important.

.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Library Allows Child Porn; Policy Says No But Practice Says Yes; Kicks Out Complaining Mother

A library allows illegal child pornography viewing in practice, though not in policy, and kicks out a complaining mother after her child views girl giving man a Lewinsky. I could say more, but this one speaks loudly for itself--this is another American library out of control.

You have got to read this for yourselves and perhaps leave a comment, but note, it contains adult language:

A Little Too Ironic, Don't You Think?, by Kat, One Bad-Ass Blog, 20 July 2008, last accessed 21 July 2008.

Sunday, July 20, 2008
A Little Too Ironic, Don’t You Think?

When do you know it’s time to take the kiddo to the library? When the 8 year old in your house has read her entire book collection, and is now moving onto your own Klosterman collection leafing through “Sex, Drugs, And Coco Puffs.” Not quite the read I am sure her Dad has in mind for her, so off to the local library we go to find some more appropriate reading materials, little did I know that this simple trip to the library would become so frighteningly educational.

She has her heart set on a chapter book by a Russian author, so we jump on the electronic card catalog to see if there are any books available. She can’t remember the name of the book so we search for the author, no luck. Knowing how tricky the spelling of Russian names can be I decide to go to the computer terminals to look up the book on Amazon to get the correct spelling….easier said than done….the twenty five or so computers are all occupied…..but just then I see a guy get up from the end computer in last row and head to the bathroom.

I make my move…thinking yeah I know he’s got the computer signed out in his name but all I really need is like 30 seconds on Amazon and I will be out of his way before he’s done washing his hands, he’ll never even know I was there.

So we sprint to the back to the open computer… sit down, I flip back the “work in progress” sheet he left on his screen, hit the button to turn on the monitor, nervously looking toward the bathroom to see if he’s coming out as to not get caught, when I feel a tough on my arm. I turn to Lilly whose eyes are as big as saucers and ask her what’s the matter? “ Mom……Why is that little girl doing that?”

To my horror on the screen I had just uncovered was a very graphic picture of an obviously preteen girl giving a middle aged fucker a head job. That’s right that scum bucket was looking at kiddie porn at the local library. I immediately turn off the monitor, and send her back to the front desk. At this point the jerk off is walking like he is on a mission back to the computer area…..obviously he didn’t take the extra 30 seconds to wash his hands. I am greeted with a charming “What the hell, I am signed up for this computer for another hour, what do you think you are doing?”

Of course my response was “Well I wasn’t enjoying the kiddie porn you had pulled up on the screen if that’s what you’re asking dumb ass” Of course the dipshit spews off some idiotic statement that there is no rule against what he could or could not look at on the computers. Oh really…. we’ll see about that mutherfucker… so of course in typical “Kat” fashion I head up to the desk to let the desk clerk know what Mr. JackOff is doing in the back row of the computers. I send Lilly to sit on a bench out of earshot and proceed to question the desk clerk.

Needless to say I am not happy with the response that I get from the clerk. I immediately ask her if the Library had a policy on internet usage that customers had to abide by. “Yes, we have a policy was her response”. Does said policy state that all forms of pornography including kiddie porn are prohibited was my next question. Once again the clerk confirms my question by saying yes. Ok, then are you aware that the gentleman at the last computer in the back row is at this moment looking at kiddie porn?
Now this is where the conversation takes a pathetic turn for the worse……the clerks response literally floored me…….”Oh he’s in the back row, so we kinda let it go, no one can really see what he’s doing, he’s not really hurting anyone.”

Excuse me? Let me get this right, you have a policy against looking at porn on your computers that specifically states that it is not allowed, from your statement you are aware he is looking at said material, and you are giving him a free pass because he uses the back row? Have you overlooked the fact that the computer area is located a mere ten feet from the kid’s book section? Did it not occur to you that you might want to monitor this jack off?

At this point I am asked to keep my voice down………yeah wouldn’t want to disturb the fucking pedophile’s in the back row! This of course just makes me want to notch it up a level. “What keep my voice down that you allow people to watch kiddie porn on your computers here? The next thing you’ll be telling me is that you ask them if they’d like a bottle of Jerkins Lotion and a box of Kleenex when they sign out the computers. Might as well make the scum buckets comfortable right?”

Surprisingly, I am informed that If I don’t quiet down I will be asked to leave and could have my library privileges revoked. Oh that’s just perfect isn’t it, you’ll punish me someone who has the interest of a child in mind, but you won’t do fucking squat about someone who is in all probability a child predator hanging out in your library!

By this point the manager has come out of his office and asked what the commotion was all about……..long story short I rattled off a few choice words about how f’d up their internet security system was and I was asked to leave the premises. Seeing I was getting nowhere with my argument, I begrudgingly relented and turned on my heal to leave, but not before asking the manager one last question…….. How exactly am I supposed to explain to an 8 year old why that little girl had her mouth wrapped around that grown man’s dick? Thanks to your ill managed organization a little piece of her innocence is forever stolen. Just one of the many services you provide the community with my tax dollars…A little too ironic, don’t you think?